The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Open accessAbstract
The promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor1. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here we report the use of a processor with programmable superconducting qubits2–7 to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a computational state-space of dimension 253 (about 1016). Measurements from repeated experiments sample the resulting probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. Our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times—our benchmarks currently indicate that the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy8–14 for this specific computational task, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm. Quantum supremacy is demonstrated using a programmable superconducting processor known as Sycamore, taking approximately 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times, which would take a state-of-the-art supercomputer around ten thousand years to compute.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In typical cases, if noise overwhelms the circuit, the measured distribution will be uniform18 and the measured XEB will be 0.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As an illustration, a type of superconducting processor used for Google's quantum supremacy experiment had single-qubit and two-qubit gate errors of 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively [5].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recent advances in control and readout of quantum bits have underscored the spectacular promise of QIP [82,83].”
From 2022 Roadmap on integrated quantum photonics (2022) · cites this paper as [82]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Quantum advantage was demonstrated against the best classical computers for the task of sampling the output of a pseudo-random quantum circuit.”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Arute et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finally, using 3D [[8,3,2]] code blocks16,17, we realize computationally complex sampling circuits18 with up to 48 logical qubits entangled with hypercube connectivity19 with 228 logical two-qubit gates and 48 logical CCZ gates20.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We obtain an XEB of approximately 0.1 for 48 logical qubits and hundreds of nonlocal logical entangling gates, up to roughly an order of magnitude higher than previous physical qubit implementations of digital circuits of similar complexity18,48, showing the benefits of a logical encoding for this application.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The researchers have explained that their sycamore processor takes about 200s to compute. A similar job would take approximately 10,000years by a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer [5].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the year of 2019, researchers executed quantum supremacy successfully in a 53 qubit superconducting machine.”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“RCS is a system-level benchmark assessing how effectively a quantum computer can generate computationally complex quantum states15.”
From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In either case, the quality of samples can be judged by statistical tests, with the linear cross-entropy test being a widely used standard15.”
From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Existing quantum devices contain on the order of 100 physical qubits.”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Arute et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The recent development of quantum computing, which uses entanglement, superposition, and other quantum fundamental concepts, can provide substantial processing advantages over traditional computing.”
From Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Error correction requires thousands of physical qubits for each logical qubit [91], resulting in millions of qubits for calculating the FeMoco ground state energy [45, 46].”
From Drug design on quantum computers (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“However, in the near term, this tradeoff is a happy one as many NISQ architectures—most notably superconducting qubit devices—can easily and rapidly repeat executions of a quantum circuit.”
From Training deep quantum neural networks (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
In the citing paper
“For example, the recently reported experiment involving the “Sycamore” quantum computer executed one instance of a quantum circuit a million times in 200 s46.”
From Training deep quantum neural networks (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
In the citing paper
“For comparison, the recent work on quantum supremacy by Google reported fidelities of 0.1% for single-qubit gates and 0.3% for two-qubit gates in a superconducting processor [20].”
From The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Given that the current record for a controllable, programmable quantum processor is 53 qubits [20], there is still a long way to go.”
From The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552
Self-citationScheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack
Grover, L. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.325 · Cited by 4,306
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box
Koch, J., Yu, T. M., Gambetta, J., Houck, A. A., Schuster, D. I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 · Cited by 3,351
Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation
Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032324 · Cited by 3,059
Self-citationBarren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes
McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 · Cited by 2,329
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Farhi, E. & Neven, H. Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06002 (2018). · arXiv
- Cross, A. W., Magesan, E., Bishop, L. S., Smolin, J. A. & Gambetta, J. M. Scalable randomised benchmarking of non-Clifford gates. npj Quant. Inform. 2, 16012 (2016).
- Villalonga, B. et al. A flexible high-performance simulator for the verification and benchmarking of quantum circuits implemented on real hardware. npj Quant. Inform. (in the press); preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09599 (2018). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,052
Classical algorithm for simulating experimental Gaussian boson sampling
Oh, C., Liu, M., Alexeev, Y., Fefferman, B., & Jiang, L. (2024) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02535-8 · Cited by 87
Decoding algorithms for surface codes
deMarti iOlius, A., Fuentes, P., Orús, R., Crespo, P. M., & Etxezarreta Martinez, J. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-10-10-1498 · Cited by 60
Variational quantum circuits for quantum state tomography
Liu, Y., Wang, D., Xue, S., Huang, A., Fu, X., Qiang, X., Xu, P., Huang, H.-L., Deng, M., Guo, C., et al. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.052316 · Cited by 59
Solid-State Qubits: 3D Integration and Packaging
Rosenberg, D., Weber, S. J., Conway, D., Yost, D., Mallek, J., Calusine, G., Das, R. N., Kim, D. K., Schwartz, M. E., Woods, W. H., et al. (2020) · IEEE Microwave Magazine · doi:10.1109/mmm.2020.2993478 · Cited by 96
Efficient Encoding of the Weighted MAX $$k$$-CUT on a Quantum Computer Using QAOA
Fuchs, F. G., Kolden, H. Ø., Aase, N. H., & Sartor, G. (2021) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-020-00437-z · Cited by 56
On applications of quantum computing to plasma simulations
Dodin, I. Y., & Startsev, E. A. (2021) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/5.0056974 · Cited by 57
The Rise of the Quantum Internet
Caleffi, M., Chandra, D., Cuomo, D., Hassanpour, S., & Cacciapuoti, A. S. (2020) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2020.2984871 · Cited by 56
Demonstration of an All-Microwave Controlled-Phase Gate between Far-Detuned Qubits
Krinner, S., Kurpiers, P., Royer, B., Magnard, P., Tsitsilin, I., Besse, J.-C., Remm, A., Blais, A., & Wallraff, A. J. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.044039 · Cited by 58
Variational Quantum-Neural Hybrid Eigensolver
Zhang, S., Wan, Z., Lee, C., Hsieh, C., Zhang, S., & Yao, H. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.120502 · Cited by 65
Quantum Support Vector Machine Algorithms for Remote Sensing Data Classification
Delilbasic, A., Cavallaro, G., Willsch, M., Melgani, F., Riedel, M., & Michielsen, K. F. L. (2021) · IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) · doi:10.1109/igarss47720.2021.9554802 · Cited by 58
Self-citationQuantum generative adversarial networks with multiple superconducting qubits
Huang, K., Wang, Z., Song, C., Xu, K., Li, H., Wang, Z., Guo, Q., Song, Z., Liu, Z., Zheng, D., et al. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00503-1 · Cited by 62
Efficient Quantum Network Communication Using Optimized Entanglement Swapping Trees
Ghaderibaneh, M., Zhan, C., Gupta, H., & Ramakrishnan, C. R. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2022.3168784 · Cited by 56
Development of variational quantum deep neural networks for image recognition
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, C., Jiang, R., & Huang, W. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.010 · Cited by 60
Confinement in a $${{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}$$ lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer
Mildenberger, J., Mruczkiewicz, W., Halimeh, J. C., Zhang, J., & Hauke, P. (2025) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02723-6 · Cited by 77
Quantum inverse iteration algorithm for programmable quantum simulators
Kyriienko, O. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0239-7 · Cited by 66
The theory of the quantum kernel-based binary classifier
Park, D. K., Blank, C., & Petruccione, F. (2020) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126422 · Cited by 61
Dimensional Expressivity Analysis of Parametric Quantum Circuits
Funcke, L., Hartung, T., Jansen, K., Kühn, S., & Stornati, P. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-03-29-422 · Cited by 79
Chicco, S., Chiesa, A., Allodi, G., Garlatti, E., Atzori, M., Sorace, L., Renzi, R. D., Sessoli, R., & Carretta, S. (2021) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d1sc01358k · Cited by 55
Generating spatially entangled itinerant photons with waveguide quantum electrodynamics
Kannan, B., Campbell, D. L., Vasconcelos, F., Winik, R., Kim, D. K., Kjærgaard, M., Krantz, P., Melville, A. J., Niedzielski, B. M., Yoder, J., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb8780 · Cited by 60
Noguchi, A., Osada, A., Masuda, S., Kono, S., Heya, K., Wolski, S. P., Takahashi, H., Sugiyama, T., Lachance-Quirion, D., & Nakamura, Y. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.062408 · Cited by 56
Scalable Neural Decoder for Topological Surface Codes
Meinerz, K., Park, C.-Y., & Trebst, S. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.080505 · Cited by 55
Eigenstate correlations around the many-body localization transition
Tikhonov, K. S., & Mirlin, A. D. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.064204 · Cited by 57
A Leap among Quantum Computing and Quantum Neural Networks: A Survey
Massoli, F. V., Vadicamo, L., Amato, G. M., & Falchi, F. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3529756 · Cited by 78
Methods for Simulating String-Net States and Anyons on a Digital Quantum Computer
Liu, Y.-J., Shtengel, K., Smith, A., & Pollmann, F. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.040315 · Cited by 61
Demonstration of Algorithmic Quantum Speedup
Pokharel, B., & Lidar, D. A. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.210602 · Cited by 66
Taking advantage of noise in quantum reservoir computing
Domingo, L., Carlo, G. G., & Borondo, F. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35461-5 · Cited by 55
Two-Qutrit Quantum Algorithms on a Programmable Superconducting Processor
Roy, T., Li, Z., Kapit, E., & Schuster, D. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.064024 · Cited by 70
Optimality guarantees for crystal structure prediction
Gusev, V. V., Adamson, D., Deligkas, A., Antypov, D., Collins, C. M., Krysta, P., Potapov, I., Darling, G. R., Dyer, M. S., Spirakis, P. G., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06071-y · Cited by 58
Acharya, R., Brebels, S., Grill, A., Verjauw, J., Ivanov, T., Lozano, D. P., Wan, D., Damme, J. V., Vadiraj, A. M., Mongillo, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-023-01033-8 · Cited by 67
Superconducting microwave cavities and qubits for quantum information systems
Krasnok, A., Dhakal, P., Fedorov, A., Frigola, P., Kelly, M. J., & Kutsaev, S. (2024) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0155213 · Cited by 69
Non-Abelian braiding of Fibonacci anyons with a superconducting processor
Xu, S., Sun, Z.-Z., Wang, K., Li, H., Zhu, Z., Dong, H., Deng, J., Zhang, X., Chen, J., Wu, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02529-6 · Cited by 67
Visualizing dynamics of charges and strings in (2 + 1)D lattice gauge theories
Cochran, T. A., Jobst, B., Rosenberg, E. N., Lensky, Y. D., Gyawali, G., Eassa, N. M., Will, M., Szasz, A., Abanin, D. A., Acharya, R., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08999-9 · Cited by 93
Self-citationDepth optimization of quantum search algorithms beyond Grover's algorithm
Zhang, K., & Korepin, V. E. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032346 · Cited by 55
Unsupervised Machine Learning of Quantum Phase Transitions Using Diffusion Maps
Lidiak, A., & Gong, Z. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.225701 · Cited by 57
Limitations of Linear Cross-Entropy as a Measure for Quantum Advantage
Gao, X., Kalinowski, M., Chou, C.-N., Lukin, M. D., Barak, B., & Choi, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.01657 · Cited by 54
Baldwin, C. H., Mayer, K., Brown, N. C., Ryan-Anderson, C., & Hayes, D. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-05-09-707 · Cited by 54
Electronic properties of the bulk and surface states of Fe1+yTe1−xSex
Li, Y., Zaki, N., Garlea, V. O., Savici, A. T., Fobes, D., Xu, Z., Camino, F., Petrović, C., Gu, G. D., Johnson, P. D., et al. (2021) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-021-00984-7 · Cited by 54
A co-design framework of neural networks and quantum circuits towards quantum advantage
Jiang, W., Xiong, J., & Shi, Y. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 54
QuantumFed: A Federated Learning Framework for Collaborative Quantum Training
Xia, Q., & Li, Q. (2021) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom46510.2021.9685012 · Cited by 62
Advances and opportunities in materials science for scalable quantum computing
Lordi, V., & Nichol, J. M. (2021) · MRS Bulletin · doi:10.1557/s43577-021-00133-0 · Cited by 64
Izmaylov, A. F., Lang, R. A., & Yen, T.-C. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.062443 · Cited by 65
Variational quantum eigensolver for the Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice
Kattemölle, J., & van Wezel, J. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.214429 · Cited by 65
The Schottky barrier transistor in emerging electronic devices
Schwarz, M., Vethaak, T. D., Derycke, V., Francheteau, A., Iñı́guez, B., Kataria, S., Kloes, A., Lefloch, F., Lemme, M. C., Snyder, J. P., et al. (2023) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/1361-6528/acd05f · Cited by 57
Fast generation of Schrödinger cat states using a Kerr-tunable superconducting resonator
He, X., Lu, Y., Bao, D., Xue, H., Jiang, W., Wang, Z., Roudsari, A. F., Delsing, P., Tsai, J. S., & Lin, Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42057-0 · Cited by 61
Limitations of Linear Cross-Entropy as a Measure for Quantum Advantage
Gao, X., Kalinowski, M., Chou, C.-N., Lukin, M. D., Barak, B., & Choi, S. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.010334 · Cited by 89
Applications of diamond films: a review
Zulkharnay, R., & May, P. W. (2024) · Functional Diamond · doi:10.1080/26941112.2024.2410160 · Cited by 55
Two-dimensional hard-core Bose–Hubbard model with superconducting qubits
Yanay, Y., Braumüller, J., Gustavsson, S., Oliver, W. D., & Tahan, C. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0269-1 · Cited by 57
Measurement-free preparation of grid states
Hastrup, J., Ki-min Park, B., Brask, J. B., Filip, R., & Andersen, U. L. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00353-3 · Cited by 52
A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Mitigating Measurement Errors in Quantum Algorithms
Kwon, H., & Bae, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2020.3009664 · Cited by 54
Boundaries of quantum supremacy via random circuit sampling
Zlokapa, A., Villalonga, B., Boixo, S., & Lidar, D. A. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00703-x · Cited by 66
Self-citationHigh-Fidelity Software-Defined Quantum Logic on a Superconducting Qudit
Wu, X., Tomarken, S., Petersson, N. A., Martinez, L. A., Rosen, Y. J., & DuBois, J. L. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.170502 · Cited by 57
Correlating AGP on a quantum computer
Khamoshi, A., Evangelista, F. A., & Scuseria, G. E. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abc1bb · Cited by 59
Iterative quantum-assisted eigensolver
Bharti, K., & Haug, T. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.l050401 · Cited by 64
Programmable directional emitter and receiver of itinerant microwave photons in a waveguide
Gheeraert, N., Kono, S., & Nakamura, Y. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.053720 · Cited by 59
Quantum Computing: Towards Industry Reference Problems
Luckow, A., Klepsch, J., & Pichlmeier, J. (2021) · Digitale Welt · doi:10.1007/s42354-021-0335-7 · Cited by 56
Qubit Mapping Based on Subgraph Isomorphism and Filtered Depth-Limited Search
Li, S., Zhou, X., & Feng, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2020.3023247 · Cited by 57
A review on reversible quantum adders
Orts, F. J., Ortega, G., Combarro, E. F., & Garzón, E. M. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102810 · Cited by 54
QECOOL: On-Line Quantum Error Correction with a Superconducting Decoder for Surface Code
Ueno, Y., Kondo, M., Tanaka, M., Suzuki, Y., & Tabuchi, Y. (2021) · ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) · doi:10.1109/dac18074.2021.9586326 · Cited by 55
Dimensional Expressivity Analysis of Parametric Quantum Circuits
Funcke, L., Hartung, T., Jansen, K., Kühn, S., & Stornati, P. (2021) · Desy Publications Database (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY) · Cited by 57
Superconducting qubits in a flip-chip architecture
Conner, C. R., Bienfait, A., Chang, H.-S., Chou, M.-H., Dumur, É., Grebel, J., Peairs, G. A., Povey, R. G., Yan, H., Zhong, Y., et al. (2021) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0050173 · Cited by 62
Efficient quantum computation of molecular forces and other energy gradients
O’Brien, T. E., Streif, M., Rubin, N. C., Santagati, R., Su, Y., Huggins, W. J., Goings, J. J., Moll, N., Kyoseva, E. S., Degroote, M., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.043210 · Cited by 71
Self-citationThe Evaluation of Software Security through Quantum Computing Techniques: A Durability Perspective
Alyami, H., Nadeem, M., Alharbi, A., Alosaimi, W. A., Ansari, M. T. J., Pandey, D., Kumar, R., & Khan, R. A. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app112411784 · Cited by 67
Variational quantum solutions to the advection–diffusion equation for applications in fluid dynamics
Demirdjian, R., Gunlycke, D., Reynolds, C. A., Doyle, J. D., & Tafur, S. (2022) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03667-7 · Cited by 62
Protecting Fiber-Optic Quantum Key Distribution Sources against Light-Injection Attacks
Ponosova, A., Ruzhitskaya, D. D., Chaiwongkhot, P., Egorov, V. I., Makarov, V., & Huang, A. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.040307 · Cited by 53
Resource theory of quantum scrambling
Garcia, R. J., Bu, K., & Jaffe, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2217031120 · Cited by 72
Photonic link from single-flux-quantum circuits to room temperature
Shen, M., Xie, J., Xu, Y., Wang, S., Cheng, R., Fu, W., Zhou, Y., & Tang, H. X. (2024) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-023-01370-2 · Cited by 53
Quantum-inspired computing technology in operations and logistics management
Núñez‐Merino, M., Marín, J. M. M., Moyano‐Fuentes, J., & Castaño-Moraga, C. A. (2024) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2023-0065 · Cited by 60
Cavallaro, G., Willsch, D., Willsch, M., Michielsen, K., & Riedel, M. (2020) · IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium · doi:10.1109/igarss39084.2020.9323544 · Cited by 53
Self-citationA shortcut tour of quantum control methods for modern quantum technologies
Stefanatos, D., & Paspalakis, E. (2020) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/132/60001 · Cited by 53
Quantum Computing: An Overview Across the System StackPreprint
Resch, S., & Karpuzcu, U. R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.07240 · Cited by 94
Data used in "Qubit Readout Error Mitigation with Bit-flip Averaging"
Smith, A. W. R., Self, C. N., Khosla, K. E., & Kim, M. S. (2021) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5267396 · Cited by 76
Towards Quantum-Enhanced Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection
Gouveia, A., & Correia, M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA) · doi:10.1109/nca51143.2020.9306691 · Cited by 52
Mutual information-assisted adaptive variational quantum eigensolver
Zhang, Z.-J., Kyaw, T. H., Kottmann, J. S., Degroote, M., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abdca4 · Cited by 52
Morgan, V., Casso-Hartmann, L., Bahamón-Pinzón, D., McCourt, K. M., Hjort, R. G., Bahramzadeh, S., Vélez‐Torres, I., McLamore, E. S., Gomes, C. L., Alocilja, E. C., et al. (2020) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics10010022 · Cited by 53
Oscillotherapeutics – Time-targeted interventions in epilepsy and beyond
Takeuchi, Y., & Berényi, A. (2020) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2020.01.002 · Cited by 53
Quantum technology hype and national security
Smith, F. L. (2020) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010620904922 · Cited by 62
Advantages and Bottlenecks of Quantum Machine Learning for Remote Sensing
Zaidenberg, D. A., Sebastianelli, A., Spiller, D., Le Saux, B., & Ullo, S. L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS · doi:10.1109/igarss47720.2021.9553133 · Cited by 52
Statistical complexity of quantum circuits
Bu, K., Koh, D. E., Li, L., Luo, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.062431 · Cited by 64
Enabling Multi-programming Mechanism for Quantum Computing in the NISQ Era
Niu, S., & Todri‐Sanial, A. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-16-925 · Cited by 70
Building a large-scale quantum computer with continuous-variable optical technologies
Fukui, K., & Takeda, S. (2022) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ac489c · Cited by 61
LILLIPUT: a lightweight low-latency lookup-table decoder for near-term Quantum error correction
Das, P., Locharla, A., & Jones, C. (2022) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/3503222.3507707 · Cited by 84
Optimizing Shadow Tomography with Generalized Measurements
Nguyen, H. C., Bönsel, J. L., Steinberg, J., & Gühne, O. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.220502 · Cited by 58
Chemical Profiles of the Oxides on Tantalum in State of the Art Superconducting Circuits
McLellan, R. A., Dutta, A., Zhou, C., Jia, Y., Weiland, C. R., Gui, X., Place, A. P. M., Crowley, K. D., Le, X. H., Madhavan, T., et al. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202300921 · Cited by 51
Garms, L., Paraïso, T. K., Hanley, N., Khalid, A., Rafferty, C., Grant, J., Newman, J., Shields, A. J., Cid, C., & O'Neill, M. P. (2024) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202300304 · Cited by 57
Swiadek, F., Shillito, R., Magnard, P., Remm, A., Hellings, C., Lacroix, N., Ficheux, Q., Zanuz, D. C., Norris, G. J., Blais, A., et al. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.040326 · Cited by 56
Subthreshold Mismatch in Nanometer CMOS at Cryogenic Temperatures
Hart, P. A. T., Babaie, M., Edoardo Charbon, A., Vladimirescu, A., & Sebastiano, F. (2020) · IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society · doi:10.1109/jeds.2020.2988730 · Cited by 52
Quantum simulation of open quantum systems in heavy-ion collisions
de Jong, W. A., Metcalf, M., Mulligan, J. D., Ploskon, M. A., Ringer, F., & Yao, X. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.l051501 · Cited by 53
Tensor Network Quantum Simulator With Step-Dependent Parallelization
Lykov, D., Schutski, R., Galda, A., Vinokur, V. M., & Alexeev, Y. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce53715.2022.00081 · Cited by 52
Analyzing the performance of variational quantum factoring on a superconducting quantum processor
Karamlou, A. H., Simon, W., Katabarwa, A., Scholten, T. L., Peropadre, B., & Cao, Y. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00478-z · Cited by 52
Integrating Quantum Computing into Workflow Modeling and Execution
Weder, B., Breitenbücher, U., Leymann, F., & Wild, K. (2020) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC) · doi:10.1109/ucc48980.2020.00046 · Cited by 61
Lin, C., Hu, G.-H., Chan, C.-Y., & Yan, J. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11031329 · Cited by 52
Jonay, C., Khemani, V., & Ippoliti, M. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043046 · Cited by 57
Experimental quantum kernel trick with nuclear spins in a solid
Kusumoto, T., Mitarai, K., Fujii, K., Kitagawa, M., & Negoro, M. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00423-0 · Cited by 70
Generalized quantum circuit differentiation rules
Kyriienko, O., & Elfving, V. E. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.052417 · Cited by 69
Analyzing the Performance of Variational Quantum Factoring on a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Karamlou, A. H., Simon, W. A., Katabarwa, A., Scholten, T. L., Peropadre, B., & Cao, Y. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07825 · Cited by 52
Reconfigurable continuously-coupled 3D photonic circuit for Boson Sampling experiments
Hoch, F., Piacentini, S., Giordani, T., Tian, Z.-N., Iuliano, M., Esposito, C., Camillini, A., Carvacho, G., Ceccarelli, F., Spagnolo, N., et al. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00568-6 · Cited by 51
Chu, J., Li, D., Yang, X., Song, S., Han, Z., Yang, Z., Dong, Y., Zheng, W., Wang, Z., Yu, X., et al. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.064012 · Cited by 51
Overhead for simulating a non-local channel with local channels by quasiprobability sampling
Mitarai, K., & Fujii, K. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-01-28-388 · Cited by 67
Quantum-Classical Hybrid Machine Learning for Image Classification (ICCAD Special Session Paper)
Alam, M., Kundu, S., Topaloglu, R. O., & Ghosh, S. (2021) · International Conference on Computer Aided Design · doi:10.1109/iccad51958.2021.9643516 · Cited by 63
Improved Plantard Arithmetic for Lattice-based Cryptography
Huang, J., Zhang, J., Zhao, H., Liu, Z., Cheung, R. C. C., Koç, Ç. K., & Chen, D. (2022) · IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems · doi:10.46586/tches.v2022.i4.614-636 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., Burkett, B., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Collins, R., Courtney, W., Dunsworth, A., Farhi, E., Foxen, B., Fowler, A., Gidney, C., Giustina, M., Graff, R., Guerin, K., Habegger, S., Harrigan, M. P., Hartmann, M. J., Ho, A., Hoffmann, M., Huang, T., Humble, T. S., Isakov, S. V., Jeffrey, E., Jiang, Z., Kafri, D., Kechedzhi, K., Kelly, J., Klimov, P. V., Knysh, S., Korotkov, A., Kostritsa, F., Landhuis, D., Lindmark, M., Lucero, E., Lyakh, D., Mandrà, S., McClean, J. R., McEwen, M., Megrant, A., Mi, X., Michielsen, K., Mohseni, M., Mutus, J., Naaman, O., Neeley, M., Neill, C., Niu, M. Y., Ostby, E., Petukhov, A., Platt, J. C., Quintana, C., Rieffel, E. G., Roushan, P., Rubin, N. C., Sank, D., Satzinger, K. J., Smelyanskiy, V., Sung, K. J., Trevithick, M. D., Vainsencher, A., Villalonga, B., White, T., Yao, Z. J., Yeh, P., Zalcman, A., Neven, H., & Martinis, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Martinis, John M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-10-23
- Volume
- 574
- Issue
- 7779
- Pages
- 505-510
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2982169647
- Cited by
- 7,720
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 701 · 2025: 1157 · 2024: 1143 · 2023: 1234 · 2022: 1230 · 2021: 1315 · 2020: 875 · 2019: 60
- FWCI
- 397.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Comillas Repository (Comillas Pontifical University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (AC05-00OR22725, DE--AC05--00OR22725, DE-AC05?, Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, 00OR22725)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (DE-AC05-00OR22725)
- Office of Science (DEAC05- 00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
- Ames Research Center
- University of California, Santa Barbara
- Air Force Research Laboratory (F4HBKC4162G001, DE-AC05-00OR22725)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum advantage, superconducting qubits, classical simulation of quantum circuits, programmable quantum processors, quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
