Cited by 351Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games

Open access
Rand, David G., Nowak, Martin A.·2011·Nature Communications

Abstract

Cooperation, where one individual incurs a cost to help another, is a fundamental building block of the natural world and human society. It has been suggested that costly punishment can promote the evolution of cooperation, with the threat of punishment deterring free-riders. Recent experiments, however, have revealed the existence of 'antisocial' punishment, where non-cooperators punish cooperators. While various theoretical models find that punishment can promote the evolution of cooperation, these models a priori exclude the possibility of antisocial punishment. Here we extend the standard theory of optional public goods games to include the full set of punishment strategies. We find that punishment no longer increases cooperation, and that selection favours substantial levels of antisocial punishment for a wide range of parameters. Furthermore, we conduct behavioural experiments, showing results consistent with our model predictions. As opposed to an altruistic act that promotes cooperation, punishment is mostly a self-interested tool for protecting oneself against potential competitors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms1442

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Punishment-based mechanisms reduce the overall social good.

    “First, they reduce the overall social good2,3,6.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rand, David G.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2011-08-16
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
434-434
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133772963
Cited by
350
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 25
FWCI
98.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (37874)
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM078986)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
antisocial punishment, evolution of cooperation, costly punishment, free-riding, punishment strategies, altruism, behavioural experiments
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Biological Evolution, Female, Game Theory, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Models, Psychological, Punishment, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review