Cited by 61SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

A phase I/II randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of a self-amplifying Covid-19 mRNA vaccine

Open access
Low, Jenny G., de Alwis, Ruklanthi, Chen, Shiwei, Kalimuddin, Shirin, Leong, Yan Shan, Mah, Tania Ken Lin, Yuen, Natalene, Tan, Hwee Cheng +13 more·2022·npj Vaccines

Abstract

Coronavirus disease-19 (Covid-19) pandemic have demonstrated the importantance of vaccines in disease prevention. Self-amplifying mRNA vaccines could be another option for disease prevention if demonstrated to be safe and immunogenic. Phase 1 of this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial ( N = 42) assessed the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity in healthy young and older adults of ascending levels of one-dose ARCT-021, a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine against Covid-19. Phase 2 ( N = 64) tested two-doses of ARCT-021 given 28 days apart. During phase 1, ARCT-021 was well tolerated up to one 7.5 μg dose and two 5.0 μg doses. Local solicited AEs, namely injection-site pain and tenderness were more common in ARCT-021vaccinated, while systemic solicited AEs, mainly fatigue, headache and myalgia were reported in 62.8% and 46.4% of ARCT-021 and placebo recipients, respectively. Seroconversion rate for anti-S IgG was 100% in all cohorts, except for the 1 μg one-dose in younger adults and the 7.5 μg one-dose in older adults. Anti-S IgG and neutralizing antibody titers showed a general increase with increasing dose, and overlapped with titers in Covid-19 convalescent patients. T-cell responses were also observed in response to stimulation with S-protein peptides. Taken collectively, ARCT-021 is immunogenic and has favorable safety profile for further development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41541-022-00590-x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early saRNA vaccine trials showed lower efficacy and neutralizing antibody levels than mRNA vaccine trials.

    “However, early saRNA vaccine trials showed lower efficacy and neutralizing antibody levels than mRNA vaccine trials11.”

    From Complete substitution with modified nucleotides in self-amplifying RNA suppresses the interferon response and increases potency (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion reports that neutralizing antibody titers for the saRNA vaccine ARCT-021 were low. It does not compare those titers with mRNA vaccine trials or report lower clinical efficacy for ARCT-021; the efficacy figure it mentions concerns a different saRNA vaccine, ARCT-154. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Low, J. G., de Alwis, R., Chen, S., Kalimuddin, S., Leong, Y. S., Mah, T. K. L., Yuen, N., Tan, H. C., Zhang, S. L., Sim, J. X. Y., Chan, Y. F. Z., Syenina, A., Yee, J. X., Ong, E. Z., Sekulovich, R., Sullivan, B. B., Lindert, K., Sullivan, S. M., Chivukula, P., Hughes, S. G., & Ooi, E. E.
Affiliations
  • SingHealth (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Singapore General Hospital (SG)
  • Arcturus Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Hughes, Steven G.
Venue
npj Vaccines
Published
2022-12-13
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
161-161
ISSN
2059-0105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311822524
Cited by
61
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 2
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Vaccines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
self-amplifying mRNA vaccine, COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, vaccine safety, immunogenicity, dose escalation, neutralizing antibodies, T cell response, adverse events, older adults, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review