The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The molecular basis of tight nuclear tethering and inactivation of cGAS
Open accessAbstract
Nucleic acids derived from pathogens induce potent innate immune responses1–6. Cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS) is a double-stranded DNA sensor that catalyses the synthesis of the cyclic dinucleotide cyclic GMP–AMP, which mediates the induction of type I interferons through the STING–TBK1–IRF3 signalling axis7–11. cGAS was previously thought to not react with self DNA owing to its cytosolic localization2,12,13; however, recent studies have shown that cGAS is localized mostly in the nucleus and has low activity as a result of tight nuclear tethering14–18. Here we show that cGAS binds to nucleosomes with nanomolar affinity and that nucleosome binding potently inhibits its catalytic activity. To elucidate the molecular basis of cGAS inactivation by nuclear tethering, we determined the structure of mouse cGAS bound to human nucleosome by cryo-electron microscopy. The structure shows that cGAS binds to a negatively charged acidic patch formed by histones H2A and H2B via its second DNA-binding site19. High-affinity nucleosome binding blocks double-stranded DNA binding and maintains cGAS in an inactive conformation. Mutations of cGAS that disrupt nucleosome binding alter cGAS-mediated signalling in cells. Structural studies show that cyclic GMP–AMP synthase binds to nucleosomes through its DNA-binding site, which maintains it in an inactive conformation and prevents self-DNA binding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Previously, we and others showed that cGAS is suppressed by binding to nucleosomes and that disruption of nucleosome regulation enables robust DNA-dependent activation of cGAS32–37 (Fig. 4a).”
From cGAS–STING drives ageing-related inflammation and neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features and development of Coot
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., & Cowtan, K. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910007493 · Cited by 29,915
Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., et al. (2019) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798319011471 · Cited by 7,953
Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is a Cytosolic DNA Sensor That Activates the Type I Interferon Pathway
Sun, L., Wu, J., Du, F., Chen, X., & Chen, Z. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232458 · Cited by 4,996
Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS–STING signalling
Hopfner, K.-P., & Hornung, V. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0244-x · Cited by 2,052
CGAS produces a 2′-5′-linked cyclic dinucleotide second messenger that activates STING.
Ablasser, A., Goldeck, M., Cavlar, T., Deimling, T., Witte, G., Röhl, I., Hopfner, K.-P., Ludwig, J., & Hornung, V. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12306 · Cited by 1,695
Innate Immune Sensing and Signaling of Cytosolic Nucleic Acids
Wu, J., & Chen, Z. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120156 · Cited by 1,212
Gao, P., Ascano, M., Wu, Y., Barchet, W., Gaffney, B. L., Zillinger, T., Serganov, A. A., Liu, Y., Jones, R. A., Hartmann, G., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.046 · Cited by 1,101
cGAS in action: Expanding roles in immunity and inflammation
Ablasser, A., & Chen, Z. J. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8657 · Cited by 1,077
Recognition of Cytosolic DNA Activates an IRF3-Dependent Innate Immune Response
Stetson, D. B., & Medzhitov, R. M. (2006) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2005.12.003 · Cited by 1,003
Paludan, S. R., & Bowie, A. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.004 · Cited by 795
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–259 of 259
Lebrec, V., Κανέλλου, Α., Davies, L. R., Afshar, N., Kujirai, T., Pickering, R. J., Solntceva, V., Tidu, F., & Zierhut, C. (2026) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-026-02037-0 · Cited by 3
“We and others demonstrated that this is prevented by inhibitory association with nucleosomes 6,9–16 .”
Interferons in human inborn errors of disease
Stine, L., Cahill, S. E., & Humphries, F. (2025) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01570-25 · Cited by 2
Loosening the grip on nuclear cGAS
Humphries, F., & Fitzgerald, K. A. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00746-2 · Cited by 2
DNA sensor in standby mode during mitosis
Ablasser, A. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg7422 · Cited by 2
Gispert, S., Key, J., Kohli, A., Torres-Odio, S., Koepf, G., Amr, S., Reichlmeir, M., Harter, P. N., West, A. P., Münch, C., et al. (2022) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202205.0033.v1 · Cited by 2
Self-citationCauses and Consequences of Nuclear Envelope Rupture and DNA Damage in Micronuclei
Grodsky, A. (2021) · Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine · doi:10.7575/aiac.abcmed.v.9n.4p.12 · Cited by 1
Song, X., Ling, X., Liu, H., Zhao, Q., Li, X., Lai, W., & Wang, H. (2024) · Chemical Research in Chinese Universities · doi:10.1007/s40242-024-4120-7 · Cited by 1
KDM4B enhances immune surveillance via demethylating cGAS
Peng, Q., Zhuo, H., Wu, M., et al. (2025) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-025-07792-w · Cited by 1
Self-citationCentromeres as minefields: host–virus warfare
Leung, C. W. B., & Esashi, F. (2025) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-025-01159-8 · Cited by 1
Self-DNA by Activating the CGAS-STING1 Pathway Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis
Marian, A. J. (2025) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-025-01352-5 · Cited by 2
HIV-1 and Its Strategy for Hiding Viral cDNA from STING-Mediated Innate Immunity
Mashkovskaia, A. V., Agapkina, Y. Y., Oretskaya, T. S., Gottikh, M., & Anisenko, A. N. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms262311635 · Cited by 1
Distinct Domains Contribute to the Subcellular Localization of Human cGAS in Yeast
López-Montesino, S., Coronas-Serna, J. M., Martı́n, H., Molina, M., & Cid, V. J. (2026) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom16020259 · Cited by 1
“This mutation should be expected to affect Zn coordination for DNA recognition and the subsequent conformational changes that lead to catalytic activation [6], but the basic residues involved in interactions with histones in the nucleosome [34] should be intact, allowing for nuclear retention.”
Wu, Z., Jia, R., Zhang, Q., Huang, L.-Y., Yan, J.-T., Zhang, Y. H., & Fan, Y. (2026) · Biomarker Research · doi:10.1186/s40364-026-00906-2 · Cited by 2
Barrier-to-autointegration factor protects against the cGAS-STING response to chromatin bridges
Chastant, L., Normandin, K., El-Mortada, F., Servant, M. J., & Archambault, V. (2026) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1012191 · Cited by 2
PKCα-mediated nuclear translocation of cGAS stabilizes β-catenin and drives metastasis
Zhang, Q., Tong, C., Zhao, M., Ma, M., Huang, S., He, Y., Song, Y., Liu, M., Yi, L., Yao, F., et al. (2026) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2026.05.023 · Cited by 1
Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Liu, J., Qi, Q., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Xie, B., Yan, C., Liu, Y., Jin, Z., et al. (2026) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2026.06.010 · Cited by 1
Pathophysiological functions of self-derived DNA
Ori, D., & Kawai, T. (2022) · International Reviews of Immunology · doi:10.1080/08830185.2022.2070616 · Cited by 1
Voelz, C., Schaack, L., Kogel, V., Beyer, C., Seitz, J., & Trinh, S. (2024) · Journal of Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s12031-024-02223-5 · Cited by 1
Rowlett, C. M., & Liu, W. R. (2020) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/62113 · Cited by 1
Self-citationCisplatin Inhibits Bladder Cancer Proliferation Through cGAS-STING Pathway.Preprint
Fu, G., CHEN, X., Xu, Z., SU, J., Tian, J., Shi, Y., Xu, C., Pan, H., & Jin, B. (2020) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-130877/v1 · Cited by 1
Gispert, S., Key, J., Kohli, A., Torres-Odio, S., Koepf, G., Amr, S., Reichlmeir, M., Harter, P. N., West, A. P., Münch, C., et al. (2022) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202204.0245.v1 · Cited by 1
Self-citationNuclear Soluble cGAS Senses DNA Virus InfectionPreprint
Wu, Y., Song, K., Hao, W., Li, S., & Wang, L. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3912216
Nuclear soluble cGAS senses DNA virus infectionPreprint
Wu, Y., Song, K., Hao, W., Wang, L., & Li, S. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.27.457948
Inactivation Mechanism of an Innate Immune DNA Sensor cGAS by Self-chromatinized DNA
Kujirai, T., & Kurumizaka, H. (2021) · Seibutsu Butsuri · doi:10.2142/biophys.61.324
Técnicas de lectura en voz alta de textos jurídicos
Albar, I., & Fernández, M. R. D. A. (2013) · Iuris: Actualidad y práctica del derecho
Imler, J. (2021) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.739487836.793585723
Cytoplasmic Sensing in Innate Immunity
Akhade, A. S., & Subramanian, N. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821618-7.00012-2 · Cited by 1
Progress in functional characterization of cGAS
Wang, Z., Zhao, M., & HaiPeng, L. I. U. (2022) · Scientia Sinica Vitae · doi:10.1360/ssv-2021-0404 · Cited by 1
Mechanism of Histone Arginine Methylation Dynamic Change on Cellular StressPreprint
Ren, X., Li, W., Li, W., Yang, S., Yang, Z., Tong, Y., Chen, L., Liu, M., Zhang, B., & Yu, W. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4619306
Recognition of protein with nucleic acid
Li, G. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95917-9.00015-8
Cuddy, S. R., Flores, M. E., Krakowiak, P. A., Whitford, A., Dochnal, S. A., Babnis, A. W., Miyake, T., Tigano, M., Engel, D. A., & Cliffe, A. R. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.07.06.601241
Hwang, S., Baker, C. D., & Field, M. S. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.07.30.605854
García‐Lepe, U. O., & Harding, S. M. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-128-24465-4.00132-0
Radiation-dependent Nucleic Acid Sensing, and Its Possible Impact on Radiotherapy
Pickering, R. J., & Zierhut, C. (2025) · The Cancer Journal · doi:10.1097/ppo.0000000000000775
Bressac, F., Bargain, T., Kleijwegt, C., Bouchereau, W., Bonnefoy, L., Monier, K., Lomonte, P., & Corpet, A. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.24.684316
Human Papillomavirus Infection Blunts STING Signaling and Alters Downstream ResponsePreprint
Tobey, I. G., Kosanke, D. P., King, K. M., Uhlorn, B. L., Jeevanandam, A., Campos, S. K., & Doorslaer, K. V. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.06.686957
Liu, H., Hu, Q., Ren, K., Wu, P., Wang, Y., & Lv, C. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24883583
Averchuk, E. S., Salmina, A. B., Akhmadieva, L. A., Mukhamedyarov, M. A., & Illarioshkin, S. N. (2025) · Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology · doi:10.17816/acen.1240 · Cited by 1
Myers, C., Saffarzadeh, N., Öberg, M., Enriquez, J., Carlsson, J., & Härtlová, A. (2026) · Immunology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2026.107145
Jimenez, D. M. D. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/516d926bz4200z4807zab52z085bba3f08ba
Étude de la fonction de la DNASE1L3 en contexte auto-immun et anti-tumoral
Santa, P. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2af1f0cfz45caz418azb93ez88367c4a54c8
Protein•DNA Mesh Assembly Drives dsDNA-Specific and Duplex Length-Dependent Activation of cGASPreprint
Wu, S., Stallings, C. M., Torres, S., Antiochos, B., & Sohn, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6978764
Yang, S., Wu, S., Chen, S., Li, X., Chelepis, I., Willcox, S., Barnett, K. C., Hu, X., Huang, G., Brickey, W. J., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.22.726336
Ling, X., Song, X., Zhang, D., Lai, W., Liu, C., Jiang, G., Zhao, Q., & Wang, H. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73740-7
Huang, K., Tang, Z., Gong, Q., Peng, J., Rong, Y., Wu, T., Song, W., Mao, S., Xia, Y., Guo, W., et al. (2026) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2026.06.010
“cGAS, a DNA sensor, is primarily expressed in the cellular nucleus and cytoplasm 43 , but nuclear cGAS (inactive cGAS) cannot activate STING-mediated interferon activation 18,20,44 .”
Self-citationcGAS-STING pathway in innate immunity and its cell-specific role in kidney diseases
Wei, M., Luo, H., Liu, W., Ma, T., & Wang, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1763106
Self-citationChen, J., Wang, S. M., 颜培宇, Arad, M., Wang, H., Chi, S., Zhao, L., Yuan, P., Wang, Q., Foster, L. J., et al. (2026) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2026.118231
Broccolo, F., Sannino, A., Pollini, M., Paladini, F., Mourer, T., & Nunzio, F. D. (2026) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens15070766
Li, J., Wang, L., Mao, X., Hu, D., Lu, Q., Shi, C., Wang, Y., Meng, Z., Fan, H., & Sun, H. (2026) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6c00132
Repositioning Ku70 unlocks cGAS–STING immunity in colorectal cancer
Yang, H. (2026) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2026.07.036
Liu, C., 杨蓝楠, Yang, J., Wang, J., Zhao, J., Ding, X., & Ni, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1867680
The cGAS-STING pathway in inflammaging and neuroinflammation
Zhang, C., Liu, C., Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Fang, Z., He, Z., Mao, Y., & Yang, H. (2026) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-026-3414-8
Dynamic phosphorylation of cGAS by DNA-PKcs and PPP1CC balances DNA repair and innate immunity
Jia, J., Lai, S., Gao, S., Guo, H., Li, S., Guan, H., Yu, Z., & Zhou, P. (2026) · Medical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12032-026-03385-5
“This binding suppresses second DNA-binding domain (site B) in cGAS while preventing cGAS dimer generation and subsequent enzymatic activation [30 ].”
Multilayered interplay between the cGAS-STING pathway and autophagy
Huang, Z.-B., Gao, X.-Z., Lin, J.-Y., Feng, D., & Lu, G. X. (2026) · Autophagy Reports · doi:10.1080/27694127.2026.2728537 · Cited by 1
Targeting the DNA Damage Response in Cancer
Qiao, Y., Kang, B., Zhang, J., Zhang, R., & Li, J. (2026) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.71020
“Nuclear cGAS is restrained by nucleosomes, especially interactions with the H2A–H2B acidic patch, and by chromatin-associated factors such as barrier-to-autointegration factor and nuclear lamina-associated mechanisms [ 139–145 ].”
Nuclear cGAS inhibits stimulation-induced inflammatory gene transcription via HDAC1
高, 尚., Li, H. P., Yan, S., Hou, S., & Yin, H. H. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2601665123
Yuan, X., Li, J., Li, Y., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1909062
TREX1 limits anti-tumor immunity by degrading short cytosolic DNA molecules
Yang, C. Y., Chami, B., Ursino, C., Johnson, S. M., Faget, J., Mettling, C., Gros, L., Pasero, P., & Lin, Y. (2026) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/s44319-026-00961-8
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, B., Xu, P., Rowlett, C. M., Jing, T., Shinde, O., Lei, Y., West, A. P., Liu, W. R., & Li, P.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Wenshe Ray
- Li, Pingwei
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-09-10
- Volume
- 587
- Issue
- 7835
- Pages
- 673-677
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC7704945
- OpenAlex
- W3083971280
- Semantic Scholar
- e3ee6a242101a668250c6be62a691a28b1ea9829
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL148153)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM121584, R01GM127575)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI145287)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Keywords
- cGAS, nucleosome binding, nucleic acid sensing, type I interferon, double-stranded DNA binding, protein-DNA complex structure, innate immunity
- MeSH terms
- Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase, Animals, Cell Line, DNA, Humans, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Nucleosomes, Nucleotidyltransferases, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction, Catalytic Domain, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Mice, Biocatalysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
