Cited by 200Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPersonal Information Management and User BehaviorDigital Media and Philosophy

Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults.

Open access
Moisala, M., Salmela, V., Hietajärvi, L., Salo, E., Carlson, S., Salonen, O., Lonka, K., Hakkarainen, K. +2 more·2016·NeuroImage

Abstract

The current generation of young people indulges in more media multitasking behavior (e.g., instant messaging while watching videos) in their everyday lives than older generations. Concerns have been raised about how this might affect their attentional functioning, as previous studies have indicated that extensive media multitasking in everyday life may be associated with decreased attentional control. In the current study, 149 adolescents and young adults (aged 13-24years) performed speech-listening and reading tasks that required maintaining attention in the presence of distractor stimuli in the other modality or dividing attention between two concurrent tasks. Brain activity during task performance was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We studied the relationship between self-reported daily media multitasking (MMT), task performance and brain activity during task performance. The results showed that in the presence of distractor stimuli, a higher MMT score was associated with worse performance and increased brain activity in right prefrontal regions. The level of performance during divided attention did not depend on MMT. This suggests that daily media multitasking is associated with behavioral distractibility and increased recruitment of brain areas involved in attentional and inhibitory control, and that media multitasking in everyday life does not translate to performance benefits in multitasking in laboratory settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.011

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous studies showed that media multitasking behavior could detrimentally affect cognitive ability, such as attention and memory.

    “numerous studies showed that media multitasking behavior could detrimentally affect cognitive ability, such as attention and memory (7–9).”

    From Media multitasking, depression, and anxiety of college students: Serial mediating effects of attention control and negative information attentional bias (2022) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction reports that several studies link excessive media multitasking with poorer attentional processes, supporting the attention part of the claim. The supplied passages and searches do not establish a detrimental effect on memory. The Behavioral Results also note contradictory findings, so the evidence does not establish that media multitasking causes cognitive harm. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moisala, M., Salmela, V., Hietajärvi, L., Salo, E., Carlson, S., Salonen, O., Lonka, K., Hakkarainen, K., Salmela-Aro, K., & Alho, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Moisala, M.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
134
Pages
113-121
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316381207
Cited by
200
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
media multitasking, distractibility, prefrontal cortex, adolescents, young adults, attentional control, inhibitory control, divided attention, distractor interference, everyday media use
MeSH terms
Multitasking Behavior, Adolescent, Attention, Auditory Perception, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Reading, Task Performance and Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex, Multimedia, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review