Cited by 72Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchGut microbiota and healthEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment

Barrett's esophagus is associated with a distinct oral microbiome

Open access
Snider, Erik J., Compres, Griselda, Freedberg, Daniel E., Giddins, Marla J., Khiabanian, Hossein, Lightdale, Charles J., Nobel, Yael R., Toussaint, Nora C. +2 more·2018·Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The esophageal microbiome is composed of predominantly oral flora and is altered in reflux-related conditions including Barrett's esophagus (BE). Changes to the esophageal microbiome may be reflected in the oral cavity. Assessing the oral microbiome thus represents a potential non-invasive method to identify patients with BE. METHODS: Patients with and without BE undergoing upper endoscopy were prospectively enrolled. Demographics, clinical data, medications, and dietary intake were assessed. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed on saliva samples collected prior to endoscopy. Taxonomic differences between groups were assessed via linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe). Logit models were used to develop microbiome signatures to distinguish BE from non-BE, assessed by area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were enrolled (control = 17, BE = 32). There was no significant difference in alpha diversity comparing all BE patients vs. CONTROLS: At the phylum level, the oral microbiome in BE patients had significantly increased relative abundance of Firmicutes (p = 0.005) and decreased Proteobacteria (p = 0.02). There were numerous taxonomic differences in the oral microbiome between BE and controls. A model including relative abundance of Lautropia, Streptococcus, and a genus in the order Bacteroidales distinguished BE from controls with an AUROC 0.94 (95% CI: 0.85-1.00). The optimal cutoff identified BE patients with 96.9% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The oral microbiome in BE patients was markedly altered and distinguished BE with relatively high accuracy. The oral microbiome represents a potential screening marker for BE, and validation studies in larger and distinct populations are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41424-018-0005-8

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various disease states are associated with the oral microbiome, including caries, periodontal disease, oral, esophageal, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers, cardiovascular disease, and inflammatory bowel disease.

    “This is demonstrated by the association of various disease states with the oral microbiome, including not only caries and periodontal disease but also oral, esophageal, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers, cardiovascular disease, and inflammatory bowel disease.147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snider, E. J., Compres, G., Freedberg, D. E., Giddins, M. J., Khiabanian, H., Lightdale, C. J., Nobel, Y. R., Toussaint, N. C., Uhlemann, A.-C., & Abrams, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • New York Genome Center (US)
Corresponding author
Abrams, Julian A.
Venue
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Published
2018-03
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
e135
ISSN
2155-384X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791377533
Cited by
72
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Keywords
Barrett's esophagus, oral microbiota, esophageal microbiome, saliva, reflux, non-invasive screening, microbiome signatures, Streptococcus, Bacteroidales, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review