Cited by 97Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attentionCognitive Abilities and Testing

Closed-loop digital meditation improves sustained attention in young adults

Open access
Ziegler, David A., Simon, Alexander J., Gallen, Courtney L., Skinner, Sasha, Janowich, Jacqueline R., Volponi, Joshua J., Rolle, Camarin E., Mishra, Jyoti +3 more·2019·Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract

Attention is a fundamental cognitive process that is critical for essentially all aspects of higher-order cognition and real-world activities. Younger generations have deeply embraced information technology and multitasking in their personal lives, school and the workplace, creating myriad challenges to their attention. While improving sustained attention in healthy young adults would be beneficial, enhancing this ability has proven notoriously difficult in this age group. Here we show that 6 weeks of engagement with a meditation-inspired, closed-loop software program (MediTrain) delivered on mobile devices led to gains in both sustained attention and working memory in healthy young adults. These improvements were associated with positive changes in key neural signatures of attentional control (frontal theta inter-trial coherence and parietal P3b latency), as measured by electroencephalography. Our findings suggest the utility of delivering aspects of the ancient practice of focused-attention meditation in a modern, technology-based approach and its benefits on enhancing sustained attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-019-0611-9

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FA can promote positive changes in the key neural signals (frontal theta inter-trial coherence and parietal P3b latency) of attention networks.

    “FA13 can promote positive changes in the key neural signals (frontal theta inter-trial coherence and parietal P3b latency) of attention networks.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [43]Boot WR, Simons DJ, Stothart C & Stutts C The pervasive problem with placebos in psychology: why active control groups are not sufficient to rule out placebo effects. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8, 445– 454 (2013). 26173122
  2. [48]Hedeker, Gibbons & Waternaux. Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24, 70– 93 (1999).
  3. [71]Polich J Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 118, 2128– 2148, (2007). 17573239 PMC2715154

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziegler, D. A., Simon, A. J., Gallen, C. L., Skinner, S., Janowich, J. R., Volponi, J. J., Rolle, C. E., Mishra, J., Kornfield, J., Anguera, J. A., & Gazzaley, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ziegler, David A.
  • Gazzaley, Adam
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2019-06-03
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
746-757
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947676450
Cited by
97
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG041071, R01AG049424)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
sustained attention, working memory, focused attention meditation, mobile health, attentional control, young adults, multitasking
MeSH terms
Multitasking Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Meditation, Young Adult, Mobile Applications, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review