Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parenting Stress Undermines Mother-Child Brain-to-Brain Synchrony: A Hyperscanning Study

Azhari, A., Leck, W. Q., Gabrieli, G., Bizzego, A., Rigo, P., Setoh, P., Bornstein, M. H., Esposito, G.·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Synchrony refers to the coordinated interplay of behavioural and physiological signals that reflect the bi-directional attunement of one partner to the other’s psychophysiological, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral state. In mother-child relationships, a synchronous pattern of interaction indicates parental sensitivity. Parenting stress has been shown to undermine mother-child behavioural synchrony. However, it has yet to be discerned whether parenting stress affects brain-to-brain synchrony during everyday joint activities. Here, we show that greater parenting stress is associated with less brain-to-brain synchrony in the medial left cluster of the prefrontal cortex when mother and child engage in a typical dyadic task of watching animation videos together. This brain region overlaps with the inferior frontal gyrus, the frontal eye field, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which are implicated in inference of mental states and social cognition. Our result demonstrates the adverse effect of parenting stress on mother-child attunement that is evident at a brain-to-brain level. Mother-child brain-to-brain asynchrony may underlie the robust association between parenting stress and poor dyadic co-regulation. We anticipate our study to form the foundation for future investigations into mechanisms by which parenting stress impairs the mother-child relationship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-47810-4

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Illustration depicting the set-up of devices and sitting arrangement of mother-child dyads during the experimental sessions. Figure illustrated by Nur Hasyimah Bte Johari.
Figure 1 Illustration depicting the set-up of devices and sitting arrangement of mother-child dyads during the experimental sessions. Figure illustrated by Nur Hasyimah Bte Johari.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Schematic diagram representing the video stimuli screened to participants. A 5-sec fixation point “+” was presented before the onset of the first video clip. Three 1-min video clips were screened in total, with an inter-stimulus interval of 10 sec between each clip. The order of presentation of the three video clips was randomised such that six video sequences were generated. Mother-child dyads were randomly assigned to one of six video sequences.
Figure 2 Schematic diagram representing the video stimuli screened to participants. A 5-sec fixation point “+” was presented before the onset of the first video clip. Three 1-min video clips were screened in total, with an inter-stimulus interval of 10 sec between each clip. The order of presentation of the three video clips was randomised such that six video sequences were generated. Mother-child dyads were randomly assigned to one of six video sequences.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Schematic diagram depicting locations of the 20 optode channels and their corresponding positions with respect to the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC). Channels were grouped into the following clusters: frontal left, frontal right, medial left, and medial right.
Figure 3 Schematic diagram depicting locations of the 20 optode channels and their corresponding positions with respect to the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC). Channels were grouped into the following clusters: frontal left, frontal right, medial left, and medial right.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Scatterplot depicting the positive linear relation between reported parenting stress by mothers and normalised distance index in the medial left cluster (r = 0.56, p = 0.0032; FDR corrected).
Figure 4 Scatterplot depicting the positive linear relation between reported parenting stress by mothers and normalised distance index in the medial left cluster (r = 0.56, p = 0.0032; FDR corrected).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Nelson-Coffey, S. K., Katherine Nelson-Coffey, S. & Stewart, D. Well-Being in parenting (2019). · DOI
  2. Deater-Deckard, K. & Scarr, S. Parenting stress among dual-earner mothers and fathers: Are there gender differences? J. Fam. Psychol. 10, 45 (1996). · DOI
  3. Oxford, M. L. & Lee, J. O. The effect of family processes on school achievement as moderated by socioeconomic context. J. Sch. Psychol. 49, 597–612 (2011). · DOI
  4. Pereira, J. et al. Parenting stress mediates between maternal maltreatment history and maternal sensitivity in a community sample (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chan, J. C., Nugent, B. M. & Bale, T. L. Parental advisory: Maternal and paternal stress can impact offspring neurodevelopment. Biol. Psychiatry 83, 886–894 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Jarvis, P. A. & Creasey, G. L. Parental stress, coping, and attachment in families with an 18-month-old infant. Infant Behav. Dev. 14, 383–395 (1991). · DOI
  7. Anthony, L. G. et al. The relationships between parenting stress, parenting behaviour and preschoolers’ social competence and behaviour problems in the classroom. Infant Child Dev. 14, 133–154 (2005). · DOI
  8. Williford, A. P., Calkins, S. D. & Keane, S. P. Predicting change in parenting stress across early childhood: child and maternal factors. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 35, 251–263 (2007). · DOI
  9. Bornstein, M. H. Mother-infant attunement: A multilevel approach via body, brain, and behavior. In: T. editor (Eds), The Infant Mind: Origins of the Social Brain, pp. 266–298 (Guilford, New York, 2013).
  10. Ambrose, H. N. & Menna, R. Physical and relational aggression in young children: the role of mother–child interactional synchrony. Early Child Dev. Care 183, 207–222 (2013). · DOI
  11. Bazhenova, O. V., Plonskaia, O. & Porges, S. W. Vagal reactivity and affective adjustment in infants during interaction challenges. Child Dev. 72, 1314–1326 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gilbert, S. J. & Burgess, P. W. Executive function. Curr. Biol. 18, R110–4 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ochsner, K. N., Silvers, J. A. & Buhle, J. T. Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: a synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1251, E1–24 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Noriuchi, M., Kikuchi, Y., Mori, K. & Kamio, Y. The orbitofrontal cortex modulates parenting stress in the maternal brain. Sci. Rep. 9, 1658 (2019). · DOI
  15. Abidin, R. R. Parenting stress index–fourth edition (PSI-4). (Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL, 2012).
  16. Johnson, A. O. Test review: Parenting stress index, fourth edition (PSI-4) (2015). · DOI
  17. Brobst, J. B., Clopton, J. R. & Hendrick, S. S. Parenting children with autism spectrum disorders: The couple’s relationship. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabl. 24, 38–49 (2009). · DOI
  18. Reitman, D., Currier, R. O. & Stickle, T. R. A critical evaluation of the parenting stress Index-Short form (PSI-SF) in a head start population. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 31, 384–392 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lloyd-Fox, S., Blasi, A. & Elwell, C. E. Illuminating the developing brain: The past, present and future of functional near infrared spectroscopy (2010). · DOI
  20. Keogh, E. & Ratanamahatana, C. A. Exact indexing of dynamic time warping. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 7, 358–386 (2005). · DOI
  21. Senin, P. Dynamic time warping algorithm review, and Computer Science Department University of Hawaii (2008).
  22. Tuzcu, V. & Nas, S. Dynamic time warping as a novel tool in pattern recognition of ECG changes in heart rhythm disturbances. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, volume 1, pp. 182–186 Vol. 1 (2005).
  23. Rath, T. M. & Manmatha, R. Word image matching using dynamic time warping. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings, volume 2, pp. II–II (2003).
  24. Myers, C. & Rabiner, L. A level building dynamic time warping algorithm for connected word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust. 29, 284–297 (1981). · DOI
  25. Rabiner, L., Rosenberg, A. & Levinson, S. Considerations in dynamic time warping algorithms for discrete word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust. 26, 575–582 (1978). · DOI
  26. Giorgino, T. Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: the dtw package. J. Stat. Softw. 31, 1–24 (2009). · DOI
  27. Suveg, C., Shaffer, A. & Davis, M. Family stress moderates relations between physiological and behavioral synchrony and child self-regulation in mother-preschooler dyads. Dev. Psychobiol. 58, 83–97 (2016). · DOI
  28. Frith, C. D. & Frith, U. Interacting minds–a biological basis. Science 286, 1692–1695 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Frith, C. & Frith, U. The physiological basis of theory of mind: functional neuroimaging studies. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience 2 (2000). · DOI
  30. Gallagher, H. L. et al. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 38, 11–21 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hala, S., Chandler, M. & Fritz, A. S. Fledgling theories of mind: Deception as a marker of three-year-olds’ understanding of false belief. Child Dev. 62, 83–97 (1991). · DOI
  32. Curci, A. & Rimé, B. The temporal evolution of social sharing of emotions and its consequences on emotional recovery: a longitudinal study. Emotion 12, 1404–1414 (2012). · DOI
  33. Anderson, C., Keltner, D., Tiedens, L. Z. & Leach, C. W. The emotional convergence hypothesis. The social life of emotions 2, 144 (2004). · DOI
  34. Ponnet, K. et al. The influence of mothers’ and fathers’ parenting stress and depressive symptoms on own and partner’s parent-child communication. Fam. Process 52, 312–324 (2013). · DOI
  35. Wang, M. & Saudino, K. J. Emotion regulation and stress. J. Adult Dev. 18, 95–103 (2011). · DOI
  36. Buchanan, T. W. et al. Medial prefrontal cortex damage affects physiological and psychological stress responses differently in men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35, 56–66 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Cerqueira, J. J., Almeida, O. F. X. & Sousa, N. The stressed prefrontal cortex. left? right! Brain Behav. Immun. 22, 630–638 (2008). · DOI
  38. Euston, D. R., Gruber, A. J. & McNaughton, B. L. The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making. Neuron 76, 1057–1070 (2012). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Azhari, A., Leck, W. Q., Gabrieli, G., Bizzego, A., Rigo, P., Setoh, P., Bornstein, M. H., & Esposito, G.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-08-06
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322
Cited by
175
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review