Cited by 500Immune cells in cancerInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

Loss of p53 triggers WNT-dependent systemic inflammation to drive breast cancer metastasis

Open access
Wellenstein, Max D., Coffelt, Seth B., Duits, Danique E. M., van Miltenburg, Martine H., Slagter, Maarten, de Rink, Iris, Henneman, Linda, Kas, Sjors M. +12 more·2019·Nature

Abstract

Cancer-associated systemic inflammation is strongly linked to poor disease outcome in patients with cancer 1,2. For most human epithelial tumour types, high systemic neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios are associated with poor overall survival 3, and experimental studies have demonstrated a causal relationship between neutrophils and metastasis 4,5. However, the cancer-cell-intrinsic mechanisms that dictate the substantial heterogeneity in systemic neutrophilic inflammation between tumour-bearing hosts are largely unresolved. Here, using a panel of 16 distinct genetically engineered mouse models for breast cancer, we uncover a role for cancer-cell-intrinsic p53 as a key regulator of pro-metastatic neutrophils. Mechanistically, loss of p53 in cancer cells induced the secretion of WNT ligands that stimulate tumour-associated macrophages to produce IL-1β, thus driving systemic inflammation. Pharmacological and genetic blockade of WNT secretion in p53-null cancer cells reverses macrophage production of IL-1β and subsequent neutrophilic inflammation, resulting in reduced metastasis formation. Collectively, we demonstrate a mechanistic link between the loss of p53 in cancer cells, secretion of WNT ligands and systemic neutrophilia that potentiates metastatic progression. These insights illustrate the importance of the genetic makeup of breast tumours in dictating pro-metastatic systemic inflammation, and set the stage for personalized immune intervention strategies for patients with cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1450-6

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some missense mutant proteins can lose the transcriptional effects of wild-type genes, such as keeping PDL1 expression low, making cancer cells more susceptible to cytotoxic T cells and NK cells, limiting the immune system's ability to attack cancer cells.

    “Some missense mutant proteins can lose the transcriptional effects of wild-type genes, such as keeping PDL1 expression levels low, thereby making cancer cells more susceptible to cytotoxic T cells and NK cells, limiting the immune system’s ability to attack cancer cells.”
  • Activating wild-type proteins can increase IFNγ signaling and sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors, whereas corresponding mutant proteins can reduce the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

    “On the other hand, activating wild-type proteins can increase IFNγ signaling and sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors, whereas corresponding mutant proteins can reduce the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.612–614”
  • The status of genes can influence tumor cells through the impact of wild-type gene loss and through their effects on the tumor immune microenvironment.

    “In brief, the status of genes can influence tumor cells not only through the impact of wild-type gene loss but also through their effects on the TIME.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wellenstein, M. D., Coffelt, S. B., Duits, D. E. M., van Miltenburg, M. H., Slagter, M., de Rink, I., Henneman, L., Kas, S. M., Prekovic, S., Hau, C.-S., Vrijland, K., Drenth, A. P., de Korte-Grimmerink, R., Schut, E., van der Heijden, I., Zwart, W., Wessels, L. F. A., Schumacher, T. N., Jonkers, J., & de Visser, K. E.
Affiliations
The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Jonkers, Jos
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-07-31
Volume
572
Issue
7770
Pages
538-542
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2965576600
Cited by
500
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 9
FWCI
23.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Keywords
p53 deficiency, breast cancer metastasis, Wnt signaling, systemic inflammation, neutrophilia, tumour-associated macrophages, IL-1β, tumor microenvironment, genetically engineered mouse models
MeSH terms
Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Inflammation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neutrophils, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Wnt Proteins, Mice, Interleukin-1beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review