Cited by 289Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleepSleep and related disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 208 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The neurobiological basis of narcolepsy

Open access

Abstract

Narcolepsy is the most common neurological cause of chronic sleepiness. The discovery about 20 years ago that narcolepsy is caused by selective loss of the neurons producing orexins (also known as hypocretins) sparked great advances in the field. Here, we review the current understanding of how orexin neurons regulate sleep-wake behaviour and the consequences of the loss of orexin neurons. We also summarize the developing evidence that narcolepsy is an autoimmune disorder that may be caused by a T cell-mediated attack on the orexin neurons and explain how these new perspectives can inform better therapeutic approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-018-0097-x

Cites

208 of 208 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 209 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chemelli, R., Sinton, C. & Yanagisawa, M. Polysomnographic characterization of orexin-2 receptor knockout mice. Sleep 23, A296–A297 (2000).
  2. Kisanuki, Y. et al. Behavioral and polysomnographic characterization of orexin-1 receptor and orexin-2 receptor double knockout mice. Sleep 24, A22 (2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mahoney, C. E., Cogswell, A., Koralnik, I. J., & Scammell, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Scammell, Thomas E.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2018-12-13
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
83-93
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2904386018
Cited by
289
References
209
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL095491)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS099787, R01NS106032)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
narcolepsy, orexin neurons, orexin, sleep-wake regulation, autoimmune disease, neurodegeneration, treatment options
MeSH terms
Orexins, Animals, Autoimmune Diseases, Humans, Narcolepsy, Nervous System, Neurobiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review