CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Photonic simulation of entanglement growth and engineering after a spin chain quench

Pitsios, Ioannis, Banchi, Leonardo, Rab, Adil S., Bentivegna, Marco, Caprara, Debora, Crespi, Andrea, Spagnolo, Nicolò, Bose, Sougato, Mataloni, Paolo, Osellame, Roberto, Sciarrino, Fabio·2017·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01589-yPMC PMC5691163
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The time evolution of quantum many-body systems is one of the most important processes for benchmarking quantum simulators. The most curious feature of such dynamics is the growth of quantum entanglement to an amount proportional to the system size (volume law) even when interactions are local. This phenomenon has great ramifications for fundamental aspects, while its optimisation clearly has an impact on technology (e.g., for on-chip quantum networking). Here we use an integrated photonic chip with a circuit-based approach to simulate the dynamics of a spin chain and maximise the entanglement generation. The resulting entanglement is certified by constructing a second chip, which measures the entanglement between multiple distant pairs of simulated spins, as well as the block entanglement entropy. This is the first photonic simulation and optimisation of the extensive growth of entanglement in a spin chain, and opens up the use of photonic circuits for optimising quantum devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-017-01589-y

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For disordered systems, dynamic disorders are associated with diffusive transport, where interference no longer affects the evolution and a classical-like spreading is found for a distance proportional to the square root of the evolution time.

    “For disordered systems a further distinction can be made: dynamic disorders are associated to diffusive transports, where interference no longer affects the evolution and a classical-like spreading is found for a distance proportional to √ T , while static disorders lead to a complete halting in the process, a phenomenon known as Anderson localization [546,547]”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [547]

  • Static disorders lead to a complete halting of the transport process, known as Anderson localization, where the wave packet localizes on the initial sites of the lattice.

    “static disorders lead to a complete halting in the process, a phenomenon known as Anderson localization [546,547] where the wave packet localizes on the initial sites of the lattice [518,530,534,548]”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [547]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Polkovnikov, A., Sengupta, K., Silva, A. & Vengalattore, M. Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Calabrese, P. & Cardy, J. Quantum quenches in 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories. J. Stat. Mech., 064003 (2016). · DOI
  3. Fagotti, M. & Calabrese, P. Evolution of entanglement entropy following a quantum quench: analytic results for the XY chain in a transverse magnetic field. Phys. Rev. A. 78, 010306 (2008). · DOI
  4. Kim, H. & Huse, D. A. Ballistic spreading of entanglement in a diffusive nonintegrable system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127205 (2013). · DOI
  5. De Chiara, G., Montangero, S., Calabrese, P. & Fazio, R. Entanglement entropy dynamics of Heisenberg chains. J. Stat. Mech. P03001 (2006). · DOI
  6. Altman, E. & Vosk, R. Universal dynamics and renormalization in many-body localized systems. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 383–409 (2015). · DOI
  7. Bardarson, J. H., Pollmann, F. & Moore, J. E. Unbounded growth of entanglement in models of many-body localization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 017202 (2012). · DOI
  8. Eisert, J., Friesdorf, M. & Gogolin, C. Quantum many-body systems out of equilibrium. Nat. Phys. 11, 124–130 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Takayanagi, T. & Ugajin, T. Measuring the black hole formation by entanglement entropy via coarse-graining. JHEP 11, 1–23 (2010).
  10. Liu, H. & Suh, S. J. Entanglement tsunami: universal scaling in holographic thermalization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 011601 (2014). · DOI
  11. Islam, R. et al. Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system. Nature 528, 77–83 (2015). · DOI
  12. Kaufman, A. M. et al. Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system. Science 353, 794–800 (2016). · DOI
  13. Richerme, P. et al. Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interaction. Nature 511, 198–201 (2014). · DOI
  14. Fukuhara, T. et al. Spatially resolved detection of a spin-entanglement wave in a Bose-Hubbard chain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 035302 (2015). · DOI
  15. Alkurtass, B., Banchi, L. & Bose, S. Optimal quench for distance-independent entanglement and maximal block entropy. Phys. Rev. A. 90, 042304 (2014). · DOI
  16. Wichterich, H. & Bose, S. Exploiting quench dynamics in spin chains for distant entanglement and quantum communication. Phys. Rev. A. 79, 060302(R) (2009). · DOI
  17. Bose, S. Quantum communication through an unmodulated spin chain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 207901 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Banchi, L., Apollaro, T. J. G., Cuccoli, A., Vaia, R. & Verrucchi, P. Optimal dynamics for quantum-state and entanglement transfer through homogeneous quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A. 82, 052321 (2010). · DOI
  19. Yao, N. Y. et al. Robust quantum state transfer in random unpolarized spin chains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 040505 (2011). · DOI
  20. Banchi, L., Bayat, A., Verrucchi, P. & Bose, S. Nonperturbative entangling gates between distant qubits using uniform cold atom chains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 140501 (2011). · DOI
  21. Spring, J. B. et al. Boson sampling on a photonic chip. Science 339, 798–801 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Tillmann, M. et al. Experimental boson sampling. Nat. Photon 7, 540–544 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Barz, S. et al. Linear-optical generation of eigenstates of the two-sites XY model. Phys. Rev. X 5, 021010 (2015).
  24. Ma, X. S. et al. Towards photonic quantum simulation of ground states of frustrated Heisenberg spin systems. Sci. Rep. 4, 3583 (2014). · DOI
  25. Orieux, A. et al. Experimental linear-optics simulation of multiparticle non-locality in the ground state of a quantum Ising ring. Sci. Rep. 4, 7184 (2014). · DOI
  26. Bellec, M., Nikolopoulos, G. M. & Tzortzakis, S. Faithful communication Hamiltonian in photonics lattices. Opt. Lett. 37, 4504–4506 (2012). · DOI
  27. Perez-Leija, A. et al. Coherent quantum transport in photonic lattices. Phys. Rev. A. 87, 012309 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Barmettler, P., Punk, M., Gritsev, V., Demler, E. & Altman, E. Relaxation of antiferromagnetic order in spin-1/2 chains following a quantum quench. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 130603 (2009). · DOI
  29. Di Franco, C., Paternostro, M. & Kim, M. S. Nested entanglement states for distributed quantum channels. Phys. Rev. A. 77, 020303(R) (2008). · DOI
  30. Ramírez, G., Rodríguez-Laguna, J. & Sierra, G. Entanglement over the rainbow. J. Stat. Mech. P06002 (2015). · DOI
  31. Ho, W. W. & Abanin, D. A. Entanglement dynamics in quantum many-body systems. Phys. Rev. B 95, 093402 (2017).
  32. Crespi, A. et al. Particle statistics affects quantum decay and Fano interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 090201 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J. & Bertani, P. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58–61 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Barends, R. et al. Digital quantum simulation of fermionic models with a superconducting circuit. Nat. Commun. 6, 7654 (2015). · DOI
  35. Flamini, F. et al. Thermally reconfigurable quantum photonic circuits at telecom wavelength by femtosecond laser micro-machining. Light Sci. Appl. 4, e354 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Chaboyer, Z., Meany, T., Helt, L. G., Withford, M. J. & Steel, M. J. Tunable quantum interference in a 3D integrated circuit. Sci. Rep. 5, 9601 (2015). · DOI
  37. Laing, A. & O’Brien, J. L. Super-stable tomography of any linear optical device. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.2868v1 (2012). · arXiv
  38. Crespi, A. et al. Suppression law of quantum states in a 3D photonic fast Fourier transform chip. Nat. Commun. 7, 10469 (2015). · DOI
  39. Lombardi, E., Sciarrino, F., Popescu, P. & De Martini, F. Teleportation of a vacuum-one-photon qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 070402 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. & Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865–942 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Russomanno, A., Santoro, G. E. & Fazio, R. Entanglement entropy in a periodically driven Ising chain. J. Stat. Mech. 073101 (2016). · DOI
  42. Apollaro, T. J. G., Palma, G. M. & Marino, J. Entanglement entropy in a periodically driven quantum Ising ring. Phys. Rev. B 94, 134304 (2016). · DOI
  43. Venkataraman, V., Saha, K. & Gaeta, A. L. Phase modulation at the few-photon level for weak-nonlinearity-based quantum computing. Nat. Photon 7, 138–141 (2013). · DOI
  44. Moura Alves, C. & Jaksch, D. Multipartite entanglement detection in bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 110501 (2004). · DOI
  45. Daley, A. J., Pichler, H., Schachenmayer, J. & Zoller, P. Measuring entanglement growth in quench dynamics of bosons in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 020505 (2012). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pitsios, I., Banchi, L., Rab, A. S., Bentivegna, M., Caprara, D., Crespi, A., Spagnolo, N., Bose, S., Mataloni, P., Osellame, R., & Sciarrino, F.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-11-17
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
DOI
10.1038/s41467-017-01589-y
PMC
PMC5691163
Cited by
56
References
13
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review