Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient upgrading of CO to C3 fuel using asymmetric C-C coupling active sites

Open access
Wang, Xue, Wang, Ziyun, Zhuang, Tao-Tao, Dinh, Cao-Thang, Li, Jun, Nam, Dae-Hyun, Li, Fengwang, Huang, Chun-Wei, Tan, Chih-Shan, Chen, Zitao, Chi, Miaofang, Gabardo, Christine M., Seifitokaldani, Ali, Todorović, Petar, Proppe, Andrew, Pang, Yuanjie, Kirmani, Ahmad R., Wang, Yuhang, Ip, Alexander H., Richter, Lee J., Scheffel, Benjamin, Xu, Aoni, Lo, Shen-Chuan, Kelley, Shana O., Sinton, David, Sargent, Edward H.·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

The electroreduction of C 1 feedgas to high-energy-density fuels provides an attractive avenue to the storage of renewable electricity. Much progress has been made to improve selectivity to C 1 and C 2 products, however, the selectivity to desirable high-energy-density C 3 products remains relatively low. We reason that C 3 electrosynthesis relies on a higher-order reaction pathway that requires the formation of multiple carbon-carbon (C-C) bonds, and thus pursue a strategy explicitly designed to couple C 2 with C 1 intermediates. We develop an approach wherein neighboring copper atoms having distinct electronic structures interact with two adsorbates to catalyze an asymmetric reaction. We achieve a record n-propanol Faradaic efficiency (FE) of (33 ± 1)% with a conversion rate of (4.5 ± 0.1) mA cm−2, and a record n-propanol cathodic energy conversion efficiency (EE cathodic half-cell) of 21%. The FE and EE cathodic half-cell represent a 1.3× improvement relative to previously-published CO-to-n-propanol electroreduction reports.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-13190-6

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Wang, X., Wang, Z., Zhuang, T.-T., Dinh, C.-T., Li, J., Nam, D.-H., Li, F., Huang, C.-W., Tan, C.-S., Chen, Z., Chi, M., Gabardo, C. M., Seifitokaldani, A., Todorović, P., Proppe, A., Pang, Y., Kirmani, A. R., Wang, Y., Ip, A. H., Richter, L. J., Scheffel, B., Xu, A., Lo, S.-C., Kelley, S. O., Sinton, D., & Sargent, E. H.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-11-29
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
5186-5186
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990582562
Cited by
222
References
17
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient upgrading of CO to C3 fuel using asymmetric C-C coupling active sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-019-13190-6
The paper
Wang, X., Wang, Z., Zhuang, T.-T., Dinh, C.-T., Li, J., Nam, D.-H., Li, F., Huang, C.-W., Tan, C.-S., Chen, Z., Chi, M., Gabardo, C. M., Seifitokaldani, A., Todorović, P., Proppe, A., Pang, Y., Kirmani, A. R., Wang, Y., Ip, A. H., . . . Sargent, E. H. (2019). Efficient upgrading of CO to C3 fuel using asymmetric C-C coupling active sites. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13190-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.