Cited by 10Epigenetics and DNA MethylationBirth, Development, and HealthClimate Change and Health Impacts

Severe drought exposure in utero associates to children’s epigenetic age acceleration in a global climate change hot spot

Open access
Qiao, Xi, Straight, Bilinda, Ngo, Duy, Hilton, Charles E., Owuor Olungah, Charles, Naugle, Amy, Lalancette, Claudia, Needham, Belinda L.·2024·Nature Communications

Abstract

The goal of this study is to examine the association between in utero drought exposure and epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) in a global climate change hot spot. Calculations of EAA in adults using DNA methylation have been found to accurately predict chronic disease and longevity. However, fewer studies have examined EAA in children, and drought exposure in utero has not been investigated. Additionally, studies of EAA in low-income countries with diverse populations are rare. We assess EAA using epigenetic clocks and two DNAm-based pace-of-aging measurements from whole saliva samples in 104 drought-exposed children and 109 same-sex sibling controls in northern Kenya. We find a positive association between in utero drought exposure and EAA in two epigenetic clocks (Hannum’s and GrimAge) and a negative association in the DNAm based telomere length (DNAmTL) clock. The combined impact of drought’s multiple deleterious stressors may reduce overall life expectancy through accelerated epigenetic aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-48426-7

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prenatal disaster exposure has been associated with accelerated epigenetic aging and shorter methylation-based telomeres, markers linked to increased chronic disease risk and immune decline.

    “Prenatal disaster exposure has been associated with accelerated epigenetic aging and shorter methylation-based telomeres, markers linked to increased chronic disease risk and immune decline (24).”

    From Epigenetic changes associated with multi-generational trauma: characterization, mechanisms, and therapeutics (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Discussion reports that severe drought exposure in utero was associated with accelerated epigenetic aging on two clocks and a lower DNA methylation–based telomere-length estimate in children. The Introduction links these markers to chronic disease and other adverse health outcomes. The paper does not establish an association with immune decline, and its finding concerns severe drought rather than prenatal disaster exposure generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [56]Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). (Pearson, 2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiao, X., Straight, B., Ngo, D., Hilton, C. E., Owuor Olungah, C., Naugle, A., Lalancette, C., & Needham, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Western Michigan University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Straight, Bilinda
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-05-16
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
4140-4140
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396958823
Cited by
10
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1728743)
  • Western Michigan University
  • National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation
  • Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (1728743)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
Keywords
epigenetic age acceleration, epigenetic clocks, DNA methylation, children, epigenetic aging, telomere length, Hannum clock, GrimAge clock, climate change, low-income countries, northern Kenya, life expectancy
MeSH terms
Aging, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Kenya, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Saliva, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Droughts, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review