The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate de novo design of high-affinity protein-binding macrocycles using deep learning
Abstract
Developing macrocyclic binders to therapeutic proteins typically relies on large-scale screening methods that are resource intensive and provide little control over binding mode. Despite progress in protein design, there are currently no robust approaches for de novo design of protein-binding macrocycles. Here we introduce RFpeptides, a denoising diffusion-based pipeline for designing macrocyclic binders against protein targets of interest. We tested 20 or fewer designed macrocycles against each of four diverse proteins and obtained binders with medium to high affinity against all targets. For one of the targets, Rhombotarget A (RbtA), we designed a high-affinity binder ( K d < 10 nM) despite starting from the predicted target structure. X-ray structures for macrocycle-bound myeloid cell leukemia 1, γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor-associated protein and RbtA complexes match closely with the computational models, with a Cα root-mean-square deviation < 1.5 Å to the design models. RFpeptides provides a framework for rapid and custom design of macrocyclic peptides for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444909047337 · Cited by 16,463
Overview of the CCP 4 suite and current developments
Winn, M. D., Ballard, C. C., Cowtan, K. D., Dodson, E. J., Emsley, P., Evans, P. R., Keegan, R. M., Krissinel, E. B., Leslie, A. G. W., McCoy, A., et al. (2011) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910045749 · Cited by 12,353
seaborn: statistical data visualization
Waskom, M. (2021) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.03021 · Cited by 7,310
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,549
Self-citationWatson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.09.519842 · Cited by 2,369
Self-citationDe novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · Cited by 2,325
Self-citationRobust deep learning–based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add2187 · Cited by 2,210
Self-citationStructure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain
Kussie, P. H., Gorina, S., Marechal, V., Elenbaas, B., Moreau, J., Levine, A. J., & Pavletich, N. P. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.948 · Cited by 2,206
Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.03.494563 · Cited by 2,107
Self-citationTerwilliger, T. C., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Afonine, P. V., Moriarty, N. W., Zwart, P. H., Hung, L.-W., Read, R. J., & Adams, P. D. (2008) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s090744490705024x · Cited by 1,462
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Vinogradov, A. A., Yin, Y. & Suga, H. Macrocyclic peptides as drug candidates: recent progress and remaining challenges. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 4167–4181 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Muttenthaler, M., King, G. F., Adams, D. J. & Alewood, P. F. Trends in peptide drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 309–325 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
- Tsomaia, N. Peptide therapeutics: targeting the undruggable space. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 94, 459–470 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Atanasov, A. G., Zotchev, S. B. & Dirsch, V. M. International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce & Supuran, C. T. Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 200–216 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
- Bhardwaj, G. et al. Accurate de novo design of membrane-traversing macrocycles. Cell 185, 3520–3532 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- Bhardwaj, G. et al. Accurate de novo design of hyperstable constrained peptides. Nature 538, 329–335 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- Hosseinzadeh, P. et al. Comprehensive computational design of ordered peptide macrocycles. Science 358, 1461–1466 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- Mulligan, V. K. et al. Computationally designed peptide macrocycle inhibitors of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2012800118 (2021). · DOI
- Hosseinzadeh, P. et al. Anchor extension: a structure-guided approach to design cyclic peptides targeting enzyme active sites. Nat. Commun. 12, 3384 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
- Muratspahić, E. et al. Design and structural validation of peptide–drug conjugate ligands of the κ-opioid receptor. Nat. Commun. 14, 8064 (2023). · DOI
- Rettie, S. A. et al. Cyclic peptide structure prediction and design using AlphaFold2. Nat. Commun. 16, 4730 (2025). · DOI · Paper page
- Grambow, C. A., Weir, H., Cunningham, C. N., Biancalani, T. & Chuang, K. V. CREMP: conformer–rotamer ensembles of macrocyclic peptides for machine learning. Sci. Data 11, 859 (2024). · DOI
- Zhang, C. et al. HighFold: accurately predicting structures of cyclic peptides and complexes with head-to-tail and disulfide bridge constraints. Brief. Bioinform 25, bbae215 (2024). · DOI
- Brixi, G. et al. SaLT&PepPr is an interface-predicting language model for designing peptide-guided protein degraders. Commun. Biol. 6, 1081 (2023). · DOI
- Xie, X., Valiente, P. A., Kim, J. & Kim, P. M. HelixDiff, a score-based diffusion model for generating all-atom α-helical structures. ACS Cent. Sci. 10, 1001–1011 (2024). · DOI
- Li, Q., Vlachos, E. N. & Bryant, P. Design of linear and cyclic peptide binders of different lengths from protein sequence information. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.20.599739 (2024). · DOI
- Vázquez Torres, S. et al. De novo design of high-affinity binders of bioactive helical peptides. Nature 626, 435–442 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
- Wicky, B. I. M. et al. Hallucinating symmetric protein assemblies. Science 378, 56–61 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- Widden, H. & Placzek, W. J. The multiple mechanisms of MCL1 in the regulation of cell fate. Commun. Biol. 4, 1029 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
- Leman, J. K. et al. Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks. Nat. Methods 17, 665–680 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
- Brown, H. et al. Structure-based design of stapled peptides that bind GABARAP and inhibit autophagy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 14687–14697 (2022). · DOI
- Ji, C. H. et al. The AUTOTAC chemical biology platform for targeted protein degradation via the autophagy–lysosome system. Nat. Commun. 13, 904 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- Popelka, H. & Klionsky, D. J. Analysis of the native conformation of the LIR/AIM motif in the Atg8/LC3/GABARAP-binding proteins. Autophagy 11, 2153–2159 (2015). · DOI
- Weiergräber, O. H. et al. Ligand binding mode of GABAA receptor-associated protein. J. Mol. Biol. 381, 1320–1331 (2008). · DOI
- van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
- Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
- Zhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 2302–2309 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
- Dauparas, J. et al. Atomic context-conditioned protein sequence design using LigandMPNN. Nat. Methods 22, 717–723 (2025). · DOI · Paper page
- Siew, N., Elofsson, A., Rychlewski, L. & Fischer, D. MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 16, 776–785 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
- Fire, E., Gullá, S. V., Grant, R. A. & Keating, A. E. Mcl‐1–Bim complexes accommodate surprising point mutations via minor structural changes. Protein Sci. 19, 507–519 (2010). · DOI
- Anil, B., Riedinger, C., Endicott, J. A. & Noble, M. E. M. The structure of an MDM2–Nutlin-3a complex solved by the use of a validated MDM2 surface-entropy reduction mutant. Acta Crystallogr. D 69, 1358–1366 (2013). · DOI
- Sumida, K. H. et al. Improving protein expression stability and function with ProteinMPNN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 2054–2061 (2024). · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c10941
- Davis, G. D., Elisee, C., Newham, D. M. & Harrison, R. G. New fusion protein systems designed to give soluble expression in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng 65, 382–388 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
- Dang, B. et al. SNAC-tag for sequence-specific chemical protein cleavage. Nat. Methods 16, 319–322 (2019). · DOI
- Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 22–25 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Vagin, A. & Lebedev, A. MoRDa, an automatic molecular replacement pipeline. Acta Crystallogr. A Found. Adv. 71, s19 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all‐atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- McCoy, A. J. et al. Read Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Leveille, A. N. et al. Exploring arylidene–indolinone ligands of autophagy proteins LC3B and GABARAP. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 16, 271–277 (2025). · DOI
- Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng 9, 90–95 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci 30, 70–82 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Wu, D., & Zou, Y. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c03236 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Rettie, S. A., Juergens, D., Adebomi, V., Bueso, Y. F., Zhao, Q., Leveille, A. N., Liu, A., Bera, A. K., Wilms, J. A., Üffing, A., Kang, A., Brackenbrough, E., Lamb, M., Gerben, S. R., Murray, A., Levine, P. M., Schneider, M., Vasireddy, V., Ovchinnikov, S., Weiergräber, O. H., Willbold, D., Kritzer, J. A., Mougous, J. D., Baker, D., DiMaio, F., & Bhardwaj, G.
- Venue
- Nature Chemical Biology
- Published
- 2025-06-20
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1948-1956
- ISSN
- 1552-4450
- 1552-4469
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 13
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate de novo design of high-affinity protein-binding macrocycles using deep learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41589-025-01929-w
- The paper
- Rettie, S. A., Juergens, D., Adebomi, V., Bueso, Y. F., Zhao, Q., Leveille, A. N., Liu, A., Bera, A. K., Wilms, J. A., Üffing, A., Kang, A., Brackenbrough, E., Lamb, M., Gerben, S. R., Murray, A., Levine, P. M., Schneider, M., Vasireddy, V., Ovchinnikov, S., . . . Bhardwaj, G. (2025). Accurate de novo design of high-affinity protein-binding macrocycles using deep learning. Nature Chemical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-025-01929-w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.