Cited by 20Infectious Encephalopathies and EncephalitisBacterial Infections and VaccinesTryptophan and brain disorders

Encephalitis and aseptic meningitis: short-term and long-term outcome, quality of life and neuropsychological functioning

Open access
Quist-Paulsen, Else, Ormaasen, Vidar, Kran, Anne-Marte B., Dunlop, Oona, Ueland, Per Magne, Ueland, Thor, Eikeland, Randi, Aukrust, Pål +1 more·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

For those surviving encephalitis, the influence on daily life of patients and their relatives may be substantial. In contrast, the prognosis after aseptic meningitis (ASM) is considered good. In this prospective study in patients with encephalitis (n = 20) and ASM (n = 46), we show that both groups experienced reduced Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) at two months after discharge, and that workability was reduced in 37% of the patients with ASM. However, 12 months after discharge no neuropsychological deficits were detected in the ASM group, whereas patients with encephalitis had lower scores on tests of fine motor and psychomotor skills as well as on learning and memory. We also found that for patients with encephalitis, neopterin, as a marker of Th1 cell induced macrophage activation, and a putatively neurotoxic ratio of the kynurenine pathway (KP) measured during the acute phase was associated with lower HRQoL. Our data show that not only encephalitis, but also ASM has substantial short-term influence on HRQoL and workability. For patients with encephalitis we suggest a link between immune activation and activation of the KP during the acute phase with impaired HRQoL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-52570-2

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Short-term outcome after viral meningitis was frequently unfavourable but improved during extended follow up.

    “In agreement with most previous studies, we observed that short-term outcome after viral meningitis was frequently unfavourable but improved during extended follow up.6,21,22”

    From Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with viral meningitis. (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results (Short-term outcome; page unavailable) report daily symptoms in 63% of patients with aseptic meningitis at about two months. The Discussion describes their long-term prognosis as good, but the 12-month assessment measured neuropsychological function rather than repeating the short-term outcome measures. The paper therefore does not directly show that those outcomes improved over follow-up. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Longitudinal studies in aseptic meningitis did not report a significant morbidity in the long term.

    “Longitudinal studies in AM did not report a significant morbidity in the long term [24, 100, 101].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Delis, D. C., K. J., Kaplan, E. & Ober, B. E. California Verbal Learning Test (2nd ed.) (Psychological Corporation, 2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quist-Paulsen, E., Ormaasen, V., Kran, A.-M. B., Dunlop, O., Ueland, P. M., Ueland, T., Eikeland, R., Aukrust, P., & Nordenmark, T. H.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Bevital (Norway) (NO)
  • Sørlandet Sykehus (NO)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-11-06
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
16158-16158
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2988061537
Cited by
20
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, health-related quality of life, neuropsychological outcomes, workability, kynurenine pathway, neopterin, Th1 cell activation, macrophage activation, learning and memory impairment, prognosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain Damage, Chronic, Encephalitis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Kynurenine, Learning Disabilities, Macrophage Activation, Male, Memory Disorders, Meningitis, Aseptic, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Psychomotor Performance, Quality of Life, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Th1 Cells, Neopterin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review