CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 72Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and Philosophy

Media use, attention, mental health and academic performance among 8 to 12 year old children

Open access
Cardoso-Leite, Pedro, Buchard, Albert, Tissieres, Isabel, Mussack, Dominic, Bavelier, Daphne·2021·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0259163PMC PMC8598050
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The rise in digital media consumption, especially among children, raises the societal question of its impact on cognition, mental health and academic achievement. Here, we investigate three different ways of measuring technology use-—total hours of media consumed, hours of video game play and number of media used concurrently—-in 118 eight-to-twelve year-old children. At stake is the question of whether different technology uses have different effects, which could explain some of the past mixed findings. We collected data about children’s media uses as well as (i) attentional and behavioral control abilities, (ii) psychological distress, psychosocial functioning, and sleep, and (iii) academic achievement and motivation. While attentional control abilities were assessed using both cognitive tests and questionnaires, mental health and sleep were all questionnaire-based. Finally, academic performance was based on self-reported grades, with motivational variables being measured through the grit and the growth-mindset questionnaires. We present partial correlation analyses and construct a psychological network to assess the structural associations between different forms of media consumption and the three categories of measures. We observe that children consume large amounts of media and media multitask substantially. Partial correlation analyses show that media multitasking specifically was mostly correlated with negative mental health, while playing video games was associated with faster responding and better mental health. No significant partial correlations were observed for total hours on media. Psychological network analysis complement these first results by indicating that all three ways of consuming technology are only indirectly related to self-reported grades. Thus, technology uses appear to only indirectly relate to academic performance, while more directly affecting mental health. This work emphasizes the need to differentiate among technology uses if one is to understand how every day digital consumption impacts human behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0259163

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. [4]Cardoso-Leite P, Ansarinia M, Schmück E, Bavelier D. Training cognition with video games. In: Cohen Kadosh K, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford University Press; 2021. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827474.013.38 · DOI
  2. [5]Bavelier D, Green CS. Enhancing Attentional Control: Lessons from Action Video Games. Neuron. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.031 31600511 · DOI
  3. [10]Orben A, Weinstein N, Przybylski AK. Only Holistic and Iterative Change Will Fix Digital Technology Research. Psychological Inquiry. Routledge; 2020; 31: 235– 241. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820221 · DOI
  4. [11]Bediou B, Rich M, Bavelier D. Digital media and cognitive development. OECD; 2020; https://doi-org.proxy.bnl.lu/10.1787/3b071e13-en · DOI
  5. [15]Zhao J, Zhang Y, Jiang F, Ip P, Ho FKW, Zhang Y, et al. Excessive Screen Time and Psychosocial Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Body Mass Index, Sleep Duration, and Parent-Child Interaction. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2018; 202: 157– 162.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.029 30100232 · DOI
  6. [16]Ra CK, Cho J, Stone MD, De La Cerda J, Goldenson NI, Moroney E, et al. Association of Digital Media Use With Subsequent Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Among Adolescents. JAMA. 2018; 320: 255. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8931 30027248 PMC6553065 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [18]Limtrakul N, Louthrenoo O, Narkpongphun A, Boonchooduang N, Chonchaiya W. Media use and psychosocial adjustment in children and adolescents. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018; 54: 296– 301. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13725 28948669 · DOI
  8. [19]Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997; 38: 581– 586. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x 9255702 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [20]Domoff SE, Harrison K, Gearhardt AN, Gentile DA, Lumeng JC, Miller AL. Development and Validation of the Problematic Media Use Measure: A Parent Report Measure of Screen Media “Addiction” in Children. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2019; 8: 2– 11. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000163 30873299 PMC6411079 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [22]Aypay A. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Usage and Achievement of Turkish Students in Pisa 2006. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology—TOJET. 2010; 9: 116– 124. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ898009
  11. [23]Bulut O, Cutumisu M. When Technology Does Not Add Up: ICT Use Negatively Predicts Mathematics and Science Achievement for Finnish and Turkish Students in PISA 2012. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE); 2017. pp. 935–945. Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/178407/
  12. [24]Rideout VJ, Vandewater EA, Wartella EA. Zero to six: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers and preschoolers. ERIC; 2003 17473074
  13. [26]Ophir E, Nass C, Wagner AD. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. PNAS. 2009; 106: 15583– 7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903620106 19706386 PMC2747164 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [27]Wiradhany W, Nieuwenstein MR. Cognitive control in media multitaskers: Two replication studies and a meta-Analysis. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics; 2017 doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1408-4 28840547 PMC5662702 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [29]Uncapher MR, Wagner AD. Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018; 115: 9889– 9896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611612115 30275312 PMC6176627 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [30]Cheever NA, Peviani K, Rosen LD. Media Multitasking and Mental Health. In: Moreno MA, Radovic A, editors. Technology and Adolescent Mental Health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 101– 112. 10.1007/978-3-319-69638-6_8 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [31]Magen H. The relations between executive functions, media multitasking and polychronicity. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017; 67: 1– 9. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.011 · DOI
  18. [33]Baumgartner SE, Sumter SR. Dealing with media distractions: An observational study of computer-based multitasking among children and adults in the Netherlands. Journal of Children and Media. 2017; 11: 295– 313. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2017.1304971 · DOI
  19. [34]Minear M, Brasher F, McCurdy M, Lewis J, Younggren A. Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2013; 20: 1274– 81. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0456-6 23722949 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [35]Sanbonmatsu DM, Strayer DL, Medeiros-Ward N, Watson JM. Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking. Chambers C, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e54402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054402 23372720 PMC3553130 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [36]Shin M, Webb A, Kemps E. Media multitasking, impulsivity and dual task ability. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019; 92: 160– 168. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.018 · DOI
  22. [37]Ralph BCW, Thomson DR, Cheyne JA, Smilek D. Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychological Research. 2014; 78: 661– 669. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0523-7 24178629 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [38]Wiradhany W, van Vugt MK, Nieuwenstein MR. Media multitasking, mind-wandering, and distractibility: A large-scale study. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01842-0 PMC7303060 31392594 · DOI
  24. [42]Elbe P, Sörman DE, Mellqvist E, Brändström J, Ljungberg JK. Predicting attention shifting abilities from self-reported media multitasking. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019; 26: 1257– 1265. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-01566-6 31030392 PMC6710456 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [43]Seddon AL, Law AS, Adams A-M, Simmons FR. Exploring the relationship between executive functions and self-reported media-multitasking in young adults. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. Routledge; 2018; 30: 728– 742. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2018.1525387 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [44]Cardoso-Leite P, Kludt R, Vignola G, Ma WJ, Green CS, Bavelier D. Technology consumption and cognitive control: Contrasting action video game experience with media multitasking. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2016; 78: 218– 241. Available: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-015-0988-0 26474982 PMC4834063 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [45]Shin M, Linke A, Kemps E. Moderate amounts of media multitasking are associated with optimal task performance and minimal mind wandering. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020; 111: 106422. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106422 · DOI
  28. [46]Baumgartner SE, Weeda WD, van der Heijden LL, Huizinga M. The Relationship Between Media Multitasking and Executive Function in Early Adolescents: The Journal of Early Adolescence. 2014 doi: 10.1177/0272431614523133 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [47]Rogobete DA, Ionescu T, Miclea M. The Relationship Between Media Multitasking Behavior and Executive Function in Adolescence: A Replication Study. The Journal of Early Adolescence. SAGE Publications Inc; 2020; 0272431620950478. doi: 10.1177/0272431620950478 · DOI
  30. [49]Srisinghasongkram P, Trairatvorakul P, Maes M, Chonchaiya W. Effect of early screen media multitasking on behavioural problems in school-age children. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 32856131
  31. [50]Becker MW, Alzahabi R, Hopwood CJ. Media Multitasking Is Associated with Symptoms of Depression and Social Anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2013; 16: 132– 135. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0291 23126438 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [51]Calamaro CJ, Mason TBA, Ratcliffe SJ. Adolescents Living the 24/7 Lifestyle: Effects of Caffeine and Technology on Sleep Duration and Daytime Functioning. PEDIATRICS. 2009; 123: e1005– e1010. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3641 19482732 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [53]van der Schuur WA, Baumgartner SE, Sumter SR, Valkenburg PM. Media multitasking and sleep problems: A longitudinal study among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018; 81: 316– 324. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.024 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [54]Loh KK, Tan BZH, Lim SWH. Media multitasking predicts video-recorded lecture learning performance through mind wandering tendencies. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 63: 943– 947. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.030 · DOI
  35. [56]Cain MS, Leonard JA, Gabrieli JDE, Finn AS. Media multitasking in adolescence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2016; 23: 1932– 1941. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1036-3 27188785 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [57]Martín-Perpiñá M de las M, Viñas i Poch F, Malo Cerrato S. Media multitasking impact in homework, executive function and academic performance in Spanish adolescents. Martin-Perpiñá, Mercedes Viñas i Poch, Ferran Malo Cerrato, Sara 2019 Media multitasking impact in homework, executive function and academic performance in Spanish adolescents Psicothema 31 1 81 87. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias; 2019 10.7334/psicothema2018.178 30664415 · DOI
  37. [58]Luo J, Yeung P, Li H. The relationship among media multitasking, academic performance and self-esteem in Chinese adolescents: The cross-lagged panel and mediation analyses. Children and Youth Services Review. 2020; 117: 105308. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105308 · DOI
  38. [59]Powers KL, Brooks PJ. Evaluating the Specificity of Effects of Video Game Training. In: Blumberg FC, editor. Learning by Playing. Oxford University Press; 2014. pp. 302– 330. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896646.003.0021 · DOI
  39. [62]Toril P, Reales JM, Ballesteros S. Video game training enhances cognition of older adults: A meta-analytic study. Psychology and Aging. 2014; 29: 706– 716. doi: 10.1037/a0037507 25244488 · DOI
  40. [65]Dye MWG, Bavelier D. Differential development of visual attention skills in school-age children. Vision Research. 2010; 50: 452– 459. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.010 19836409 PMC2824025 · DOI
  41. [66]Franceschini S, Gori S, Ruffino M, Viola S, Molteni M, Facoetti A. Action Video Games Make Dyslexic Children Read Better. Current Biology. 2013; 23: 462– 466. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.044 23453956 · DOI
  42. [67]Franceschini S, Trevisan P, Ronconi L, Bertoni S, Colmar S, Double K, et al. Action video games improve reading abilities and visual-to-auditory attentional shifting in English-speaking children with dyslexia. Sci Rep. 2017; 7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05826-8 28725022 PMC5517521 · DOI
  43. [70]Przybylski AK. Electronic Gaming and Psychosocial Adjustment. Pediatrics. 2014; 134: e716– e722. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4021 25092934 · DOI
  44. [72]Posso A. Internet usage and educational outcomes among 15-year old Australian students. International Journal of Communication. 2016; 10: 26.
  45. [78]Libertus ME, Liu A, Pikul O, Jacques T, Cardoso-Leite P, Halberda J, et al. The Impact of Action Video Game Training on Mathematical Abilities in Adults. AERA Open. 2017; 3: 233285841774085. doi: 10.1177/2332858417740857 · DOI · Paper page
  46. [79]Parry DA, le Roux DB. Media multitasking and cognitive control: A systematic review of interventions. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019; 92: 316– 327. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.031 · DOI
  47. [80]Clifford S, Doane LD, Breitenstein R, Grimm KJ, Lemery-Chalfant K. Effortful Control Moderates the Relation Between Electronic-Media Use and Objective Sleep Indicators in Childhood. Psychol Sci. SAGE Publications Inc; 2020; 31: 822– 834. doi: 10.1177/0956797620919432 32558622 PMC7492726 · DOI
  48. [81]Lange K, Cohrs S, Skarupke C, Görke M, Szagun B, Schlack R. Electronic media use and insomnia complaints in German adolescents: Gender differences in use patterns and sleep problems. J Neural Transm. 2017; 124: 79– 87. doi: 10.1007/s00702-015-1482-5 26577762 · DOI
  49. [84]Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried EI. Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods. 2018; 50: 195– 212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1 28342071 PMC5809547 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [85]Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013; 64: 135– 168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 23020641 PMC4084861 · DOI · Paper page
  51. [92]Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J. ‘Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia. 1997; 35: 747– 758. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8 9204482 · DOI
  52. [93]Petton M, Perrone-Bertolotti M, Mac-Auliffe D, Bertrand O, Aguera P-E, Sipp F, et al. BLAST: A short computerized test to measure the ability to stay on task. Normative behavioral data and detailed cortical dynamics. bioRxiv. 2018. doi: 10.1101/498691 31541659 · DOI
  53. [96]Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4. J Stat Soft. 2015; 67. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
  54. [97]Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J Stat Soft. 2017; 82. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13 · DOI · Paper page
  55. [99]Cotten SR, Shank DB, Anderson WA. Gender, technology use and ownership, and media-based multitasking among middle school students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014; 35: 99– 106. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.041 · DOI
  56. [100]Bavelier D, Green CS, Dye MWG. Children, Wired: For Better and for Worse. Neuron. 2010; 67: 692– 701. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.035 20826302 PMC3170902 · DOI · Paper page
  57. [101]Reilly D, Neumann DL, Andrews G. Gender Differences in Spatial Ability: Implications for STEM Education and Approaches to Reducing the Gender Gap for Parents and Educators. In: Khine MS, editor. Visual-spatial Ability in STEM Education: Transforming Research into Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 195– 224. 10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0_10 · DOI
  58. [102]Uzun AM, Kilis S. Does persistent involvement in media and technology lead to lower academic performance? Evaluating media and technology use in relation to multitasking, self-regulation and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019; 90: 196– 203. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.045 · DOI
  59. [103]Chaput J-P, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Carson V, Gruber R, Olds T, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016; 41: S266– S282. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0627 27306433 · DOI · Paper page
  60. [104]Owens J, ADOLESCENT SLEEP WORKING GROUP, COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE. Insufficient Sleep in Adolescents and Young Adults: An Update on Causes and Consequences. PEDIATRICS. 2014; 134: e921– e932. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1696 25157012 PMC8194472 · DOI · Paper page
  61. [105]Stevens C, Bavelier D. The role of selective attention on academic foundations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2012; 2: S30– S48. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.11.001 22682909 PMC3375497 · DOI
  62. [107]Salkind NJ, Wright JC. The development of reflection-impulsivity and cognitive efficiency. Human development. Karger Publishers; 1977; 20: 377– 387.
  63. [108]Conard MA. Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality. 2006; 40: 339– 346. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.10.003 · DOI
  64. [109]Bruni O, Ferinistrambi L, Russo P, Antignani M, Innocenzi M, Ottaviano P, et al. Sleep disturbances and teacher ratings of school achievement and temperament in children. Sleep Medicine. 2006; 7: 43– 48. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2005.09.003 16309959 · DOI
  65. [110]Dyson MP, Hartling L, Shulhan J, Chisholm A, Milne A, Sundar P, et al. A Systematic Review of Social Media Use to Discuss and View Deliberate Self-Harm Acts. Seedat S, editor. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0155813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155813 27191728 PMC4871432 · DOI
  66. [112]Lobel A, Engels RCME, Stone LL, Granic I. Gaining a competitive edge: Longitudinal associations between children’s competitive video game playing, conduct problems, peer relations, and prosocial behavior. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 2017. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000159 · DOI
  67. [113]Hampton KN. Studying the Digital: Directions and Challenges for Digital Methods. Annual Review of Sociology. 2017; 43: 167– 188. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053505 · DOI
  68. [114]Rich M, Bickham DS, Shrier LA. Measuring Youth Media Exposure: A Multimodal Method for Investigating the Influence of Media on Digital Natives. American Behavioral Scientist. 2015; 59: 1736– 1754. doi: 10.1177/0002764215596558 · DOI
  69. [115]Greenberg BS, Eastin MS, Skalski P, Cooper L, Levy M, Lachlan K. Comparing Survey and Diary Measures of Internet and Traditional Media Use. Communication Reports. 2005; 18: 1– 8. doi: 10.1080/08934210500084164 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardoso-Leite, P., Buchard, A., Tissieres, I., Mussack, D., & Bavelier, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Cardoso-Leite, Pedro
ORCID
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2021-11-17
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
e0259163
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0259163
PMC
PMC8598050
OpenAlex
W3163837537
Cited by
72
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (ATTRACT/2016/ID/11242114/DIGILEARN)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (100014_159506)
  • Jacobs Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
children's media use, video gaming, media multitasking, attentional control, mental health, academic performance, psychological distress, sleep, grit, growth mindset, psychological network analysis
MeSH terms
Academic Performance, Attention, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Video Games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review