Cited by 490Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attentionNeural dynamics and brain function

Mental training enhances attentional stability: Neural and behavioral evidence

Open access
Lutz, Antoine, Slagter, Heleen A., Rawlings, Nancy B., Francis, Andrew D., Greischar, Lawrence L., Davidson, Richard J.·2009·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The capacity to stabilize the content of attention over time varies among individuals, and its impairment is a hallmark of several mental illnesses. Impairments in sustained attention in patients with attention disorders have been associated with increased trial-to-trial variability in reaction time and event-related potential deficits during attention tasks. At present, it is unclear whether the ability to sustain attention and its underlying brain circuitry are transformable through training. Here, we show, with dichotic listening task performance and electroencephalography, that training attention, as cultivated by meditation, can improve the ability to sustain attention. Three months of intensive meditation training reduced variability in attentional processing of target tones, as indicated by both enhanced theta-band phase consistency of oscillatory neural responses over anterior brain areas and reduced reaction time variability. Furthermore, those individuals who showed the greatest increase in neural response consistency showed the largest decrease in behavioral response variability. Notably, we also observed reduced variability in neural processing, in particular in low-frequency bands, regardless of whether the deviant tone was attended or unattended. Focused attention meditation may thus affect both distracter and target processing, perhaps by enhancing entrainment of neuronal oscillations to sensory input rhythms, a mechanism important for controlling the content of attention. These novel findings highlight the mechanisms underlying focused attention meditation and support the notion that mental training can significantly affect attention and brain function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1614-09.2009

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness meditation has been independently found to improve attention, self-judgment, and clinical symptoms (the three psychological barriers).

    “Mindfulness meditation has been independently found to improve all three of these psychological barriers.”

    From Effects of Mindfulness Training on Body Awareness to Sexual Stimuli: Implications for Female Sexual Dysfunction (2011) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Discussion’s Summary/Conclusions reports that three months of focused-attention meditation enhanced attentional stability. The paper does not report improvements in self-judgment or clinical symptoms; its Materials and Methods > Participants section says participants had no history of mental or neurological illness. Thus it supports the attention component, not all three barriers. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some, but not all, meditation practices result in increases in theta power.

    “For example, some, but not all, meditation practices result in increases in theta power (Lutz, et al., 2009).”

    From Brain oscillations, hypnosis, and hypnotizability (2015) · cites this paper as Lutz, et al., 2009

    The Results section reports increased theta-band phase locking after focused-attention meditation, not increased theta power. The power analysis reported there concerns alpha, and our copy does not establish which meditation practices do or do not increase theta power (searched: theta power, theta-band power, meditation practices). No page number was provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This work converges with findings from the meditation literature showing improved attentional processing and increased activity in brain regions involved in empathy and compassion related to practice.

    “This work also converges with findings from the meditation literature showing improved attentional processing (Lutz et al., 2009; Slatger et al., 2007) and increased activity in brain regions involved in empathy and compassion related to practice (Lutz, Brefczynski-Lewis, Johnstone, & Davidson, 2008).”
  • Attention training is an important part of meditation and has proven to augment the ability to sustain attention.

    “Attention training is an important part of meditation, and has proven to augment the ability to sustain attention [1].”
  • A group attending mindfulness sessions showed increased activation in prefrontal regions as identified by functional MRI and attenuated their emotional arousals more easily compared to a control group.

    “The authors reported that the group, in attending mindfulness sessions, showed increased activation in prefrontal regions as identified by functional MRI and, therefore, this group attenuated their emotional arousals more easily compared to the control group [1].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Niedermeyer E Niedermeyer E Lopes Da Silva F 1999 The normal EEG of the waking adult Electroencephalography: Basic principles, clinical application, and related fields Maryland, USA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Rawlings, N. B., Francis, A. D., Greischar, L. L., & Davidson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-10-21
Volume
29
Issue
42
Pages
13418-13427
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2145637681
Cited by
489
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 36
FWCI
28.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01at002114-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH069315)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (U01-AT002114, P01AT004952)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
attention stability, sustained attention, meditation training, focused attention meditation, mental training, neural oscillations, reaction time variability, dichotic listening, event-related potentials, attentional control
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Auditory Perception, Contingent Negative Variation, Dichotic Listening Tests, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Case-Control Studies, Meditation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review