Cited by 396Categorization, perception, and languageNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition

Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science

Open access
Blasi, Damián E., Henrich, Joseph, Adamou, Evangelia, Kemmerer, David, Majid, Asifa·2022·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

English is the dominant language in the study of human cognition and behavior: the individuals studied by cognitive scientists, as well as most of the scientists themselves, are frequently English speakers. However, English differs from other languages in ways that have consequences for the whole of the cognitive sciences, reaching far beyond the study of language itself. Here, we review an emerging body of evidence that highlights how the particular characteristics of English and the linguistic habits of English speakers bias the field by both warping research programs (e.g., overemphasizing features and mechanisms present in English over others) and overgeneralizing observations from English speakers' behaviors, brains, and cognition to our entire species. We propose mitigating strategies that could help avoid some of these pitfalls.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.015

Cites

195 of 195 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More fine-grained linguistic phenomena differ widely across languages and often deviate from findings in English.

    “Nevertheless, more fine-grained phenomena differ widely across languages and often deviate from findings in English. 75,91-93”
  • The study's focus on English implies that results should be interpreted with caution when applied outside the English-language news domain.

    “While this choice is common in various language-related fields, including cognitive science (Blasi et al. 2022), it implies interpreting our results with caution when applying them outside the context of the English language and the news domain.”

    From Contrasting Linguistic Patterns in Human and LLM-Generated News Text (2024) · cites this paper as Blasi et al. 2022

  • Models like GPT have been trained chiefly on WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) people's textual data primarily in English, perpetuating the English-centricity of psychology.

    “Models like GPT have been trained chiefly on WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic; (32)) people’s textual data primarily in English, perpetuating the English-centricity of psychology (33), hindering efforts to take linguistic diversity seriously.”
  • English dominates research on neurocognition in general and on neurodegeneration in particular.

    “Nevertheless, it dominates research on neurocognition, in general, 75 and on neurodegeneration, in particular (Fig. 1C).”
  • Myriad phonological, orthographic, morphological, syntactic and lexico-semantic systems, and their interfaces with non-linguistic mechanisms, differ radically between English and most of the world's languages.

    “More generally, myriad phonological, orthographic, morphological, syntactic and lexico-semantic systems, as well as their interfaces with non-linguistic mechanisms, differ radically be tween English and most of the world's languages. 75,92”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Liu, J. et al. (2021) Language experience shapes music pro- cessing across 40 tonal, pitch-accented, and non-tonal lan- guages. bioRxiv Published online October 20, 2021. https:// doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.18.464888 · DOI
  2. Dingemanse, M. et al. (2022) Convergent cultural evolution of continuers (mhmm). In The Joint Conference on Language Evolution (JCoLE) 114.
  3. Vaid, J. et al. (2017) Languages without borders. In Bilingualism: A Framework for Understanding the Mental Lexicon (Libben, M. et al., eds), pp. 7-26, John Benjamins 145.
  4. Okada, B.M. and Slevc, L.R. (2021) What is "musical ability" and how do we measure it? In Proceedings of the Future Directions of Music Cognition International Conference 175.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blasi, D. E., Henrich, J., Adamou, E., Kemmerer, D., & Majid, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Blasi, Damián E.
  • Majid, Asifa
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
1153-1170
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4306247398
Cited by
396
References
195
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Harvard University
  • Kempe Foundation
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-0083, ANR-10)
  • Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Keywords
English language, language bias, cognitive science, overgeneralization, language and cognition, cross-cultural generalizability, research bias, linguistic habits, mitigation measures
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Humans, Language, Linguistics, Cognitive Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review