Cited by 27Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

Relationship between media multitasking and functional connectivity in the dorsal attention network

Open access
Kobayashi, Kei, Oishi, Naoya, Yoshimura, Sayaka, Ueno, Tsukasa, Miyagi, Takashi, Murai, Toshiya, Fujiwara, Hironobu·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

With the development of digital technology, media multitasking behaviour, which is using two or more media simultaneously, has become more commonplace. There are two opposing hypotheses of media multitasking with regard to its impact on attention. One hypothesis claims that media multitasking can strengthen attention control, and the other claims heavy media multitaskers are less able to focus on relevant tasks in the presence of distractors. A total of 103 healthy subjects took part in this study. We measured the Media Multitasking Index (MMI) and subjects performed the continuous performance test. Resting state and oddball task functional MRI were conducted to analyse functional connectivity in the dorsal attention network, and the degree centrality (DC) was calculated using graph theory analysis. We found that the DCs in the dorsal attention network were higher during resting state than during the oddball task. Furthermore, the DCs during the task were positively correlated with the MMI. These results indicated that the DC reduction from resting state to the oddball task in high media multitaskers was attenuated compared with low media multitaskers. This study not only reveals more about the neurophysiology of media multitasking, but could also indicate brain biomarkers of media multitasking behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-75091-9

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous studies showed that media multitasking behavior could detrimentally affect cognitive ability, such as attention and memory.

    “numerous studies showed that media multitasking behavior could detrimentally affect cognitive ability, such as attention and memory (7–9).”

    From Media multitasking, depression, and anxiety of college students: Serial mediating effects of attention control and negative information attentional bias (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction reports that several studies found poorer focused attention among heavy media multitaskers, supporting the attention portion of the claim. It also describes conflicting findings, and the Discussion says this study cannot establish a causal relationship. Our copy does not report a detrimental effect on memory; memory appears only in a cited study’s title. No page numbers are available in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kobayashi, K., Oishi, N., Yoshimura, S., Ueno, T., Miyagi, T., Murai, T., & Fujiwara, H.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Fujiwara, Hironobu
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-10-22
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
17992-17992
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094488817
Cited by
27
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas, Ministry of Education, Culture Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (16H06395, 16H06402)
  • Impulsing Paradigm Change through Disruptive Technologies Program, Program of the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (2015-PM11-08-01)
  • Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Japan Society for The Promotion of Science (19H00518)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
media multitasking, dorsal attention network, functional connectivity, degree centrality, attentional control, resting state, oddball paradigm, continuous performance test, brain biomarkers, graph theory
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain, Cognition, Communications Media, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Nerve Net, Task Performance and Analysis, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review