Cited by 11Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsCoagulation and Flocculation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 17 of the 32 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Performance of maize tassel activated carbon for COD removal from industrial wastewater under optimized conditions

Open access
El Gamal, Ghada A., Gomaa, Ahmed M.·2025·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Industrial wastewater, laden with hazardous organic and inorganic contaminants, poses critical environmental risks. Adsorption via activated carbon stands out as a scalable and efficient remediation strategy due to its simplicity and adaptability. This study evaluates maize tassel–derived activated carbon (MTAC), synthesized from agricultural waste, as a low-cost and sustainable solution to remove organic pollutants, with emphasis on reducing chemical oxygen demand (COD) in industrial effluents. A comprehensive assessment of critical parameters (pH, temperature, adsorbent dosage, contact time, and agitation speed) was performed to optimize the adsorption process. MTAC exhibited a high surface area of 510.4 m 2 /g, and characterization through FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed its porous structure and abundant surface functional groups. The adsorption performance was strongly influenced by pH, with the highest adsorption capacity (464 mg/g) and COD removal of 92.8% at pH 6 and 30 °C. Maximum efficiency (96.6%) was obtained at a dose of 3 g/L, with peak adsorption capacity (484 mg/g) achieved at 45 min and 200 rpm. Adsorption equilibrium data fitted well to the Langmuir model (R 2 = 0.999), indicating monolayer adsorption with a maximum capacity of 484 mg/g, while Freundlich parameters confirmed favorable multilayer adsorption. Thermodynamic analysis revealed negative ΔG° values, confirming spontaneity, along with a negative ΔH° (− 0.523 kJ·mol⁻ 1 ), validating the exothermic nature of the process. Reusability tests demonstrated that MTAC retained more than 85% of its efficiency after five regeneration cycles, confirming its economic and practical viability. Comparative analysis further showed that MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC) in adsorption capacity, COD removal, and cost-effectiveness. The utilization of maize tassel, an abundant agricultural byproduct, highlights its potential as a sustainable adsorbent that supports circular economy strategies and advances progress toward SDGs 6, 12, and 13.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Maize tassel–derived activated carbon (MTAC) removed COD from industrial wastewater, with reported optimal conditions of pH 6, 30 °C, 3 g/L dose, 45 min contact time, and 200 rpm agitation. MTAC reached 484 mg/g adsorption capacity and 96.8% COD removal, outperforming commercial activated carbon and retaining >85% efficiency after five regeneration cycles.

Key findings

  • MTAC had a BET surface area of 510.4 m²/g, total pore volume 0.472 cm³/g, and average pore diameter 3.71 nm; FTIR indicated –OH, –COOH, C=O, and C=C groups, and XRD showed an amorphous/partially graphitized carbon with a broad peak at 2θ ≈ 25°.
  • Reported optimal batch conditions were pH 6, 30 °C, 3 g/L adsorbent dose, 45 min contact time, and 200 rpm agitation; the paper reports 464 mg/g and 92.8% COD removal at pH 6/30 °C, and 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD removal at 45 min/200 rpm. Under optimized conditions, initial COD of 250 mg/L was reduced to approximately 17.8 mg/L.
  • Equilibrium fitted Langmuir best (R² = 0.999 in table/abstract; text also reports 0.996), with qo = 484 mg/g, KL = 0.25 L/mg, and RL = 0.015; Freundlich gave n = 2.23 and R² = 0.995. Pseudo-second-order kinetics fit well (R² = 0.998), and thermodynamics showed negative ΔG° (−0.64 to −0.76 kJ/mol at 303–333 K), ΔH° = −0.523 kJ/mol, and ΔS° = 0.003 kJ/mol·K.
  • MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC): 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD removal vs 370 mg/g and 85.0% (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0002, respectively). Estimated cost was 1.25 USD/kg vs 3.50 USD/kg for CAC, and COD removal remained above 85% after five regeneration cycles (85.1% at cycle 5).

Methods

  • MTAC was synthesized from maize tassels by carbonization at 500 °C for 2 h under nitrogen, impregnation with 85% H₃PO₄ at a 1:1 weight ratio for 24 h, then activation at 800 °C for 1.5 h under nitrogen; the product was washed to neutral pH and dried.
  • Batch adsorption tests used industrial wastewater from a juice processing factory in Cairo, Egypt, with initial COD ≈ 250 mg/L, pH 5.8, TDS 180 mg/L, TSS 320 mg/L, and light-yellow color (320 Pt–Co units). Variables tested included pH, temperature, adsorbent dose, contact time, and agitation speed; COD was measured according to APHA (2017), with experiments in triplicate and results as mean ± SD.
  • Characterization used BET, FTIR, SEM, and XRD. Equilibrium data were modeled with Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms, kinetics with pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models, and thermodynamics with ΔG°, ΔH°, and ΔS°. MTAC vs CAC performance was compared using a two-sample t-test in Minitab at α = 0.05.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: experimental parameter ranges are inconsistent across sections—introduction/methods mention pH 2–8, dose 0.01–0.1 g/L, and agitation 300–600 rpm, while results report pH 4–10, dose 0.5–3 g/L, and agitation 200–700 rpm. The wastewater source is also inconsistent: methods cite a juice processing factory in Cairo, but one batch-experiment sentence cites the Rockat fertilizer factory in New Salhia, Sharqia, Egypt.
  • Evident from the text: some reported optima and model fits conflict—abstract/text emphasize 464 mg/g and 92.8% at pH 6/30 °C, while maximum efficiency is 96.6% at 3 g/L and peak capacity is 484 mg/g at 45 min/200 rpm; Langmuir R² is reported as both 0.996 and 0.999; Freundlich linear R² = 0.270 contrasts with nonlinear R² = 0.995; and cost estimates vary between 1.25 USD/kg and 0.50–0.70 USD/kg for MTAC.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-24902-y

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

17 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The adsorption performance of MTAC is influenced by pH, temperature, adsorbent dosage, contact time, and agitation speed.

    “The adsorption performance of MTAC is influenced by several key process parameters, including pH, temperature, adsorbent dosage, contact time, and agitation speed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [48] Abd Elhafez, S. E., El-Maghraby, A. & Taha, N. A. Adsorption studies of cationic dye on raw and modified sugarcane bagasse from aqueous solutions: Kinetic and isotherm aspects. Egypt. J. Chem. 64(3), 1593–1600. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJCHEM.2020.41762.2846 (2021). source

      Sections 3.3–3.5 describe effects of adsorbent dose, agitation rate, and temperature on methylene-blue adsorption by raw and modified sugarcane bagasse; the kinetic study also addresses adsorption over time. Section 3.2 explains why pH matters for this dye, but the Conclusion says pH variation will be studied separately. The paper does not identify its adsorbent as MTAC, so these findings do not establish the stated effects for MTAC. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [49] Bounaas, M. et al. Effect of washing temperature on adsorption of cationic dyes by raw lignocellulosic biomass. Appl. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210365 (2024). source
  • Findingown data

    Peak adsorption capacity (484 mg/g) was achieved at 45 min and 200 rpm.

    “Maximum efficiency (96.6%) was obtained at a dose of 3 g/L, with peak adsorption capacity (484 mg/g) achieved at 45 min and 200 rpm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC) in adsorption capacity.

    “Comparative analysis further showed that MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC) in adsorption capacity, COD removal, and cost-effectiveness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    MTAC outperformed CAC in COD removal.

    “Comparative analysis further showed that MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC) in adsorption capacity, COD removal, and cost-effectiveness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    MTAC exhibited a high surface area of 510.4 m2/g.

    “MTAC exhibited a high surface area of 510.4 m2/g, and characterization through FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed its porous structure and abundant surface functional groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 61
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Patel et al. (2019) found that MTAC exhibited excellent removal efficiency for methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions, especially under acidic conditions.

    “Similarly, Patel et al. (2019) investigated the potential of MTAC for the removal of methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions and found that it exhibited excellent removal efficiency, especially under acidic conditions46.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] Dharmapriya, T. N., Shih, H. Y. & Huang, P. J. Facile synthesis of hydrogel-based ion-exchange resins for nitrite/nitrate removal and studies of adsorption behavior. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071442 (2022). source

      The Conclusions (page unavailable) identify this as a study of PEGDA-MTAC hydrogels for nitrate and nitrite removal, not a Patel et al. (2019) study of methylene blue dye. The Results and Discussions (page unavailable) also report that nitrate adsorption increased as pH rose from 2 to 10, rather than finding the claimed advantage under acidic conditions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Chaudhary et al. (2020) demonstrated that MTAC has high adsorption capacity for lead and cadmium, with maximum adsorption capacities reaching 150 mg/g for lead and 120 mg/g for cadmium under optimal conditions.

    “For instance, Chaudhary et al. (2020) demonstrated that MTAC has high adsorption capacity for lead and cadmium, with maximum adsorption capacities reaching 150 mg/g for lead and 120 mg/g for cadmium under optimal conditions45.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Ashraf, M. A., Balkhair, K. S., Khan Chowdhury, A. J. & Hanafiah, M. M. Treatment of taman beringin landfill leachate using the columntechnique. Desalin Water Treat. 2019(149), 370–387. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.23839 (2019). source

      The abstract (p. 1) describes column experiments using aquifer sand, peat, and BIRM to treat leachate containing Fe, Cr, Ni, and Cu. Searches for MTAC, lead, cadmium, and the claimed 150 and 120 mg/g capacities found no passage addressing those results in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The adsorption efficiency of MTAC increases under acidic conditions due to enhanced electrostatic interactions between the adsorbent and the pollutants.

    “The effect of these parameters has been widely studied in the literature, with several investigations indicating that the adsorption efficiency of MTAC increases under acidic conditions due to enhanced electrostatic interactions between the adsorbent and the pollutants48,49.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [48] Abd Elhafez, S. E., El-Maghraby, A. & Taha, N. A. Adsorption studies of cationic dye on raw and modified sugarcane bagasse from aqueous solutions: Kinetic and isotherm aspects. Egypt. J. Chem. 64(3), 1593–1600. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJCHEM.2020.41762.2846 (2021). source

      The paper studies methylene blue adsorption on sugarcane bagasse, not MTAC. Section 3.2 (page unavailable) says methylene blue adsorption is favored above pH 6.3, but that finding does not establish whether MTAC adsorption increases under acidic conditions. Searches for MTAC and acidic-condition electrostatic interactions found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [49] Bounaas, M. et al. Effect of washing temperature on adsorption of cationic dyes by raw lignocellulosic biomass. Appl. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210365 (2024). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    CAC is produced from carbonaceous materials such as coal, wood, and coconut shells and has a high surface area ranging from 400 to over 1000 m2/g.

    “CAC is produced from carbonaceous materials such as coal, wood, and coconut shells and is characterized by its high surface area (ranging from 400 to over 1000 m2/g) and strong adsorption affinity for a variety of contaminants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [32] Muttil, N., Jagadeesan, S., Chanda, A., Duke, M. & Singh, S. K. Production, types, and applications of activated carbon derived from waste tyres: An overview. Appl. Sci. 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010257 (2023). source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says commercial activated carbon can be produced from coal, wood, and coconut shell and describes its high surface area. Section 2.2 reports a surface area of 1000 m²/g for steam-activated waste-tyre carbon, but the paper does not give the claimed range of 400 to over 1000 m²/g for CAC. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [33] Sujiono, E. H. et al. Fabrication and characterization of coconut shell activated carbon using variation chemical activation for wastewater treatment application. Results Chem. 4(February), 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100291 (2022). source
    • cites [34] Alam, M. M. et al. The potentiality of rice husk-derived activated carbon: From synthesis to application. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8020203 (2020). source

      The Introduction lists coal, wood, and coconut shells as activated-carbon precursors and describes activated carbon as having a high surface area and uses in contaminant removal. The paper defines CAC as commercial activated carbon in Table 6, but does not establish the stated 400-to-over-1000 m²/g range for CAC or specifically link those precursors to commercial products. Its numerical surface-area examples in Table 5 concern rice-husk-derived activated carbon. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Other studies have highlighted the effectiveness of MTAC in removing pharmaceutical residues, including ibuprofen and paracetamol.

    “Other studies have highlighted the effectiveness of MTAC in removing pharmaceutical residues, including ibuprofen and paracetamol, further supporting its versatility as an adsorbent material for a wide range of industrial pollutant47.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] Jedynak, K. et al. Ordered mesoporous carbons for adsorption of paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Ibuprofen and naproxen from aqueous solutions. Water (Switzerland). 11(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051099 (2019). source

      The Introduction and Conclusions describe adsorption of paracetamol and ibuprofen from water, but the materials studied were ordered mesoporous carbons (ST-A-P and ST-A-P-CO₂) and commercial activated carbon (WG-15), not MTAC. The Conclusions also say ibuprofen removal was significantly lower than removal of the other pharmaceuticals. The paper therefore does not establish MTAC’s effectiveness or its versatility across industrial pollutants. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    CAC can effectively adsorb organic pollutants such as dyes, phenols, and pharmaceuticals, as well as inorganic pollutants such as heavy metals including lead, cadmium, and chromium, often with adsorption capacities exceeding 200 mg/g under optimal conditions.

    “Studies have shown that CAC can effectively adsorb organic pollutants such as dyes, phenols, and pharmaceuticals, as well as inorganic pollutants such as heavy metals including lead, cadmium, and chromium, often with adsorption capacities exceeding 200 mg/g under optimal conditions32–34.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [32] Muttil, N., Jagadeesan, S., Chanda, A., Duke, M. & Singh, S. K. Production, types, and applications of activated carbon derived from waste tyres: An overview. Appl. Sci. 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010257 (2023). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [33] Sujiono, E. H. et al. Fabrication and characterization of coconut shell activated carbon using variation chemical activation for wastewater treatment application. Results Chem. 4(February), 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100291 (2022). source
    • cites [34] Alam, M. M. et al. The potentiality of rice husk-derived activated carbon: From synthesis to application. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8020203 (2020). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural waste product and a promising feedstock for producing activated carbon.

    “Among these, maize tassels, an abundant agricultural waste product, have gained attention as a promising feedstock for producing activated carbon39–41.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [39] Enaime, G., Dababat, S., Wichern, M. & Lübken, M. Olive mill wastes: From wastes to resources. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 31(14), 20853–20880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32468-x (2024). source

      The wastewater-treatment section discusses producing activated carbon from olive mill wastes, not maize tassels. Searches for “maize tassels activated carbon” and “maize corn tassel agricultural waste feedstock” found no passage addressing maize tassels or their suitability as a feedstock. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [40] Jagadeesh, N. & Sundaram, B. Adsorption of pollutants from wastewater by biochar: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100226 (2023). source
    • cites [41] Bharathi, K. S. & Ramesh, S. T. Removal of dyes using agricultural waste as low-cost adsorbents: A review. Appl. Water Sci. 3(4), 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0117-y (2013). source

      The Introduction describes agricultural wastes as readily available adsorbents, and Modifications of adsorbents discusses activated carbon made from other materials. Searches for maize tassels, tassels, and maize-based activated carbon found no passage addressing whether maize tassels are abundant or a promising activated-carbon feedstock. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Juice processing effluents typically exhibit elevated COD and BOD levels, low pH values due to natural acids, and high turbidity from suspended solids and pulp.

    “These effluents typically exhibit elevated COD and BOD levels, low pH values due to natural acids (e.g., citric acid), and high turbidity from suspended solids and pulp.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Sonawane, J. M., Mahadevan, R., Pandey, A. & Greener, J. Heliyon Recent progress in microbial fuel cells using substrates from diverse sources. Heliyon. 8(12), e12353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12353 (2022). source

      The Fruit waste section discusses residues from juice extraction and clarified cashew apple juice as an MFC substrate, but does not describe juice-processing effluents. The Industrial wastewater and Agricultural waste sections report COD, BOD, acidity, and suspended solids for other effluents; they do not establish elevated COD and BOD, acid-driven low pH, or pulp-driven turbidity for juice-processing effluents. Searches for juice wastewater, citric acid, and fruit-processing effluent found no passage addressing those properties together. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [9] Sar, T., Marchlewicz, A., Harirchi, S., Th, F. & Taherzadeh, M. J. Resource recovery and treatment of wastewaters using filamentous fungi. Sci. Total Environ. 951(June), 175752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175752 (2024). source

      Section 3.9 (page unavailable) includes fruit juices among processed fruit products and describes fruit wastewaters as high in COD and organic acids. It does not establish that juice-processing effluents typically have high BOD, low pH caused by natural acids such as citric acid, or high turbidity from suspended solids and pulp. The high BOD reported in section 3.7 concerns paper-pulp effluent, not juice processing. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    If untreated, discharges from juice processing wastewater can severely affect aquatic ecosystems by depleting dissolved oxygen and promoting eutrophication.

    “If untreated, such discharges can severely affect aquatic ecosystems by depleting dissolved oxygen and promoting eutrophication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Periyasamy AP. Recent advances in the remediation of textile-dye-containing wastewater: Prioritizing human health and sustainable wastewater treatment. Published online 2024. source

      Section 3 says dyes in textile effluent hinder the formation of dissolved oxygen, and Section 3.1 says untreated textile wastewater harms aquatic ecosystems. The paper does not establish this claim for juice-processing wastewater or say that these discharges promote eutrophication; its oxygen statement concerns reduced formation, not explicitly depletion. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [2] Hashem, M. S. & Qi, X. Treated wastewater irrigation—A review. Published online 2025:1–37.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [3] Maia, A. S., Teodorovi, A., Langergraber, G., Ribeiro, A. R. L. & Maja, Đ. Bio-waste valorisation: Agricultural wastes as biosorbents for removal of (in) organic pollutants in wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100239 (2022). source

      The Introduction reports that dye-polluted water can have harmful environmental effects and reduced dissolved oxygen. It does not establish those effects for juice-processing wastewater, and the searched passages do not mention eutrophication. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The juice processing industry generates large volumes of wastewater characterized by high organic loads, primarily from fruit residues, sugars, and organic acids.

    “Among these, the juice processing industry generates large volumes of wastewater characterized by high organic loads, primarily from fruit residues, sugars, and organic acids4,9.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Sonawane, J. M., Mahadevan, R., Pandey, A. & Greener, J. Heliyon Recent progress in microbial fuel cells using substrates from diverse sources. Heliyon. 8(12), e12353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12353 (2022). source

      The Fruit waste section (page unavailable) says orange-juice production generates a large volume of residues, including seeds and peels. It does not say that juice processing generates large volumes of wastewater or characterize that wastewater as having high organic loads primarily from fruit residues, sugars, and organic acids. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [9] Sar, T., Marchlewicz, A., Harirchi, S., Th, F. & Taherzadeh, M. J. Resource recovery and treatment of wastewaters using filamentous fungi. Sci. Total Environ. 951(June), 175752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175752 (2024). source

      Section 3.9 (page unavailable) includes fruit juices among processed fruit products and says fruit wastewaters have high organic-acid content and high COD, supporting the claim of a substantial organic load. It does not establish that juice processing generates large wastewater volumes or that fruit residues and sugars are the primary contributors. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The adsorption performance of MTAC was strongly influenced by pH, with the highest adsorption capacity (464 mg/g) and COD removal of 92.8% at pH 6 and 30 °C.

    “The adsorption performance was strongly influenced by pH, with the highest adsorption capacity (464 mg/g) and COD removal of 92.8% at pH 6 and 30 °C.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Characterization by FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed that MTAC has a porous structure and abundant surface functional groups.

    “characterization through FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed its porous structure and abundant surface functional groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At 40°C, adsorption capacity fell to 440 mg/g and COD removal decreased to 88%.

    “When the temperature was elevated to 40 °C, both metrics declined adsorption capacity fell to 440 mg/g, and COD removal decreased to 88% demonstrating reduced efficacy at higher temperatures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Under optimized settings, MTAC exhibited a maximum adsorption capacity of 484 mg/g and attained a COD reduction efficiency of 96.8%.

    “Under these optimized settings, MTAC exhibited a maximum adsorption capacity of 484 mg/g and attained a COD reduction efficiency of 96.8%”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Under optimized conditions, MTAC achieved a maximum adsorption capacity of 464 mg/g and COD removal efficiency of 92.8%.

    “Under optimized conditions, MTAC achieved a maximum adsorption capacity of 464 mg/g and COD removal efficiency of 92.8%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    COD removal efficiency decreased gradually over successive adsorption-desorption cycles but remained above 85% even after the fifth cycle.

    “As listed Table 8, and FigureS1 (Supplementary File) the COD removal efficiency decreased gradually over successive cycles but remained above 85% even after the fifth cycle.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Beyond the initial period, the adsorption rate diminished progressively, stabilizing near equilibrium conditions by 45 min.

    “Beyond this period, the adsorption rate diminished progressively, stabilizing near equilibrium conditions by 45 min.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    MTAC demonstrated enhanced adsorption performance (484 mg/g, 96.8% COD removal) compared to CAC (370 mg/g, 85%).

    “MTAC demonstrated enhanced adsorption performance (484 mg/g, 96.8% COD removal) compared to CAC (370 mg/g, 85%)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Table 7 shows MTAC adsorption capacity of 484 mg/g and CAC adsorption capacity of 370 mg/g under identical experimental conditions.

    “Table 7 presents the adsorption capacity of MTAC (484 mg/g) and CAC (370 mg/g) under identical experimental conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    XRD indicates partial graphitization and formation of layered carbon structures.

    “Indicates partial graphitization and formation of layered carbon structures”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Peak adsorption capacity of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD reduction occurred at 45 min.

    “Prolonged interaction time significantly improved adsorption efficacy, with Fig. 6 showing a peak capacity of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD reduction at 45 min.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At 300 rpm, adsorption capacity decreased to 426 mg/g with 85.2% COD reduction.

    “At 300 rpm, the capacity decreased to 426 mg/g with 85.2% COD reduction, and further declined at 500 rpm (390 mg/g, 78%) and 700 rpm (384 mg/g, 76.8%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At 60°C, adsorption capacity was 410 mg/g and COD reduction was 82%.

    “Further increases in temperature to 50 °C and 60 °C led to additional reductions in capacity (422 mg/g and 410 mg/g, respectively), accompanied by COD reduction efficiencies of 84.4% and 82%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Under optimized conditions, MTAC attained a peak capacity of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD removal, while CAC achieved a maximum capacity of 370 mg/g and 85% COD reduction under identical experimental settings.

    “Under optimized conditions, MTAC demonstrated significantly enhanced adsorption performance, attaining a peak capacity of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD removal efficiency. In comparison, commercial activated carbon (CAC) achieved lower efficacy, with a maximum capacity of 370 mg/g and 85% COD reduction under identical experimental settings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    XRD indicates reduced crystallinity and dominance of amorphous carbon.

    “Suggests reduced crystallinity and dominance of amorphous carbon”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    MTAC had a mean adsorption capacity of 484.0 ± 8.6 mg/g, compared with 370.0 ± 10.2 mg/g for CAC (p = 0.0004).

    “| Adsorption capacity (mg/g) | 484.0 ± 8.6 | 370.0 ± 10.2 | 0.0004 | Significant |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At pH 8, the adsorption capacity dropped to 408 mg/g and COD reduction was 81.6%.

    “At pH 8, the capacity dropped slightly to 408 mg/g, with a COD reduction of 81.6%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At 50°C, adsorption capacity was 422 mg/g and COD reduction was 84.4%.

    “Further increases in temperature to 50 °C and 60 °C led to additional reductions in capacity (422 mg/g and 410 mg/g, respectively), accompanied by COD reduction efficiencies of 84.4% and 82%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The initial COD concentration of the industrial wastewater was 250 mg/L, and after treatment the residual COD concentration was reduced to approximately 17.8 mg/L.

    “The initial COD concentration of the industrial wastewater was 250 mg/L, and after treatment, the residual COD concentration was reduced to approximately 17.8 mg/L.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At pH 4, the adsorption capacity was 400 mg/g and COD reduction was 80%.

    “Similarly, at pH 4, although the adsorption capacity was still relatively high (400 mg/g), the COD reduction was only 80%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At 700 rpm, adsorption capacity was 384 mg/g and COD reduction was 76.8%.

    “At 300 rpm, the capacity decreased to 426 mg/g with 85.2% COD reduction, and further declined at 500 rpm (390 mg/g, 78%) and 700 rpm (384 mg/g, 76.8%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    The estimated treatment cost per cubic meter is $1.50-2.10 for MTAC and $7.50-9.00 for CAC.

    “MTAC:3kg*$0.5–0.7/Kg = $1.50–2.10/m3CAC: 3kg*$2.5–3.00/Kg = $7.50–9.00/m3”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
    • Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    MTAC demonstrated a cost advantage of approximately 64% over CAC, with an estimated production cost of 1.25 USD/kg.

    “Furthermore, MTAC demonstrated a cost advantage of approximately 64% over CAC, with an estimated production cost of 1.25 USD/kg, offering a promising solution for large-scale industrial applications where cost constraints and sustainability are critical.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
    • Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Increasing the adsorbent dose resulted in significant enhancement in COD reduction, reaching 95.2% at 1 g/L and up to 96.6% at 3 g/L.

    “As shown in Fig. 5, increasing the adsorbent dose resulted in a significant enhancement in COD reduction, reaching 95.2% at 1 g/L, and up to 96.6% at 3 g/L.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The adsorption process exhibited an initial rapid phase, with capacity escalating from 430 mg/g at 20 min (86% COD removal) to 464 mg/g at 30 min (92.8% COD removal).

    “The adsorption process exhibited an initial rapid phase, with capacity escalating from 430 mg/g at 20 min (86% COD removal) to 464 mg/g at 30 min (92.8% COD removal), driven by the high density of accessible active sites on maize tassel-derived activated carbon (MTAC).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    MTAC had a mean COD removal efficiency of 96.8 ± 1.1%, compared with 85.0 ± 1.5% for CAC (p = 0.0002).

    “| COD removal efficiency (%) | 96.8 ± 1.1 | 85.0 ± 1.5 | 0.0002 | Significant |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The optimal operational conditions for MTAC were pH 6, temperature 30°C, adsorbent dosage 3 g/L, contact duration 45 min, and agitation speed 200 rpm.

    “The optimal operational conditions for MTAC were determined to be a pH of 6, temperature of 30°C, adsorbent dosage of 3 g/L, contact duration of 45 min, and agitation speed of 200 rpm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Adsorption capacity and COD reduction initially increased with agitation intensity, reaching a maximum of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD reduction at 200 rpm.

    “As shown in Fig. 7, the adsorption capacity and COD reduction initially increased with Agitation intensity, reaching a maximum value of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD reduction at 200 rpm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Maximum adsorption efficiency (464 mg/g) and COD removal (92.8%) occurred at pH 6.

    “Maximum adsorption efficiency (464 mg/g) and COD removal (92.8%) occurred at pH 6, suggesting strong electrostatic affinity between MTAC’s functional groups and organic contaminants under slightly acidic conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At 30°C, MTAC attained its highest adsorption performance, with a capacity of 464 mg/g and a COD removal efficiency of 92.8%.

    “At a temperature of 30°C, MTAC attained its highest adsorption performance, with a capacity of 464 mg/g and a COD removal efficiency of 92.8%, underscoring the effectiveness of mild thermal conditions for adsorption.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At pH 10, the adsorption capacity was 390 mg/g and COD reduction was 78%.

    “At pH 10, both adsorption capacity (390 mg/g) and COD reduction (78%) declined, suggesting reduced efficiency in alkaline environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At 500 rpm, adsorption capacity was 390 mg/g and COD reduction was 78%.

    “At 300 rpm, the capacity decreased to 426 mg/g with 85.2% COD reduction, and further declined at 500 rpm (390 mg/g, 78%) and 700 rpm (384 mg/g, 76.8%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Maize tassels are rich in cellulose and lignin, which are ideal for producing activated carbon with high porosity and surface area.

    “Maize tassels are rich in cellulose and lignin, which are ideal for the production of activated carbon with high porosity and surface area11,42–44.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [11] Alvez-Tovar, B. et al. Agro-industrial waste upcycling into activated carbons: A sustainable approach for dye removal and wastewater treatment. Sustainability. 17(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052036 (2025). source
    • cites [42] Sarkar, D., Panicker, T. F., Kumar Mishra, R. & Srinivas, K. M. A comprehensive review of production and characterization of biochar for removal of organic pollutants from water and wastewater. Water-Energy Nexus. 7, 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2024.11.001 (2024). source
    • cites [43] Trivedi, Y. et al. Biochar potential for pollutant removal during wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review of separation mechanisms, technological integration, and process analysis. Desalination 2025(600), 118509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.118509 (2024). source
    • cites [44] Zhao, R. A review on the catalytic ozonation of pollutants in wastewater by heteroelements-doped biochar: Internal and external doping strategies. Alexandria Eng J. 119(January), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.088 (2025). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    MTAC is a sustainable adsorbent that supports circular economy strategies and advances progress toward SDGs 6, 12, and 13.

    “The utilization of maize tassel, an abundant agricultural byproduct, highlights its potential as a sustainable adsorbent that supports circular economy strategies and advances progress toward SDGs 6, 12, and 13.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The high cost of commercial activated carbon remains a limiting factor for many industries, particularly in developing countries.
    • Rests on an assumption: Batch adsorption results obtained under controlled conditions are indicative of performance in real-world industrial wastewater treatment.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The Langmuir model indicates monolayer adsorption with a maximum capacity of 484 mg/g.

    “Adsorption equilibrium data fitted well to the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.999), indicating monolayer adsorption with a maximum capacity of 484 mg/g, while Freundlich parameters confirmed favorable multilayer adsorption.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    MTAC offers advantages including low cost, availability, sustainability, and potential for waste valorisation.

    “Maize tassel-based activated carbon (MTAC) offers several advantages, including its low cost, availability, and sustainability, as well as its potential for waste valorisation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [11] Alvez-Tovar, B. et al. Agro-industrial waste upcycling into activated carbons: A sustainable approach for dye removal and wastewater treatment. Sustainability. 17(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052036 (2025). source
    • cites [42] Sarkar, D., Panicker, T. F., Kumar Mishra, R. & Srinivas, K. M. A comprehensive review of production and characterization of biochar for removal of organic pollutants from water and wastewater. Water-Energy Nexus. 7, 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2024.11.001 (2024). source
    • cites [43] Trivedi, Y. et al. Biochar potential for pollutant removal during wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review of separation mechanisms, technological integration, and process analysis. Desalination 2025(600), 118509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.118509 (2024). source
    • cites [44] Zhao, R. A review on the catalytic ozonation of pollutants in wastewater by heteroelements-doped biochar: Internal and external doping strategies. Alexandria Eng J. 119(January), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.088 (2025). source
    • Rests on an assumption: The high cost of commercial activated carbon remains a limiting factor for many industries, particularly in developing countries.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The BET findings are consistent with the observed high adsorption capacity up to 484 mg/g and support MTAC's effectiveness as a low-cost, sustainable adsorbent for wastewater treatment.

    “These findings are consistent with the observed high adsorption capacity (up to 484 mg/g) and support the material’s effectiveness as a low-cost, sustainable adsorbent for wastewater treatment applications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    MTAC competes favorably with commercial activated carbon and may offer enhanced performance for COD removal in industrial wastewater treatment, particularly for low to moderate organic pollutant loads such as juice processing effluents.

    “In summary, the comparison clearly indicates that MTAC not only competes favorably with commercial activated carbon but may also offer enhanced performance for COD removal in industrial wastewater treatment, particularly in applications targeting low to moderate organic pollutant loads such as juice processing effluents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Higher doses improve removal efficiency but decrease adsorption capacity per unit mass, so an optimal balance between removal efficiency and material cost must be considered for practical and economic applications.

    “These findings highlight that although higher doses improve removal efficiency, the adsorption capacity per unit mass decreases, and therefore, an optimal balance between removal efficiency and material cost must be considered for practical and economic applications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All trials were replicated to validate reproducibility, with mean values applied for data interpretation.

    “All trials were replicated to validate reproducibility, with mean values applied for data interpretation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The SEM-observed structural modifications align with increased adsorption performance and confirm that the activation protocol improved the adsorbent's adsorptive efficiency.

    “These structural modifications, as observed under SEM, align with the increase in adsorption performance reported in the FTIR and other characterization studies, confirming that the activation protocol successfully improved the adsorbent’s adsorptive efficiency, underscoring its suitability for contaminant mitigation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The adsorption kinetics of COD onto MTAC are best described by the pseudo-second-order model, implying chemisorption as the dominant mechanism.

    “These results confirm that the adsorption kinetics of COD onto MTAC are best described by the pseudo-second-order model, implying that the dominant mechanism is chemisorption involving strong chemical interactions between the organic pollutants and the functional groups on the MTAC surface.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The pseudo-second-order model assumes that chemisorption is the rate-limiting step, involving the sharing or exchange of electrons between the adsorbate and the adsorbent surface.
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    MTAC is a low-cost, renewable, sustainable, and regenerable adsorbent suitable for industrial wastewater treatment.

    “MTAC is a low-cost, renewable material derived from agricultural waste, promoting environmental sustainability and resource valorization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Monolayer adsorption remains the dominant mechanism, though surface heterogeneity may still play a contributory role.

    “Thus, monolayer adsorption remains the dominant mechanism, though surface heterogeneity may still play a contributory role.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Langmuir isotherm assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface with finite identical sites.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Freundlich model assumes adsorption on a heterogeneous surface with sites of varied affinities and multilayer adsorption.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    MTAC offers a substantial economic advantage over CAC, reducing both material costs and the cost per unit volume of treated water.

    “These results confirm that MTAC offers a substantial economic advantage over CAC, reducing both material costs and the cost per unit volume of treated water.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
    • Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    MTAC is cost-effective and derived from agricultural waste, aligning with sustainable waste management and environmental protection practices.

    “Additionally, the MTAC offered the advantage of being cost-effective and derived from agricultural waste, aligning with sustainable waste management and environmental protection practices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The Freundlich model showed a good fit (R2 = 0.995, n = 2.23), indicating strong adsorption affinity and surface heterogeneity of MTAC.

    “These results indicate strong adsorption affinity and surface heterogeneity of MTAC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Freundlich model assumes adsorption on a heterogeneous surface with sites of varied affinities and multilayer adsorption.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All adsorption experiments were conducted in triplicate, and results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

    “All adsorption experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the results are presented as mean ± standard deviation to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The adsorption process is highly sensitive to solution pH, with optimal performance at pH 6.

    “These results clearly demonstrate that the adsorption process is highly sensitive to the solution pH, with optimal performance observed at pH 6.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    COD adsorption onto MTAC is spontaneous, mildly exothermic, and governed primarily by physical adsorption interactions.

    “These findings validate the experimental data and demonstrate that COD removal by MTAC is a spontaneous and mildly exothermic process, governed primarily by physical adsorption interactions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    The use of Minitab ensured precise validation of observed differences and supported the reliability of the comparative findings.

    “The use of Minitab ensured precise validation of observed differences and supported the reliability of the comparative findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Combined with its high adsorption capacity and reusability, MTAC is a cost-effective and sustainable alternative for industrial wastewater treatment.

    “Combined with its high adsorption capacity and reusability, MTAC is a cost-effective and sustainable alternative for industrial wastewater treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
    • Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The high surface area and favorable pore characteristics of MTAC facilitate enhanced mass transfer, greater accessibility of adsorbate molecules to active sites, and improved adsorption efficiency.

    “The high surface area and favorable pore characteristics facilitate enhanced mass transfer, greater accessibility of adsorbate molecules to active sites, and improved adsorption efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The analytical method ensured precise and reliable detection of contaminants.

    “This method ensured precise and reliable detection of contaminants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The pH of wastewater samples was adjusted to target values (2-8) using diluted NaOH or HCl solutions, with adjustments validated via a calibrated pH meter before each experiment.

    “The pH of wastewater samples was calibrated to target values (2–8) using diluted NaOH or HCl solutions, with adjustments validated via a calibrated pH meter before commencing each experiment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The optimal batch adsorption conditions for MTAC are pH 6, temperature 30°C, adsorbent dose 3 g/L, contact time 45 min, and agitation intensity 200 rpm.

    “In conclusion, the optimal batch adsorption conditions for MTAC are:pH: 6Temperature: 30 °CAdsorbent dose: 3 g/LContact time: 45 minAgitation intensity: 200 rpm”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationown data

    The decline at 60 min may be attributed to possible desorption or redistribution of adsorbed molecules.

    “Interestingly, a slight decline in adsorption capacity was recorded at 60 min (390 mg/g and 78% COD reduction), which may be attributed to possible desorption or redistribution of adsorbed molecules.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    COD reduction was measured according to APHA (2017) Standard Methods.

    “After the optimum contact time, the treated samples were filtered, and the COD reduction was measured according to APHA (2017) Standard Methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites APHA (2017)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Error bars corresponding to standard deviation values have been added to all applicable figures.

    “Error bars corresponding to standard deviation values have been added to all applicable figures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The reduction in COD illustrates the effectiveness of MTAC in eliminating organic pollutants and highlights its potential as a cost-effective alternative to commercial activated carbon.

    “This significant reduction illustrates the effectiveness of MTAC in eliminating organic pollutants and highlights its potential as a cost-effective alternative to commercial activated carbon.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    By utilizing an underexplored agricultural waste, the study introduces a novel material to adsorption science and contributes to resource-efficient wastewater treatment aligned with SDGs 6, 12, and 13.

    “By utilizing an underexplored agricultural waste, the study not only introduces a novel material to the field of adsorption science but also contributes to resource-efficient wastewater treatment aligned with SDGs 6 (Clean Water), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 13 (Climate Action).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Maize tassel-derived activated carbon is a novel material in adsorption science.
71 of 71
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The high cost of commercial activated carbon remains a limiting factor for many industries, particularly in developing countries.

    “Despite its widespread use, the high cost of commercial activated carbon remains a limiting factor for many industries, particularly in developing countries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Compared with other well-studied precursors, maize tassel has not been systematically evaluated for its structural advantages, adsorption efficiency, or economic potential.

    “Compared to other well-studied precursors like coconut shell, rice husk, and bamboo, maize tassel has not been systematically evaluated for its structural advantages, adsorption efficiency, or economic potential.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Batch adsorption results obtained under controlled conditions are indicative of performance in real-world industrial wastewater treatment.

    “The choice of this effluent allows the assessment of MTAC in treating real-world, moderately contaminated industrial wastewater with significant organic content.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.

    “MTAC was synthesized from maize tassels, an abundant agricultural byproduct, which significantly lowers raw material costs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.

    “In contrast, commercially available activated carbon (CAC) has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg, reflecting the cost of raw material procurement, processing, quality control, and distribution.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Maize tassel-derived activated carbon is a novel material in adsorption science.

    “By utilizing an underexplored agricultural waste, the study not only introduces a novel material to the field of adsorption science but also contributes to resource-efficient wastewater treatment aligned with SDGs 6 (Clean Water), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 13 (Climate Action).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The adsorption capacity of MTAC (484 mg/g) significantly exceeds many previously reported biosorbents for COD removal.

    “The adsorption capacity of MTAC (484 mg/g) significantly exceeds many previously reported biosorbents for COD removal, reflecting its enhanced surface area (510.4 m2/g), mesoporous structure, and abundant functional groups.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Langmuir isotherm assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface with finite identical sites.

    “The Langmuir isotherm assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface with finite identical sites.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Freundlich model assumes adsorption on a heterogeneous surface with sites of varied affinities and multilayer adsorption.

    “The Freundlich model explains adsorption on a heterogeneous surface with sites of varied affinities and multilayer adsorption.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The pseudo-first-order kinetic model assumes that the rate of adsorption is directly proportional to the number of available adsorption sites.

    “The pseudo-first-order kinetic model assumes that the rate of adsorption is directly proportional to the number of available adsorption sites.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The pseudo-second-order model assumes that chemisorption is the rate-limiting step, involving the sharing or exchange of electrons between the adsorbate and the adsorbent surface.

    “The pseudo-second-order model assumes that chemisorption is the rate-limiting step, involving the sharing or exchange of electrons between the adsorbate and the adsorbent surface.”
11 of 11

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Wastewater source changes between methods sections

    Major

    The batch-experiment description identifies a fertilizer factory in Sharqia as the wastewater source, whereas the wastewater-collection description identifies a juice processing factory in Cairo.

  • MTAC production-cost estimates disagree

    Major

    The comparative analysis gives an estimated MTAC production cost of 1.25 USD/kg, whereas the cost-evaluation section estimates $0.50-$0.70 per kg.

  • Adsorption mechanism is described as both chemical and physical

    Major

    The kinetic-model discussion identifies chemisorption as the dominant mechanism, while the thermodynamic discussion says the process is governed primarily by physical adsorption.

  • Two different results are reported for optimized conditions

    Major

    One passage reports 464 mg/g and 92.8% COD removal under optimized conditions; the comparison section reports 484 mg/g and 96.8% under optimized conditions.

  • CAC cost estimates disagree

    Major

    Table 7 lists CAC at 3.50 USD/kg, while the cost-evaluation section gives a CAC price range of $2.50-$3.00 per kg.

  • Ambient-temperature claim conflicts with temperature experiments

    Minor

    The batch methods say all experiments were conducted at ambient room temperature, but the temperature results describe experiments at four controlled temperatures up to 60 °C.

  • Reported adsorbent-dose ranges differ

    Minor

    The batch methods specify a dosage range of 0.01-0.1 g/L, whereas the dose results describe testing 0.5-3 g/L.

  • Reported pH ranges differ

    Minor

    The stated experimental pH range is 2-8, but the results say pH 4-10 was analyzed and report a measurement at pH 10.

  • pH figure caption disagrees with the reported maximum

    Minor

    The Fig. 3 caption gives 96.8% removal at pH 6, but the accompanying results give 92.8% at pH 6.

  • Reported agitation ranges exclude the stated optimum

    Minor

    The batch methods specify 300-600 rpm, but the results report experiments at 200-700 rpm and identify 200 rpm as optimal.

  • Temperature figure caption disagrees with the reported maximum

    Minor

    The Fig. 4 caption gives 96.8% removal at 30 °C, while the temperature results give 92.8% at 30 °C.

  • Langmuir fit statistic is attributed to the wrong parameter set

    Minor

    The prose assigns R2 = 0.996 to the Langmuir result with capacity 484 mg/g and KL = 0.25 L/mg. Table 10 assigns that parameter set R2 = 0.999; its 0.996 value belongs to a different parameter set.

12 of 12

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hashem, M. S. & Qi, X. Treated wastewater irrigation—A review. Published online 2025:1–37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
El Gamal, G. A., & Gomaa, A. M.
Affiliations
Egyptian Chinese University (EG)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-18
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
40378-40378
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416308775
Cited by
11
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 11
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Egyptian Chinese University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Keywords
maize tassel, activated carbon, agricultural waste valorization, COD removal, industrial wastewater treatment, adsorption, Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, adsorption thermodynamics, adsorbent reusability, low-cost adsorbent, circular economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review