Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 618

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The HADDOCK2.4 web server for integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes

Open access
Honorato, Rodrigo V., Trellet, Mikael E., Jiménez-García, Brian, Schaarschmidt, Jörg J., Giulini, Marco, Reys, Victor, Koukos, Panagiotis I., Rodrigues, João P. G. L. M., Karaca, Ezgi, van Zundert, Gydo C. P., Roel-Touris, Jorge, van Noort, Charlotte W., Jandová, Zuzana, Melquiond, Adrien S. J., Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.·2024·Nature Protocols
DOI 10.1038/s41596-024-01011-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41596-024-01011-0

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. van Noort, C. W., Honorato, R. V. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Information-driven modeling of biomolecular complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 70, 70–77 (2021). · DOI
  2. Masrati, G. et al. Integrative structural biology in the era of accurate structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 167127 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rout, M. P. & Sali, A. Principles for integrative structural biology studies. Cell 177, 1384–1403 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Perrakis, A. & Sixma, T. K. AI revolutions in biology. EMBO Rep. 22, e54046 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Vakser, I. A. & Deeds, E. J. Computational approaches to macromolecular interactions in the cell. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 55, 59–65 (2019). · DOI
  6. wwPDB Consortium. Protein Data Bank: the single global archive for 3D macromolecular structure data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D520–D528 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Sali, A. et al. Outcome of the First wwPDB Hybrid/Integrative Methods Task Force Workshop. Structure 23, 1156–1167 (2015). · DOI
  8. Vallat, B. et al. New system for archiving integrative structures. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 77, 1486–1496 (2021). · DOI
  9. Saponaro, A., Maione, V., Bonvin, A. & Cantini, F. Understanding docking complexes of macromolecules using HADDOCK: the synergy between experimental data and computations. Bio-Protoc. 10, e3793 (2020). · DOI
  10. Roel-Touris, J., Jiménez-García, B. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Integrative modeling of membrane-associated protein assemblies. Nat. Commun. 11, 6210 (2020). · DOI
  11. Ambrosetti, F., Jandova, Z. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Information-driven antibody–antigen modelling with HADDOCK. In: Methods in Molecular Biology Vol. 2552 (eds Tsumoto, K. & Kuroda, D.) 267–282 (Humana, 2023). · DOI
  12. Ambrosetti, F., Jiménez-García, B., Roel-Touris, J. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Modeling antibody-antigen complexes by information-driven docking. Structure 28, 119–129.e2 (2020). · DOI
  13. Trellet, M., van Zundert, G. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Structural bioinformatics, methods and protocols. Methods Mol. Biol. 2112, 145–162 (2020). · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0270-6_11
  14. Koukos, P. I. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Integrative modelling of biomolecular complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 2861–2881 (2020). · DOI
  15. Rosell, M. & Fernández-Recio, J. Docking approaches for modeling multi-molecular assemblies. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 64, 59–65 (2020). · DOI
  16. Roel-Touris, J., Bonvin, A. M. J. J. & Jiménez-García, B. LightDock goes information-driven. Bioinformatics 36, 950–952 (2019). · DOI
  17. Xia, B., Vajda, S. & Kozakov, D. Accounting for pairwise distance restraints in FFT-based protein–protein docking. Bioinformatics 32, 3342–3344 (2016). · DOI
  18. Echartea, M. E. R., Ritchie, D. W. & de Beauchêne, I. C. Using restraints in EROS‐DOCK improves model quality in pairwise and multicomponent protein docking. Proteins 88, 1121–1128 (2020). · DOI
  19. Bryant, P. et al. Predicting the structure of large protein complexes using AlphaFold and Monte Carlo tree search. Nat. Commun. 13, 6028 (2022). · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33729-4
  20. Brünger, A. T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905–921 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  21. de Vries, S. J., van Dijk, M. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat. Protoc. 5, 883–897 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  22. van Zundert, G. C. P. et al. The HADDOCK2.2 web server: user-friendly integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 720–725 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Roel-Touris, J., Don, C. G., Honorato, R. V., Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Less is more: coarse-grained integrative modeling of large biomolecular assemblies with HADDOCK. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 6358–6367 (2019). · DOI
  24. Honorato, R. V., Roel-Touris, J. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. MARTINI-based protein-DNA coarse-grained HADDOCKing. Front. Mol. Biosci. 6, 102 (2019). · DOI
  25. Marrink, S. J., Risselada, H. J., Yefimov, S., Tieleman, D. P. & de Vries, A. H. The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 7812–7824 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  26. van Zundert, G. C. P. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Defining the limits and reliability of rigid-body fitting in cryo-EM maps using multi-scale image pyramids. J. Struct. Biol. 195, 252–258 (2016). · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2016.06.011
  27. Neijenhuis, T., Keulen, S. Cvan & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Interface refinement of low- to medium-resolution cryo-EM complexes using HADDOCK2.4. Structure 30, 476–484 (2021). · DOI
  28. Koukos, P. I., Réau, M. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Shape-restrained modeling of protein–small-molecule complexes with high ambiguity driven DOCKing. J. Chem. Inf. Model 61, 4807–4818 (2021). · DOI
  29. Honorato, R. V. et al. Structural biology in the clouds: the WeNMR-EOSC ecosystem. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 729513 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Schüttelkopf, A. W. & van Aalten, D. M. F. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein–ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. l Crystallogr. 60, 1355–1363 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Jorgensen, W. L. & Tirado-Rives, J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 1657–1666 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Fernández-Recio, J., Totrov, M. & Abagyan, R. Identification of protein–protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. J. Mol. Biol. 335, 843–865 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Veerapandian, B. et al. Functional implications of interleukin‐1β based on the three‐dimensional structure. Proteins 12, 10–23 (1992). · DOI
  34. Blech, M. et al. One target—two different binding modes: structural insights into gevokizumab and canakinumab interactions to interleukin-1β. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 94–111 (2013). · DOI
  35. Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M., Teixeira, J. M. C., Trellet, M. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. pdb-tools: a swiss army knife for molecular structures. F1000Res. 7, 1961 (2018). · DOI
  36. Mattiroli, F., Uckelmann, M., Sahtoe, D. D., van Dijk, W. J. & Sixma, T. K. The nucleosome acidic patch plays a critical role in RNF168-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2A. Nat. Commun. 5, 3291 (2014). · DOI
  37. McGinty, R. K., Henrici, R. C. & Tan, S. Crystal structure of the PRC1 ubiquitylation module bound to the nucleosome. Nature 514, 591–596 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Bentley, M. L. et al. Recognition of UbcH5c and the nucleosome by the Bmi1/Ring1b ubiquitin ligase complex. EMBO J. 30, 3285–3297 (2011). · DOI
  39. Blech, M. & Hoerer, S. Crystal structure of human IL-1beta in complex with therapeutic antibody binding fragment of gevokizumab. Available at https://www.rcsb.org/structure/4g6m (2012). · doi:10.2210/pdb4g6m/pdb
  40. Tjandra, N., Omichinski, J. G., Gronenborn, A. M., Clore, G. M. & Bax, A. Use of dipolar 1H–15N and 1H–13C couplings in the structure determination of magnetically oriented macromolecules in solution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 732–738 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Meiler, J., Blomberg, N., Nilges, M. & Griesinger, C. A new approach for applying residual dipolar couplings as restraints in structure elucidation. J. Biomol. NMR 16, 245–252 (2000). · doi:10.1023/a:1008378624590
  42. Banci, L. et al. Paramagnetism-based restraints for Xplor-NIH. J. Biomol. NMR 28, 249–261 (2004). · doi:10.1023/b:jnmr.0000013703.30623.f7
  43. Tjandra, N., Garrett, D. S., Gronenborn, A. M., Bax, A. & Clore, G. M. Defining long range order in NMR structure determination from the dependence of heteronuclear relaxation times on rotational diffusion anisotropy. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 443–449 (1997). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 618

Metadata

Authors
Honorato, R. V., Trellet, M. E., Jiménez-García, B., Schaarschmidt, J. J., Giulini, M., Reys, V., Koukos, P. I., Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M., Karaca, E., van Zundert, G. C. P., Roel-Touris, J., van Noort, C. W., Jandová, Z., Melquiond, A. S. J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-06-17
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
3219-3241
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
DOI
10.1038/s41596-024-01011-0
OpenAlex
W4399731408
Cited by
618
References
15
FWCI
71.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The HADDOCK2.4 web server for integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41596-024-01011-0
The paper
Honorato, R. V., Trellet, M. E., Jiménez-García, B., Schaarschmidt, J. J., Giulini, M., Reys, V., Koukos, P. I., Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M., Karaca, E., van Zundert, G. C. P., Roel-Touris, J., van Noort, C. W., Jandová, Z., Melquiond, A. S. J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2024). The HADDOCK2.4 web server for integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes. Nature Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01011-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.