The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Open accessAbstract
The promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor1. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here we report the use of a processor with programmable superconducting qubits2–7 to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a computational state-space of dimension 253 (about 1016). Measurements from repeated experiments sample the resulting probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. Our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times—our benchmarks currently indicate that the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy8–14 for this specific computational task, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm. Quantum supremacy is demonstrated using a programmable superconducting processor known as Sycamore, taking approximately 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times, which would take a state-of-the-art supercomputer around ten thousand years to compute.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In typical cases, if noise overwhelms the circuit, the measured distribution will be uniform18 and the measured XEB will be 0.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As an illustration, a type of superconducting processor used for Google's quantum supremacy experiment had single-qubit and two-qubit gate errors of 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively [5].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recent advances in control and readout of quantum bits have underscored the spectacular promise of QIP [82,83].”
From 2022 Roadmap on integrated quantum photonics (2022) · cites this paper as [82]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Quantum advantage was demonstrated against the best classical computers for the task of sampling the output of a pseudo-random quantum circuit.”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Arute et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finally, using 3D [[8,3,2]] code blocks16,17, we realize computationally complex sampling circuits18 with up to 48 logical qubits entangled with hypercube connectivity19 with 228 logical two-qubit gates and 48 logical CCZ gates20.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We obtain an XEB of approximately 0.1 for 48 logical qubits and hundreds of nonlocal logical entangling gates, up to roughly an order of magnitude higher than previous physical qubit implementations of digital circuits of similar complexity18,48, showing the benefits of a logical encoding for this application.”
From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The researchers have explained that their sycamore processor takes about 200s to compute. A similar job would take approximately 10,000years by a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer [5].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the year of 2019, researchers executed quantum supremacy successfully in a 53 qubit superconducting machine.”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“RCS is a system-level benchmark assessing how effectively a quantum computer can generate computationally complex quantum states15.”
From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In either case, the quality of samples can be judged by statistical tests, with the linear cross-entropy test being a widely used standard15.”
From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Existing quantum devices contain on the order of 100 physical qubits.”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Arute et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The recent development of quantum computing, which uses entanglement, superposition, and other quantum fundamental concepts, can provide substantial processing advantages over traditional computing.”
From Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Error correction requires thousands of physical qubits for each logical qubit [91], resulting in millions of qubits for calculating the FeMoco ground state energy [45, 46].”
From Drug design on quantum computers (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“However, in the near term, this tradeoff is a happy one as many NISQ architectures—most notably superconducting qubit devices—can easily and rapidly repeat executions of a quantum circuit.”
From Training deep quantum neural networks (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
In the citing paper
“For example, the recently reported experiment involving the “Sycamore” quantum computer executed one instance of a quantum circuit a million times in 200 s46.”
From Training deep quantum neural networks (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
In the citing paper
“For comparison, the recent work on quantum supremacy by Google reported fidelities of 0.1% for single-qubit gates and 0.3% for two-qubit gates in a superconducting processor [20].”
From The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Given that the current record for a controllable, programmable quantum processor is 53 qubits [20], there is still a long way to go.”
From The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552
Self-citationScheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack
Grover, L. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.325 · Cited by 4,306
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box
Koch, J., Yu, T. M., Gambetta, J., Houck, A. A., Schuster, D. I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 · Cited by 3,351
Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation
Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032324 · Cited by 3,059
Self-citationBarren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes
McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 · Cited by 2,329
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Farhi, E. & Neven, H. Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06002 (2018). · arXiv
- Cross, A. W., Magesan, E., Bishop, L. S., Smolin, J. A. & Gambetta, J. M. Scalable randomised benchmarking of non-Clifford gates. npj Quant. Inform. 2, 16012 (2016).
- Villalonga, B. et al. A flexible high-performance simulator for the verification and benchmarking of quantum circuits implemented on real hardware. npj Quant. Inform. (in the press); preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09599 (2018). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,052
Forging the Future: Strategic Approaches to Quantum AI Integration for Industry Transformation
How, M.-L., & Cheah, S.-M. (2024) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai5010015 · Cited by 120
A Hardware-Aware Heuristic for the Qubit Mapping Problem in the NISQ Era
Niu, S., Suau, A., Staffelbach, G., & Todri-Sanial, A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2020.3026544 · Cited by 103
Recent advances for quantum classifiers
Li, W., & Deng, D.-L. (2021) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-021-1793-6 · Cited by 118
Early Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing
Katabarwa, A., Gratsea, K., Caesura, A., & Johnson, P. D. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020101 · Cited by 103
Parity-Protected Superconductor-Semiconductor Qubit
Larsen, T. W., Gershenson, M. E., Casparis, L., Kringhøj, A., Pearson, N., McNeil, R. P. G., Kuemmeth, F., Krogstrup, P., Petersson, K. D., & Marcus, C. M. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.056801 · Cited by 102
Lo, H., Moy, W., Yu, H., Sapatnekar, S. S., & Kim, C. H. (2023) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-023-01021-y · Cited by 105
Stable quantum-correlated many-body states through engineered dissipation
Mi, X., Michailidis, A. A., Shabani, S., Miao, K. C., Klimov, P. V., Lloyd, J., Rosenberg, E. N., Acharya, R., Aleǐner, I. L., Andersen, T. I., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh9932 · Cited by 138
Self-citationA site-resolved two-dimensional quantum simulator with hundreds of trapped ions
Guo, S., Wu, Y., Ye, J., Zhang, L., Lian, W., Yao, R., Wang, Y., Yan, R., Yi, Y.-J., Xu, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07459-0 · Cited by 121
Encoding-dependent generalization bounds for parametrized quantum circuits
Caro, M. C., Gil-Fuster, E., Meyer, J. J., Eisert, J., & Sweke, R. (2021) · Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) · doi:10.17169/refubium-33753 · Cited by 104
Roy, S. S., & Basso, A. (2020) · IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems · doi:10.46586/tches.v2020.i4.443-466 · Cited by 107
Quantum simulation of nonequilibrium dynamics and thermalization in the Schwinger model
de Jong, W. A., Lee, K., Mulligan, J. D., Ploskon, M. A., Ringer, F., & Yao, X. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.054508 · Cited by 137
A cryo-CMOS chip that integrates silicon quantum dots and multiplexed dispersive readout electronics
Ruffino, A., Yang, T.-Y., Michniewicz, J., Peng, Y., Edoardo Charbon, A., & González-Zalba, M. F. (2021) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00687-6 · Cited by 118
Chen, S., Cotler, J. S., Huang, H.-Y., & Li, J. Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41217-6 · Cited by 139
Quantum computing for near-term applications in generative chemistry and drug discovery.
Pyrkov, A., Aliper, A., Bezrukov, D., Lin, Y.-C., Polykovskiy, D., Kamya, P., Ren, F., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2023) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103675 · Cited by 100
Low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computing using long-range connectivity
Cohen, L. Z., Kim, I. H., Bartlett, S. D., & Brown, B. J. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn1717 · Cited by 98
Many-Body Physics in the NISQ Era: Quantum Programming a Discrete Time Crystal
Ippoliti, M., Kechedzhi, K., Moessner, R., Sondhi, S. L., & Khemani, V. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030346 · Cited by 105
Self-citationComprehensive Survey of Consensus Docking for High-Throughput Virtual Screening
Blanes‐Mira, C., Fernández-Aguado, P., de Andrés-López, J., Fernández-Carvajal, A. M., Ferrer-Montiel, A. V., & Fernandez-Ballester, G. J. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28010175 · Cited by 113
Quantum machine learning: from physics to software engineering
Melnikov, A. A., Kordzanganeh, M., Alodjants, A. P., & Lee, R. (2023) · Advances in Physics X · doi:10.1080/23746149.2023.2165452 · Cited by 125
Microscopic relaxation channels in materials for superconducting qubits
Premkumar, A., Weiland, C. R., Hwang, S., Jäck, B., Place, A. P. M., Waluyo, I., Hunt, A. H., Bisogni, V., Pelliciari, J., Barbour, A., et al. (2021) · Communications Materials · doi:10.1038/s43246-021-00174-7 · Cited by 111
Stanisic, S., Bosse, J. L., Gambetta, F. M., Santos, R. A., Mruczkiewicz, W., O’Brien, T. E., Ostby, E. P., & Montanaro, A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33335-4 · Cited by 97
Self-citationQuantum self-attention neural networks for text classification
Li, G., Zhao, X., & Wang, X. (2024) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-023-3879-7 · Cited by 137
Three-nucleon forces: implementation and applications to atomic nuclei and dense matter
Hebeler, K. (2020) · TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) · Cited by 101
Detecting and tracking drift in quantum information processors
Proctor, T. J., Revelle, M., Nielsen, E., Rudinger, K., Lobser, D., Maunz, P., Blume-Kohout, R., & Young, K. C. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19074-4 · Cited by 118
The superconducting quasicharge qubit
Pechenezhskiy, I., Mencia, R. A., Nguyen, L. B., Lin, Y.-H., & Manucharyan, V. E. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2687-9 · Cited by 97
Generation of High-Resolution Handwritten Digits with an Ion-Trap Quantum Computer
Rudolph, M. S., Bashige, N. T., Katabarwa, A., Johri, S., Peropadre, B., & Perdomo‐Ortiz, A. (2022) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.031010 · Cited by 115
Parameter Transfer for Quantum Approximate Optimization of Weighted MaxCut
Shaydulin, R., Lotshaw, P. C., Larson, J. M., Ostrowski, J., & Humble, T. S. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3584706 · Cited by 126
Self-citationHuang, H.-L., Xu, X., Guo, C., Tian, G., Wei, S.-J., Sun, X., Bao, W., & Long, G. (2023) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-022-2057-y · Cited by 111
A volumetric framework for quantum computer benchmarks
Blume-Kohout, R., & Young, K. C. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-11-15-362 · Cited by 122
Applying the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm to the Tail-Assignment Problem
Vikstål, P., Grönkvist, M., Svensson, M., Andersson, M., Johansson, G., & Ferrini, G. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.034009 · Cited by 96
Khatri, S., Brady, A. J., Desporte, R. A., Bart, M. P., & Dowling, J. P. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00327-5 · Cited by 115
Bolometer operating at the threshold for circuit quantum electrodynamics
Kokkoniemi, R., Girard, J.-P., Hazra, D., Laitinen, A., Govenius, J., Lake, R. E., Sallinen, I., Vesterinen, V., Partanen, M., Tan, J. Y., et al. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 96
Classification and reconstruction of optical quantum states with deep neural networks
Ahmed, S., Muñoz, C. S., Nori, F., & Kockum, A. F. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033278 · Cited by 100
Simple mitigation of global depolarizing errors in quantum simulations
Vovrosh, J., Khosla, K. E., Greenaway, S., Self, C. N., Kim, M. S., & Knolle, J. (2021) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.104.035309 · Cited by 117
A perspective on scaling up quantum computation with molecular spins
Carretta, S., Zueco, D., Chiesa, A., Gómez-León, Á., & Luis, F. (2021) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0053378 · Cited by 99
Quantum computation in power systems: An overview of recent advances
Golestan, S., Habibi, M. R., Mousavi, S. Y. M., Guerrero, J. M., & Vásquez, J. C. (2022) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.185 · Cited by 113
Asymptotically Optimal Circuit Depth for Quantum State Preparation and General Unitary Synthesis
Sun, X., Tian, G., Yang, S., Yuan, P., & Zhang, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2023.3244885 · Cited by 144
Quantum Computing: Circuits, Algorithms, and Applications
Shafique, M. A., Munir, A., & Latif, I. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3362955 · Cited by 111
Quantum Computing: An Introduction for Microwave Engineers
Bardin, J. C., Sank, D., Naaman, O., & Jeffrey, E. R. (2020) · IEEE Microwave Magazine · doi:10.1109/mmm.2020.2993475 · Cited by 102
Self-citationSolid-state qubits integrated with superconducting through-silicon vias
Yost, D., Schwartz, M. E., Mallek, J., Rosenberg, D., Stull, C., Yoder, J., Calusine, G., Cook, M., Das, R. N., Day, A., et al. (2020) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 104
A Cryogenic Broadband Sub-1-dB NF CMOS Low Noise Amplifier for Quantum Applications
Peng, Y., Ruffino, A., & Edoardo Charbon, A. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2021.3073068 · Cited by 95
In‐Volume Laser Direct Writing of Silicon—Challenges and Opportunities
Chambonneau, M., Grojo, D., Tokel, O., Ilday, F. Ö., Tzortzakis, S., & Nolte, S. (2021) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.202100140 · Cited by 95
Qubit-excitation-based adaptive variational quantum eigensolver
Yordanov, Y. S., Armaos, V., Barnes, C. H., & Arvidsson-Shukur, D. R. M. (2021) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.75907 · Cited by 95
Quantum estimation, control and learning: Opportunities and challenges
Dong, D., & Petersen, I. R. (2022) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.04.011 · Cited by 103
Entangling microwaves with light
Sahu, R., Qiu, L., Hease, W., Arnold, G., Minoguchi, Y., Rabl, P., & Fink, J. M. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg3812 · Cited by 107
Dynamics of magnetization at infinite temperature in a Heisenberg spin chain
Rosenberg, E. N., Andersen, T. I., Samajdar, R., Petukhov, A., Hoke, J. C., Abanin, D. A., Bengtsson, A., Drozdov, I., Erickson, C., Klimov, P. V., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adi7877 · Cited by 95
Self-citationTwo-Qubit Spectroscopy of Spatiotemporally Correlated Quantum Noise in Superconducting Qubits
von Lüpke, U., Beaudoin, F., Norris, L., Sung, Y., Winik, R., Qiu, J. Y., Kjærgaard, M., Kim, D. K., Yoder, J., Gustavsson, S., et al. (2020) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.010305 · Cited by 95
High-Contrast Z Z Interaction Using Superconducting Qubits with Opposite-Sign Anharmonicity
Zhao, P., Xu, P., Lan, D., Chu, J., Tan, X., Yu, H., & Yu, Y. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.200503 · Cited by 100
Variational Quantum Algorithms for Computational Fluid Dynamics
Jaksch, D., Givi, P., Daley, A. J., & Rung, T. (2023) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j062426 · Cited by 118
Ganjam, S., Wang, Y., Lu, Y., Banerjee, A., Lei, C. U., Krayzman, L., Kisslinger, K., Zhou, C., Li, R., Jia, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47857-6 · Cited by 93
Quantum computing's potential for drug discovery: Early stage industry dynamics
Zinner, M., Dahlhausen, F., Boehme, P., Ehlers, J. P., Bieske, L., & Fehring, L. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.06.003 · Cited by 102
Learnability of Quantum Neural Networks
Du, Y., Hsieh, M.-H., Liu, T., You, S., & Tao, D. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040337 · Cited by 127
Hexagonal boron nitride as a low-loss dielectric for superconducting quantum circuits and qubits
Wang, J. I.-J., Yamoah, M., Li, Q., Karamlou, A. H., Dinh, T. H., Kannan, B., Braumüller, J., Kim, D. K., Melville, A. J., Muschinske, S. E., et al. (2022) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-021-01187-w · Cited by 102
Quantum computing in power systems
Zhou, Y., Tang, Z., Nikmehr, N., Babahajiani, P., Feng, F., Wei, T.-C., Zheng, H., & Zhang, P. (2022) · iEnergy · doi:10.23919/ien.2022.0021 · Cited by 105
Technological trajectories in quantum computing to design a quantum ecosystem for industrial change
Coccia, M. (2022) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2022.2110056 · Cited by 102
Business Renaissance: Opportunities and Challenges at the Dawn of the Quantum Computing Era
How, M.-L., & Cheah, S.-M. (2023) · Businesses · doi:10.3390/businesses3040036 · Cited by 114
Chow, J. C. L. (2024) · Medical Sciences · doi:10.3390/medsci12040067 · Cited by 108
Enhanced coherence of all-nitride superconducting qubits epitaxially grown on silicon substrate
Kim, S., Terai, H., Yamashita, T., Qiu, W., Fuse, T., Yoshihara, F., Ashhab, S., Inomata, K., & Semba, K. (2021) · Communications Materials · doi:10.1038/s43246-021-00204-4 · Cited by 92
Mitigating Realistic Noise in Practical Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Devices
Sun, J., Yuan, X., Tsunoda, T., Vedral, V., Benjamin, S. C., & Endo, S. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034026 · Cited by 105
Optimality Study of Existing Quantum Computing Layout Synthesis Tools
Tan, D. B., & Cong, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2020.3009140 · Cited by 106
Quantum Computers for High-Performance Computing
Humble, T. S., McCaskey, A., Lyakh, D. I., Gowrishankar, M., Frisch, A., & Monz, T. (2021) · IEEE Micro · doi:10.1109/mm.2021.3099140 · Cited by 92
Self-citationAn introduction to quantum machine learning: from quantum logic to quantum deep learning
Alchieri, L., Badalotti, D., Bonardi, P., & Bianco, S. (2021) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-021-00056-8 · Cited by 102
Time-series quantum reservoir computing with weak and projective measurements
Mujal, P., Martínez‐Peña, R., Giorgi, G. L., Soriano, M. C., & Zambrini, R. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00682-z · Cited by 114
No-Go Theorems for Quantum Resource Purification
Fang, K., & Liu, Z.-W. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.060405 · Cited by 104
Quantum process tomography with unsupervised learning and tensor networks
Torlai, G., Wood, C. J., Acharya, A., Carleo, G., Carrasquilla, J., & Aolita, L. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38332-9 · Cited by 124
Theoretical and Experimental Perspectives of Quantum Verification
Carrasco, J. A., Elben, A., Kokail, C., Kraus, B., & Zoller, P. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010102 · Cited by 103
Parametric-Resonance Entangling Gates with a Tunable Coupler
Sete, E. A., Didier, N., Chen, A. Q., Kulshreshtha, S., Manenti, R., & Poletto, S. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.024050 · Cited by 97
Noise-resilient edge modes on a chain of superconducting qubits
Mi, X., Sonner, M., Niu, M. Y., Lee, K., Foxen, B., Acharya, R., Aleǐner, I. L., Andersen, T. I., Arute, F., Arya, K., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abq5769 · Cited by 99
Self-citationSilicon Nitride Integrated Photonics from Visible to Mid‐Infrared Spectra
Buzaverov, K. A., Baburin, A. S., Sergeev, E. V., Avdeev, S. S., Lotkov, E. S., Bukatin, S. V., Stepanov, I. A., Kramarenko, A. B., Amiraslanov, A. S., Kushnev, D. V., et al. (2024) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.202400508 · Cited by 97
Quantum Computing: Navigating the Future of Computation, Challenges, and Technological Breakthroughs
Memon, Q. A., Ahmad, M. A., & PECHT, M. G. (2024) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum6040039 · Cited by 121
Variational quantum unsampling on a quantum photonic processor
Carolan, J., Mohseni, M., Olson, J. P., Prabhu, M., Chen, C., Bunandar, D., Niu, M. Y., Harris, N. C., Wong, F. N. C., Hochberg, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0747-6 · Cited by 88
Self-citationPauli Blockade in Silicon Quantum Dots with Spin-Orbit Control
Seedhouse, A. E., Tanttu, T., Leon, R. C. C., Zhao, R., Tan, K. Y., Hensen, B., Hudson, F. E., Itoh, K. M., Yoneda, J., Yang, C. H., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010303 · Cited by 90
Molecular Nanomagnets as Qubits with Embedded Quantum-Error Correction
Chiesa, A., Macaluso, E., Petiziol, F., Wimberger, S., Santini, P. M., & Carretta, S. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02213 · Cited by 87
Yazdani, A., von Oppen, F., Halperin, B. I., & Yacoby, A. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ade0850 · Cited by 99
Lunt, O., Szyniszewski, M., & Pal, A. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.155111 · Cited by 92
cuQuantum SDK: A High-Performance Library for Accelerating Quantum Science
Bayraktar, H. H., Charara, A., Clark, D., Cohen, S. D., Costa, T. B., Fang, Y.-L. L., Gao, Y., Guan, J., Gunnels, J. A., Haidar, A., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00119 · Cited by 89
Self-citationBuilding blocks of a flip-chip integrated superconducting quantum processor
Kosen, S., Li, H.-X., Rommel, M., Shiri, D., Warren, C., Grönberg, L., Salonen, J., Abad, T., Biznárová, J., Caputo, M., et al. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac734b · Cited by 88
How many qubits are needed for quantum computational supremacy?
Dalzell, A. M., Harrow, A. W., Koh, D. E., & La Placa, R. L. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-05-11-264 · Cited by 88
Quantum advantage of two-level batteries in the self-discharging process
Santos, A. C. (2021) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.103.042118 · Cited by 88
Towards understanding the power of quantum kernels in the NISQ era
Wang, X., Du, Y., Luo, Y., & Tao, D. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-08-30-531 · Cited by 98
Geometric and holonomic quantum computation
Zhang, J., Kyaw, T. H., Filipp, S., Kwek, L. C., Sjöqvist, E., & Tong, D. M. (2023) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.07.004 · Cited by 108
Biology and medicine in the landscape of quantum advantages
Cordier, B. A., Sawaya, N. P. D., Guerreschi, G. G., & McWeeney, S. K. (2022) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0541 · Cited by 87
Osman, A., Simon, J., Bengtsson, A., Kosen, S., Krantz, P., P. Lozano, D., Scigliuzzo, M., Delsing, P., Bylander, J., & Fadavi Roudsari, A. (2021) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0037093 · Cited by 87
Regimes of Classical Simulability for Noisy Gaussian Boson Sampling
Qi, H., Brod, D. J., Quesada, N., & García-Patrón, R. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.100502 · Cited by 87
Quantum Josephson junction circuits and the dawn of artificial atoms
Martinis, J. M., Devoret, M., & Clarke, J. L. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0829-5 · Cited by 85
Self-citationRandom Matrix Spectral Form Factor of Dual-Unitary Quantum Circuits
Bertini, B., Kos, P., & Prosen, T. (2021) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04139-2 · Cited by 87
Micromasers as quantum batteries
Shaghaghi, V., Singh, V., Benenti, G., & Rosa, D. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac8829 · Cited by 87
Recent Advances in Quantum Computing for Drug Discovery and Development
Kumar, G., Yadav, S., Mukherjee, A., Hassija, V., & Guizani, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3376408 · Cited by 96
Quantum implementation of an artificial feed-forward neural network
Tacchino, F., Barkoutsos, P. K., Macchiavello, C., Tavernelli, I., Gerace, D., & Bajoni, D. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abb8e4 · Cited by 96
Suhail, S., Hussain, R., Khan, A., & Hong, C. S. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3013019 · Cited by 90
Bidirectional Electro-Optic Wavelength Conversion in the Quantum Ground State
Hease, W., Rueda, A., Sahu, R., Wulf, M., Arnold, G., Schwefel, H. G. L., & Fink, J. M. (2020) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.020315 · Cited by 87
On the Quantum versus Classical Learnability of Discrete Distributions
Sweke, R., Seifert, J., Hangleiter, D., & Eisert, J. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-03-23-417 · Cited by 102
Advances in Silicon Quantum Photonics
Adcock, J. C., Bao, J., Chi, Y., Chen, X., Bacco, D., Gong, Q., Oxenløwe, L. K., Wang, J., & Ding, Y. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2020.3025737 · Cited by 93
Whole‐Device Entanglement in a 65‐Qubit Superconducting Quantum Computer
Mooney, G. J., White, G. A. L., Hill, C. D., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100061 · Cited by 99
Parity-preserving and magnetic field–resilient superconductivity in InSb nanowires with Sn shells
Pendharkar, M., Zhang, B., Wu, H., Zarassi, A., Zhang, P., Dempsey, C. P., Lee, J. S., Harrington, S. D., Badawy, G., Gazibegović, S., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba5211 · Cited by 86
Fisher Information in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Applications
Meyer, J. J. (2021) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-33820 · Cited by 94
Practical Guide for Building Superconducting Quantum Devices
Gao, Y. Y., Rol, M. A., Touzard, S., & Wang, C. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040202 · Cited by 94
Limitations of Variational Quantum Algorithms: A Quantum Optimal Transport Approach
Palma, G. D., Marvian, M., Rouzé, C., & França, D. S. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010309 · Cited by 106
Futuristic view of the Internet of Quantum Drones: Review, challenges and research agenda
Kumar, A., Pacheco, D. A. D. J., Kaushik, K., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2022) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2022.100487 · Cited by 91
Wei, K. X., Magesan, E., Lauer, I., Srinivasan, S. J., Bogorin, D. F., Carnevale, S. D., Keefe, G., Kim, Y., Klaus, D., Landers, W., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.060501 · Cited by 86
Blueprint for a High-Performance Fluxonium Quantum Processor
Nguyen, L. B., Koolstra, G., Kim, Y., Morvan, A., Chistolini, T., Singh, S., Nesterov, K., Jünger, C., Chen, L., Pedramrazi, Z., et al. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.037001 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., Burkett, B., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Collins, R., Courtney, W., Dunsworth, A., Farhi, E., Foxen, B., Fowler, A., Gidney, C., Giustina, M., Graff, R., Guerin, K., Habegger, S., Harrigan, M. P., Hartmann, M. J., Ho, A., Hoffmann, M., Huang, T., Humble, T. S., Isakov, S. V., Jeffrey, E., Jiang, Z., Kafri, D., Kechedzhi, K., Kelly, J., Klimov, P. V., Knysh, S., Korotkov, A., Kostritsa, F., Landhuis, D., Lindmark, M., Lucero, E., Lyakh, D., Mandrà, S., McClean, J. R., McEwen, M., Megrant, A., Mi, X., Michielsen, K., Mohseni, M., Mutus, J., Naaman, O., Neeley, M., Neill, C., Niu, M. Y., Ostby, E., Petukhov, A., Platt, J. C., Quintana, C., Rieffel, E. G., Roushan, P., Rubin, N. C., Sank, D., Satzinger, K. J., Smelyanskiy, V., Sung, K. J., Trevithick, M. D., Vainsencher, A., Villalonga, B., White, T., Yao, Z. J., Yeh, P., Zalcman, A., Neven, H., & Martinis, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Martinis, John M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-10-23
- Volume
- 574
- Issue
- 7779
- Pages
- 505-510
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2982169647
- Cited by
- 7,720
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 701 · 2025: 1157 · 2024: 1143 · 2023: 1234 · 2022: 1230 · 2021: 1315 · 2020: 875 · 2019: 60
- FWCI
- 397.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Comillas Repository (Comillas Pontifical University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (AC05-00OR22725, DE--AC05--00OR22725, DE-AC05?, Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, 00OR22725)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (DE-AC05-00OR22725)
- Office of Science (DEAC05- 00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
- Ames Research Center
- University of California, Santa Barbara
- Air Force Research Laboratory (F4HBKC4162G001, DE-AC05-00OR22725)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum advantage, superconducting qubits, classical simulation of quantum circuits, programmable quantum processors, quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
