Cited by 45Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesGame Theory and Applications

Stochastic evolutionary voluntary public goods game with punishment in a Quasi-birth-and-death process

Open access
Quan, Ji, Liu, Wei, Chu, Yuqing, Wang, Xianjia·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Traditional replication dynamic model and the corresponding concept of evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) only takes into account whether the system can return to the equilibrium after being subjected to a small disturbance. In the real world, due to continuous noise, the ESS of the system may not be stochastically stable. In this paper, a model of voluntary public goods game with punishment is studied in a stochastic situation. Unlike the existing model, we describe the evolutionary process of strategies in the population as a generalized quasi-birth-and-death process. And we investigate the stochastic stable equilibrium (SSE) instead. By numerical experiments, we get all possible SSEs of the system for any combination of parameters, and investigate the influence of parameters on the probabilities of the system to select different equilibriums. It is found that in the stochastic situation, the introduction of the punishment and non-participation strategies can change the evolutionary dynamics of the system and equilibrium of the game. There is a large range of parameters that the system selects the cooperative states as its SSE with a high probability. This result provides us an insight and control method for the evolution of cooperation in the public goods game in stochastic situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-16140-8

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quan, J., Liu, W., Chu, Y., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Quan, Ji
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-11-23
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
16110-16110
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769366072
Cited by
45
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71501149, 71231007)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (71231007, 71501149, WUT: 2017VI070)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
punishment, stochastic stability, stochastic evolutionary game, quasi-birth-and-death processes, evolution of cooperation, evolutionarily stable strategy, cooperative equilibrium
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Biological Evolution, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Theoretical, Punishment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review