Cited by 60Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

Three major dimensions of human brain cortical ageing in relation to cognitive decline across the eighth decade of life

Open access
Cox, S. R., Harris, M. A., Ritchie, S. J., Buchanan, C. R., Valdés Hernández, M. C., Corley, J., Taylor, A. M., Madole, J. W. +8 more·2021·Molecular Psychiatry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Different brain regions can be grouped together, based on cross-sectional correlations among their cortical characteristics; this patterning has been used to make inferences about ageing processes. However, cross-sectional brain data conflate information on ageing with patterns that are present throughout life. We characterised brain cortical ageing across the eighth decade of life in a longitudinal ageing cohort, at ages ~73, ~76, and ~79 years, with a total of 1376 MRI scans. Volumetric changes among cortical regions of interest (ROIs) were more strongly correlated (average r = 0.805, SD = 0.252) than were cross-sectional volumes of the same ROIs (average r = 0.350, SD = 0.178). We identified a broad, cortex-wide, dimension of atrophy that explained 66% of the variance in longitudinal changes across the cortex. Our modelling also discovered more specific fronto-temporal and occipito-parietal dimensions that were orthogonal to the general factor and together explained an additional 20% of the variance. The general factor was associated with declines in general cognitive ability ( r = 0.431, p < 0.001) and in the domains of visuospatial ability ( r = 0.415, p = 0.002), processing speed ( r = 0.383, p < 0.001) and memory ( r = 0.372, p < 0.001). Individual differences in brain cortical atrophy with ageing are manifest across three broad dimensions of the cerebral cortex, the most general of which is linked with cognitive declines across domains. Longitudinal approaches are invaluable for distinguishing lifelong patterns of brain-behaviour associations from patterns that are specific to aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41380-020-00975-1

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [46]Muthén LK Muthén BO 1998-2017, Mplus User’s Guide Los Angeles, CA Muthén & Muthén Eighth Edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, S. R., Harris, M. A., Ritchie, S. J., Buchanan, C. R., Valdés Hernández, M. C., Corley, J., Taylor, A. M., Madole, J. W., Harris, S. E., Whalley, H. C., McIntosh, A. M., Russ, T. C., Bastin, M. E., Wardlaw, J. M., Deary, I. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Alzheimer Scotland (GB)
  • UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Cox, S. R.
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2021-01-04
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
2651-2662
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W3120668417
Cited by
60
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Texas at Austin (P2CHD042849)
  • Wellcome Trust (104036/Z/14/Z, 104036)
  • Mrs Gladys Row Fogo Charitable Trust (FID3668413, BRO-D.FID3668413)
  • Alzheimer's Society
  • British Heart Foundation (104036/Z/14/Z)
  • Age UK (MR/M013111/1, G0701120, MR/R024065/1, P2CHD042849, G1001245, LBC1936, R01AG054628)
  • Fondation Leducq
  • UK Dementia Research Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (104036/Z/14/Z, MR/M013111/1, MR/R024065/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17209, MR/M013111/1, MR/R024065/1, 104036/Z/14/Z, R01AG054628, MR/M01311/1, MR/K026992/1, P2CHD042849, G0701120, G1001245, LBC1936)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG054628)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD042849)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
brain atrophy, cognitive decline, older adults, longitudinal MRI, cortical thickness, visuospatial ability, processing speed, memory
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review