Cited by 369Visual perception and processing mechanismsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Evidence for an Accumulator Model of Psychophysical Discrimination

VICKERS, D.·1970·Ergonomics

Abstract

Recent theoretical approaches to the problem of psychophysical discrimination have produced what may be classified as ‘ statistical decision ’ or ‘ data accumulation ’ models. While the former have received much attention their application to judgment and choice meets with some difficulties. Among the latter, the two types which have received most attention are a ‘ runs ’ and a ‘ recruitment ’ model, but neither seems able to account for all of the relevant data. It is suggested instead that an ‘ accumulator ’ model, in which sampled events may vary in magnitude as well as probability, can be developed to give a good account of much of the available data on psychophysical discrimination. Two experiments are reported, in which the subject presses one of two keys as soon as he has decided whether the longer of two simultaneously presented lines is on the left or right. Results are found to be inconsistent with a runs or recruitment process, but to accord well with predictions from the accumulator model. Other evidence consistent with such a mechanism is briefly reviewed

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00140137008931117

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Choice confidence emerges from the dynamics of noisy accumulators in the race model, leading to dual effects of difference in value and reaction time on confidence.

    “Choice confidence can be seen to emerge from the dynamics of noisy accumulators in the race model7,21, leading to dual effects of difference in value and reaction time on confidence27.”

    From Confidence in value-based choice (2013) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VICKERS, D.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
VICKERS, D.
Venue
Ergonomics
Published
1970-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
37-58
ISSN
  • 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5847
OpenAlex
W2003178747
Cited by
369
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
accumulator model, recruitment model, decision-making, reaction time (psychology)
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Discrimination, Psychological, Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychophysics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review