Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries

A safe operating space for humanity

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333

Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet

Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527

The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview

Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., et al. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 · Cited by 6,607

Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3 .10 Dataset

Harris, I. C., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., & Lister, D. (2013) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.3711 · Cited by 6,326

Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model

Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Crämer, W., Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., et al. (2003) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x · Cited by 3,343

Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change

Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1053 · Cited by 2,680

Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

(2011) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139151153 · Cited by 1,536

Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions

Smith, P., Davis, S. J., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Minx, J., Gabrielle, B., Kato, E., Jackson, R. B., Cowie, A., Kriegler, E., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2870 · Cited by 1,440

Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance

Bondeau, A., Smith, P. L., Zaehle, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Crämer, W., Gerten, D., Lotze‐Campen, H., Müller, C., Reichstein, M., et al. (2006) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x · Cited by 1,333

A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions

Kier, G., Kreft, H., Lee, T. M., Jetz, W., Ibisch, P. L., Nowicki, C., Mutke, J., & Barthlott, W. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810306106 · Cited by 1,320

Technological innovation enables low cost climate change mitigation

Creutzig, F., Hilaire, J., Nemet, G. F., Müller-Hansen, F., & Minx, J. C. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103276 · Cited by 66

Delivering carbon negative electricity, heat and hydrogen with BECCS – Comparing the options

Bui, M., Zhang, D., Fajardy, M., & Dowell, N. M. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.042 · Cited by 61

Sustainable scale-up of negative emissions technologies and practices: where to focus

Cobo, S., Negri, V., Valente, A., Reiner, D. M., Hamelin, L., Dowell, N. M., & Guillén‐Gosálbez, G. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acacb3 · Cited by 57

Plastic Pollution in Soils: Governance Approaches to Foster Soil Health and Closed Nutrient Cycles

Stubenrauch, J., & Ekardt, F. (2020) · Environments · doi:10.3390/environments7050038 · Cited by 55

The potential role of olive groves to deliver carbon dioxide removal in a carbon-neutral Europe: Opportunities and challenges

Galán‐Martín, Á., Contreras, M. D. M., Romero, I., Ruiz, E., Bueno, S., Eliche‐Quesada, D., & Castro-Galiano, E. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112609 · Cited by 60

Environmental process optimisation of an adsorption-based direct air carbon capture and storage system

Postweiler, P., Engelpracht, M., Rezo, D., Gibelhaus, A., & von der Assen, N. V. (2024) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee02970k · Cited by 51

Trade-offs in land-based carbon removal measures under 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures

Zhao, X., Mignone, B. K., Wise, M., & McJeon, H. C. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46575-3 · Cited by 63

CO2 mitigation or removal: The optimal uses of biomass in energy system decarbonization

Patrizio, P., Fajardy, M., Bui, M., & Dowell, N. M. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102765 · Cited by 56

Human and planetary health implications of negative emissions technologies

Cobo, S., Galán‐Martín, Á., Tulus, V., Huijbregts, M. A. J., & Guillén‐Gosálbez, G. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30136-7 · Cited by 55

Bioenergy-induced land-use-change emissions with sectorally fragmented policies

Merfort, L., Bauer, N., Humpenöder, F., Klein, D., Strefler, J., Popp, A., Luderer, G., & Kriegler, E. (2023) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01697-2 · Cited by 57

Ecosystem maintenance energy and the need for a green EROI

Moriarty, P., & Honnery, D. (2019) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.006 · Cited by 53

Jobs in a Net-Zero Emissions Future in Latin America and the Caribbean

Saget, C., Vogt‐Schilb, A., & Luu, T. (2020) · doi:10.18235/0002509 · Cited by 49

Drivers and implications of alternative routes to fuels decarbonization in net-zero energy systems

Mignone, B. K., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Gurgel, A., Herzog, H. J., Johnson, J. X., Mallapragada, D. S., McJeon, H. C., Morris, J., O’Rourke, P., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47059-0 · Cited by 51

The Economics of 1.5°C Climate Change

Dietz, S., Bowen, A., Doda, B., Gambhir, A., & Warren, R. (2018) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025817 · Cited by 53

Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity: A Threat Identification Framework

Dooley, K., Harrould‐Kolieb, E., & Talberg, A. (2020) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12828 · Cited by 46

Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate–carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios

Melnikova, I., Boucher, O., Cadule, P., Tanaka, K., Gasser, T., Hajima, T., Quilcaille, Y., Shiogama, H., Séférian, R., Tachiiri, K., et al. (2022) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-13-779-2022 · Cited by 49

The influence of the global electric power system on terrestrial biodiversity

Holland, R. A., Scott, K., Agnolucci, P., Rapti, C., Eigenbrod, F., & Taylor, G. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1909269116 · Cited by 50

The importance of socioeconomic conditions in mitigating climate change impacts and achieving Sustainable Development Goals

Liu, J., Fujimori, S., Takahashi, K., Hasegawa, T., Wu, W., Geng, Y., Takakura, J., & Masui, T. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abcac4 · Cited by 45

Life cycle optimization of BECCS supply chains in the European Union

Negri, V., Galán‐Martín, Á., Pozo, C., Fajardy, M., Reiner, D. M., Dowell, N. M., & Guillén‐Gosálbez, G. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117252 · Cited by 49

Modeling direct air carbon capture and storage in a 1.5 °C climate future using historical analogs

Edwards, M. R., Thomas, Z. H., Nemet, G. F., Rathod, S., Greene, J. H., Surana, K., Kennedy, K. M., Fuhrman, J., & McJeon, H. C. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2215679121 · Cited by 49

Prediction of pyrolytic product composition and yield for various grass biomass feedstocks

Pathy, A., Swagathnath, G., Selvasembian, R., Rajkumar, M. A., & Balasubramanian, P. (2019) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-019-00475-5 · Cited by 45

Can biomass supply meet the demands of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)?

Jones, M. B., & Albanito, F. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15296 · Cited by 49

Carbon pricing and planetary boundaries

Engström, G., Gars, J., Krishnamurthy, C. K. B., Spiro, D., Calel, R. A., Lindahl, T., & Narayanan, B. G. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18342-7 · Cited by 44

Seize the Means of Carbon Removal: The Political Economy of Direct Air Capture

Malm, A., & Carton, W. (2021) · Historical Materialism · doi:10.1163/1569206x-29012021 · Cited by 38

Captured Futures

Hajer, M. A., & Oomen, J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198955382.001.0001 · Cited by 52

Reflections on cross-impact balances, a systematic method constructing global socio-technical scenarios for climate change research

Schweizer, V. J. (2020) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02615-2 · Cited by 50

Recognizing the Value of Collaboration in Delivering Carbon Dioxide Removal

Fajardy, M., & Dowell, N. M. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.014 · Cited by 46

Policy incentives for Greenhouse Gas Removal Techniques: the risks of premature inclusion in carbon markets and the need for a multi-pronged policy framework

Burke, J., & Gambhir, A. (2022) · Energy and Climate Change · doi:10.1016/j.egycc.2022.100074 · Cited by 51

Future bioenergy expansion could alter carbon sequestration potential and exacerbate water stress in the United States

Cheng, Y., Huang, M., Lawrence, D. M., Calvin, K., Lombardozzi, D., Sinha, E., Pan, M., & He, X. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm8237 · Cited by 40

A decade of the U.S. energy mix transitioning away from coal: historical reconstruction of the reductions in the public health burden of energy

Buonocore, J. J., Salimifard, P., Michanowicz, D. R., & Allen, J. G. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abe74c · Cited by 40

Counting (on) blue carbon—Challenges and ways forward for carbon accounting of ecosystem-based carbon removal in marine environments

Mengis, N., Paul, A. J., & Fernández‐Méndez, M. (2023) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000148 · Cited by 39

Negative Emission Energy Production Technologies: A Techno‐Economic and Life Cycle Analyses Review

Li, W., & Wright, M. M. (2019) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.201900871 · Cited by 40

Toward quantification of the feasible potential of land-based carbon dioxide removal

Perkins, O., Alexander, P. M., Arneth, A., Brown, C., Millington, J. D. A., & Rounsevell, M. (2023) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.11.011 · Cited by 37

Human Rights and Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: Potential Limits to BECCS and DACCS Deployment

Günther, P., & Ekardt, F. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11122153 · Cited by 48

Role of negative emission technologies in South Africa's pathway to net zero emissions by 2050

Afrane, S., Ampah, J. D., Yusuf, A. A., Jinjuan, Z., Yang, P., Chen, J. L., & Mao, G. (2024) · Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development · doi:10.1016/j.esd.2024.101401 · Cited by 38

Biofuels from perennial energy crops on buffer strips: A win-win strategy

Agostini, A., Serra, P., Giuntoli, J., Martani, E., Ferrarini, A., & Amaducci, S. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126703 · Cited by 39

Framework for Assessing the Feasibility of Carbon Dioxide Removal Options Within the National Context of Germany

Förster, J., Beck, S., Borchers, M., Gawel, E., Korte, K., Markus, T., Mengis, N., Oschlies, A., Schaller, R., Stevenson, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.758628 · Cited by 36

Developing Africa’s energy mix

Schwerhoff, G., & Sy, M. (2018) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1459293 · Cited by 38

Exploring techno-economic landscapes of abatement options for hard-to-electrify sectors

Bachorz, C., Verpoort, P. C., Luderer, G., & Ueckerdt, F. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59277-1 · Cited by 41

Trading off regional and overall energy system design flexibility in the net-zero transition

van Greevenbroek, K., Grochowicz, A., Zeyringer, M., & Benth, F. E. (2025) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-025-01556-2 · Cited by 35

Life-cycle impacts from different decarbonization pathways for the European car fleet

Dirnaichner, A., Rottoli, M., Sacchi, R., Rauner, S., Cox, B., Mutel, C., Bauer, C., & Luderer, G. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac4fdb · Cited by 34

The risk of catastrophic climate change: Future energy implications

Moriarty, P., & Honnery, D. (2021) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102728 · Cited by 35

Potential of Land‐Neutral Negative Emissions Through Biochar Sequestration

Werner, C., Lucht, W., Gerten, D., & Kammann, C. I. (2022) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2021ef002583 · Cited by 33

Drivers for decoupling carbon footprint pressure from economic growth in China’s provinces

Liang, D., Lu, H., Guan, Y., & Feng, L. (2022) · Geography and sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2022.08.003 · Cited by 35

Unlocking the potential of BECCS with indigenous sources of biomass at a national scale

Zhang, D., Bui, M., Fajardy, M., Patrizio, P., Kraxner, F., & Dowell, N. M. (2019) · Sustainable Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1039/c9se00609e · Cited by 39

The role of carbon capture and storage electricity in attaining 1.5 and 2 °C

Vinca, A., Rottoli, M., Marangoni, G., & Tavoni, M. (2018) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.020 · Cited by 33

Carbon-negative hydrogen from biomass using gas switching integrated gasification: Techno-economic assessment

Helf, A., Cloete, S. W. P., Keller, F., Cloete, J. H., & Zaabout, A. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116248 · Cited by 34

Quantifying the cost of leaving the Paris Agreement via the integration of life cycle assessment, energy systems modeling and monetization

Algunaibet, I. M., Pozo, C., Galán‐Martín, Á., & Guillén‐Gosálbez, G. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.081 · Cited by 33

Combining mitigation strategies to increase co-benefits for biodiversity and food security

Prudhomme, R., Palma, A. D., Dumas, P., Gonzalez, R., Leadley, P., Levrel, H., Purvis, A., & Brunelle, T. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abb10a · Cited by 35

Global biomethane and carbon dioxide removal potential through anaerobic digestion of waste biomass

Feng, Y., & Rosa, L. (2024) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad1e81 · Cited by 36

Methods to Assess the Impacts and Indirect Land Use Change Caused by Telecoupled Agricultural Supply Chains: A Review

Parra-Paitan, C., & Verburg, P. H. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11041162 · Cited by 34

Environmental problem shifting from climate change mitigation: A mapping review

Hansen, O. W., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad448 · Cited by 40

A Precautionary Assessment of Systemic Projections and Promises From Sunlight Reflection and Carbon Removal Modeling

Low, S., & Honegger, M. (2020) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13565 · Cited by 30

A bioenergy-focused versus a reforestation-focused mitigation pathway yields disparate carbon storage and climate responses

Cheng, Y., Lawrence, D. M., Pan, M., Zhang, B., Graham, N. T., Lawrence, P., Liu, Z., & He, X. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2306775121 · Cited by 28

Carbon Removal and Solar Geoengineering: Potential implications for delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals

Honegger, M., Derwent, H., Harrison, N., Michaelowa, A., & Schäfer, S. (2018) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-159656 · Cited by 27

Renewable Energy from Wildflowers—Perennial Wild Plant Mixtures as a Social‐Ecologically Sustainable Biomass Supply System

von Cossel, M. (2020) · Advanced Sustainable Systems · doi:10.1002/adsu.202000037 · Cited by 29

Future land-use competition constrains natural climate solutions

Zheng, Q., Siman, K., Zeng, Y., Teo, H. C., Sarira, T. V., Sreekar, R., & Koh, L. P. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156409 · Cited by 27

N-Doped Carbon Materials as Heterogeneous Catalysts for High Efficiency Isomerization Glucose to Fructose in Aqueous Media

Wang, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Song, F., Xie, Y., Wang, M., Cui, H., & Yi, W. (2019) · Catalysis Letters · doi:10.1007/s10562-019-03020-1 · Cited by 26

Evolution patterns of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) from a science mapping perspective

Li, M., Lü, Y., & Huang, M. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144318 · Cited by 26

A low GHG development pathway design framework for agriculture, forestry and land use

Svensson, J., Waisman, H., Vogt‐Schilb, A., Bataille, C., Aubert, P., Jaramillo, M., Angulo-Paniagua, J., Argüello, R., Bravo, G., Buira, D., et al. (2021) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2021.100683 · Cited by 28

CO 2 removal and 1.5 °C: what, when, where, and how?

Chiquier, S., Fajardy, M., & Dowell, N. M. (2022) · Energy Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ya00108j · Cited by 27

Exploring risks and benefits of overshooting a 1.5 °C carbon budget over space and time

Bauer, N., Keller, D., Garbe, J., Karstens, K., Piontek, F., von Bloh, W., Thiery, W., Zeitz, M., Mengel, M., Strefler, J., et al. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/accd83 · Cited by 28

A study on public acceptance of hydrogen portfolio standard for renewable energy expansion: Comparative analysis of hydrogen production mix plans

Moon, S., Kim, K., & Kim, J. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.224 · Cited by 26

Jobs in a net-zero emissions future in Latin America and the Caribbean

(2022) · Climate Change and Law Collection · doi:10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2020-0196-1102 · Cited by 26

Limits to climate action - Narratives of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage

Haikola, S., Anshelm, J., & Hansson, A. (2021) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102416 · Cited by 31

Trade-Offs between Sugarcane Straw Removal and Soil Organic Matter in Brazil

Morais, M. C., Neto, M. S., Guerra, H. P., Satiro, L. S., Soltangheisi, A., Cerri, C. E. P., Feigl, B. J., & Cherubin, M. R. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12229363 · Cited by 25

Framing and context

(2022) · Climate Change and Land · doi:10.1017/9781009157988.003 · Cited by 23

Managing Forests for Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change Mitigation

Azuero-Pedraza, C. G., Lauri, P., Augustynczik, A. L. D., & Thomas, V. M. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c07163 · Cited by 22

Carbon removal for a just transition

Nawaz, S., McLaren, D. P., Caggiano, H., Hudson, A. D., & Scott-Buechler, C. M. (2024) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2024.2418305 · Cited by 22

Negative Emissions as the New Frontier of Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction

May, M. M., & Rehfeld, K. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202103801 · Cited by 23

Renewable Energy Resource Assessment

Teske, S., Nagrath, K., Morris, T., & Dooley, K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05843-2_7 · Cited by 22

Options to achieve net-zero emissions from agriculture and land use changes in Latin America and the Caribbean

Dumas, P., Wirsenius, S., Searchinger, T., Andrieu, N., & Vogt‐Schilb, A. (2022) · doi:10.18235/0004427 · Cited by 22

Interdisciplinary Research Maps: A new technique for visualizing research topics

Marrone, M., & Linnenluecke, M. K. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242283 · Cited by 22

Authenticity, mindfulness and destination liminoidity: a multi-level model

Lengyel, A. (2020) · Tourism Recreation Research · doi:10.1080/02508281.2020.1815412 · Cited by 21

Global scenarios of irrigation water abstractions for bioenergy production: a systematic review

Stenzel, F., Gerten, D., & Hanasaki, N. (2021) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-25-1711-2021 · Cited by 22

European Forest Governance: Status Quo and Optimising Options with Regard to the Paris Climate Target

Stubenrauch, J., Garske, B., Ekardt, F., & Hagemann, K. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14074365 · Cited by 23

Great power, great responsibility: Assessing power sector policy for the UK’s net zero target

Ball-Burack, A., Salas, P., & Mercure, J.-F. (2022) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113167 · Cited by 20

Co-deploying biochar and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage improves cost-effectiveness and sustainability of China’s carbon neutrality

Deng, X., Teng, F., Zhang, X., Fan, J., Forsell, N., & Reiner, D. M. (2025) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2024.12.008 · Cited by 20

Feeding the world in a narrowing safe operating space

Gerten, D., & Kummu, M. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.020 · Cited by 26

Balancing climate goals and biodiversity protection: legal implications of the 30x30 target for land-based carbon removal

Günther, P., & Ekardt, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2023.1276606 · Cited by 20

Does China's pathway to carbon neutrality require the integration of land-based biological negative emission solutions with geochemical and chemical alternatives?

Ampah, J. D., Jin, C., Afrane, S., Li, B., Adun, H. H., Liu, H., Yao, M., & Morrow, D. R. (2023) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.025 · Cited by 19

Carbon dioxide removal: A source of ambition or of delays? Examining expectations for CDR in Swiss climate policy

von Rothkirch, J., Ejderyan, O., & Stauffacher, M. (2024) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103659 · Cited by 19

Net-Negative Emissions through Molten Sorbents and Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage

Halliday, C., & Hatton, T. A. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04512 · Cited by 19

Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts

Merfort, A., Strefler, J., Abrahão, G. M., Bauer, N., Dorndorf, T., Kriegler, E., Luderer, G., Merfort, L., & Edenhofer, O. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60606-7 · Cited by 18

Planetary boundaries under a land-based climate change mitigation scenario with a food demand transformation: a modelling study

Beier, F., Dietrich, J. P., Heinke, J., Abrahão, G. M., von Jeetze, P., Bodirsky, B. L., Crawford, M., Humpenöder, F., Merfort, L., Weindl, I., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(25)00087-7 · Cited by 31

The role of biomaterials for the energy transition from the lens of a national integrated assessment model

Souza, C. D. O., Angelkorte, G. B., Rochedo, P., & Szklo, A. S. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03201-1 · Cited by 19

Policy support for BECCS and DACCS in Europe: the view of market participants

Yang, P., Fankhauser, S., Smith, S. M., Sundvor, I., Hirmer, S. A., Johnstone, I., & Stemmler, J. (2024) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad661e · Cited by 18

Managing the risks of missing international climate targets

Taylor, G., & Vink, S. M. (2021) · Climate Risk Management · doi:10.1016/j.crm.2021.100379 · Cited by 25

Fixing the Climate? How Geoengineering Threatens to Undermine the SDGs and Climate Justice

Schneider, L. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1057/s41301-019-00211-6 · Cited by 18

Targeted carbon dioxide removal measures are essential for the cost and energy transformation of the electricity sector by 2050

Afrane, S., Ampah, J. D., Adun, H. H., Chen, J. L., Zou, H., Mao, G., & Yang, P. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02190-8 · Cited by 17

Biochar and Its Potential to Deliver Negative Emissions and Better Soil Quality in Europe

Tisserant, A., Hu, X., Liu, Q., Xie, Z., Zhao, W., & Cherubini, F. (2023) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef003246 · Cited by 18

Recent Advances on Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials Supported Single-Atom for Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysts

Fu, K.-K., Yuan, D., Yu, T., Lei, C., Kou, Z., Huang, B., Lyu, S., Zhang, F., & Wan, T. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29184304 · Cited by 17

Reply to Second comment on ‘The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions’

Wynes, S., & Nicholas, K. A. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aac9cf · Cited by 17

Multiple planetary boundaries preclude biomass crops for carbon capture and storage outside of agricultural areas

Braun, J., Werner, C., Gerten, D., Stenzel, F., Schaphoff, S., & Lucht, W. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02033-6 · Cited by 23

Mutual reinforcement of land-based carbon dioxide removal and international emissions trading in deep decarbonization scenarios

Morris, J., Gurgel, A., Mignone, B. K., Kheshgi, H. S., & Paltsev, S. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49502-8 · Cited by 19

Mediterranean forest policy beyond the Paris Climate Agreement

Andrea, V. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105797 · Cited by 18

Simulating second-generation herbaceous bioenergy crop yield using the global hydrological model H08 (v.bio1)

Ai, Z., Hanasaki, N., Heck, V., Hasegawa, T., & Fujimori, S. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-6077-2020 · Cited by 14

PopFor: A new model for estimating poplar yields

Henner, D. N., Hastings, A., Pogson, M., McNamara, N. P., Davies, C. A., & Smith, P. (2020) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105470 · Cited by 14

New insights into assessing the carrying capacity of resources and the environment: The origin, development and prospects of the planetary boundaries framework

Xian-peng, C., Kai, F., Peng, J., & Ai-yuan, L. (2020) · 自然资源学报 · doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200302 · Cited by 14

Towards a synthesized critique of forest‐based ‘carbon‐fix’ strategies

Vian, J. E., Garvey, B., & Tuohy, P. G. (2023) · Climate Resilience and Sustainability · doi:10.1002/cli2.48 · Cited by 16

Multiple planetary boundaries preclude biomass crops for carbon capture and storage outside of agricultural areas

Braun, J., Werner, C., Gerten, D., Stenzel, F., Schaphoff, S., & Lucht, W. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02033-6 · Cited by 23

Estimating water–food–ecosystem trade-offs for the global negative emission scenario (IPCC-RCP2.6)

Yamagata, Y., Hanasaki, N., Ito, A., Kinoshita, T., Murakami, D., & Zhou, Q. (2018) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0522-5 · Cited by 42

Global Negative Emission Land Use Scenarios and Their Ecological Implications

Yamagata, Y. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.10893-0 · Cited by 3

Freshwater requirements of large-scale bioenergy plantations for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C

Stenzel, F., Gerten, D., Werner, C., & Jägermeyr, J. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab2b4b · Cited by 39

Can biomass supply meet the demands of BECCS?

Jones, M. B. (2020) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-5461