Cited by 169Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potentiating glymphatic drainage minimizes post-traumatic cerebral oedema

Open access

Abstract

Cerebral oedema is associated with morbidity and mortality after traumatic brain injury (TBI)1. Noradrenaline levels are increased after TBI 2-4, and the amplitude of the increase in noradrenaline predicts both the extent of injury 5 and the likelihood of mortality 6. Glymphatic impairment is both a feature of and a contributor to brain injury 7,8, but its relationship with the injury-associated surge in noradrenaline is unclear. Here we report that acute post-traumatic oedema results from a suppression of glymphatic and lymphatic fluid flow that occurs in response to excessive systemic release of noradrenaline. This post-TBI adrenergic storm was associated with reduced contractility of cervical lymphatic vessels, consistent with diminished return of glymphatic and lymphatic fluid to the systemic circulation. Accordingly, pan-adrenergic receptor inhibition normalized central venous pressure and partly restored glymphatic and cervical lymphatic flow in a mouse model of TBI, and these actions led to substantially reduced brain oedema and improved functional outcomes. Furthermore, post-traumatic inhibition of adrenergic signalling boosted lymphatic export of cellular debris from the traumatic lesion, substantially reducing secondary inflammation and accumulation of phosphorylated tau. These observations suggest that targeting the noradrenergic control of central glymphatic flow may offer a therapeutic approach for treating acute TBI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-023-06737-7

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Panadrenergic inhibition with prazosin, propranolol and atipamezole blocked the locus coeruleus-induced decrease in blood albumin signal.

    “Panadrenergic inhibition (i.p. administration of the α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist prazosin, the broad β-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol, and the α2-adrenergic antagonist atipamezole, PPA13,14) blocked the LC-induced decrease in blood albumin signal (Figure 1H).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Tucker, B. et al. Early brain edema is a predictor of in-hospital mortality in traumatic brain injury. J. Emerg. Med. 53, 18–29 (2017). · DOI
  2. Johansson, P. I. et al. Elderly trauma patients have high circulating noradrenaline levels but attenuated release of adrenaline, platelets, and leukocytes in response to increasing injury severity. Crit. Care Med. 40, 1844–1850 (2012). · DOI
  3. Woolf, P. D., Hamill, R. W., Lee, L. A., Cox, C. & McDonald, J. V. The predictive value of catecholamines in assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. 66, 875–882 (1987). · DOI
  4. Hamill, R. W., Woolf, P. D., McDonald, J. V., Lee, L. A. & Kelly, M. Catecholamines predict outcome in traumatic brain injury. Ann. Neurol. 21, 438–443 (1987). · DOI
  5. Rizoli, S. B. et al. Catecholamines as outcome markers in isolated traumatic brain injury: the COMA-TBI study. Crit. Care 21, 37 (2017). · DOI
  6. Iliff, J. J. et al. Impairment of glymphatic pathway function promotes tau pathology after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosci. 34, 16180–16193 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Plog, B. A. et al. Biomarkers of traumatic injury are transported from brain to blood via the glymphatic system. J. Neurosci, 35, 518–526 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  8. GBD 2016 Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 18, 56–87 (2019). · DOI
  9. Dewan, M. C. et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.Jns17352 (2018). · DOI
  10. Mannix, R. et al. Clinical correlates in an experimental model of repetitive mild brain injury. Ann. Neurol. 74, 65–75 (2013). · DOI
  11. McKee, A. C. et al. The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain 136, 43–64 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Goldstein, D. S. et al. Effect of ganglion blockade on cerebrospinal fluid norepinephrine. J. Neurochem. 49, 1484–1490 (1987). · DOI
  13. Da Mesquita, S. et al. Functional aspects of meningeal lymphatics in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 560, 185–191 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Louveau, A. et al. CNS lymphatic drainage and neuroinflammation are regulated by meningeal lymphatic vasculature. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1380–1391 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wang, L. et al. Deep cervical lymph node ligation aggravates AD-like pathology of APP/PS1 mice. Brain Pathol. 29, 176–192 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Si, J., Chen, L. & Xia, Z. Effects of cervical-lymphatic blockade on brain edema and infarction volume in cerebral ischemic rats. Chin. J. Physiol. 49, 258–265 (2006).
  17. Plá, V. et al. A real-time in vivo clearance assay for quantification of glymphatic efflux. Cell Rep. 40, 111320 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Azuma, M., Lee, H., Shinzaki, K., Yamane, R. & Morita, M. Cortical-wide impairment of “the glymphatic system” after focal brain injury. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.05.510560 (2022). · DOI
  19. Wolman, M. et al. Evaluation of the dye-protein tracers in pathophysiology of the blood-brain barrier. Acta Neuropathol. 54, 55–61 (1981). · DOI
  20. Leandoer, L. & Lewis, D. H. The effect of l-norepinephrine on lymph flow in man. Ann. Surg. 171, 257–260 (1970). · DOI
  21. Mawhinney, H. J. & Roddie, I. C. Spontaneous activity in isolated bovine mesenteric lymphatics. J. Physiol. 229, 339–348 (1973). · DOI
  22. Liu, X. et al. Subdural haematomas drain into the extracranial lymphatic system through the meningeal lymphatic vessels. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 8, 16 (2020). · DOI
  23. Castorena-Gonzalez, J. A. et al. Mechanisms of connexin-related lymphedema. Circ. Res. 123, 964–985 (2018). · DOI
  24. Laine, G. A., Allen, S. J., Katz, J., Gabel, J. C. & Drake, R. E. Effect of systemic venous pressure elevation on lymph flow and lung edema formation. J. Appl. Physiol. 61, 1634–1638 (1986). · DOI
  25. Monai, H. et al. Adrenergic receptor antagonism induces neuroprotection and facilitates recovery from acute ischemic stroke. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11010–11019 (2019). · DOI
  26. Goldman-Rakic, P. S., Lidow, M. S. & Gallager, D. W. Overlap of dopaminergic, adrenergic, and serotoninergic receptors and complementarity of their subtypes in primate prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 10, 2125–2138 (1990). · DOI
  27. Hablitz, L. M. et al. Increased glymphatic influx is correlated with high EEG delta power and low heart rate in mice under anesthesia. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav5447 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Liebe, T. et al. Ketamine influences the locus coeruleus norepinephrine network, with a dependency on norepinephrine transporter genotype—a placebo controlled fMRI study. Neuroimage. Clin. 20, 715–723 (2018). · DOI
  29. Pashkov, V. N. & Hemmings Jr, H. C. The effects of general anesthetics on norepinephrine release from isolated rat cortical nerve terminals. Anesth. Analg. 95, 1274–1281 (2002). · DOI
  30. Kang, R. et al. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine attenuates norepinephrine levels in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 20, 100 (2020). · DOI
  31. Rauch, S. et al. Severe traumatic brain injury and hypotension is a frequent and lethal combination in multiple trauma patients in mountain areas—an analysis of the prospective international Alpine Trauma Registry. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 29, 61 (2021). · DOI
  32. Lloyd-Donald, P. et al. In adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury, does the use of norepinephrine for augmenting cerebral perfusion pressure improve neurological outcome? A systematic review. Injury 51, 2129–2134 (2020). · DOI
  33. Brassard, P., Seifert, T. & Secher, N. H. Is cerebral oxygenation negatively affected by infusion of norepinephrine in healthy subjects? Br. J. Anaesth. 102, 800–805 (2009). · DOI
  34. Tschuor, C. et al. In vitro norepinephrine significantly activates isolated platelets from healthy volunteers and critically ill patients following severe traumatic brain injury. Crit. Care 12, R80 (2008). · DOI
  35. Ko, A. et al. Early propranolol after traumatic brain injury is associated with lower mortality. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 80, 637–642 (2016). · DOI
  36. Ley, E. J. et al. The in vivo effect of propranolol on cerebral perfusion and hypoxia after traumatic brain injury. J. Trauma 66, 154–159 (2009). discussion 159-161.
  37. George, K. C., Kebejian, L., Ruth, L. J., Miller, C. W. & Himelhoch, S. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of prazosin versus placebo for the treatment of nightmares and sleep disturbances in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Trauma Dissociation 17, 494–510 (2016). · DOI
  38. Ursano, R. J. et al. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 161, 3–31 (2004). · DOI
  39. Nissinen, J. et al. Disease-modifying effect of atipamezole in a model of post-traumatic epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 136, 18–34 (2017). · DOI
  40. Pitkanen, A., Narkilahti, S., Bezvenyuk, Z., Haapalinna, A. & Nissinen, J. Atipamezole, an α2-adrenoceptor antagonist, has disease modifying effects on epileptogenesis in rats. Epilepsy Res. 61, 119–140 (2004). · DOI
  41. Nemoto, E. M. Dynamics of cerebral venous and intracranial pressures. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 96, 435–437 (2006). · DOI
  42. Neumann, H., Kotter, M. R. & Franklin, R. J. Debris clearance by microglia: an essential link between degeneration and regeneration. Brain 132, 288–295 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Ohkura, M. et al. Genetically encoded green fluorescent Ca2+ indicators with improved detectability for neuronal Ca2+ signals. PLoS ONE 7, e51286 (2012). · DOI
  44. Ren, Z. et al. ‘Hit & Run’ model of closed-skull traumatic brain injury (TBI) reveals complex patterns of post-traumatic AQP4 dysregulation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 33, 834–845 (2013). · DOI
  45. Xiong, Y., Mahmood, A. & Chopp, M. Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 128–142 (2013). · DOI
  46. Sellappan, P. et al. Variability and uncertainty in the rodent controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosci. Methods 312, 37–42 (2019). · DOI
  47. Cortes, D. & Pera, M. F. The genetic basis of inter-individual variation in recovery from traumatic brain injury. NPJ Regen. Med. 6, 5 (2021). · DOI
  48. Weikop, P., Kehr, J. & Scheel-Kruger, J. Reciprocal effects of combined administration of serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitors on serotonin and dopamine levels in the rat prefrontal cortex: the role of 5-HT1A receptors. J. Psychopharmacol. 21, 795–804 (2007). · DOI
  49. Kelley, D. H. & Ouellette, N. T. Using particle tracking to measure flow instabilities in an undergraduate laboratory experiment. Am. J. Phys. 79, 267–273 (2011). · DOI
  50. Mestre, H. et al. Flow of cerebrospinal fluid is driven by arterial pulsations and is reduced in hypertension. Nat. Commun. 9, 4878 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Min Rivas, F. et al. Surface periarterial spaces of the mouse brain are open, not porous. J. R. Soc. Interface 17, 20200593 (2020). · DOI
  52. Cherian, I. et al. Introducing the concept of “CSF-shift edema” in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosci. Res. 96, 744–752 (2018). · DOI
  53. Bertram, C. D., Macaskill, C. & Moore Jr, J. E. Simulation of a chain of collapsible contracting lymphangions with progressive valve closure. J. Biomech. Eng. 133, 011008 (2011). · DOI
  54. Jamalian, S., Bertram, C. D., Richardson, W. J. & Moore Jr, J. E. Parameter sensitivity analysis of a lumped-parameter model of a chain of lymphangions in series. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 305, H1709–H1717 (2013). · DOI
  55. Bertram, C. D., Macaskill, C., Davis, M. J. & Moore Jr, J. E. Development of a model of a multi-lymphangion lymphatic vessel incorporating realistic and measured parameter values. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 13, 401–416 (2014). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hussain, R., Tithof, J., Wang, W., Cheetham-West, A., Song, W., Peng, W., Sigurdsson, B., Kim, D., Sun, Q., Peng, S., Plá, V., Kelley, D. H., Hirase, H., Castorena-Gonzalez, J. A., Weikop, P., Goldman, S. A., Davis, M. J., & Nedergaard, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hussain, Rashad
  • Nedergaard, Maiken
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-11-15
Volume
623
Issue
7989
Pages
992-1000
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4388694379
Cited by
169
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 3
FWCI
27.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W911NF1910280, W81XWH)
  • Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  • EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research
  • Lundbeckfonden (R386--2021--165, R155-2016-553, R155-2016–552)
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF19OC0058058, NNF13OC0004260)
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institutes of Health (W911NF1910280, W81XWH)
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (W911NF1910280)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG072298)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL122578)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS110776, U19NS128613)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (W911NF1910280, R01AT012312, R01AT011439)
  • Army Research Office (MURI W911NF1910280, W911NF1910280)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, cerebral edema, glymphatic system, lymphatic drainage, norepinephrine, central venous pressure, tau phosphorylation, secondary inflammation, glymphatic flow
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Glymphatic System, Animals, Brain Edema, Disease Models, Animal, Inflammation, Norepinephrine, Phosphorylation, Receptors, Adrenergic, tau Proteins, Adrenergic Antagonists, Lymphatic Vessels, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review