Cited by 45CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Blackjack mutations improve the on-target activities of increased fidelity variants of SpCas9 with 5′ G-extended sgRNAs

Open access
Kulcsár, Péter István, Tálas, András, Tóth, Eszter, Nyeste, Antal, Ligeti, Zoltán, Welker, Zsombor, Welker, Ervin·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Increased fidelity mutants of the SpCas9 nuclease constitute the most promising approach to mitigating its off-target effects. However, these variants are effective only in a restricted target space, and many of them are reported to work less efficiently when applied in clinically relevant, pre-assembled, ribonucleoprotein forms. The low tolerance to 5'-extended, 21G-sgRNAs contributes, to a great extent, to their decreased performance. Here, we report the generation of Blackjack SpCas9 variant that shows increased fidelity yet remain effective with 21G-sgRNAs. Introducing Blackjack mutations into previously reported increased fidelity variants make them effective with 21G-sgRNAs and increases their fidelity. Two "Blackjack" nucleases, eSpCas9-plus and SpCas9-HF1-plus are superior variants of eSpCas9 and SpCas9-HF1, respectively, possessing matching on-target activity and fidelity but retaining activity with 21G-sgRNAs. They facilitate the use of existing pooled sgRNA libraries with higher specificity and show similar activities whether delivered as plasmids or as pre-assembled ribonucleoproteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-15021-5

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modifications at the 5′ end of the gRNA, such as addition of secondary structures or unpaired nucleotides, lower off-target activity.

    “Modifications at the 5′end of the gRNA, such as the addition of secondary structures (Kocak et al., 2019) or unpaired nucleotides (Kulcsár et al., 2020), have also been found to lower off-target activity.”
  • Current regulations may differentiate between genome editing techniques (SDN-1, SDN-2, SDN-3) and the use of foreign DNA or sequence templates in the editing process.

    “Current regulations may differentiate between genome editing techniques (SDN-1, SDN-2, SDN-3) and the use of foreign DNA or sequence templates in the editing process (Kulcsár et al., 2020).”

    From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Kulcsár et al., 2020

    The Introduction discusses Cas9 targeting and guide-RNA methods, while the Methods describe plasmid-based editing experiments. Our copy does not discuss regulations, SDN-1/2/3 classifications, or regulatory distinctions involving foreign DNA or sequence templates (searched for those terms and concepts). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kulcsár, P. I., Tálas, A., Tóth, E., Nyeste, A., Ligeti, Z., Welker, Z., & Welker, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Szeged (HU)
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • Institute of Molecular Life Sciences (HU)
  • Laboratory for the Bioengineering of Tissues (FR)
  • HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont (HU)
Corresponding author
  • Kulcsár, Péter István
  • Welker, Ervin
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-03-06
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1223-1223
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3009572786
Cited by
45
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
SpCas9, on-target activity, off-target effects, ribonucleoprotein delivery, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Humans, Mutation, Structure-Activity Relationship, Mutagenesis, RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida, Protein Structure, Secondary, Crystallography, X-Ray, HEK293 Cells, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review