The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The molecular basis of tight nuclear tethering and inactivation of cGAS
Open accessAbstract
Nucleic acids derived from pathogens induce potent innate immune responses1–6. Cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS) is a double-stranded DNA sensor that catalyses the synthesis of the cyclic dinucleotide cyclic GMP–AMP, which mediates the induction of type I interferons through the STING–TBK1–IRF3 signalling axis7–11. cGAS was previously thought to not react with self DNA owing to its cytosolic localization2,12,13; however, recent studies have shown that cGAS is localized mostly in the nucleus and has low activity as a result of tight nuclear tethering14–18. Here we show that cGAS binds to nucleosomes with nanomolar affinity and that nucleosome binding potently inhibits its catalytic activity. To elucidate the molecular basis of cGAS inactivation by nuclear tethering, we determined the structure of mouse cGAS bound to human nucleosome by cryo-electron microscopy. The structure shows that cGAS binds to a negatively charged acidic patch formed by histones H2A and H2B via its second DNA-binding site19. High-affinity nucleosome binding blocks double-stranded DNA binding and maintains cGAS in an inactive conformation. Mutations of cGAS that disrupt nucleosome binding alter cGAS-mediated signalling in cells. Structural studies show that cyclic GMP–AMP synthase binds to nucleosomes through its DNA-binding site, which maintains it in an inactive conformation and prevents self-DNA binding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Previously, we and others showed that cGAS is suppressed by binding to nucleosomes and that disruption of nucleosome regulation enables robust DNA-dependent activation of cGAS32–37 (Fig. 4a).”
From cGAS–STING drives ageing-related inflammation and neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features and development of Coot
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., & Cowtan, K. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910007493 · Cited by 29,915
Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., et al. (2019) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798319011471 · Cited by 7,953
Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is a Cytosolic DNA Sensor That Activates the Type I Interferon Pathway
Sun, L., Wu, J., Du, F., Chen, X., & Chen, Z. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232458 · Cited by 4,996
Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS–STING signalling
Hopfner, K.-P., & Hornung, V. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0244-x · Cited by 2,052
CGAS produces a 2′-5′-linked cyclic dinucleotide second messenger that activates STING.
Ablasser, A., Goldeck, M., Cavlar, T., Deimling, T., Witte, G., Röhl, I., Hopfner, K.-P., Ludwig, J., & Hornung, V. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12306 · Cited by 1,695
Innate Immune Sensing and Signaling of Cytosolic Nucleic Acids
Wu, J., & Chen, Z. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120156 · Cited by 1,212
Gao, P., Ascano, M., Wu, Y., Barchet, W., Gaffney, B. L., Zillinger, T., Serganov, A. A., Liu, Y., Jones, R. A., Hartmann, G., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.046 · Cited by 1,101
cGAS in action: Expanding roles in immunity and inflammation
Ablasser, A., & Chen, Z. J. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8657 · Cited by 1,077
Recognition of Cytosolic DNA Activates an IRF3-Dependent Innate Immune Response
Stetson, D. B., & Medzhitov, R. M. (2006) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2005.12.003 · Cited by 1,003
Paludan, S. R., & Bowie, A. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.004 · Cited by 795
Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is Activated by Double-Stranded DNA-Induced Oligomerization
Li, X., Shu, C., Yi, G., Chaton, C. T., Shelton, C. L., Diao, J., Zuo, X., Kao, C. C., Herr, A. B., & Li, P. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.019 · Cited by 681
Self-citationNuclear cGAS suppresses DNA repair and promotes tumorigenesis
Liu, H., Zhang, H., Wu, X., Ma, D., Wu, J., Wang, L., Jiang, Y., Fei, Y., Zhu, C., Tan, R., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0629-6 · Cited by 672
Recognition of Endogenous Nucleic Acids by the Innate Immune System
Roers, A., Hiller, B., & Hornung, V. (2016) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.04.002 · Cited by 541
STING and the innate immune response to nucleic acids in the cytosol
Burdette, D. L., & Vance, R. E. (2013) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2491 · Cited by 501
A conserved PLPLRT/SD motif of STING mediates the recruitment and activation of TBK1
Zhao, B., Du, F., Xu, P., Shu, C., Sankaran, B., Bell, S. L., Liu, M., Lei, Y., Gao, X., Fu, X., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1228-x · Cited by 447
Self-citationThe Cytoplasmic DNA Sensor cGAS Promotes Mitotic Cell Death
Zierhut, C., Yamaguchi, N., Paredes, M. C. G., Luo, J., Carroll, T., & Funabiki, H. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.035 · Cited by 411
RIG‐I‐like receptors: cytoplasmic sensors for non‐self RNA
Kato, H., Takahasi, K., & Fujita, T. (2011) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1600-065x.2011.01052.x · Cited by 340
Tight nuclear tethering of cGAS is essential for preventing autoreactivity
Volkman, H. E., Cambier, S., Gray, E. E., & Stetson, D. B. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47491 · Cited by 303
Barber, G. N. (2011) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2010.12.015 · Cited by 287
Jiang, H., Xue, X., Panda, S., Kawale, A. S., Hooy, R. M., Liang, F., Sohn, J., Sung, P., & Gekara, N. O. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2019102718 · Cited by 270
Gentili, M., Lahaye, X., Nadalin, F., Nader, G. P. F., Lombardi, E. P., Hervé, S., Silva, N. S. D., Rookhuizen, D. C., Zueva, E., Goudot, C., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.105 · Cited by 256
Tachiwana, H., Kagawa, W., Osakabe, A., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003064107 · Cited by 231
A Chemical Biology Approach to Reveal Sirt6-targeted Histone H3 Sites in Nucleosomes
Wang, W., Zeng, Y., Wu, B., Deiters, A., & Liu, W. R. (2016) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.6b00243 · Cited by 91
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cGAS–STING pathway as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases
Decout, A., Katz, J. D., Venkatraman, S., & Ablasser, A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-021-00524-z · Cited by 2,309
cGAS–STING drives ageing-related inflammation and neurodegeneration
Gulen, M. F., Samson, N., Keller, A., Schwabenland, M., Liu, C., Glück, S., Thacker, V. V., Favre, L., Mangeat, B., Kroese, L. J., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06373-1 · Cited by 1,104
Mitochondrial control of inflammation
Marchi, S., Guilbaud, E., Tait, S. W. G., Yamazaki, T., & Galluzzi, L. (2023) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-022-00760-x · Cited by 1,027
Cold and hot tumors: from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapy
Wu, B., Zhang, B., Li, B., Wu, H., & Jiang, M. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01979-x · Cited by 811
The cGAS–STING pathway and cancer
Samson, N., & Ablasser, A. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00468-w · Cited by 740
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, B., Xu, P., Rowlett, C. M., Jing, T., Shinde, O., Lei, Y., West, A. P., Liu, W. R., & Li, P.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Wenshe Ray
- Li, Pingwei
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-09-10
- Volume
- 587
- Issue
- 7835
- Pages
- 673-677
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC7704945
- OpenAlex
- W3083971280
- Semantic Scholar
- e3ee6a242101a668250c6be62a691a28b1ea9829
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL148153)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM121584, R01GM127575)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI145287)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Keywords
- cGAS, nucleosome binding, nucleic acid sensing, type I interferon, double-stranded DNA binding, protein-DNA complex structure, innate immunity
- MeSH terms
- Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase, Animals, Cell Line, DNA, Humans, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Nucleosomes, Nucleotidyltransferases, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction, Catalytic Domain, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Mice, Biocatalysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
