The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Open accessAbstract
The promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor1. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here we report the use of a processor with programmable superconducting qubits2–7 to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a computational state-space of dimension 253 (about 1016). Measurements from repeated experiments sample the resulting probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. Our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times—our benchmarks currently indicate that the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy8–14 for this specific computational task, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm. Quantum supremacy is demonstrated using a programmable superconducting processor known as Sycamore, taking approximately 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times, which would take a state-of-the-art supercomputer around ten thousand years to compute.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In typical cases, if noise overwhelms the circuit, the measured distribution will be uniform18 and the measured XEB will be 0.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As an illustration, a type of superconducting processor used for Google's quantum supremacy experiment had single-qubit and two-qubit gate errors of 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively [5].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recent advances in control and readout of quantum bits have underscored the spectacular promise of QIP [82,83].”
From 2022 Roadmap on integrated quantum photonics (2022) · cites this paper as [82]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Quantum advantage was demonstrated against the best classical computers for the task of sampling the output of a pseudo-random quantum circuit.”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Arute et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finally, using 3D [[8,3,2]] code blocks16,17, we realize computationally complex sampling circuits18 with up to 48 logical qubits entangled with hypercube connectivity19 with 228 logical two-qubit gates and 48 logical CCZ gates20.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We obtain an XEB of approximately 0.1 for 48 logical qubits and hundreds of nonlocal logical entangling gates, up to roughly an order of magnitude higher than previous physical qubit implementations of digital circuits of similar complexity18,48, showing the benefits of a logical encoding for this application.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The researchers have explained that their sycamore processor takes about 200s to compute. A similar job would take approximately 10,000years by a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer [5].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the year of 2019, researchers executed quantum supremacy successfully in a 53 qubit superconducting machine.”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“RCS is a system-level benchmark assessing how effectively a quantum computer can generate computationally complex quantum states15.”
From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In either case, the quality of samples can be judged by statistical tests, with the linear cross-entropy test being a widely used standard15.”
From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Existing quantum devices contain on the order of 100 physical qubits.”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Arute et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The recent development of quantum computing, which uses entanglement, superposition, and other quantum fundamental concepts, can provide substantial processing advantages over traditional computing.”
From Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Error correction requires thousands of physical qubits for each logical qubit [91], resulting in millions of qubits for calculating the FeMoco ground state energy [45, 46].”
From Drug design on quantum computers (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“However, in the near term, this tradeoff is a happy one as many NISQ architectures—most notably superconducting qubit devices—can easily and rapidly repeat executions of a quantum circuit.”
From Training deep quantum neural networks (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
In the citing paper
“For example, the recently reported experiment involving the “Sycamore” quantum computer executed one instance of a quantum circuit a million times in 200 s46.”
From Training deep quantum neural networks (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
In the citing paper
“For comparison, the recent work on quantum supremacy by Google reported fidelities of 0.1% for single-qubit gates and 0.3% for two-qubit gates in a superconducting processor [20].”
From The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Given that the current record for a controllable, programmable quantum processor is 53 qubits [20], there is still a long way to go.”
From The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552
Self-citationScheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack
Grover, L. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.325 · Cited by 4,306
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box
Koch, J., Yu, T. M., Gambetta, J., Houck, A. A., Schuster, D. I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 · Cited by 3,351
Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation
Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032324 · Cited by 3,059
Self-citationBarren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes
McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 · Cited by 2,329
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Farhi, E. & Neven, H. Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06002 (2018). · arXiv
- Cross, A. W., Magesan, E., Bishop, L. S., Smolin, J. A. & Gambetta, J. M. Scalable randomised benchmarking of non-Clifford gates. npj Quant. Inform. 2, 16012 (2016).
- Villalonga, B. et al. A flexible high-performance simulator for the verification and benchmarking of quantum circuits implemented on real hardware. npj Quant. Inform. (in the press); preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09599 (2018). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,052
Advances in Chip-Based Quantum Key Distribution
Liu, Q., Huang, Y., Du, Y., Zhao, Z., Geng, M., Zhang, Z., & Wei, K. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24101334 · Cited by 51
QUARK: A Framework for Quantum Computing Application Benchmarking
Finžgar, J. R., Ross, P., Hölscher, L., Klepsch, J., & Luckow, A. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce53715.2022.00042 · Cited by 51
Probing quantum correlations in many-body systems: a review of scalable methods
Frérot, I., Fadel, M., & Lewenstein, M. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acf8d7 · Cited by 60
Singh, H., Majumder, S., & Mishra, S. (2023) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0161057 · Cited by 51
Precision medicine for cardiometabolic disease: a framework for clinical translation
Franks, P. W., Cefalu, W. T., Dennis, J., Florez, J. C., Mathieu, C., Morton, R. W., Ridderstråle, M., Sillesen, H. H., & Stehouwer, C. D. A. (2023) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00165-1 · Cited by 57
Probing Postmeasurement Entanglement without Postselection
Garratt, S. J., & Altman, E. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.030311 · Cited by 56
High-Fidelity and Robust Geometric Quantum Gates that Outperform Dynamical Ones
Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.064009 · Cited by 50
Error-Robust Quantum Logic Optimization Using a Cloud Quantum Computer Interface
Carvalho, A. R. R., Ball, H., Biercuk, M. J., Hush, M., & Thomsen, F. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.064054 · Cited by 59
A single inverse-designed photonic structure that performs parallel computing
Camacho, M., Edwards, B. E., & Engheta, N. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 51
Adiabatic Spectroscopy and a Variational Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm
Schiffer, B. F., Brugués, J. T. I., & Cirac, J. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020347 · Cited by 50
The dominant eigenvector of a noisy quantum state
Koczor, B. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac37ae · Cited by 52
Quantum Optimization via Four-Body Rydberg Gates
Dlaska, C., Ender, K., Mbeng, G. B., Kruckenhauser, A., Lechner, W., & van Bijnen, R. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.120503 · Cited by 51
Kono, S., Pan, J., Chegnizadeh, M., Wang, X., Youssefi, A., Scigliuzzo, M., & Kippenberg, T. J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48230-3 · Cited by 50
Yamasaki, H., Matsuura, T., & Koashi, M. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023270 · Cited by 51
Nishikawa, K., Duţan, I., Köhn, C., & Mizuno, Y. (2021) · Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics · doi:10.1007/s41115-021-00012-0 · Cited by 56
Suau, A., Staffelbach, G., & Calandra, H. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3430030 · Cited by 61
Qi, J., & Tejedor, J. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9747636 · Cited by 55
Neuromorphic scaling advantages for energy-efficient random walk computations
Smith, J. D., Hill, A. J., Collis, L., Franke, B. C., Lehoucq, R. B., Parekh, O., Severa, W., & Aimone, J. B. (2022) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00705-7 · Cited by 56
Advancing hybrid quantum–classical computation with real-time execution
Lubinski, T., Granade, C., Anderson, A., Geller, A., Roetteler, M., Petrenko, A., & Heim, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.940293 · Cited by 63
Quantum natural gradient generalized to noisy and nonunitary circuits
Koczor, B., & Benjamin, S. C. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.062416 · Cited by 108
Quantum computing with and for many-body physics
Ayral, T., Besserve, P., Denis Lacroix, A., & Guzman, E. A. R. (2023) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01141-1 · Cited by 71
Quantum kernel methods for solving regression problems and differential equations
Paine, A. E., Elfving, V. E., & Kyriienko, O. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.032428 · Cited by 71
Work Extraction from Unknown Quantum Sources
Šafránek, D., Rosa, D., & Binder, F. C. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.210401 · Cited by 50
Liu, P., Wang, R., Zhang, J.-N., Zhang, Y., Cai, X., Xu, H., Li, Z., Han, J., Li, X., Xue, G., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.021028 · Cited by 51
Evidence of Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling on a digital quantum simulator
Keenan, N., Robertson, N., Murphy, T., Zhuk, S. M., & Goold, J. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00742-4 · Cited by 66
Quantum Machine Learning for Next-G Wireless Communications: Fundamentals and the Path Ahead
Narottama, B., Mohamed, Z., & Aı̈ssa, S. (2023) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2023.3309268 · Cited by 59
A universal programmable Gaussian boson sampler for drug discovery
Yu, S., Zhong, Z., Fang, Y., Patel, R. B., Li, Q., Liu, W., Li, Z., Xu, L., Sagona-Stophel, S., Mer, E., et al. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00526-y · Cited by 60
Maximum Entropy Principle in Deep Thermalization and in Hilbert-Space Ergodicity
Mark, D. K., Surace, F. M., Elben, A., Shaw, A. L., Choi, J., Refael, G., Endres, M., & Choi, S. (2024) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.041051 · Cited by 74
Piezoelectric actuation for integrated photonics
Tian, H., Liu, J., Attanasio, A., Siddharth, A., Blésin, T., Wang, R. N., Voloshin, A., Lihachev, G., Riemensberger, J., Kenning, S., et al. (2024) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.529288 · Cited by 58
Towards a Quantum Software Modeling Language
Pérez-Delgado, C. A., & Pérez‐González, H. G. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3387940.3392183 · Cited by 55
Guo, X., Ge, Z.-Y., Li, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y.-R., Song, P., Xiang, Z., Song, X., Jin, Y., Lü, L., et al. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00385-3 · Cited by 52
Quantum versus classical generative modelling in finance
Coyle, B., Henderson, M., Le, J. C. J., Kumar, N., Paini, M., & Kashefi, E. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd3db · Cited by 65
Koczor, B., & Benjamin, S. C. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023017 · Cited by 55
Realising and compressing quantum circuits with quantum reservoir computing
Ghosh, S., Krisnanda, T., Paterek, T., & Liew, T. C. H. (2021) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00606-3 · Cited by 68
Silicon photonic quantum computing with spin qubits
Yan, X., Gitt, S., Lin, B., Witt, D. M., Abdolahi, M., Afifi, A. E., Azem, A., Darcie, A., Wu, J., Awan, K. M., et al. (2021) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/5.0049372 · Cited by 51
Experimental Realization of the Rabi-Hubbard Model with Trapped Ions
Mei, Q.-X., Li, B.-W., Wu, Y.-K., Cai, M.-L., Wang, Y., Yao, L., Zhou, Z.-C., & Duan, L.-M. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.160504 · Cited by 52
Partonic collinear structure by quantum computing
Li, T., Guo, X., Lai, W. K., Liu, X., Wang, E., Xing, H., Zhang, D.-B., & Zhu, S.-L. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.l111502 · Cited by 50
Witnessing quantum memory in non-Markovian processes
Giarmatzi, C., & Costa, F. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-26-440 · Cited by 67
Doggen, E. V. H., Gefen, Y., Gornyi, I. V., Mirlin, A. D., & Polyakov, D. G. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023146 · Cited by 62
Fast Multiqubit Gates through Simultaneous Two-Qubit Gates
Gu, X. Q., Fernández-Pendás, J., Vikstål, P., Abad, T., Warren, C., Bengtsson, A., Tancredi, G., Shumeiko, V. S., Bylander, J., Johansson, G., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040348 · Cited by 49
Limitations in quantum computing from resource constraintsPreprint
Fellous-Asiani, M., Chai, J. H., Whitney, R. S., Auffèves, A., & Ng, H. K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040335 · Cited by 4
Zhou, C., Lu, P., Praquin, M., Chien, T.-C., Kaufman, R., Cao, X., Xia, M., Mong, R. S. K., Pfaff, W., Pekker, D., et al. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00723-7 · Cited by 66
The Performance of Post-Quantum TLS 1.3
Sosnowski, M., Wiedner, F., Hauser, E., Steger, L., Schoinianakis, D., Gallenmüller, S., & Carle, G. (2023) · Companion of the 19th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies · doi:10.1145/3624354.3630585 · Cited by 49
Challenges of variational quantum optimization with measurement shot noise
Scriva, G., Astrakhantsev, N., Pilati, S., & Mazzola, G. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.032408 · Cited by 64
Quantum computational infusion in extreme learning machines for early multi-cancer detection
Bilal, A., Shafiq, M., Obidallah, W. J., Alduraywish, Y. A., & Long, H. (2025) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-024-01050-0 · Cited by 51
Artificial intelligence for quantum computing
Alexeev, Y., Farag, M. H., Patti, T. L., Wolf, M. E., Ares, N., Aspuru‐Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., Cai, Z., Cao, S., Chamberland, C., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65836-3 · Cited by 99
Programmable Superconducting Processor with Native Three-Qubit Gates
Roy, T., Hazra, S., Kundu, S., Chand, M., Patankar, M. P., & Vijay, R. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.014072 · Cited by 55
Proposal for a Nanomechanical Qubit
Pistolesi, F., Cleland, A. N., & Bachtold, A. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031027 · Cited by 50
Jin, F., Willsch, D., Willsch, M., Lagemann, H., Michielsen, K. F. L., & Raedt, H. A. D. (2020) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.90.012001 · Cited by 52
Self-citationDetermining the proton content with a quantum computer
Pérez-Salinas, A., Cruz-Martinez, J. M., Alhajri, A., & Carrazza, S. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.034027 · Cited by 51
Polymer physics by quantum computing
Micheletti, C., Hauke, P., & Faccioli, P. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.080501 · Cited by 48
Quantum Shuttle: traffic navigation with Quantum computing
Yarkoni, S., Neukart, F., Tagle, E. M. G., Magiera, N., Mehta, B., Hire, K., Narkhede, S., & Hofmann, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Architectures and Paradigms for Engineering Quantum Software · doi:10.1145/3412451.3428500 · Cited by 50
Quadratic Speed-Up for Simulating Gaussian Boson Sampling
Quesada, N., Chadwick, R. S., Bell, B. A., Arrazola, J. M., Vincent, T., Qi, H., & García−Patrón, R. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.010306 · Cited by 48
Implementing bilinear interpolation with quantum images
Yan, F., Zhao, S.-S., Venegas-Andraca, S. E., & Hirota, K. (2021) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103149 · Cited by 48
A Configurable CRYSTALS-Kyber Hardware Implementation with Side-Channel Protection
Jati, A., Gupta, N., Chattopadhyay, A., & Sanadhya, S. K. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3587037 · Cited by 48
Random Quantum Circuits Transform Local Noise into Global White Noise
Dalzell, A. M., Hunter-Jones, N., & Brandão, F. G. S. L. (2024) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-024-04958-z · Cited by 124
Scalable Method for Eliminating Residual ZZ Interaction between Superconducting Qubits
Ni, Z., Li, S., Zhang, L., Chu, J., Niu, J., Yan, T., Deng, X., Hu, L., Li, J., Zhong, Y., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.040502 · Cited by 54
Ajagekar, A., Hamoud, K. A., & You, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2022.3187367 · Cited by 50
Simulation of Interaction-Induced Chiral Topological Dynamics on a Digital Quantum Computer
Koh, J. M., Tai, T., & Lee, C. H. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.140502 · Cited by 50
Zhu, Y., Xue, S., Wu, R.-B., Li, W. L., Peng, Z., & Jiang, M. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.043710 · Cited by 49
Carollo, F., & Alba, V. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.l220304 · Cited by 48
Tight Bounds on the Convergence of Noisy Random Circuits to the Uniform Distribution
Deshpande, A., Niroula, P., Shtanko, O., Gorshkov, A. V., Fefferman, B., & Gullans, M. J. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.040329 · Cited by 48
Quantum Instruction Set Design for Performance
Huang, C., Wang, T., Wu, F., Ding, D., Ye, Q., Kong, L., Zhang, F., Ni, X., Song, Z., Shi, Y., et al. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.070601 · Cited by 56
Rochman, J., Xie, T., Bartholomew, J. G., Schwab, K., & Faraon, A. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36799-0 · Cited by 47
Quantum Simulation of Dissipative Collective Effects on Noisy Quantum Computers
Cattaneo, M., Rossi, M. A. C., García-Pérez, G., Zambrini, R., & Maniscalco, S. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010324 · Cited by 54
Nuclear shell-model simulation in digital quantum computers
Pérez-Obiol, A., Romero, A. M., Menéndez, J., Rios, A., García-Sáez, A., & Juliá-Díaz, B. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39263-7 · Cited by 59
Qubit Allocation for Distributed Quantum Computing
Mao, Y., Liu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infocom53939.2023.10228915 · Cited by 53
Room-temperature quantum coherence of entangled multiexcitons in a metal-organic framework
Yamauchi, A., Tanaka, K., Fuki, M., Fujiwara, S., Kimizuka, N., Ryu, T., Saigo, M., Onda, K., Kusumoto, R., Ueno, N., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi3147 · Cited by 54
Block-encoding structured matrices for data input in quantum computing
Sünderhauf, C., Campbell, E. T., & Camps, J. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-01-11-1226 · Cited by 86
Hunting for quantum-classical crossover in condensed matter problems
Yoshioka, N., Okubo, T., Suzuki, Y., Koizumi, Y., & Mizukami, W. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00839-4 · Cited by 75
Superconducting Qubits above 20 GHz Operating over 200 mK
Anferov, A., Harvey, S. P., Wan, F., Simon, J., & Schuster, D. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.030347 · Cited by 64
Suppressing Counter-Rotating Errors for Fast Single-Qubit Gates with Fluxonium
Rower, D. A., Ding, L., Zhang, H., Hays, M., An, J., Harrington, P. M., Rosen, I. T., Gertler, J., Hazard, T., Niedzielski, B. M., et al. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.040342 · Cited by 48
Characterizing decoherence rates of a superconducting qubit by direct microwave scattering
Lu, Y., Bengtsson, A., Burnett, J., Wiegand, E., Suri, B., Krantz, P., Roudsari, A. F., Kockum, A. F., Gasparinetti, S., Johansson, G., et al. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00367-5 · Cited by 53
Simulating Hydrodynamics on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Devices with Random Circuits
Richter, J., & Pal, A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.230501 · Cited by 50
Jet: Fast quantum circuit simulations with parallel task-based tensor-network contraction
Vincent, T. J., Riordan, L. J. O. A., Andrenkov, M., Brown, J., Killoran, N., Qi, H., & Dhand, I. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-05-09-709 · Cited by 56
Suppression of Static Z Z Interaction in an All-Transmon Quantum Processor
Zhao, P., Lan, D., Xu, P., Xue, G., Blank, M., Tan, X., Yu, H., & Yu, Y. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.024037 · Cited by 48
Jakob, A. M., Robson, S. G., Schmitt, V., Mourik, V., Posselt, M., Spemann, D., Johnson, B. C., Firgau, H. R., Mayes, E. L. H., McCallum, J. C., et al. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202103235 · Cited by 48
Classically verifiable quantum advantage from a computational Bell test
Kahanamoku–Meyer, G. D., Choi, S., Vazirani, U. V., & Yao, N. Y. (2022) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01643-7 · Cited by 62
Exploiting degeneracy in belief propagation decoding of quantum codes
Kuo, K.-Y., & Lai, C. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00623-2 · Cited by 46
Quantum computation: Algorithms and Applications
Cho, C., Chen, C.-Y., Chen, K.-C., Huang, T., Hsu, M.-C., Cao, N., Zeng, B., Tan, S.-G., & Chang, C. (2021) · Chinese Journal of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2021.05.001 · Cited by 54
Self-citationZaman, A., Morrell, H. J., & Wong, H. Y. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3297658 · Cited by 56
Li, A., Fang, B., Granade, C., Prawiroatmodjo, G., Heim, B., Roetteler, M., & Krishnamoorthy, S. (2021) · International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC) · doi:10.1145/3458817.3476169 · Cited by 46
Design and integration of single-qubit rotations and two-qubit gates in silicon above one Kelvin
Petit, L., Rimbach-Russ, M., Eenink, H. G. J., Lawrie, W. I. L., Clarke, J. S., Vandersypen, L. M. K., & Veldhorst, M. (2022) · Communications Materials · doi:10.1038/s43246-022-00304-9 · Cited by 48
A Survey on Exotic Signatures for Post-quantum Blockchain: Challenges and Research Directions
Buser, M., Dowsley, R., Esgin, M. F., Gritti, C., Kermanshahi, S. K., Kuchta, V., LeGrow, J. T., Liu, J. K., Phan, R. C. ‐., Sakzad, A., et al. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3572771 · Cited by 50
Practical advantage of quantum machine learning in ghost imaging
Xiao, T., Zhai, X., Wu, X., Jianping Fan, B., & Zeng, G. (2023) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01290-1 · Cited by 57
Computational design of mRNA vaccines
Kim, Y.-A., Mousavi, K., Yazdi, A. K., Zwierzyna, M., Cardinali, M., Fox, D. M., Peel, T., Coller, J., Aggarwal, K., & Maruggi, G. (2023) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.024 · Cited by 47
Application-Motivated, Holistic Benchmarking of a Full Quantum Computing Stack
Mills, D., Sivarajah, S., Scholten, T. L., & Duncan, R. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-03-22-415 · Cited by 62
Fast Estimation of Sparse Quantum Noise
Harper, R., Yu, W., & Flammia, S. T. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010322 · Cited by 47
High-Fidelity Measurement of a Superconducting Qubit Using an On-Chip Microwave Photon Counter
Opremcak, A., Liu, C. H., Wilen, C., Okubo, K., Christensen, B. G., Sank, D., White, T. C., Vainsencher, A., Giustina, M., Megrant, A., et al. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.011027 · Cited by 53
Self-citationGenerating spatially entangled itinerant photons with waveguide quantum electrodynamics
Kannan, B., Campbell, D., Vasconcelos, F., Winik, R., Kim, D., Kjærgaard, M., Krantz, P., Melville, A. J., Niedzielski, B. M., Yoder, J., et al. (2020) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 47
Introduction to Quantum Computing
Marella, S. T., & Parisa, H. S. K. (2020) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.94103 · Cited by 50
Entanglement barriers in dual-unitary circuits
Reid, I., & Bertini, B. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.014301 · Cited by 47
Nuclear Forces for Precision Nuclear Physics: A Collection of Perspectives
Tews, I., Davoudi, Z., Ekström, A., Holt, J. D., Becker, K., Briceño, R., Dean, D. J., Detmold, W., Drischler, C., Duguet, T., et al. (2022) · Few-Body Systems · doi:10.1007/s00601-022-01749-x · Cited by 50
Quantum blockchain based on asymmetric quantum encryption and a stake vote consensus algorithm
Wang, W.-S., Yu, Y., & Du, L. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12412-0 · Cited by 51
Noise-resilient variational hybrid quantum-classical optimization
Gentini, L., Cuccoli, A., Pirandola, S., Verrucchi, P., & Banchi, L. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.052414 · Cited by 46
Abrupt transitions in variational quantum circuit training
Campos, E., Nasrallah, A., & Biamonte, J. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032607 · Cited by 46
Gyöngyösi, L., & Imre, S. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56689-0 · Cited by 48
Battistel, F., Varbanov, B., & Terhal, B. M. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030314 · Cited by 52
Variational Inference with a Quantum Computer
Benedetti, M., Coyle, B., Fiorentini, M., Lubasch, M., & Rosenkranz, M. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.044057 · Cited by 62
Experimental Simulation of Open Quantum System Dynamics via Trotterization
Han, J., Cai, W., Hu, L., Mu, X. D., Ma, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, W., Wang, H., Song, Y., Zou, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.020504 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., Burkett, B., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Collins, R., Courtney, W., Dunsworth, A., Farhi, E., Foxen, B., Fowler, A., Gidney, C., Giustina, M., Graff, R., Guerin, K., Habegger, S., Harrigan, M. P., Hartmann, M. J., Ho, A., Hoffmann, M., Huang, T., Humble, T. S., Isakov, S. V., Jeffrey, E., Jiang, Z., Kafri, D., Kechedzhi, K., Kelly, J., Klimov, P. V., Knysh, S., Korotkov, A., Kostritsa, F., Landhuis, D., Lindmark, M., Lucero, E., Lyakh, D., Mandrà, S., McClean, J. R., McEwen, M., Megrant, A., Mi, X., Michielsen, K., Mohseni, M., Mutus, J., Naaman, O., Neeley, M., Neill, C., Niu, M. Y., Ostby, E., Petukhov, A., Platt, J. C., Quintana, C., Rieffel, E. G., Roushan, P., Rubin, N. C., Sank, D., Satzinger, K. J., Smelyanskiy, V., Sung, K. J., Trevithick, M. D., Vainsencher, A., Villalonga, B., White, T., Yao, Z. J., Yeh, P., Zalcman, A., Neven, H., & Martinis, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Martinis, John M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-10-23
- Volume
- 574
- Issue
- 7779
- Pages
- 505-510
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2982169647
- Cited by
- 7,720
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 701 · 2025: 1157 · 2024: 1143 · 2023: 1234 · 2022: 1230 · 2021: 1315 · 2020: 875 · 2019: 60
- FWCI
- 397.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Comillas Repository (Comillas Pontifical University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (AC05-00OR22725, DE--AC05--00OR22725, DE-AC05?, Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, 00OR22725)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (DE-AC05-00OR22725)
- Office of Science (DEAC05- 00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
- Ames Research Center
- University of California, Santa Barbara
- Air Force Research Laboratory (F4HBKC4162G001, DE-AC05-00OR22725)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum advantage, superconducting qubits, classical simulation of quantum circuits, programmable quantum processors, quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
