Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ancestral SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells cross-recognize the Omicron variant

Open access
Gao, Yu, Cai, Curtis, Grifoni, Alba, Müller, Thomas R., Niessl, Julia, Olofsson, Anna, Humbert, Marion, Hansson, Lotta, Österborg, Anders, Bergman, Peter, Chen, Puran, Olsson, Annika, Sandberg, Johan K., Weiskopf, Daniela, Price, David A., Ljunggren, Hans-Gustaf, Karlsson, Annika C., Sette, Alessandro, Aleman, Soo, Buggert, Marcus·2022·Nature Medicine

Abstract

The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of concern (VOC) has destabilized global efforts to control the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recent data have suggested that B.1.1.529 can readily infect people with naturally acquired or vaccine-induced immunity, facilitated in some cases by viral escape from antibodies that neutralize ancestral SARS-CoV-2. However, severe disease appears to be relatively uncommon in such individuals, highlighting a potential role for other components of the adaptive immune system. We report here that SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells induced by prior infection or BNT162b2 vaccination provide extensive immune coverage against B.1.1.529. The median relative frequencies of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4+ T cells that cross-recognized B.1.1.529 in previously infected or BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals were 84% and 91%, respectively, and the corresponding median relative frequencies for SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD8+ T cells were 70% and 92%, respectively. Pairwise comparisons across groups further revealed that SARS-CoV-2 spike-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were functionally and phenotypically similar in response to the ancestral strain or B.1.1.529. Collectively, our data indicate that established SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses, especially after BNT162b2 vaccination, remain largely intact against B.1.1.529.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-022-01700-x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Gao, Y., Cai, C., Grifoni, A., Müller, T. R., Niessl, J., Olofsson, A., Humbert, M., Hansson, L., Österborg, A., Bergman, P., Chen, P., Olsson, A., Sandberg, J. K., Weiskopf, D., Price, D. A., Ljunggren, H.-G., Karlsson, A. C., Sette, A., Aleman, S., & Buggert, M.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2022-01-14
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
472-476
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4206774638
Cited by
403
References
23
FWCI
44.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ancestral SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells cross-recognize the Omicron variant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41591-022-01700-x
The paper
Gao, Y., Cai, C., Grifoni, A., Müller, T. R., Niessl, J., Olofsson, A., Humbert, M., Hansson, L., Österborg, A., Bergman, P., Chen, P., Olsson, A., Sandberg, J. K., Weiskopf, D., Price, D. A., Ljunggren, H.-G., Karlsson, A. C., Sette, A., Aleman, S., & Buggert, M. (2022). Ancestral SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells cross-recognize the Omicron variant. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01700-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.