The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, these experiments use thin informational treatments consisting of a single piece of information. Researchers typically present to participants a single fact relevant to a topic (e.g., ref. 4) or one argument either supporting or opposing a policy proposal (e.g., ref. 23).”
From Factual knowledge can reduce attitude polarization (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Consistent with this view, a growing number of empirical studies have uncovered evidence that people update their political attitudes and beliefs in line with evidence (e.g., refs. 4,13,27–29) and arguments23,30,31 presented to them.”
From Factual knowledge can reduce attitude polarization (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
Cialdini, R. B. (1993) · Cited by 2,563
The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks
Braman, D., Kahan, D. M., Peters, E. M., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., & Mandel, G. N. (2012) · Scholarly Commons - George Washington University Law School (George Washington University) · Cited by 2,421
Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009 · Cited by 1,469
The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0 · Cited by 891
Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change
Tankard, M. E., & Paluck, E. L. (2016) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12022 · Cited by 883
Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1704882114 · Cited by 607
The Effect of a Supreme Court Decision Regarding Gay Marriage on Social Norms and Personal Attitudes
Tankard, M. E., & Paluck, E. L. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617709594 · Cited by 502
Hogan, K. (1996) · Cited by 110
The crisis of politicization within and beyond science
Druckman, J. N. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0183-5 · Cited by 88
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0116 (2017).
- Kahan, D. M. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 732–735 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- McCright, A. & Dunlap, R. Environ. Sci. Policy 50, 26–35 (2008).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964
Self-citationThe psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y · Cited by 1,372
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · Cited by 733
Assessing the Effect of 'Disputed' Warnings and Source Salience on Perceptions of Fake News Accuracy
Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Collins, E., & Rand, D. G. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478 · Cited by 903
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.
Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000729 · Cited by 593
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public
van der Linden, S. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6 · Cited by 570
Self-citationCommunicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science
van der Bles, A. M., van der Linden, S., Freeman, A. L. J., Mitchell, J., Galvao, A. B., Zaval, L., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2019) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.181870 · Cited by 456
Self-citationClimate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It
Lewandowsky, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409 · Cited by 384
The gateway belief model: a large-scale replication
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009 · Cited by 262
Self-citationEffective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions
Schmid, P., & Betsch, C. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4 · Cited by 264
Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation
Jost, J. T., van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., & Hardin, C. D. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.003 · Cited by 242
Self-citationDiscussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906589116 · Cited by 234
Self-citationTappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.003 · Cited by 203
Maertens, R., Anseel, F., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101455 · Cited by 185
Self-citationFischhoff, B., & Broomell, S. B. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050747 · Cited by 197
Science skepticism in times of COVID-19
Rutjens, B. T., van der Linden, S., & van der Lee, R. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220981415 · Cited by 171
Self-citationThe Effects of Uncertainty Frames in Three Science Communication Topics
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019870811 · Cited by 151
Motivated reasoning and climate change
Bayes, R., & Druckman, J. N. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.009 · Cited by 151
Perceived Social Consensus Can Reduce Ideological Biases on Climate Change
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2019) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916519853302 · Cited by 148
Self-citationBayesian or biased? Analytic thinking and political belief updating
Tappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104375 · Cited by 127
Reynolds, J., Stautz, K., Pilling, M., van der Linden, S., & Marteau, T. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.190522 · Cited by 109
Self-citationScience by social media: Attitudes towards climate change are mediated by perceived social consensus
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Fay, N., & Gignac, G. E. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00948-y · Cited by 134
van der Linden, S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.005 · Cited by 137
Self-citationGoldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., Gustafson, A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019874361 · Cited by 130
Self-citationA toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism
Hornsey, M. J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01463-y · Cited by 135
Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication.
Pennycook, G., Bagó, B., & McPhetres, J. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001267 · Cited by 109
Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety
Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200295 · Cited by 95
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines
Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/29b4j · Cited by 593
Sultan, M., Tump, A. N., Ehmann, N., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Hertwig, R., Gollwitzer, A., & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2409329121 · Cited by 130
Experimental effects of climate messages vary geographically
Zhang, B., van der Linden, S., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J. R., Howe, P. D., & Leiserowitz, A. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0122-0 · Cited by 87
Self-citationUsing Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic ResponsePreprint
Bavel, J. J. V., D, K. B. A., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A. K., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4178356 · Cited by 89
Self-citationA Social Identity Approach to Engaging Christians in the Issue of Climate Change
Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019860847 · Cited by 73
Self-citationUnderstanding the effects of partisan identity on climate change
Doell, K. C., Pärnamets, P., Harris, E., Hackel, L. M., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.013 · Cited by 74
How Can Psychological Science Help Counter the Spread of Fake News?
van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., Basol, M., Kácha, O., Rathje, S., & Traberg, C. S. (2021) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2021.23 · Cited by 71
Self-citationDoes Climate Protest Work? Partisanship, Protest, and Sentiment Pools
Bugden, D. (2020) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023120925949 · Cited by 69
Trémolière, B., & Djeriouat, H. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101561 · Cited by 64
Cole, J. C., Gillis, A. J., van der Linden, S., Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231186409 · Cited by 61
Self-citationContessa, G. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00485-8 · Cited by 68
Gateway illusion or cultural cognition confusion?
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2017) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.16050204 · Cited by 56
Self-citationExposure to Scientific Consensus Does Not Cause Psychological Reactance
van der Linden, S., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1617763 · Cited by 64
Self-citationSocial norm interventions as a tool for pro-climate change
Nolan, J. M. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.001 · Cited by 60
A New Dark Age? Truth, Trust, and Environmental Science
Gundersen, T., Alinejad, D., Branch, T. Y., Duffy, B., Hewlett, K., Holst, C., Owens, S. E., Panizza, F., Tellmann, S. M., van Dijck, J., et al. (2022) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-120920-015909 · Cited by 61
The role of anchoring in judgments about expert consensus
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12576 · Cited by 49
Self-citationA preregistered replication of motivated numeracy
Persson, E., Andersson, D., Koppel, L., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104768 · Cited by 61
Lewandowsky, S., Pilditch, T. D., Madsen, J. K., Орескес, Н., & Risbey, J. S. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.011 · Cited by 54
Building community support for coastal management — What types of messages are most effective?
Dean, A. J., Fielding, K. S., & Wilson, K. A. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.026 · Cited by 53
Beliefs about others' global warming beliefs: The role of party affiliation and opinion deviance
Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S., Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Kotcher, J., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101466 · Cited by 41
Self-citationYork, A. M., Drummond Otten, C., BurnSilver, S., Neuberg, S. L., & Anderies, J. M. (2021) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.001 · Cited by 47
Sylvester, S. M. (2021) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12989 · Cited by 54
Communicating the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: Diverse Audiences and Effects Over Time
Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., van der Linden, S., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2022) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139165221129539 · Cited by 46
Self-citationPerception of public opinion on global warming and the role of opinion deviance
Abeles, A. T., Howe, L., Krosnick, J., & MacInnis, B. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.001 · Cited by 40
Boosting Understanding and Identification of Scientific Consensus Can Help to Correct False Beliefs
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., & Buijzen, M. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211007788 · Cited by 44
Social norms as a powerful lever for motivating pro-climate actions
Schneider, C. R., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.03.014 · Cited by 44
Self-citationvan der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2733956 · Cited by 42
Self-citationLee, N., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Flynn, D. J. (2021) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712342000037x · Cited by 39
Jones-Jang, S. M., & Noland, C. R. (2020) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1859723 · Cited by 39
Zhou, A. Y., Liu, W., & Yang, A. (2023) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2201184 · Cited by 39
Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophisticationPreprint
Pennycook, G., Bagó, B., & McPhetres, J. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ad9v7 · Cited by 37
Laypeople’s Affective Images of Energy Transition Pathways
Böhm, G., Doran, R., & Pfister, H. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01904 · Cited by 36
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., & Buijzen, M. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019898256 · Cited by 36
Bertoldo, R. B., Mays, C., Böhm, G., Poortinga, W., Marc Poumadère, A., Tvinnereim, E. M., Arnold, A., Steentjes, K., & Pidgeon, N. (2019) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662519865448 · Cited by 35
Liberty and the pursuit of science denial
Lewandowsky, S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.024 · Cited by 40
Bayesian or biased? Analytic thinking and political belief updatingPreprint
Tappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a6euj · Cited by 34
Ballew, M. T., Marlon, J. R., Goldberg, M. H., Maibach, E. W., Rosenthal, S. A., Aiken, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03397-w · Cited by 39
Self-citationReasoning about climate change
Bagó, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad100 · Cited by 41
The limited effects of partisan and consensus messaging in correcting science misperceptions
Chockalingam, V., Wu, V. Y., Berlinski, N., Chandra, Z., Hu, A., Jones, E., Kramer, J., Li, X. S., Monfre, T., Ng, Y. S., et al. (2021) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680211014980 · Cited by 30
Making behavioral science integral to climate science and action
Fischhoff, B. (2020) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.38 · Cited by 30
van der Linden, S. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0631-5 · Cited by 29
Self-citationBalancing the Freedom–Security Trade-Off During Crises and Disasters
Cheek, N. N., Reutskaja, E., & Schwartz, B. N. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211034499 · Cited by 35
Self-assessed understanding of climate change
Hamilton, L. C. (2018) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2305-0 · Cited by 27
Perceived Social Consensus Can Reduce Ideological Biases on Climate Change
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2019) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.37992 · Cited by 26
Self-citationTappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/k3jhy · Cited by 28
Metagoverning the Co-Creation of Green Transitions: A Socio-Political Contingency Framework
Torfing, J., Ansell, C., & Sørensen, E. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16166776 · Cited by 31
Dixon, G., & Hubner, A. Y. (2018) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547018769907 · Cited by 24
How often does random assignment fail? Estimates and recommendations
Goldberg, M. H. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101351 · Cited by 23
Dean, A. J., Gulliver, R., & Wilson, K. A. (2020) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12765 · Cited by 22
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2h7as · Cited by 21
Self-citationDemocratic Norms, Social Projection, and False Consensus in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
Weinschenk, A. C., Panagopoulos, C., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Journal of Political Marketing · doi:10.1080/15377857.2021.1939568 · Cited by 18
Self-citationReasoning about climate changePreprint
Bagó, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vcpkb · Cited by 17
Ability-related political polarization in the COVID-19 pandemic
Shoots‐Reinhard, B. L., Goodwin, R., Bjälkebring, P., Markowitz, D. M., Silverstein, M. C., & Peters, E. M. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2021.101580 · Cited by 16
The Psychology of Misinformation Across the Lifespan
Edelson, S. M., Reyna, V. F., Singh, A., & Roue, J. E. (2024) · Annual Review of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-010923-093547 · Cited by 19
Sherman, D. K., SHTEYN, M. F., Han, H. C., & Leaf Van Boven, A. (2020) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.41 · Cited by 14
Weiner, R., Church, S. P., Lu, J., Esman, L. A., Getson, J. M., Fleckenstein, M., Radulski, B., Ranjan, P., Usher, E. M., Prokopy, L. S., et al. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03032-0 · Cited by 14
Ngo, T. T. A., Nguyen, H. L. T., Mai, H. T. A., Nguyen, H., Tran, T. H., & Hoang, P. L. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322866 · Cited by 46
Underestimating belief in climate change
Jost, J. T. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0082-4 · Cited by 13
Mitigating Perceived Environment Insignificance Through Information Engagement
Gong, Y., Tian, J., Li, Y., Zhou, J., Pongpiachan, S., Chen, X., & Sun, Y. (2023) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470231188357 · Cited by 15
A motivational systems approach to investigating opinions on climate change
Molden, D. C., Bayes, R., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2021.1982003 · Cited by 12
Social vigilantism and the extremity, superiority, and defense of attitudes toward climate change
O’Dea, C. J., Bueno, A. M. C., & Saucier, D. A. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.040 · Cited by 12
Factual knowledge can reduce attitude polarization
Stagnaro, M. N., & Amsalem, E. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58697-3 · Cited by 14
Syropoulos, S., & Sparkman, G. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2419705122 · Cited by 12
James, O., Olsen, A. L., Moynihan, D. P., & Ryzin, G. G. V. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108761338 · Cited by 103
Johnson, B. B. (2022) · Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal · doi:10.1080/10807039.2022.2048354 · Cited by 10
WITHDRAWNPreprint
Sultan, M., Tump, A. N., Ehmann, N., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Hertwig, R., Gollwitzer, A., & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7u4fg · Cited by 9
Rode, J. B., Remshard, M., Groot, L. J., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101521 · Cited by 9
Self-citationSystematic review raises doubts about the effectiveness of framing in climate change communicationPreprint
Fesenfeld, L., Sun, Y., Wicki, M., McGrath, L. F., & Bernauer, T. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-445613/v1 · Cited by 8
Understanding the effects of partisan identity on climate changePreprint
Doell, K. C., Pärnamets, P., Harris, E., Hackel, L. M., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5vems · Cited by 8
Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006221114132 · Cited by 8
Self-citationLearning from and about climate scientistsPreprint
Orchinik, R., Dubey, R., Gershman, S. J., Powell, D., & Bhui, R. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ezua5 · Cited by 8
Lee, S. Y., Ham, J. H., Park, H., Jang, D. H., & Jang, W. M. (2024) · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy · doi:10.2147/rmhp.s463739 · Cited by 7
Schaeffer, M., Krakowski, K., & Olsen, A. L. (2024) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12933 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Linden, S. V. D., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Yale University (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Linden, Sander van der
- Venue
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2017-12-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-3
- ISSN
- 2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2774167246
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 39.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Energy Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Keywords
- politicization of science, scientific consensus, public trust in science, science communication, public perception of scientists, science and politics
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Educational Status, Humans, Politics, Science, Thinking, Consensus, Climate Change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
