Cited by 79Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Whitening of odor representations by the wiring diagram of the olfactory bulb

Open access
Wanner, Adrian A., Friedrich, Rainer W.·2020·Nature Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Neuronal computations underlying higher brain functions depend on synaptic interactions among specific neurons. A mechanistic understanding of such computations requires wiring diagrams of neuronal networks. In this study, we examined how the olfactory bulb (OB) performs 'whitening', a fundamental computation that decorrelates activity patterns and supports their classification by memory networks. We measured odor-evoked activity in the OB of a zebrafish larva and subsequently reconstructed the complete wiring diagram by volumetric electron microscopy. The resulting functional connectome revealed an over-representation of multisynaptic connectivity motifs that mediate reciprocal inhibition between neurons with similar tuning. This connectivity suppressed redundant responses and was necessary and sufficient to reproduce whitening in simulations. Whitening of odor representations is therefore mediated by higher-order structure in the wiring diagram that is adapted to natural input patterns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-019-0576-z

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Barlow HB Rosenblith WA Sensory communication MIT Press 1961 217 234
  2. [41]Pehlevan C Chklovskii D Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28 NIPS 2015 1350
  3. [42]Pehlevan C Chklovskii DB 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing Allerton 2015 1458 1465

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wanner, A. A., & Friedrich, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Friedrich, Rainer W.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2020-01-20
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
433-442
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W3000124408
Cited by
79
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Novartis Research Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CRSII3_130470/1, 310030B_152833)
  • Human Frontier Science Program (rgp0015/2010)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
olfactory bulb, whitening, wiring diagrams, functional connectome, reciprocal inhibition, odor representation, zebrafish larvae, neural network reconstruction, pattern classification, memory networks
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Larva, Memory, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Odorants, Olfactory Bulb, Olfactory Pathways, Synapses, Zebrafish, Olfactory Perception, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review