Cited by 217Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Rare DiseasesRNA Research and Splicing

Modified penetrance of coding variants by cis-regulatory variation contributes to disease risk

Open access
Castel, Stephane E., Cervera, Alejandra, Mohammadi, Pejman, Aguet, François, Reverter, Ferran, Wolman, Aaron, Guigo, Roderic, Iossifov, Ivan +2 more·2018·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Coding variants represent many of the strongest associations between genotype and phenotype; however, they exhibit inter-individual differences in effect, termed 'variable penetrance'. Here, we study how cis-regulatory variation modifies the penetrance of coding variants. Using functional genomic and genetic data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GTEx), we observed that in the general population, purifying selection has depleted haplotype combinations predicted to increase pathogenic coding variant penetrance. Conversely, in cancer and autism patients, we observed an enrichment of penetrance increasing haplotype configurations for pathogenic variants in disease-implicated genes, providing evidence that regulatory haplotype configuration of coding variants affects disease risk. Finally, we experimentally validated this model by editing a Mendelian single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) using CRISPR/Cas9 on distinct expression haplotypes with the transcriptome as a phenotypic readout. Our results demonstrate that joint regulatory and coding variant effects are an important part of the genetic architecture of human traits and contribute to modified penetrance of disease-causing variants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-018-0192-y

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improved recognition of variable penetrance of many monogenic disease alleles has invigorated efforts to identify genetic and environmental modifiers.

    “Improved recognition of the variable penetrance of many ‘monogenic’ disease alleles has invigorated efforts to identify the genetic and environmental modifiers responsible26,27.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castel, S. E., Cervera, A., Mohammadi, P., Aguet, F., Reverter, F., Wolman, A., Guigo, R., Iossifov, I., Vasileva, A., & Lappalainen, T.
Affiliations
  • New York Genome Center (US)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
  • Castel, Stephane E.
  • Lappalainen, Tuuli
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2018-08-20
Volume
50
Issue
9
Pages
1327-1334
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2885204059
Cited by
217
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 7
FWCI
16.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
  • National Institutes of Health (1k99hg009916-01, HHSN2682010000029C)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH101814, R01MH106842)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (UM1HG008901, K99 HG009916)
  • NIH Office of the Director (R01MH101814)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM122924)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U24DK112331)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  • Common Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
variable penetrance, cis-regulatory variation, coding variants, purifying selection, disease risk, cancer, autism spectrum disorder, single nucleotide polymorphisms, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, gene expression, genetic architecture, GTEx
MeSH terms
Disease, Haplotypes, Humans, Phenotype, Genome, Human, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Transcriptome, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review