Cited by 1,304COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesLong-Term Effects of COVID-19COVID-19 epidemiological studies

Does comorbidity increase the risk of patients with COVID-19: evidence from meta-analysis

Open access
Wang, Bolin, Li, Ruobao, Lu, Zhong, Huang, Yan·2020·Aging

Abstract

Currently, the number of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has increased rapidly, but relationship between comorbidity and patients with COVID-19 still not clear. The aim was to explore whether the presence of common comorbidities increases COVID-19 patients' risk. A literature search was performed using the electronic platforms (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and other databases) to obtain relevant research studies published up to March 1, 2020. Relevant data of research endpoints in each study were extracted and merged. All data analysis was performed using Stata12.0 software. A total of 1558 patients with COVID-19 in 6 studies were enrolled in our meta-analysis eventually. Hypertension (OR: 2.29, P<0.001), diabetes (OR: 2.47, P<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR: 5.97, P<0.001), cardiovascular disease (OR: 2.93, P<0.001), and cerebrovascular disease (OR:3.89, P=0.002)were independent risk factors associated with COVID-19 patients. The meta-analysis revealed no correlation between increased risk of COVID-19 and liver disease, malignancy, or renal disease. Hypertension, diabetes, COPD, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease are major risk factors for patients with COVID-19. Knowledge of these risk factors can be a resource for clinicians in the early appropriate medical management of patients with COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/aging.103000

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, B., Li, R., Lu, Z., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Weifang Medical University (CN)
  • Department of Human Anatomy, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261031, China
  • Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261031, China
Corresponding author
Huang, Yan
Venue
Aging
Published
2020-04-08
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
6049-6057
ISSN
1945-4589 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014695022
Cited by
1,304
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 261 · 2021: 440 · 2020: 350 · 2018: 3
FWCI
38.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, comorbidities, risk factors, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, liver disease, cancer, kidney disease
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Comorbidity, Coronavirus Infections, Risk Assessment, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review