CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unconditional violation of the shot-noise limit in photonic quantum metrology

Slussarenko, Sergei, Weston, Morgan M., Chrzanowski, Helen M., Shalm, Lynden K., Verma, Varun B., Nam, Sae Woo, Pryde, Geoff J.·2017·Nature Photonics
DOI 10.1038/s41566-017-0011-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41566-017-0011-5

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Wiseman, H. M. & Milburn, G. J. Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009). · DOI
  2. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Jarzyna, M. & Kołdyński, J. Chapter four-quantum limits in optical interferometry. Prog. Opt. 60, 345–435 (2015). · DOI
  3. Wolfgramm, F., Vitelli, C., Beduini, F. A., Godbout, N. & Mitchell, M. W. Entanglement-enhanced probing of a delicate material system. Nat. Photon. 7, 28–32 (2013). · DOI
  4. Yonezawa, H. et al. Quantum-enhanced optical-phase tracking. Science 337, 1514–1517 (2012). · DOI
  5. Aasi, J. et al. Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light. Nat. Photon. 7, 613–619 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Xiang, G., Hofmann, H. & Pryde, G. J. Optimal multi-photon phase sensing with a single interference fringe. Sci. Rep. 3, 2684 (2013).
  7. Resch, K. J. et al. Time-reversal and super-resolving phase measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 223601 (2007).
  8. Ou, Z. Y., Zou, X. Y., Wang, L. J. & Mandel, L. Experiment on nonclassical fourth-order interference. Phys. Rev. A 42, 2957–2965 (1990). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Rarity, J. G. et al. Two-photon interference in a Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1348–1351 (1990). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fonseca, E. J. S., Monken, C. H. & Pádua, S. Measurement of the de Broglie wavelength of a multiphoton wave packet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2868–2871 (1999). · DOI
  11. Eisenberg, H. S., Hodelin, J. F., Khoury, G. & Bouwmeester, D. Multiphoton path entanglement by nonlocal bunching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 090502 (2005). · DOI
  12. Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K. & Takeuchi, S. Beating the standard quantum limit with four-entangled photons. Science 316, 726–729 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gao, W.-B. et al. Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schrödinger cat state. Nat. Phys. 6, 331–335 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Wang, X.-L. et al. Experimental ten-photon entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210502 (2016).
  15. Okamoto, R. et al. Beating the standard quantum limit: phase super-sensitivity of N-photon interferometers. New J. Phys. 10, 073033 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Datta, A. et al. Quantum metrology with imperfect states and detectors. Phys. Rev. A 83, 063836 (2011). · DOI
  17. Weston, M. M. et al. Efficient and pure femtosecond-pulse-length source of polarization-entangled photons. Opt. Express 24, 10869–10879 (2016). · DOI
  18. Marsili, F. et al. Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency. Nat. Photon. 7, 210–214 (2013). · DOI
  19. Klyshko, D. N. Use of two-photon light for absolute calibration of photoelectric detectors. Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 10, 1112–1116 (1980). · DOI
  20. Lita, A. E., Miller, A. J. & Nam, S. W. Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency. Opt. Express 16, 3032–3040 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Matthews, J. C. F. et al. Towards practical quantum metrology with photon counting. NPJ Quantum Inf. 2, 16023 (2016).
  22. Harder, G. et al. Single-mode parametric-down-conversion states with 50 photons as a source for mesoscopic quantum optics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 143601 (2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Slussarenko, S., Weston, M. M., Chrzanowski, H. M., Shalm, L. K., Verma, V. B., Nam, S. W., & Pryde, G. J.
ORCID
Slussarenko, Sergei
Venue
Nature Photonics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-10-09
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
700-703
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
DOI
10.1038/s41566-017-0011-5
Cited by
239
References
7
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review