Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ENIGMA Toolbox: multiscale neural contextualization of multisite neuroimaging datasets

Larivière, Sara, Paquola, Casey, Park, Bo-yong, Royer, Jessica, Wang, Yezhou, Benkarim, Oualid, Vos de Wael, Reinder, Valk, Sofie L., Thomopoulos, Sophia I., Kirschner, Matthias, Lewis, Lindsay B., Evans, Alan C., Sisodiya, Sanjay M., McDonald, Carrie R., Thompson, Paul M., Bernhardt, Boris C.·2021·Nature Methods

Published version of a preprint

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-021-01186-4

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between APOC1 expression and cortical thickness changes was assessed using Pearson's correlation, and statistical significance was evaluated using 1000 nonparametric spin permutation tests.

    “The association between APOC1 expression and CTh changes was assessed using Pearson’s correlation, and the statistical significance of the correlations was evaluated using 1000 nonparametric spin permutation tests [56, 57].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Patel, Y. et al. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 47–63 (2021). · DOI
  2. Amunts, K. et al. Science 340, 1472–1475 (2013). · DOI
  3. Van Essen, D. C. et al. Neuroimage 62, 2222–2231 (2012). · DOI
  4. von Economo, C. F. & Koskinas, G. N. Zellaufbau der Grosshirnrinde des Menschen (J. Springer, 1925).
  5. Zhou, J., Gennatas, E. D., Kramer, J. H., Miller, B. L. & Seeley, W. W. Neuron 73, 1216–1227 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Zheng, Y.-Q. et al. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000495 (2019). · DOI
  7. Gollo, L. L. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1107–1116 (2018). · DOI
  8. Larivière, S. et al. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc6457 (2020). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Larivière, S., Paquola, C., Park, B.-Y., Royer, J., Wang, Y., Benkarim, O., Vos de Wael, R., Valk, S. L., Thomopoulos, S. I., Kirschner, M., Lewis, L. B., Evans, A. C., Sisodiya, S. M., McDonald, C. R., Thompson, P. M., & Bernhardt, B. C.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2021-06-30
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
698-700
ISSN
  • 1548-7091
  • 1548-7105
Cited by
269
References
17
Language
en
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (U54 EB020403)
  • Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery-1304413)
  • Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-154298)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review