The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 23 of the 47 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes
Open accessAbstract
Knowledge of connectivity in the nervous system is essential to understanding its function. Here we describe connectomes for both adult sexes of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, an important model organism for neuroscience research. We present quantitative connectivity matrices that encompass all connections from sensory input to end-organ output across the entire animal, information that is necessary to model behaviour. Serial electron microscopy reconstructions that are based on the analysis of both new and previously published electron micrographs update previous results and include data on the male head. The nervous system differs between sexes at multiple levels. Several sex-shared neurons that function in circuits for sexual behaviour are sexually dimorphic in structure and connectivity. Inputs from sex-specific circuitry to central circuitry reveal points at which sexual and non-sexual pathways converge. In sex-shared central pathways, a substantial number of connections differ in strength between the sexes. Quantitative connectomes that include all connections serve as the basis for understanding how complex, adaptive behavior is generated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
44 Own result · 33 Own interpretation · 13 Own method · 10 Partly supported · 9 No full text of the sources · 8 No basis given · 6 Sources not found · 3 Supported so far · 2 Supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Several shared neurons, including sensory neurons, are sexually differentiated to support sex-specific navigational choices39,40.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [39] Ryan, D. A. et al. Sex, age, and hunger regulate behavioral prioritization through dynamic modulation of chemoreceptor expression. Curr. Biol. 24, 2509–2517 (2014). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section “Sexual Regulation of AWA and odr-10 Modulates Feeding Behavior” reports that changing the sexual state of the shared AWA sensory neurons alters food-leaving and food-search behavior in C. elegans. This supports a role for sexual differentiation in sex-specific choices, but the paper’s direct finding concerns one pair of sensory neurons, not several shared neurons. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [40] Hilbert, Z. A. & Kim, D. H. Sexually dimorphic control of gene expression in sensory neurons regulates decision-making behavior in C. elegans. eLife 6, e21166 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (no page number available) show male-specific daf-7 expression in the shared ASJ sensory-neuron pair, and the Discussion links that expression to male mate-searching decisions. The paper also notes changes in other sex-shared neurons, but its own behavioral evidence concerns ASJ; it does not establish that several shared neurons support sex-specific navigational choices. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“As previously noted3,18, the feedforward loop is a prevalent motif in the C. elegans connectome (Extended Data Fig. 7).”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > The architecture of information flow
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Jarrell, T. A. et al. The connectome of a decision-making neural network. Science 337, 437–444 (2012). source
- Partly supportedcites [18] Varshney, L. R., Chen, B. L., Paniagua, E., Hall, D. H. & Chklovskii, D. B. Structural properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001066 (2011). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on the chemical synapse network reports that fully connected three-neuron subnetworks, considered collectively, occur more often than expected in random networks. It does not identify the feedforward loop specifically as a prevalent motif; its separate description of feedforward information processing concerns connections between neuron categories, not that three-neuron motif. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Immunofluorescence staining of acetylcholine-synthesizing and -releasing machinery reveals extensive release of this neurotransmitter along the sublateral tracts, at least through the anterior two-thirds of the body27”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Generation of body movements
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [27] Pereira, L. et al. A cellular and regulatory map of the cholinergic nervous system of C. elegans. eLife 4, e12432 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (Antibody staining; page unavailable) describe immunofluorescence for UNC-17, a vesicular acetylcholine transporter, and the Results (Defining cholinergic neurons; page unavailable) use that staining to identify cholinergic cells. Our copy does not report acetylcholine release along sublateral tracts or its extent through the anterior two-thirds of the body. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A further six have been experimentally verified by others42.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [42] Oren-Suissa, M., Bayer, E. A. & Hobert, O. Sex-specific pruning of neuronal synapses in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 533, 206–211 (2016). source
In “Sexually dimorphic synaptic target choices between sex-shared neurons” (page unavailable), the authors report experimentally checking seven synaptic connections and finding the predicted sex difference in all seven. That supports the citing sentence’s count of six further verified differences if one of the seven was already counted. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here we describe connectomes for both adult sexes of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We present quantitative connectivity matrices that encompass all connections from sensory input to end-organ output across the entire animal”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sex-shared central pathways, a substantial number of connections differ in strength between the sexes.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Diverging connectivity enables information from single sensory neurons to potentially reach from 70% to 98% of all the other cells in the network within two synaptic steps.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > The architecture of information flow
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One hundred fifty-four neurons in 46 classes have neuromuscular junctions with these somatic muscles (Extended Data Fig. 9a).”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Generation of body movements
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Chemical and gap junctional connections are distributed throughout the network (Extended Data Fig. 6).”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > The architecture of information flow
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- It may state two separate claims as one. 45
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Connectivity has been described previously for sections of the C. elegans nervous system that encompasses the major neural centres, including the anterior and posterior body regions and the pharynx of the adult hermaphrodite and the posterior region of the adult male1–4,18.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [1] White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N. & Brenner, S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 1–340 (1986). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [2] Albertson, D. G. & Thomson, J. N. The pharynx of Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 275, 299–325 (1976). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Jarrell, T. A. et al. The connectome of a decision-making neural network. Science 337, 437–444 (2012). source
- Partly supportedcites [4] Hall, D. H. & Russell, R. L. The posterior nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: serial reconstruction of identified neurons and complete pattern of synaptic interactions. J. Neurosci. 11, 1–22 (1991). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s opening passage says earlier reports described the anterior sensory cells, pharynx, ventral nerve cord and nerve ring; it then describes this paper’s reconstruction of synaptic interactions in the adult hermaphrodite tail. That supports the claim about connectivity in parts of the hermaphrodite nervous system, but our copy does not support the adult-male posterior-region component. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [18] Varshney, L. R., Chen, B. L., Paniagua, E., Hall, D. H. & Chklovskii, D. B. Structural properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001066 (2011). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Materials and Methods (Data Acquisition; page unavailable) describe earlier reconstructions of the hermaphrodite nervous system, particularly the anterior, neck, and tail regions. The paper does not establish the claim about previously described connectivity in the adult male’s posterior region; its Results (Reconstruction) also distinguish its somatic wiring diagram from the pharyngeal nervous system. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“As the sensory neurons of C. elegans generally respond to multiple stimuli, sensory integration begins within the sensory neurons themselves25,26.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > The architecture of information flow
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [25] Zou, W. et al. Polymodal responses in C. elegans phasmid neurons rely on multiple intracellular and intercellular signaling pathways. Sci. Rep. 7, 42295 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports that C. elegans PHA/PHB neurons respond to multiple stimuli and use intracellular and intercellular pathways to process them; the Discussion describes encoding and discrimination in those neurons. This supports sensory processing within particular sensory neurons, but the paper does not establish that C. elegans sensory neurons generally respond to multiple stimuli or that integration always begins within them. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites [26] Hart, A. C., Kass, J., Shapiro, J. E. & Kaplan, J. M. Distinct signaling pathways mediate touch and osmosensory responses in a polymodal sensory neuron. J. Neurosci. 19, 1952–1958 (1999). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports that ASH neurons respond to nose touch, hyperosmolarity, and volatile repellents, and distinguish stimuli through distinct signaling pathways within the neurons. This supports stimulus processing within ASH, but the paper does not establish that C. elegans sensory neurons generally respond to multiple stimuli. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Functional studies have shown that SMD encodes the amplitude of a deep ventral bend behaviour known as the Ω-turn; SMB influences the amplitude of sinusoidal movement; SAB is thought to act in proprioception; and the SIA neurons are involved in so-called ‘flipping behaviour’ during lethargus24,29,30.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Generation of body movements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] Gray, J. M., Hill, J. J. & Bargmann, C. I. A circuit for navigation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3184–3191 (2005). source
- Supportedcites [29] Kratsios, P. et al. Transcriptional coordination of synaptogenesis and neurotransmitter signaling. Curr. Biol. 25, 1282–1295 (2015). source
The cited paper is pertinent to the SAB clause of the multiply cited sentence. In Results, “Other neuronal signaling features are also unc-3-dependent” (page not supplied), it describes a putative proprioceptive function for SAB neurons, matching the claim’s cautious wording that SAB is thought to act in proprioception. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [30] Schwarz, J. & Bringmann, H. Analysis of the NK2 homeobox gene ceh-24 reveals sublateral motor neuron control of left–right turning during sleep. eLife 6, e24846 (2017). source
The Results section (‘Optogenetic activation of sublateral neurons can induce flipping during lethargus’; page unavailable) reports that activating SIA neurons can trigger flipping and that this is more likely during lethargus. This directly supports the SIA clause attributable to this paper; the other neuron functions in the multiply cited sentence are not treated as claims attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.93)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The notable similarity in the placement of the nodes to the neuroanatomy of the worm reflects economical wiring, a property commonly found for nervous systems, including in C. elegans19–22.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [19] Ahn, Y.-Y., Jeong, H. & Kim, B. J. Wiring cost in the organization of a biological neuronal network. Physica A 367, 531–537 (2006). source
The opening summary (p. 1) says neuron positions in C. elegans are organized to reduce total wiring cost. The introduction (p. 1) describes cost as a constraint on nervous-system organization, supporting the citing sentence’s broader characterization. The paper does not evaluate the citing authors’ particular node placement, but that similarity is their own observation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites [20] Chen, B. L., Hall, D. H. & Chklovskii, D. B. Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4723–4728 (2006). source
The opening section (p. 1) describes wiring economy as a general principle with many successful applications. It also reports that minimizing wiring cost predicts the positions of most C. elegans neurons; the comparison section (p. 2) says most predicted positions lie close to their actual locations. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [21] Wang, I. E. & Clandinin, T. R. The influence of wiring economy on nervous system evolution. Curr. Biol. 26, R1101–R1108 (2016). source
- Partly supportedcites [22] Gushchin, A. & Tang, A. Total wiring length minimization of C. elegans neural network: a constrained optimization approach. PLoS ONE 10, e0145029 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that total wiring-length minimization has a large influence on C. elegans interneuron placement, supporting the economical-wiring interpretation. But they also note discrepancies between real and optimal positions; the Results report that optimal layouts could reduce real wiring length substantially. The paper does not establish that economical wiring is a common property of nervous systems generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The ASEL-ASER pair is known to be lateralized in its ability to sense chemosensory cues34,35.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Reproducibility of connectivity
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Pierce-Shimomura, J. T., Faumont, S., Gaston, M. R., Pearson, B. J. & Lockery, S. R. The homeobox gene lim-6 is required for distinct chemosensory representations in C. elegans. Nature 410, 694–698 (2001). source
- Supportedcites [35] Johnston, R. J. Jr, Chang, S., Etchberger, J. F., Ortiz, C. O. & Hobert, O. MicroRNAs acting in a double-negative feedback loop to control a neuronal cell fate decision. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 12449–12454 (2005). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract states that ASEL and ASER express distinct sets of chemoreceptors, giving the gustatory system the capacity to sense and discriminate environmental inputs. The Results also report left–right-specific expression of receptor genes, supporting the claimed lateralization of chemosensory function. (LLM, conf=0.92)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, the major layer 1 pre-motor interneurons AVA and AVB, which promote backward and forward locomotion, respectively, are targeted by three major male-specific interneurons, PVV, PVX and PVY, that regulate the locomotion of the male during copulation37,38.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [37] Sherlekar, A. L. et al. The C. elegans male exercises directional control during mating through cholinergic regulation of sex-shared command interneurons. PLoS ONE 8, e60597 (2013). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on PVY reports that PVY and PVX target the AVA backward and AVB forward command interneurons, and that PVY promotes backward movement during mating (page unavailable). It does not establish the claimed role for PVV; it also says PVX ablation had no obvious effect on vulva-search behavior, leaving its role subtle or potentially redundant. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [38] Koo, P. K., Bian, X., Sherlekar, A. L., Bunkers, M. R. & Lints, R. The robustness of Caenorhabditis elegans male mating behavior depends on the distributed properties of ray sensory neurons and their output through core and male-specific targets. J. Neurosci. 31, 7497–7510 (2011). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section “Many male-specific ray neuron targets are not essential for ventral curling” (page unavailable) identifies PVV and PVY as male-specific interneuron/motor neurons, and the Discussion (page unavailable) mentions PVX and PVV as possible contributors to male posterior muscle control. Our copy does not establish that PVV, PVX, and PVY target AVA and AVB, or specify AVA’s and AVB’s respective roles in backward and forward locomotion. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Reinforcement of connectivity by circuit activity and hence experience has been demonstrated but little studied so far45.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [45] Hart, M. P. & Hobert, O. Neurexin controls plasticity of a mature, sexually dimorphic neuron. Nature 553, 165–170 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “DVB neurites are experience and activity-dependent” (page unavailable), the paper reports that mating experience and repeated circuit activation increase DVB neurite growth. In “DVB plasticity impacts behavior via dimorphic synaptic connectivity” (page unavailable), it reports an increase in specific synaptic connections with age. It does not directly show that activity reinforces those connections, and its statement that molecular mechanisms are not well understood does not establish that connectivity reinforcement itself has been little studied. (LLM, conf=0.83)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“the percentage uncertainty (s.d.) in the number of sections scored ranged for chemical synapses between 10% for edge weights of 10 sections or less to 2% for edge weights of 40 sections or more.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > EM annotation and reconstruction of connectivity.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [62] Xu, M. et al. Computer assisted assembly of connectomes from electron micrographs: application to Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 8, e54050 (2013). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page unavailable) give the claimed approximate 10% and 2% uncertainty estimates for chemical-synapse edge weights at the stated thresholds. They describe these as estimated percentage uncertainty from differences between three scorers, however, not as standard deviations. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Although C. elegans neurons are largely isopotential48, the properties of these neurons that control activity, such as calcium levels, may be compartmentalized, as has been previously demonstrated in one example49.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [48] Goodman, M. B., Hall, D. H., Avery, L. & Lockery, S. R. Active currents regulate sensitivity and dynamic range in C. elegans neurons. Neuron 20, 763–772 (1998). source
- Supportedcites [49] Hendricks, M., Ha, H., Maffey, N. & Zhang, Y. Compartmentalized calcium dynamics in a C. elegans interneuron encode head movement. Nature 487, 99–103 (2012). source
The paper reports compartmentalized calcium dynamics in the RIA interneuron: calcium activity in two axonal segments appeared independent and correlated with different directions of head movement (Abstract, passage 7). This supports the cited example of compartmentalized calcium activity; the sentence attributes the broader isopotential claim to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Reproducibility of the annotation has been assessed by comparing the results of independent annotators62.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > EM annotation and reconstruction of connectivity.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [62] Xu, M. et al. Computer assisted assembly of connectomes from electron micrographs: application to Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 8, e54050 (2013). source
The Results describe comparing duplicate reconstructions made by separate individuals to assess annotation uncertainty. They report differences in synapse scoring and compare three independent annotations of the PVX neuron, directly supporting the reproducibility claim. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Outgrowth of neurites and establishment of synapses in C. elegans occurs throughout larval development and continues through the L4 larval stage and into adulthood, and ectopic neurite sprouting continues as the nervous system ages45,46.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [45] Hart, M. P. & Hobert, O. Neurexin controls plasticity of a mature, sexually dimorphic neuron. Nature 553, 165–170 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Morphologic plasticity displayed by adult male DVB neuron’ section reports progressive neurite outgrowth from adult days 1 to 5, and ‘DVB plasticity impacts behavior via dimorphic synaptic connectivity’ reports an increase in specific synaptic connections over that period (page numbers not supplied). The paper does not establish continued outgrowth and synapse formation throughout larval development or the L4 stage, or general ectopic sprouting across the aging nervous system; its adult finding concerns the male DVB neuron. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [46] Toth, M. L. et al. Neurite sprouting and synapse deterioration in the aging Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. J. Neurosci. 32, 8778–8790 (2012). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section, “C. elegans touch receptor neurons exhibit new neurite outgrowth with age” (page unavailable), reports new branches that become more frequent in aging adults, supporting the ectopic-sprouting portion. Our copy does not establish that neurite outgrowth and synapse formation continue throughout larval development, through L4, and into adulthood; its aging-synapse findings concern deterioration rather than new synapse formation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other shared neurons that participate in the male circuits are extensively differentiated in the adult male compared to the adult hermaphrodite and larval stages, and serve different functions in the two sexes (Fig. 6a–f).”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gap junctions were more variable.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Reproducibility of connectivity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although sparse, if all edges for both sexes are considered to be undirected, both chemical and gap junction graphs are connected, meaning that there is a path connecting every pair of nodes (weakly connected).”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and 5,315 chemical and 1,755 gap junction edges in the male”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two-dimensional layouts of the connectivity graphs based on computational arrangement reveal the pathways of sensory information flow, the small number (1–5) of synaptic steps between the sensory neurons and the end organs, and the feedforward nature of the networks”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reciprocally, 54% of the shared neuron classes (50 out of 93 classes) have output onto the sex-specific component, constituting 18% of the input of the sex-specific neurons.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of these neurons, we classify 108 neurons in 17 classes—accounting for 91% of input to the body-wall muscles—as motor neurons, because a large fraction of their output is to muscle, and muscle control appears to be their primary function”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Generation of body movements
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In total 8 neurons and 16 sex muscles are specific to the hermaphrodite; 91 neurons and 39 sex muscles are specific to the male.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The primary sex differences are in reproductive functions, the vulval and uterine muscles and the motor neurons that control them in the hermaphrodite and—in the male—the large number of additional neurons, sex muscles and connections in the tail that generate the circuits for copulation3.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Jarrell, T. A. et al. The connectome of a decision-making neural network. Science 337, 437–444 (2012). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are sparse graphs with respectively 3.2% (for the hermaphrodite) and 2.4% (for the male) of all possible edges.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Considering the graph of connectivity between cell classes, median degree values of around 19 illustrate the extensive cross-connectivity and thus indicate both convergence and divergence throughout the nervous system.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > The architecture of information flow
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the hermaphrodite, 37% of the neuron classes are targeted by the two sex-specific neuron classes, HSN and VC, but this constitutes only 1.4% of total input of the shared component.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The respective graphs have 4,887 chemical (or directed) edges and 1,447 gap junction (or undirected) edges in the hermaphrodite”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of7,446 synapses (chemical plus gap junctions), the synapses fell roughly equally into these three regions (2,578 not nerve ring, 2,472 nerve ring 45°, 2,396 nerve ring in-plane).”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Adjacency matrices.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“We scored more synapses compared to the previous papers for two reasons (Extended Data Fig. 1).”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Comparison to previously published studies.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Extended Data Fig. 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the hermaphrodite, the best anterior series (N2U) ends around the midbody vulva whereas the best posterior series (JSE) extends anteriorly only as far as the junction between the ventral cord and the pre-anal ganglion”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Assembly of whole-animal connectomes.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Supplementary Information 10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the male, the anterior series (N930) extends posteriorly through the ventral ganglion, whereas the posterior series (N2Y) extends anteriorly to a position near the border between the seminal vesicle and the vas deferens”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Assembly of whole-animal connectomes.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Supplementary Information 10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This gap includes gap junctions between adjacent muscles, neuromuscular junctions between the ventral cord motor neurons and dorsal and ventral body-wall muscles, connections from one ventral cord motor neuron to the next, and connections between the major premotor interneurons AVA and AVB and ventral cord motor neurons.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Assembly of whole-animal connectomes.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“N2U includes only the anterior portion of the dorsal nerve cord where the neuromuscular junctions to the dorsal muscle quadrants are located.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Assembly of whole-animal connectomes.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This varies from 1 to 23 sections in the hermaphrodite and from 1 to 41 sections in the male for chemical synapses, and from 1 to 20 sections in the hermaphrodite and from 1 to 30 sections in the male for gap junction synapses”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Adjacency matrices.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Supplementary Information 3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The completeness of the reconstructions varies and will affect the values of the weights.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Adjacency matrices.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As none of the EM series cover an entire single animal, to generate whole-animal connectomes, data from different reconstruction series were combined and the remaining gaps were filled by extrapolating known connectivity across repetitive regions (Methods).”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Connections that were not observed in a given sex can be assumed present because certain regions are repetitive.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sex-specific neurons connect into the sex-shared central circuitry in the head with two functions: to regulate behaviour during overt reproductive activity and to mediate sex-specific, appetitive decision-making.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“This is most notable in the male, in which the neural network that controls copulation consists of 85 male-specific and 64 shared neurons3,36.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Jarrell, T. A. et al. The connectome of a decision-making neural network. Science 337, 437–444 (2012). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [36] Emmons, S. W. Neural circuits of sexual behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 41, 349–369 (2018). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reconstructions are quantitative and based on the sizes of the synapses (Methods, Extended Data Fig. 2 and Supplementary Information 2, 3), thus making graph and network analysis possible.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Whole-animal connectomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sublateral motor neurons have been incompletely described heretofore, because their axons run through body regions that have not been fully imaged by EM at high magnification.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Generation of body movements
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The major motor neurons as well as their primary pre-motor interneurons are highly interconnected and receive some input from most of the remaining neurons, defying simple interpretation of motor output.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The function of some neurons may be deduced from their connectivity, which can identify them as a previously unknown cell class.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Differences arise from out-and-out errors and from differing interpretations of ambiguous structures.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > EM annotation and reconstruction of connectivity.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Differences may be due to developmental variability, as assessed above (Fig. 5a), or to age disparity, rearing conditions or experience, not to mention differences due to errors and differing degrees of completeness in the reconstructions themselves.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“EM-level ultrastructures can indicate neuronal functions such as sensory perception or hormone secretion.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gap junctions are more difficult to score overall, but those difficulties are similar across all animals used in this study.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Sample preparation for transmission electron microscopy.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such possible differences involve both chemical and gap junctional connections and occur at all levels throughout the network (Extended Data Fig. 13).”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Comparison of the sexes
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If synapse size is not taken into account, judging connectivity strength by counting synapses alone will therefore underestimate the strength of strong connections and overestimate the strength of weaker connections.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Adjacency matrices.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The connectome is too complex not to be under the control of dynamic, homeostatic mechanisms; an EM-based connectome should be considered a snapshot of a dynamic structure.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It may or may not have any effect on larger synapses, depending on where they lie with respect to section boundaries; there is only a definite effect on larger synapses.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Adjacency matrices.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“How neurons signal emerges from whether they are chemically or electrically coupled.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inclusion of the end organs is important as—at least in the case of C. elegans—they are electrically coupled, which will have a marked effect on their activity.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar results are expected for gap junctions.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > EM annotation and reconstruction of connectivity.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, signalling may not be uniform or simultaneous at all synapses.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These gaps in the adjacency matrices, which leave some muscle cells and some motor neurons without any innervation, precisely line up with the unreconstructed region and thus are unquestionably artefactual.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Assembly of whole-animal connectomes.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this conclusion might not be true for a particular connection.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Adjacency matrices.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Synaptic partnerships were not used to identify neurons.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > EM annotation and reconstruction of connectivity.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Considering that the male graph contains the same major pathways as the hermaphrodite and verifiable sex differences can be identified, the missing synapses must be distributed relatively uniformly over the connections.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Adjacency matrices.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, this has little effect on the values of the weights but it could be important for particular connections.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Adjacency matrices.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although our efforts failed to stain chemical synaptic features exactly as in the previously published images, they are still identifiable and measurable in size in animals from both sources.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Sample preparation for transmission electron microscopy.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These whole-animal C. elegans connectomes should be considered a conceptualization, being constructed as they are from multiple animals and including some connections that are observed in the opposite sex and some that are not observed at all but assumed to be present based on the repetitive nature of certain regions.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Connections that were not observed in a given sex can be assumed present because certain regions are repetitive.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All anterior images were scored blind to sex.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Fluorescence labelling of synapses.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sexually dimorphic tail anatomy precluded blinding to sex when scoring posterior images of the PAG.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Fluorescence labelling of synapses.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Use of different fluorescence markers to label the presynaptic neurite prevented blinding to genotype in most instances.”
§ Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes > METHODS > Fluorescence labelling of synapses.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Connections that were not observed in a given sex can be assumed present because certain regions are repetitive.
“including some connections that are observed in the opposite sex and some that are not observed at all but assumed to be present based on the repetitive nature of certain regions”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The variance of observed connection strength is a function of its expectation.
“The variance of the observed connection strength is assumed to be a function of its expectation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Observed weights of connections between left-right homologues in the hermaphrodite are independent observations of random variables with the same mean and variance.
“we assume that the observed weights of connections between left-right homologues in the hermaphrodite are independent observations of random variables with the same mean and variance”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For example, rich-club neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans are part of well-studied motor control circuits7,20,21.”
From Network statistics of the whole-brain connectome of Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A high clustering coefficient and an over-representation of highly connected motifs suggest that the local structure of the brain displays a high degree of non-randomness, consistent with previous studies in C. elegans7,21 and in the mouse cortex11,24,25.”
From Network statistics of the whole-brain connectome of Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“adult connectomes have been mapped for only one species, C. elegans 2,3.”
From FlyWire: online community for whole-brain connectomics (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While connectomes in C. elegans have been proofread to the level of individual synapses21,27,35, this is not feasible in larger datasets2,3,31.”
From Network statistics of the whole-brain connectome of Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“It is a clear leap beyond C. elegans (300 neurons, <104 synapses)36–38 and the 1st instar larva of Drosophila (3,000 neurons, 5×105 synapses)39.”
From Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Owing to the use of artificial intelligence (AI), the hemibrain and FlyWire have yielded connectomes that are orders of magnitude larger than those of C. elegans38 or the larval fly39.”
From Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“This also has precedent in the C. elegans connectome38, which includes neuromuscular junctions, the Platynereis dumerilii larva152, and the 1st instar Drosophila larva for which a whole-animal EM dataset was recently published153.”
From Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Although comprehensive connectomes have been mapped for small crawling animals such as Caenorhabditis elegans48 and Drosophila larva49, we previously lacked a synapse-level wiring diagram of motor circuits for any limbed animal.”
From Connectomic reconstruction of a female Drosophila ventral nerve cord (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
THE GENETICS OF CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS
Brenner, S. (1974) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/77.1.71 · Cited by 15,220
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589
The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans
Chalfie, M., Sulston, J., White, J., Southgate, E., Thomson, J., & Brenner, S. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-04-00956.1985 · Cited by 1,093
Saturated Reconstruction of a Volume of Neocortex
Kasthuri, N., Hayworth, K. J., Berger, D. R., Schalek, R. L., Conchello, J. A., Knowles-Barley, S., Lee, D., Vázquez-Reina, A., Kaynig, V., Jones, T. R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.054 · Cited by 1,044
Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina
Helmstaedter, M., Briggman, K. L., Turaga, S. C., Jain, V., Seung, H. S., & Denk, W. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12346 · Cited by 997
Wiring specificity in the direction-selectivity circuit of the retina
Briggman, K. L., Helmstaedter, M., & Denk, W. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09818 · Cited by 883
Network anatomy and in vivo physiology of visual cortical neurons
Bock, D. D., Lee, W.-C. A., Kerlin, A., Andermann, M. L., Hood, G., Wetzel, A. W., Yurgenson, S., Soucy, E. R., Kim, H. S., & Reid, R. C. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09802 · Cited by 867
Structural Properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans Neuronal Network
Varshney, L. R., Chen, B. L., Paniagua, E., Hall, D. H., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001066 · Cited by 867
Self-citationA circuit for navigation in Caenorhabditis elegans
Gray, J. M., Hill, J. J., & Bargmann, C. I. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409009101 · Cited by 811
Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function
Chen, B. L., Hall, D. H., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506806103 · Cited by 650
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 941
DotMotif: an open-source tool for connectome subgraph isomorphism search and graph queries
Matelsky, J., Reilly, E. P., Johnson, E. C., Stiso, J., Bassett, D. S., Wester, B. A., & Gray-Roncal, W. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91025-5 · Cited by 40
retro-Tango enables versatile retrograde circuit tracing in Drosophila
Sorkaç, A., Moșneanu, R. A., Crown, A. M., Savaş, D., Okoro, A. M., Memiş, E., Talay, M., & Barnea, G. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.85041 · Cited by 36
“Further, it was not until 30 years later that the nervous system of a second animal, a male, was reconstructed (Cook et al., 2019).”
BackgroundNeziri, S., Köseoğlu, A. E., Köseoğlu, G. D., Özgültekin, B., & Özgentürk, N. Ö. (2024) · Animal Models and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1002/ame2.12487 · Cited by 40
“64,65 It has a nervous system of around 300 neurons and a well-defined synaptic connections network 126,127 (Table 1 ).”
The Connectome Predicts Resting State Functional Connectivity Across the Drosophila Brain
Turner, M. H., Mann, K. J., & Clandinin, T. R. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.004 · Cited by 34
Wirak, G. S., Florman, J., Alkema, M. J., Connor, C. W., & Gabel, C. V. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.72135 · Cited by 37
“doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002342 Awal, M.R., Wirak, G.S., Gabel, C. V., and Connor, C.W. (2020). Collapse of global neuronal states in caenorhabditis elegans under isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 133(1):133-144. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003304 Bagarinao, E., Watanabe, H., Maesawa, S., Mori, D., Hara, K., Kaw…”
BackgroundInfluentialHuang, Y.-C., Luo, J., Huang, W., Baker, C. M., Gomes, M. A., Meng, B., Byrne, A. B., & Flavell, S. W. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.088 · Cited by 38
Smith, J. J., Taylor, S. R., Blum, J. A., Feng, W., Collings, R., Gitler, A. D., Miller, D. M., & Kratsios, P. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113857 · Cited by 35
“33,47 This comprehensive dataset includes both chemical and electrical synapses for each MN.”
Bayer, E. A., Stecky, R. C., Neal, L., Katsamba, P. S., Ahlsén, G., Balaji, V., Hoppe, T., Shapiro, L. S., Oren‐Suissa, M., & Hobert, O. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.59614 · Cited by 31
Self-citationKopchock, R. J., Ravi, B., Bode, A., & Collins, K. M. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2150-20.2021 · Cited by 32
Synaptic Protein Degradation Controls Sexually Dimorphic Circuits through Regulation of DCC/UNC-40
Salzberg, Y., Pechuk, V., Gat, A., Setty, H., Sela, S., & Oren‐Suissa, M. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.002 · Cited by 33
“Indeed, according to the published connectome, AVG is predicted to make several other male-specific connections [3, 4].”
BackgroundMolecular Mechanisms of Sexually Dimorphic Nervous System Patterning in Flies and Worms
Goodwin, S. F., & Hobert, O. (2021) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-120319-115237 · Cited by 29
Self-citationNeuronal contact predicts connectivity in the C. elegans brain
Cook, S. J., Kalinski, C. A., & Hobert, O. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.04.071 · Cited by 30
Self-citationIsotopy and energy of physical networks
Liu, Y., Dehmamy, N., & Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-1029-z · Cited by 32
“a, The deviation δ from the straight link trajectories used in equation (14) is defined as the square of the standard deviation of dl, representing the distance of points along the link from their locations on the straight path (dotted line).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFenyves, B. G., Szilágyi, G. S., Vassy, Z., Sőti, C., & Csermely, P. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007974 · Cited by 29
“Furthermore, we repeated our analyses in other published connectomes [2,3] of different sizes as well (S5 Table and S5 Data).”
BackgroundResultHughes, S., van Dop, M., Kolsters, N., van de Klashorst, D., Pogosova, A., & Rijs, A. M. (2022) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph15050512 · Cited by 35
“With a completely mapped neural network and connectome [22], the nematode worm is frequently used in neurobiology studies.”
BackgroundZinchenko, V., Hugger, J., Uhlmann, V., Arendt, D., & Kreshuk, A. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.80918 · Cited by 33
“For the first time, the rapid progress in volume EM allows this for increasingly large samples, including organs and entire smaller animals, with nanometer resolution ( Bae et al., 2021 ; Vergara et al., 2021 ; Zheng et al., 2018 ; Scheffer et al., 2020 ; Cook et al., 2019 ; Verasztó et al., 2020 ).”
BackgroundDistinct roles for innexin gap junctions and hemichannels in mechanosensation
Walker, D. S., & Schafer, W. R. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.50597 · Cited by 27
Synaptogenesis: unmasking molecular mechanisms using Caenorhabditis elegans
Mizumoto, K., Jin, Y., & Bessereau, J. (2023) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyac176 · Cited by 24
The natverse: a versatile computational toolbox to combine and analyse neuroanatomical dataPreprint
Bates, A. S., Manton, J. D., Jagannathan, S. R., Costa, M., Schlegel, P., Torsten Rohlfing, B., & Jefferis, G. S. X. E. (2014) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/006353 · Cited by 31
“…neuronal morphology data in their whole-brain contexts feasible across phyla (Chiang et al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019; Kunst et al., 2019; Jenett et al., 2012; Cook et al., 2019; Economo et al., 2016; Oh et al., 2014; Ohyama et al., 2015; Winnubst et al., 2019; Ryan et al., 2016).”
BackgroundA wake-active locomotion circuit depolarizes a sleep-active neuron to switch on sleep
Maluck, E., Busack, I., Besseling, J., Masurat, F., Turek, M., Busch, K. E., & Bringmann, H. (2020) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000361 · Cited by 30
Lappalainen, J. K., Tschopp, F. D., Prakhya, S., McGill, M., Nern, A., Shinomiya, K., Takemura, S.-Y., Gruntman, E., Macke, J. H., & Turaga, S. C. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.03.11.532232 · Cited by 31
Constraining computational models using electron microscopy wiring diagrams
Litwin-Kumar, A., & Turaga, S. C. (2019) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.07.007 · Cited by 28
Wellenberg, A., Weides, L., Kurzke, J., Hennecke, T., Bornhorst, J., Crone, B., Kärst, U., Brinkmann, V., Fritz, G., & Honnen, S. (2021) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113705 · Cited by 30
Giong, H.-K., Subramanian, M., Yu, K., & Lee, J.-S. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22168465 · Cited by 31
Principles for coding associative memories in a compact neural network
Pritz, C. O., Itskovits, E., Bokman, E., Ruach, R., Gritsenko, V., Nelken, T., Menasherof, M., Azulay, A., & Zaslaver, A. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.74434 · Cited by 24
Network Statistics of the Whole-Brain Connectome of Drosophila
Lin, A., Yang, R., Dorkenwald, S., Matsliah, A., Sterling, A. R., Schlegel, P., Yu, S.-C., McKellar, C. E., Costa, M., Eichler, K., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.29.551086 · Cited by 147
An integrative data-driven model simulating C. elegans brain, body and environment interactions
Zhao, M., Wang, N., Jiang, X., Ma, X., Ma, H., He, G., Du, K., Ma, L., & Huang, T. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00738-w · Cited by 29
“The number of connections between two cells was from the cell adjacency matrix 15 (Supplementary Fig.”
InfluentialNeuropeptide signaling network of Caenorhabditis elegans: from structure to behavior
Watteyne, J., Chudinova, A., Ripoll-Sánchez, L., Schafer, W. R., & Beets, I. (2024) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyae141 · Cited by 36
“2012; Cook et al .”
Mechano-chemo-biological theory of cells and tissues: review and perspectives
Feng, X., Ли, Б., Lin, S., Wang, M.-Y., Chen, X., Zhang, H., & Fang, W. P. (2025) · Acta Mechanica Sinica · doi:10.1007/s10409-025-25315-x · Cited by 34
Distributed control circuits across a brain-and-cord connectome
Bates, A. S., Phelps, J. S., Kim, M., Yang, H. H., Matsliah, A., Ajabi, Z., Perlman, E., Delgado, K. M., Osman, M. A. M., Salmon, C. K., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10735-w · Cited by 76
“They also receive influence from the AN/DN clusters labelled as proprioceptive, postural control, flight steering 2 and grooming.”
Ascaris suum Informs Extrasynaptic Volume Transmission in Nematodes
Atkinson, L. E., Liu, Y., McKay, F., Vandewyer, E., Viau, C., Irvine, A., Rosa, B. A., Li, Z., Liang, Q., Marks, N. J., et al. (2021) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00281 · Cited by 27
Visualizing the organization and differentiation of the male-specific nervous system of C. elegans
Tekieli, T., Yemini, E., Nejatbakhsh, A., Wang, C., Varol, E., Fernandez, R. W., Masoudi, N., Paninski, L., & Hobert, O. (2021) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.199687 · Cited by 31
Self-citationNeurophysiological basis of stress-induced aversive memory in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Liao, C., Chiang, Y., Tam, W. H., Chen, Y., Chou, S., & Pan, C. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.012 · Cited by 26
Bayer, E. A., Sun, H., Rafi, I., & Hobert, O. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.060 · Cited by 28
Self-citationDuru, J., Maurer, B., Doran, C. G., Jelitto, R., Küchler, J., Ihle, S. J., Ruff, T., John, R., Genocchi, B., & Vörös, J. (2023) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2023.115591 · Cited by 28
Collapse of Global Neuronal States in Caenorhabditis elegans under Isoflurane Anesthesia
Awal, M. R., Wirak, G. S., Gabel, C. V., & Connor, C. W. (2020) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003304 · Cited by 25
“elegans have now established the connectome matrices for all neuron-to-neuron chemical synapses and gap junctions in both the hermaphroditic and male sexes.(33) Taken together, these advances will allow the analysis of the effects of anesthetics on specific neuronal types, neural circuits, and sensorimotor pathways wi…”
BackgroundBringing Anatomical Information into Neuronal Network Models
van Albada, S. J., Morales-Gregorio, A., Dickscheid, T., Goulas, A., Bakker, R., Bludau, S., Palm, G., Hilgetag, C. C., & Diesmann, M. (2021) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89439-9_9 · Cited by 29
“Elegans are nearly complete and have enabled full connectomes to be derived with minimal extrapolation from the data [1].”
BackgroundGap junctions: historical discoveries and new findings in the C aenorhabditis elegans nervous system
Jin, E. J., Park, S., Lyu, X., & Jin, Y. (2020) · Biology Open · doi:10.1242/bio.053983 · Cited by 26
Novel interpretable mechanism of neural networks based on network decoupling method
Duan, D., Wu, X., & Si, S. (2021) · Frontiers of Engineering Management · doi:10.1007/s42524-021-0169-x · Cited by 26
Structure and function in artificial, zebrafish and human neural networks
Ji, P., Wang, Y., Peron, T., Li, C., Nagler, J., & Du, J. (2023) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2023.04.004 · Cited by 27
Self-citationThe nematode worm C. elegans chooses between bacterial foods as if maximizing economic utility
Katzen, A., Chung, H.-K., Harbaugh, W. T., Iacono, C. D., Jackson, N., Glater, E. E., Taylor, C. J., Yu, S. K., Flavell, S. W., Glimcher, P. W., et al. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.69779 · Cited by 25
The hourglass organization of the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome
Sabrin, K. M., Wei, Y., van den Heuvel, M. P., & Dovrolis, C. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007526 · Cited by 25
“More recently, the same research group has mapped the complete connectome of the male nematode, focusing on its differences with the hermaphrodite [61].”
BackgroundCosta, L. D. F. (2022) · Journal of Physics Complexity · doi:10.1088/2632-072x/ac54c3 · Cited by 25
“Figure 7 illustrates the C. elegans network [29] as visualized from its respective unweighted adjacency matrix.”
Tian, J., Ren, M., Zhao, P., Luo, S., Chen, Y., Xu, X., Jiang, T., Sun, Q., Li, A., Gong, H., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2202536119 · Cited by 25
“Although neuronal connections, such as the complete connectome of Caenorhabditis elegans, can be reconstructed at the singlesynapse level with electron microscopy (8), it is labor intensive and unsuitable for largevolume samples, such as the whole mouse brain.”
BackgroundJi, H., Fouad, A. D., Li, Z., Ruba, A., & Fang-Yen, C. M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2219341120 · Cited by 24
“C. elegans has a relatively small and well-characterized nervous system with fully identified cell types and mapped synaptic connectivity (29, 30).”
BackgroundMedrano, E., & Collins, K. M. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.05.008 · Cited by 26
Comparative connectomics of dauer reveals developmental plasticity
Yim, H., Choe, D. T., Bae, J. A., Choi, M.-K., Kang, H.-M., Nguyen, K. C. Q., Ahn, S., Bahn, S.-K., Yang, H., Hall, D. H., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45943-3 · Cited by 27
“Neurons classi fi ed as interneurons by our de fi nition 4 included modulatory neurons de fi ned by Witvliet et al. 5 , which have many variable connections.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationTools for connectomic reconstruction and analysis of a female Drosophila ventral nerve cord
Azevedo, A., Lesser, E., Phelps, J. S., Mark, B., Elabbady, L., Kuroda, S., Sustar, A., Moussa, A., Kandelwal, A., Dallmann, C. J., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.15.520299 · Cited by 120
“While comprehensive connectomes have been mapped for small crawling animals like C. elegans (Cook et al., 2019) and the Drosophila larva (Winding et al., 2023), we previously lacked a synapse-level wiring diagram of motor circuits for any limbed animal.”
BackgroundWeng, J.-W., Park, H., Valotteau, C., Chen, R.-T., Essmann, C., Pujol, N., Sternberg, P., & Chen, C.-H. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.07.020 · Cited by 8
Zebrafish and nematodes as whole organism models to measure developmental neurotoxicity
Hughes, S., & Hessel, E. V. S. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408444.2024.2342448 · Cited by 28
“How each of the 302 neurons connect to each other, the neurotransmitters and synaptic connections as well as their role in behaviour have been mapped into a connectome (White et al. 1986; Cook et al. 2019, 2023).”
BackgroundA neurotransmitter atlas of C. elegans males and hermaphrodites
Wang, C., Vidal, B., Sural, S., Loer, C. M., Aguilar, G. R., Merritt, D. M., Toker, I. A., Vogt, M. C., Cros, C., & Hobert, O. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.95402.3 · Cited by 35
Self-citationRapti, G. (2020) · Journal of Neurogenetics · doi:10.1080/01677063.2020.1837799 · Cited by 27
“In addition, recent mapping of the male connectome by Emmons and colleagues will facilitate the dissection of sex-shared nervous system components that give rise to sex-specific behaviors and the plasticity of sex-related variations in neurodevelopment (Cook et al., 2019).”
BackgroundEscape steering by cholecystokinin peptidergic signaling
Chen, L., Liu, Y., Su, P., Hung, W., Li, H., Wang, Y., Yue, Z., Ge, M.-H., Wu, Z., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110330 · Cited by 23
Self-citationThe contribution of C. elegans neurogenetics to understanding neurodegenerative diseases
Liang, J., McKinnon, I. A., & Rankin, C. H. (2020) · Journal of Neurogenetics · doi:10.1080/01677063.2020.1803302 · Cited by 28
“As the molecular pathways of cell death were mapped (Cook et al., 2019), it did not take long for researchers to start using the same C. elegans techniques to delineate the molecular mechanisms underlying human neurodegenerative diseases.”
BackgroundStürner, T., Brooks, P., Capdevila, L. S., Morris, B. J., Javier, A., Fang, S., Gkantia, M., Cachero, S., Beckett, I. R., Champion, A. S., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.06.04.596633 · Cited by 24
“Comparing EM datasets across individuals, sexes and developmental stages, as done previously in Caenorhabditis elegans (Cook et al., 2019; Witvliet et al., 2021), will reveal the degree of variation in Drosophila neuronal circuits.”
C. elegans as an Animal Model to Study the Intersection of DNA Repair, Aging and Neurodegeneration
Naranjo-Galindo, F. J., Ai, R., Fang, E. F., Nilsen, H. L., & SenGupta, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging · doi:10.3389/fragi.2022.916118 · Cited by 29
Emergence of Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model Organism for Dissecting the Gut–Brain Axis
de Ora, L. O., & Bess, E. N. (2021) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00755-21 · Cited by 25
“With a fully mapped neuronal circuitry (18) as well as extensive characterization of phenotypes associated with neurosignals (Fig.”
BackgroundMakarova, A. A., Polilov, A. A., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2021) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2021.09.007 · Cited by 25
A consideration of brain networks modulating social behavior
Kelly, A. M. (2022) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105138 · Cited by 26
“This process can be replicated for non-human animals with 21st century technology that allows for visualization of whole-brain structural connectivity (Oh et al., 2014; Betzel et al., 2018; Cook et al., 2019; Scheffer et al., 2020).”
Sun, H., & Hobert, O. (2022) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.05.029 · Cited by 19
Self-citationMultilayer network analysis of C. elegans: Looking into the locomotory circuitry
Maertens, T., Schöll, E., Ruiz, J., & Hövel, P. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.11.015 · Cited by 24
“It serves as a prototype for investigations of neuronal networks because all synaptic connections between the neurons have been completely mapped by electron microscopy with reasonable accuracy at the cellular level [1,5,13,16,78,80].”
BackgroundConnectal Coding: Discovering the Structures Linking Cognitive Phenotypes to Individual Histories
Vogelstein, J. T., Bridgeford, E., Pedigo, B. D., Chung, J., Levin, K., Mensh, B. D., & Priebe, C. E. (2019) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.04.005 · Cited by 25
Ewe, C. K., Cleuren, Y. N. T., & Rothman, J. H. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00170 · Cited by 21
Generalizable Machine Learning in Neuroscience Using Graph Neural Networks
Wang, P. Y., Sapra, S., George, V. K., & Silva, G. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.618372 · Cited by 22
“elegans is a canonical species for investigating microscopic neural dynamics because it remains the only organism whose connectome (the mapping of all 302 neurons and their synaptic connections) is completely known and well studied (8) (9) (10) (11).”
BackgroundOn the structural connectivity of large-scale models of brain networks at cellular level
Giacopelli, G., Tegolo, D., Spera, E., & Migliore, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83759-z · Cited by 26
Ji, H., Fouad, A. D., Teng, S., Liu, A., Álvarez-Illera, P., Yao, B., Li, Z., & Fang-Yen, C. M. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.69905 · Cited by 18
“With its easily quantifiable behavior (Croll, 1970), well-mapped nervous system (Cook et al., 2019; White et al., 1986), genetic manipulability (Bargmann, 1998; Brenner, 1974; Hobert, 2003), and optical transparency, this worm is a unique model for obtaining an integrative understanding of…”
BackgroundTemperature sensing and context-dependent thermal behavior in nematodes
Glauser, D. A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2022.102525 · Cited by 23
The D-Mercator method for the multidimensional hyperbolic embedding of real networks
Jankowski, R., Allard, A., Boguñá, M., & Serrano, M. Á. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43337-5 · Cited by 29
“S22); the neural network of the C. elegans worm, where communities are the different neurons ’ classes 60 (see Supplementary Fig.”
Neural engineering with photons as synaptic transmitters
Porta-de-la-Riva, M., Gonzalez, A. C., Sanfeliu-Cerdán, N., Karimi, S., Malaiwong, N., Pidde, A., Morales-Curiel, L.-F., Fernandez, P., Bolívar, S. G., Hurth, C., et al. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01836-9 · Cited by 27
How purposeless physics underlies purposeful life
Ellis, G. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-03061-y · Cited by 22
Cornell, R., Cao, W. J., Harradine, B., Godini, R., Handley, A., & Pocock, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50973-y · Cited by 21
Methods for analyzing neuronal structure and activity in Caenorhabditis elegans
Emmons, S. W., Yemini, E., & Zimmer, M. (2021) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab072 · Cited by 23
“Neuronal somas are small: 2 mm in diameter (compare to the 20 mm sized somas of mammalian pyramidal cells); likewise, their processes are short ranging from 10 s of microns to about 1 mm with small diameters of about only 100–200 nm (White et al. 1986; Cook et al. 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationTranslational Neuroscience Approaches to Understanding Autism
Veenstra-VanderWeele, J. M., O’Reilly, K. C., Dennis, M. Y., Uribe‐Salazar, J. M., & Amaral, D. G. (2023) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.20230153 · Cited by 25
Ma, F., Lau, C. Y., & Zheng, C. (2023) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100467 · Cited by 18
“Neuronal classification was based on Cook et al. 51 ; CAN neurons have unknown functions; amphid sensory neurons are in blue. portion ( (cid”
MethodThe role of neuropeptides in learning: Insights from C. elegans
Fruyt, N. D., Yu, A. J., Rankin, C. H., Beets, I., & Chew, Y. L. (2020) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2020.105801 · Cited by 22
Distinct neuropeptide-receptor modules regulate a sex-specific behavioral response to a pheromone
Reilly, D. K., McGlame, E. J., Vandewyer, E., et al. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02547-7 · Cited by 22
DNA repair deficiencies and neurodegeneration
Ropert, B., Gallrein, C., & Schumacher, B. (2024) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103679 · Cited by 21
Neurogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans
Poole, R. J., Flames, N., & Cochella, L. (2024) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyae116 · Cited by 19
“…on electron microscopy (EM) enabled a classification based on morphology and connectivity, uncovering 118 different classes in the herm-aphrodite, with additional accurate predictions of whether they constituted sensory neurons, interneurons, or motor neurons (White et al. 1986; Cook et al. 2019).”
BackgroundZheng, F., Chen, C., & Aschner, M. (2022) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.496 · Cited by 21
Integration of spatially opposing cues by a single interneuron guides decision-making in C. elegans
Gat, A., Pechuk, V., Peedikayil‐Kurien, S., Karimi, S., Goldman, G., Sela, S., Lubliner, J., Krieg, M., & Oren‐Suissa, M. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113075 · Cited by 19
Doser, R. L., Knight, K. M., Deihl, E. W., & Hoerndli, F. J. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.92376 · Cited by 22
Swanson, L. W., Hahn, J. D., & Sporns, O. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2017733117 · Cited by 20
“In neuroscience, the most complete analysis of the whole adult nervous system is for the two sexes of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, with fewer than 400 neurons (parts) and on the order of 6,000 to 7,000 synapses (connections) (13, 14).”
BackgroundMicroinstrumentation for Brain Organoids
Patel, D., Shetty, S., Acha, C., Pantoja, I. E. M., Zhao, A., George, D., & Gracias, D. H. (2024) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202302456 · Cited by 21
Collins, E. S., Hessel, E. V. S., & Hughes, S. (2024) · NeuroToxicology · doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2024.03.005 · Cited by 20
Molecular Architecture of Genetically-Tractable GABA Synapses in C. elegans
Zhou, X., & Bessereau, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2019.00304 · Cited by 19
Ubiquitin-related processes and innate immunity in C. elegans
Garcia-Sanchez, J. A., Ewbank, J. J., & Visvikis, O. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03787-w · Cited by 21
Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model to Study Manganese-Induced Neurotoxicity
Martins, A. C., Gubert, P., Li, J., Ke, T., Nicolai, M. M., Moura, A. V., Bornhorst, J., Bowman, A. B., & Aschner, M. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12101396 · Cited by 22
“The evaluation of all connections from sensory input to end-organ output across the worm showed considerable connection differences between the sexes [25].”
BackgroundDissection of a sensorimotor circuit underlying pathogen aversion in C. elegans
Filipowicz, A. R., Lalsiamthara, J., & Aballay, A. (2022) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-022-01424-x · Cited by 20
“elegans [22] can be used to dissect the mechanisms involved in translating the detection of pathogenic cues into physical avoidance.”
BackgroundInheritance of associative memories and acquired cellular changes in C. elegans
Deshe, N., Eliezer, Y., Hoch, L., Itskovits, E., Bokman, E., Ben-Ezra, S., & Zaslaver, A. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39804-8 · Cited by 21
Temporal flow of hubs and connectivity in the human brain
Fransson, P., & Thompson, W. H. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117348 · Cited by 20
“…of C. elegans was sparse (3.2% of all possible conections were present), they also found that the connectivity patterns n C. elegans enable information from single sensory neurons to potenially reach from 70% to 98% of all other cells in the network within wo synaptic steps ( Cook et al., 2019 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPathak, A., Chatterjee, N., & Sitabhra Sinha, A. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007602 · Cited by 19
“A more recent reanalysis has added further connections to the connectome [90].”
BackgroundÜçer, S., Özyer, T., & Alhajj, R. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19419-7 · Cited by 23
“C. Elegans is indeed a simple worm, and its whole neuron system has been extracted, filed, and widely researched in recent years 21–23 .”
BackgroundComparative connectomics and escape behavior in larvae of closely related Drosophila species
Zhu, J., Boivin, J.-C., Pang, S., Xu, C. S., Lu, Z., Saalfeld, S., Hess, H. F., & Ohyama, T. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.05.043 · Cited by 17
Tang, L. T. H., Lee, G. A., Cook, S. J., Ho, J., Potter, C. C., & Bülow, H. E. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.07.041 · Cited by 20
Self-citationLuo, J., Bainbridge, C., Miller, R. M., Barrios, A., & Portman, D. (2024) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.02.036 · Cited by 19
“Thus, male-specific features of shared neurons—either shared sensory neurons or inter-neurons receiving input from male-specific sensory neurons 86 — are likely important for detecting or interpreting information on the surface of potential mates.”
Opportunities and dilemmas of in vitro nano neural electrodes
Wu, Y. C., Chen, H., & Guo, L. (2019) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c9ra08917a · Cited by 19
Toward Closed-Loop Electrical Stimulation of Neuronal Systems: A Review
Tanskanen, J. M. A., Ahtiainen, A., & Hyttinen, J. (2020) · Bioelectricity · doi:10.1089/bioe.2020.0028 · Cited by 20
Olivares, E., Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2021.572339 · Cited by 18
“For the hermaphrodite, each connection is marked as appearing in one or more of the following three datasets: j (Jarrell et al., 2012), v (Varshney et al., 2011), or c (Cook et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSystem-wide mapping of neuropeptide-GPCR interactions in C. elegansPreprint
Beets, I., Zels, S., Vandewyer, E., Demeulemeester, J., Caers, J., Baytemur, E., Schafer, W. R., Vértes, P. E., Mirabeau, O., & Schoofs, L. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.10.30.514428 · Cited by 19
Synaptic architecture of leg and wing premotor control networks in Drosophila
Lesser, E., Azevedo, A. W., Phelps, J. S., Elabbady, L., Cook, A., Syed, D. S., Mark, B., Kuroda, S., Sustar, A., Moussa, A., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.30.542725 · Cited by 71
“There are now connectomes for the nematode C. elegans (Cook et al., 2019; Witvliet et al., 2021) and the larval fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster (Ohyama et al., 2015; Winding et al., 2023) which provide insight into premotor control of peristaltic locomotion (Wen et al., 2012; Zarin et al., 2019).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, S. J., Jarrell, T. A., Brittin, C. A., Wang, Y., Bloniarz, A. E., Yakovlev, M. A., Nguyen, K. C. Q., Tang, L. T.-H., Bayer, E. A., Duerr, J. S., Bülow, H. E., Hobert, O., Hall, D. H., & Emmons, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Ohio University (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Emmons, Scott W.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-07-03
- Volume
- 571
- Issue
- 7763
- Pages
- 63-71
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC6889226
- OpenAlex
- W2954731284
- Cited by
- 921
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 103 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 28
- FWCI
- 41.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r21ns111145-01, R24OD010943)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH112689)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM066897)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R37NS039996, R01NS096672, R21NS111145, F31NS096863)
- National Center for Research Resources (R24RR012596)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD071593)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
- Keywords
- Caenorhabditis elegans, sexual dimorphism
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Head, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Motor Activity, Movement, Nervous System, Neural Pathways, Sex Characteristics, Caenorhabditis elegans, Hermaphroditic Organisms, Connectome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review