Cited by 137Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation

Open access
Balsdon, Tarryn, Wyart, Valentin, Mamassian, Pascal·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Perceptual decisions are accompanied by feelings of confidence that reflect the likelihood that the decision was correct. Here we aim to clarify the relationship between perception and confidence by studying the same perceptual task across three different confidence contexts. Human observers were asked to categorize the source of sequentially presented visual stimuli. Each additional stimulus provided evidence for making more accurate perceptual decisions, and better confidence judgements. We show that observers' ability to set appropriate evidence accumulation bounds for perceptual decisions is strongly predictive of their ability to make accurate confidence judgements. When observers were not permitted to control their exposure to evidence, they imposed covert bounds on their perceptual decisions but not on their confidence decisions. This partial dissociation between decision processes is reflected in behaviour and pupil dilation. Together, these findings suggest a confidence-regulated accumulation-to-bound process that controls perceptual decision-making even in the absence of explicit speed-accuracy trade-offs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-15561-w

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Propositional confidence may emerge in parallel to the decision itself and may be used to shape the ongoing decision process, for instance controlling the termination of evidence accumulation or guiding the next step in a sequential decision.

    “Interestingly, propositional confidence may emerge in parallel to the decision (or proposition) itself and may be used to shape the ongoing decision process-for instance, controlling the termination of evidence accumulation (Balsdon et al. 2020) or guiding the next step in a sequential decision (van den Berg et al. 2016b).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Balsdon et al. 2020

  • Evidence may be accumulated about particular sensory features (world-centered frame) and, simultaneously, about future or past choice correctness (self-centered frame), with the latter feeding back to set the bound on current or future sensory evidence accumulation.

    “For instance, evidence may be accumulated about particular sensory features (world-centered frame of reference) and, simultaneously, about (future or past) choice correctness (self-centered frame of reference), with the latter feeding back to set the bound on current or future sensory evidence accumulation (Balsdon et al. 2020).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Balsdon et al. 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Yeung, N. & Summerfield, C. In Fleming S. M. & Frith C. D. (editors) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. 147–167 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balsdon, T., Wyart, V., & Mamassian, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Balsdon, Tarryn
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-04-09
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1753-1753
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015873723
Cited by
137
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-CE28-0015, ANR-10-IDEX-0001, ANR18, ANR-10-LABX-0087, ANR-18-CE28, ANR-10, ANR-10-LABX)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (ANR-10-LABX-0087)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMR 8248)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
perceptual confidence, perceptual decision making, evidence accumulation, confidence judgments, pupil dilation, speed-accuracy trade-off
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review