Cited by 83Stress Responses and CortisolPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

The psychometric properties and temporal dynamics of subjective stress, retrospectively assessed by different informants and questionnaires, and hair cortisol concentrations

Open access
Weckesser, Lisa J., Dietz, Friedericke, Schmidt, Kornelius, Grass, Juliane, Kirschbaum, Clemens, Miller, Robert·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

To date, there is only scarce evidence for a considerable association of subjective and objective stress measures, which might be attributable to method bias (e.g., confounding) and/or asynchrony of their temporal changes. To validate different subjective stress measures by a physiological measure of long-term stress (hair cortisol concentrations; HCC), 37 heterosexual couples ( N = 74) completed a 12-week internet-based assessment protocol comprised of a weekly hassle scale (WHS; once per week), a perceived stress scale (PSS; once per month), and a chronic stress scale (TICS; once after three months). Partners provided vicarious stress ratings. When averaged across time, self-reported WHS significantly predicted HCC ( r = 0.27), whereas the PSS and TICS did not ( r < 0.22). Dynamic factor analysis (i.e., state-space modelling) confirmed that WHS was the most valid indicator of subjective stress, explaining up to 16% of the variance in HCC ( r = 0.37) with a time lag of ~4 weeks. This temporally delayed effect of subjective stress is consistent with the presumed retrospective character of HCC, but also suggests that the majority of variance in hair cortisol is attributable to other causes than subjective stress such as individual disposition to display increased adrenocortical activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-37526-2

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weckesser, L. J., Dietz, F., Schmidt, K., Grass, J., Kirschbaum, C., & Miller, R.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Weckesser, Lisa J.
  • Miller, Robert
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-01-31
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1098-1098
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913417140
Cited by
83
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 940/2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
subjective stress, hair cortisol, perceived stress, chronic stress, couples, methodological bias, temporal dynamics, adrenocortical function, state-space model
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Hair, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Stress, Psychological, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review