Cited by 551Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesAutophagy in Disease and TherapyAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Allele-selective lowering of mutant HTT protein by HTT–LC3 linker compounds

Open access
Li, Zhaoyang, Wang, Cen, Wang, Ziying, Zhu, Chenggang, Li, Jie, Sha, Tian, Ma, Lixiang, Gao, Chao +13 more·2019·Nature

Abstract

Accumulation of mutant proteins is a major cause of many diseases (collectively called proteopathies), and lowering the level of these proteins can be useful for treatment of these diseases. We hypothesized that compounds that interact with both the autophagosome protein microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B light chain 3 (LC3)1 and the disease-causing protein may target the latter for autophagic clearance. Mutant huntingtin protein (mHTT) contains an expanded polyglutamine (polyQ) tract and causes Huntington's disease, an incurable neurodegenerative disorder 2. Here, using small-molecule-microarray-based screening, we identified four compounds that interact with both LC3 and mHTT, but not with the wild-type HTT protein. Some of these compounds targeted mHTT to autophagosomes, reduced mHTT levels in an allele-selective manner, and rescued disease-relevant phenotypes in cells and in vivo in fly and mouse models of Huntington's disease. We further show that these compounds interact with the expanded polyQ stretch and could lower the level of mutant ataxin-3 (ATXN3), another disease-causing protein with an expanded polyQ tract 3. This study presents candidate compounds for lowering mHTT and potentially other disease-causing proteins with polyQ expansions, demonstrating the concept of lowering levels of disease-causing proteins using autophagosome-tethering compounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1722-1

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2019, Lu et al. proposed a direct strategy for selective degradation of mHTT using ATTECs; small-molecule microarray-based screening identified four compounds (10O5, AN1, AN2, 8F20) that interacted with LC3 and mHTT, leading to degradation.

    “In 2019, Lu et al. proposed a direct strategy for the selective degradation of mHTT using autophagosome-tethering compound (ATTECs). Small-molecule microarray-based screening identified four compounds (10O5 (227), AN1 (228), AN2 (229), and 8F20 (230)) that interacted with LC3 and mHTT, leading to degradation (Table 4).”
  • Two small-molecule TPD strategies have been reported to lower mHTT levels: a small-molecule glue approach inducing proximity between mHTT and MAP1LC3α to target it to autophagy for degradation; and small-molecule PROTACs that recruit mHTT aggregates to E3 ligases from the IAP family, causing proteasomal degradation of the mutant protein.

    “In fact, two small-molecule TPD strategies have been reported to lower mHTT levels: a small-molecule glue approach inducing the proximity between mHTT and microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3α (MAP1LC3α; also known as LC3) to target it to the autophagy pathway for degradation196; and small-molecule PROTACs that recruit mHTT aggregates to E3 ligases from the IAP family, causing the protea”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [196]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., Wang, C., Wang, Z., Zhu, C., Li, J., Sha, T., Ma, L., Gao, C., Yang, Y., Sun, Y., Wang, J., Sun, X., Lu, C., Difiglia, M., Mei, Y., Ding, C., Luo, S., Dang, Y., Ding, Y., Fei, Y., & Lu, B.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ding, Yu
  • Fei, Yiyan
  • Lu, Boxun
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-10-30
Volume
575
Issue
7781
Pages
203-209
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2982548291
Cited by
551
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
25.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (NAF009\1001)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M023605/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
mutant huntingtin, Huntington's disease, polyglutamine expansion, LC3, autophagy, proteinopathies, ataxin-3, small molecule screening, neurodegenerative disease treatment
MeSH terms
Ataxin-3, Huntingtin Protein, Autophagosomes, Alleles, Animals, Autophagy, Disease Models, Animal, Drosophila melanogaster, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Female, Humans, Male, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Mutation, Neurons, Peptides, Phenotype, Reproducibility of Results, Drosophila Proteins, Mutant Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review