Cited by 133Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringInfrared Thermography in MedicineData-Driven Disease Surveillance

Feasibility of continuous fever monitoring using wearable devices

Open access
Smarr, Benjamin L., Aschbacher, Kirstin, Fisher, Sarah M., Chowdhary, Anoushka, Dilchert, Stephan, Puldon, Karena, Rao, Adam, Hecht, Frederick M. +1 more·2020·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Elevated core temperature constitutes an important biomarker for COVID-19 infection; however, no standards currently exist to monitor fever using wearable peripheral temperature sensors. Evidence that sensors could be used to develop fever monitoring capabilities would enable large-scale health-monitoring research and provide high-temporal resolution data on fever responses across heterogeneous populations. We launched the TemPredict study in March of 2020 to capture continuous physiological data, including peripheral temperature, from a commercially available wearable device during the novel coronavirus pandemic. We coupled these data with symptom reports and COVID-19 diagnosis data. Here we report findings from the first 50 subjects who reported COVID-19 infections. These cases provide the first evidence that illness-associated elevations in peripheral temperature are observable using wearable devices and correlate with self-reported fever. Our analyses support the hypothesis that wearable sensors can detect illnesses in the absence of symptom recognition. Finally, these data support the hypothesis that prediction of illness onset is possible using continuously generated physiological data collected by wearable sensors. Our findings should encourage further research into the role of wearable sensors in public health efforts aimed at illness detection, and underscore the importance of integrating temperature sensors into commercially available wearables.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-78355-6

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For each 24-h period, distal body temperature values below the 5th percentile and above the 95th percentile were discarded to exclude periods of non-wear and clinical fever and to minimize influence from non-representative extreme values.

    “For each 24-h period, we discarded wearable sensor-assessed distal body temperature values below the 5th percentile value and above the 95th percentile. This served to exclude periods of non-wear and periods of clinical fever and to minimize influence from non-representative extreme values (e.g., outliers), as done in prior research with wearable sensor-assessed metrics51,52.”

    From Sleep and temperature data from wearable devices support noninvasive detection of diabetes mellitus in a large-scale, retrospective analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Methods > Data preparation passage says the paper used medians of the lowest and highest 360 minutes in each 24-hour window to reduce the influence of outliers and acute extremes. It does not describe discarding values below the 5th or above the 95th percentile, or doing so to exclude non-wear and clinical fever. The cited work supports the general outlier-minimization rationale, but not the specific procedure attributed to prior research. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smarr, B. L., Aschbacher, K., Fisher, S. M., Chowdhary, A., Dilchert, S., Puldon, K., Rao, A., Hecht, F. M., & Mason, A. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Baruch College (US)
Corresponding author
Smarr, Benjamin L.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
21640-21640
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112300562
Cited by
133
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 31
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Oura Health Oy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Infrared Thermography in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, fever monitoring, wearable devices, peripheral temperature, core body temperature, symptom reporting, health monitoring
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, COVID-19, Adult, Aged, Feasibility Studies, Female, Fever, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Telemedicine, Young Adult, Self Report, Thermometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review