Cited by 25Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting

Open access
Schechtman, Eitan, Lampe, Anna, Wilson, Brianna J., Kwon, Eunbi, Anderson, Michael C., Paller, Ken A.·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Sleep's role in memory consolidation is widely acknowledged, but its role in weakening memories is still debated. Memory weakening is evolutionary beneficial and makes an integral contribution to cognition. We sought evidence on whether sleep-based memory reactivation can facilitate memory suppression. Participants learned pairs of associable words (e.g., DIET-CREAM) and were then exposed to hint words (e.g., DIET) and instructed to either recall ("think") or suppress ("no-think") the corresponding target words (e.g., CREAM). As expected, suppression impaired retention when tested immediately after a 90-min nap. To test if reactivation could selectively enhance memory suppression during sleep, we unobtrusively presented one of two sounds conveying suppression instructions during sleep, followed by hint words. Results showed that targeted memory reactivation did not enhance suppression-induced forgetting. Although not predicted, post-hoc analyses revealed that sleep cues strengthened memory, but only for suppressed pairs that were weakly encoded before sleep. The results leave open the question of whether memory suppression can be augmented during sleep, but suggest strategies for future studies manipulating memory suppression during sleep. Additionally, our findings support the notion that sleep reactivation is particularly beneficial for weakly encoded information, which may be prioritized for consolidation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-80671-w

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efforts to enhance overnight consolidation via memory cueing in sleep are most effective when pre-sleep learning performance is low.

    “Relatedly, efforts to enhance overnight consolidation via memory cueing in sleep are most effective when pre-sleep learning performance is low [21–23].”

    From Sleep bolsters schematically incongruent memories (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Iber, C., Ancoli-Israel, S., Chesson, A. L. Jr. & Quan, S. F. AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology, and Technical Specifications Vol. 1 (American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Westchester, 2007).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schechtman, E., Lampe, A., Wilson, B. J., Kwon, E., Anderson, M. C., & Paller, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Schechtman, Eitan
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-01-14
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1383-1383
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120582190
Cited by
25
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Human Frontier Science Program
  • Zuckerman STEM Leadership Program
  • Medical Research Council (MC-A060-5PR00)
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-1829414)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
targeted memory reactivation, memory suppression, forgetting, sleep, memory consolidation, associative learning
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review