Cited by 1,541Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making

Open access
Euston, David R., Gruber, Aaron J., McNaughton, Bruce L.·2012·Neuron

Abstract

Some have claimed that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) mediates decision making. Others suggest mPFC is selectively involved in the retrieval of remote long-term memory. Yet others suggests mPFC supports memory and consolidation on time scales ranging from seconds to days. How can all these roles be reconciled? We propose that the function of the mPFC is to learn associations between context, locations, events, and corresponding adaptive responses, particularly emotional responses. Thus, the ubiquitous involvement of mPFC in both memory and decision making may be due to the fact that almost all such tasks entail the ability to recall the best action or emotional response to specific events in a particular place and time. An interaction between multiple memory systems may explain the changing importance of mPFC to different types of memories over time. In particular, mPFC likely relies on the hippocampus to support rapid learning and memory consolidation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002

Cites

172 of 172 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Paxinos G Watson C The Rat Brain 2007 Academic Press San Diego, CA 6th edn
  2. Saper CB Paxinos G The Hypothalamus The Human Nervous System 2003 513 550 Academic Press San Diego, CA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Euston, D. R., Gruber, A. J., & McNaughton, B. L.
Affiliations
University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
Euston, David R.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
1057-1070
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087404956
Cited by
1,541
References
172
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 153 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 27
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS020331-26)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, decision-making, memory consolidation, long-term memory retrieval, context-dependent learning, emotional memory, hippocampus, adaptive behavior
MeSH terms
Association Learning, Decision Making, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Neural Pathways, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review