Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph
Abstract
Recent theoretical studies of selection in finite structured populations have worked with one of two measures of selective advantage of an allele: fixation probability and inclusive fitness. Each approach has its own analytical strengths, but given certain assumptions they provide equivalent results. In most instances the structure of the population can be specified by a network of nodes connected by edges (that is, a graph), and much of the work here has focused on a continuous-time model of evolution, first described by ref. 11. Working in this context, we provide an inclusive fitness analysis to derive a surprisingly simple analytical condition for the selective advantage of a cooperative allele in any graph for which the structure satisfies a general symmetry condition ('bi-transitivity'). Our results hold for a broad class of population structures, including most of those analysed previously, as well as some for which a direct calculation of fixation probability has appeared intractable. Notably, under some forms of population regulation, the ability of a cooperative allele to invade is seen to be independent of the nature of population structure (and in particular of how game partnerships are specified) and is identical to that for an unstructured population. For other types of population regulation our results reveal that cooperation can invade if players choose partners along relatively 'high-weight' edges.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In static networks, mathematical approaches provide general conditions for how structure affects evolutionary dynamics.
“In static networks, mathematical approaches provide general conditions for how structure affects evolutionary dynamics [14, 15].”
From Strategy evolution on dynamic networks (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks
Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913149107 · Cited by 767 · see citing works
Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure
Allen, B., Lippner, G., Chen, Y.-T., Fotouhi, B., Momeni, N., Yau, S.-T., & Nowak, M. A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21723 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Strategy selection in structured populations
Tarnita, C. E., Ohtsuki, H., Antal, T., Fu, F., & Nowak, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.035 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Evolutionary dynamics in set structured populations
Tarnita, C. E., Antal, T., Ohtsuki, H., & Nowak, M. A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903019106 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Multiple strategies in structured populations
Tarnita, C. E., Wage, N., & Nowak, M. A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016008108 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Social goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies
McAvoy, A., Allen, B., & Nowak, M. A. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0881-2 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Strategy evolution on dynamic networks
Su, Q., McAvoy, A., & Plotkin, J. B. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00509-z · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“In static networks, mathematical approaches provide general conditions for how structure affects evolutionary dynamics [14, 15].”
BackgroundQuan, J., Liu, W., Chu, Y., & Wang, X. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16140-8 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A mathematical formalism for natural selection with arbitrary spatial and genetic structure
Allen, B., & McAvoy, A. (2019) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s00285-018-1305-z · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Evolution of cooperation on dynamical graphs
Kun, Á., & Scheuring, I. (2009) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.11.009 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Evaluating the structure-coefficient theorem of evolutionary game theory
McAvoy, A., & Wakeley, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2119656119 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
The coalescent in finite populations with arbitrary, fixed structure
Allen, B., & McAvoy, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.02880 · Cited by 12
Débarre, F. (2020) · Dynamic Games and Applications · doi:10.1007/s13235-019-00326-y · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taylor, P. D., Day, T., & Wild, G.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Peter D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 447
- Issue
- 7143
- Pages
- 469-472
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1967049382
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 77.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Keywords
- evolution of cooperation, homogeneous graphs, inclusive fitness, fixation probability, selective advantage, invasion fitness, population regulation, partner choice, game theory, structured populations
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Competitive Behavior, Biological Evolution, Fertility, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review