Cited by 25Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesGame Theory and Applications

The probabilistic pool punishment proportional to the difference of payoff outperforms previous pool and peer punishment

Open access
Ohdaira, Tetsushi·2022·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The public goods game is a multiplayer version of the prisoner’s dilemma game. In the public goods game, punishment on defectors is necessary to encourage cooperation. There are two types of punishment: peer punishment and pool punishment. Comparing pool punishment with peer punishment, pool punishment is disadvantageous in comparison with peer punishment because pool punishment incurs fixed costs especially if second-order free riders (those who invest in public goods but do not punish defectors) are not punished. In order to eliminate such a flaw of pool punishment, this study proposes the probabilistic pool punishment proportional to the difference of payoff. In the proposed pool punishment, each punisher pays the cost to the punishment pool with the probability proportional to the difference of payoff between his/her payoff and the average payoff of his/her opponents. Comparing the proposed pool punishment with previous pool and peer punishment, in pool punishment of previous studies, cooperators who do not punish defectors become dominant instead of pool punishers with fixed costs. However, in the proposed pool punishment, more punishers and less cooperators coexist, and such state is more robust against the invasion of defectors due to mutation than those of previous pool and peer punishment. The average payoff is also comparable to peer punishment of previous studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-022-10582-5

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pool punishment is ineffective when the cost of maintaining central authority outweighs the benefits of cooperation.

    “Specifically, pool punishment is ineffective when the cost of maintaining central authority outweighs the benefits of cooperation.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Model and Discussion (page unavailable) say conventional pool punishment incurs fixed costs and can lose out to cooperators who do not pay them. They do not establish the claimed threshold—that pool punishment becomes ineffective specifically when the cost of maintaining central authority outweighs the benefits of cooperation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Altruistic punishment is ineffective when social interactions are noisy.

    “However, this solution is ineffective when counter-punishments are possible and when social interactions are noisy.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that punishment no longer increases cooperation in a public-goods model with the full set of punishment strategies, including antisocial punishment. It does not say that altruistic punishment is ineffective when social interactions are noisy; searches for noisy interactions and counter-punishment found no such condition. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Altruistic punishment is ineffective when counter-punishments are possible.

    “However, this solution is ineffective when counter-punishments are possible and when social interactions are noisy.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports a model in which punishment no longer increases cooperation when the full set of punishment strategies, including antisocial punishment, is available. That lends limited support to the counter-punishment point, but the paper does not establish that altruistic punishment is generally ineffective whenever counter-punishments are possible. The cited passages also do not support the sentence’s claim about noisy social interactions. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Punishment-based mechanisms only solve the free-rider problem under restrictive conditions.

    “Unfortunately, numerous studies have shown that punishment-based mechanisms only solve the free-rider problem under restrictive conditions34–38.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes conditions under which particular punishment approaches sustain cooperation, including a limit on pool punishment when second-order free riders are not adequately sanctioned. That supports the claim that punishment can depend on restrictive conditions, but the paper does not establish that punishment-based mechanisms *only* solve the free-rider problem under such conditions in general. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohdaira, T.
Affiliations
Aoyama Gakuin University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ohdaira, Tetsushi
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2022-04-22
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
6604-6604
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224279262
Cited by
25
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP17K18074, JP20K11959)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
public goods game, peer punishment, cooperation, free-riding, evolutionary game theory, evolutionary stability, prisoner's dilemma
MeSH terms
Prisoner Dilemma, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Game Theory, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Punishment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review