Cited by 284COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of geographic differences in comorbidities and associated severity and mortality among individuals with COVID-19

Open access
Thakur, Bhaskar, Dubey, Pallavi, Benitez, Joseph, Torres, Joshua P., Reddy, Sireesha, Shokar, Navkiran, Aung, Koko, Mukherjee, Debabrata, Dwivedi, Alok Kumar·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Several comorbidities have been shown to be associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related severity and mortality. However, considerable variation in the prevalence estimates of comorbidities and their effects on COVID-19 morbidity and mortality have been observed in prior studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine geographical, age, and gender related differences in the prevalence of comorbidities and associated severity and mortality rates among COVID-19 patients. We conducted a search using PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE to include all COVID-19 studies published between January 1st, 2020 to July 24th, 2020 reporting comorbidities with severity or mortality. We included studies reporting the confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 on human patients that also provided information on comorbidities or disease outcomes. We used DerSimonian and Laird random effects method for calculating estimates. Of 120 studies with 125,446 patients, the most prevalent comorbidity was hypertension (32%), obesity (25%), diabetes (18%), and cardiovascular disease (16%) while chronic kidney or other renal diseases (51%, 44%), cerebrovascular accident (43%, 44%), and cardiovascular disease (44%, 40%) patients had more COVID-19 severity and mortality respectively. Considerable variation in the prevalence of comorbidities and associated disease severity and mortality in different geographic regions was observed. The highest mortality was observed in studies with Latin American and European patients with any medical condition, mostly older adults (≥ 65 years), and predominantly male patients. Although the US studies observed the highest prevalence of comorbidities in COVID-19 patients, the severity of COVID-19 among each comorbid condition was highest in Asian studies whereas the mortality was highest in the European and Latin American countries. Risk stratification and effective control strategies for the COVID-19 should be done according to comorbidities, age, and gender differences specific to geographical location.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-88130-w

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart for the selection of studies at different stages.
Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart for the selection of studies at different stages.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Prevalence of comorbidities among COVID-19 patients.
Figure 2 Prevalence of comorbidities among COVID-19 patients.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Proportion of COVID-19 severity among patients with underlying medical comorbidities.
Figure 3 Proportion of COVID-19 severity among patients with underlying medical comorbidities.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Proportion of mortality among COVID-19 patients with underlying medical comorbidities.
Figure 4 Proportion of mortality among COVID-19 patients with underlying medical comorbidities.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Thakur, B., Dubey, P., Benitez, J., Torres, J. P., Reddy, S., Shokar, N., Aung, K., Mukherjee, D., & Dwivedi, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
Corresponding author
Dwivedi, Alok Kumar
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-04-20
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
8562-8562
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3152572687
Cited by
284
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 41
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, comorbidities, disease severity, mortality, regional variation, hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, age differences, sex differences, risk stratification
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Asia, Europe, Female, Humans, Latin America, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Comorbidity, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review