Cited by 150Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Targeted memory reactivation during sleep depends on prior learning

Open access
Creery, Jessica D., Oudiette, Delphine, Antony, James W., Paller, Ken A.·2015·SLEEP

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: When sounds associated with learning are presented again during slow-wave sleep, targeted memory reactivation (TMR) can produce improvements in subsequent location recall. Here we used TMR to investigate memory consolidation during an afternoon nap as a function of prior learning. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty healthy individuals (8 male, 19-23 y old). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Participants learned to associate each of 50 common objects with a unique screen location. When each object appeared, its characteristic sound was played. After electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes were applied, location recall was assessed for each object, followed by a 90-min interval for sleep. During EEG-verified slow-wave sleep, half of the sounds were quietly presented over white noise. Recall was assessed 3 h after initial learning. A beneficial effect of TMR was found in the form of higher recall accuracy for cued objects compared to uncued objects when pre-sleep accuracy was used as an explanatory variable. An analysis of individual differences revealed that this benefit was greater for participants with higher pre-sleep recall accuracy. In an analysis for individual objects, cueing benefits were apparent as long as initial recall was not highly accurate. Sleep physiology analyses revealed that the cueing benefit correlated with delta power and fast spindle density. CONCLUSIONS: These findings substantiate the use of targeted memory reactivation (TMR) methods for manipulating consolidation during sleep. TMR can selectively strengthen memory storage for object-location associations learned prior to sleep, except for those near-perfectly memorized. Neural measures found in conjunction with TMR-induced strengthening provide additional evidence about mechanisms of sleep consolidation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5665/sleep.4670

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efforts to enhance overnight consolidation via memory cueing in sleep are most effective when pre-sleep learning performance is low.

    “Relatedly, efforts to enhance overnight consolidation via memory cueing in sleep are most effective when pre-sleep learning performance is low [21–23].”

    From Sleep bolsters schematically incongruent memories (2022) · cites this paper as [21]

    The trial-by-trial Test-1 accuracy analysis (page unavailable) found the greatest cueing benefit for objects recalled with high error before sleep, supporting the claim at the individual-memory level. But the participant-level analysis found that higher overall pre-sleep accuracy predicted a larger cueing benefit; the Optimal Conditions for TMR section also says relatively poor learners had more variable results. Thus, low pre-sleep learning performance is not generally the most effective condition. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creery, J. D., Oudiette, D., Antony, J. W., & Paller, K. A.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Creery, Jessica D.
Venue
SLEEP
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
755-763
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2321826814
Cited by
150
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1025697)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG017139, T32AG020506)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH100958)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
targeted memory reactivation, memory consolidation, slow-wave sleep, prior learning, object-location associations, location recall, delta power, sleep spindles, individual differences in memory
MeSH terms
Cues, Delta Rhythm, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Individuality, Learning, Male, Mental Recall, Sleep, Sound, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review