The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 17 of the 32 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Performance of maize tassel activated carbon for COD removal from industrial wastewater under optimized conditions
Open accessAbstract
Industrial wastewater, laden with hazardous organic and inorganic contaminants, poses critical environmental risks. Adsorption via activated carbon stands out as a scalable and efficient remediation strategy due to its simplicity and adaptability. This study evaluates maize tassel–derived activated carbon (MTAC), synthesized from agricultural waste, as a low-cost and sustainable solution to remove organic pollutants, with emphasis on reducing chemical oxygen demand (COD) in industrial effluents. A comprehensive assessment of critical parameters (pH, temperature, adsorbent dosage, contact time, and agitation speed) was performed to optimize the adsorption process. MTAC exhibited a high surface area of 510.4 m 2 /g, and characterization through FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed its porous structure and abundant surface functional groups. The adsorption performance was strongly influenced by pH, with the highest adsorption capacity (464 mg/g) and COD removal of 92.8% at pH 6 and 30 °C. Maximum efficiency (96.6%) was obtained at a dose of 3 g/L, with peak adsorption capacity (484 mg/g) achieved at 45 min and 200 rpm. Adsorption equilibrium data fitted well to the Langmuir model (R 2 = 0.999), indicating monolayer adsorption with a maximum capacity of 484 mg/g, while Freundlich parameters confirmed favorable multilayer adsorption. Thermodynamic analysis revealed negative ΔG° values, confirming spontaneity, along with a negative ΔH° (− 0.523 kJ·mol⁻ 1 ), validating the exothermic nature of the process. Reusability tests demonstrated that MTAC retained more than 85% of its efficiency after five regeneration cycles, confirming its economic and practical viability. Comparative analysis further showed that MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC) in adsorption capacity, COD removal, and cost-effectiveness. The utilization of maize tassel, an abundant agricultural byproduct, highlights its potential as a sustainable adsorbent that supports circular economy strategies and advances progress toward SDGs 6, 12, and 13.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Maize tassel–derived activated carbon (MTAC) removed COD from industrial wastewater, with reported optimal conditions of pH 6, 30 °C, 3 g/L dose, 45 min contact time, and 200 rpm agitation. MTAC reached 484 mg/g adsorption capacity and 96.8% COD removal, outperforming commercial activated carbon and retaining >85% efficiency after five regeneration cycles.
Key findings
- MTAC had a BET surface area of 510.4 m²/g, total pore volume 0.472 cm³/g, and average pore diameter 3.71 nm; FTIR indicated –OH, –COOH, C=O, and C=C groups, and XRD showed an amorphous/partially graphitized carbon with a broad peak at 2θ ≈ 25°.
- Reported optimal batch conditions were pH 6, 30 °C, 3 g/L adsorbent dose, 45 min contact time, and 200 rpm agitation; the paper reports 464 mg/g and 92.8% COD removal at pH 6/30 °C, and 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD removal at 45 min/200 rpm. Under optimized conditions, initial COD of 250 mg/L was reduced to approximately 17.8 mg/L.
- Equilibrium fitted Langmuir best (R² = 0.999 in table/abstract; text also reports 0.996), with qo = 484 mg/g, KL = 0.25 L/mg, and RL = 0.015; Freundlich gave n = 2.23 and R² = 0.995. Pseudo-second-order kinetics fit well (R² = 0.998), and thermodynamics showed negative ΔG° (−0.64 to −0.76 kJ/mol at 303–333 K), ΔH° = −0.523 kJ/mol, and ΔS° = 0.003 kJ/mol·K.
- MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC): 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD removal vs 370 mg/g and 85.0% (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0002, respectively). Estimated cost was 1.25 USD/kg vs 3.50 USD/kg for CAC, and COD removal remained above 85% after five regeneration cycles (85.1% at cycle 5).
Methods
- MTAC was synthesized from maize tassels by carbonization at 500 °C for 2 h under nitrogen, impregnation with 85% H₃PO₄ at a 1:1 weight ratio for 24 h, then activation at 800 °C for 1.5 h under nitrogen; the product was washed to neutral pH and dried.
- Batch adsorption tests used industrial wastewater from a juice processing factory in Cairo, Egypt, with initial COD ≈ 250 mg/L, pH 5.8, TDS 180 mg/L, TSS 320 mg/L, and light-yellow color (320 Pt–Co units). Variables tested included pH, temperature, adsorbent dose, contact time, and agitation speed; COD was measured according to APHA (2017), with experiments in triplicate and results as mean ± SD.
- Characterization used BET, FTIR, SEM, and XRD. Equilibrium data were modeled with Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms, kinetics with pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models, and thermodynamics with ΔG°, ΔH°, and ΔS°. MTAC vs CAC performance was compared using a two-sample t-test in Minitab at α = 0.05.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: experimental parameter ranges are inconsistent across sections—introduction/methods mention pH 2–8, dose 0.01–0.1 g/L, and agitation 300–600 rpm, while results report pH 4–10, dose 0.5–3 g/L, and agitation 200–700 rpm. The wastewater source is also inconsistent: methods cite a juice processing factory in Cairo, but one batch-experiment sentence cites the Rockat fertilizer factory in New Salhia, Sharqia, Egypt.
- Evident from the text: some reported optima and model fits conflict—abstract/text emphasize 464 mg/g and 92.8% at pH 6/30 °C, while maximum efficiency is 96.6% at 3 g/L and peak capacity is 484 mg/g at 45 min/200 rpm; Langmuir R² is reported as both 0.996 and 0.999; Freundlich linear R² = 0.270 contrasts with nonlinear R² = 0.995; and cost estimates vary between 1.25 USD/kg and 0.50–0.70 USD/kg for MTAC.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
17 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The adsorption performance of MTAC is influenced by pH, temperature, adsorbent dosage, contact time, and agitation speed.
“The adsorption performance of MTAC is influenced by several key process parameters, including pH, temperature, adsorbent dosage, contact time, and agitation speed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [48] Abd Elhafez, S. E., El-Maghraby, A. & Taha, N. A. Adsorption studies of cationic dye on raw and modified sugarcane bagasse from aqueous solutions: Kinetic and isotherm aspects. Egypt. J. Chem. 64(3), 1593–1600. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJCHEM.2020.41762.2846 (2021). source
Sections 3.3–3.5 describe effects of adsorbent dose, agitation rate, and temperature on methylene-blue adsorption by raw and modified sugarcane bagasse; the kinetic study also addresses adsorption over time. Section 3.2 explains why pH matters for this dye, but the Conclusion says pH variation will be studied separately. The paper does not identify its adsorbent as MTAC, so these findings do not establish the stated effects for MTAC. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [49] Bounaas, M. et al. Effect of washing temperature on adsorption of cationic dyes by raw lignocellulosic biomass. Appl. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210365 (2024). source
- Findingown data
Peak adsorption capacity (484 mg/g) was achieved at 45 min and 200 rpm.
“Maximum efficiency (96.6%) was obtained at a dose of 3 g/L, with peak adsorption capacity (484 mg/g) achieved at 45 min and 200 rpm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC) in adsorption capacity.
“Comparative analysis further showed that MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC) in adsorption capacity, COD removal, and cost-effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MTAC outperformed CAC in COD removal.
“Comparative analysis further showed that MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC) in adsorption capacity, COD removal, and cost-effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MTAC exhibited a high surface area of 510.4 m2/g.
“MTAC exhibited a high surface area of 510.4 m2/g, and characterization through FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed its porous structure and abundant surface functional groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
MTAC retained more than 85% of its efficiency after five regeneration cycles.
“Reusability tests demonstrated that MTAC retained more than 85% of its efficiency after five regeneration cycles, confirming its economic and practical viability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Thermodynamic analysis revealed a negative ΔH° (−0.523 kJ·mol−1).
“Thermodynamic analysis revealed negative ΔG° values, confirming spontaneity, along with a negative ΔH° (− 0.523 kJ·mol⁻1), validating the exothermic nature of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Maximum COD removal efficiency (96.6%) was obtained at an MTAC dose of 3 g/L.
“Maximum efficiency (96.6%) was obtained at a dose of 3 g/L, with peak adsorption capacity (484 mg/g) achieved at 45 min and 200 rpm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Thermodynamic analysis revealed negative ΔG° values.
“Thermodynamic analysis revealed negative ΔG° values, confirming spontaneity, along with a negative ΔH° (− 0.523 kJ·mol⁻1), validating the exothermic nature of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Adsorption equilibrium data fitted well to the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.999).
“Adsorption equilibrium data fitted well to the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.999), indicating monolayer adsorption with a maximum capacity of 484 mg/g, while Freundlich parameters confirmed favorable multilayer adsorption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
XRD confirms thermal degradation and structural transformation into amorphous carbon.
“Confirms thermal degradation and structural transformation into amorphous carbon”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The estimated cost of MTAC production ranges from $0.50 to $0.70 per kg.
“Based on laboratory-scale cost calculations and literature values, the estimated cost of MTAC production ranges from $0.50 to $0.70 per kg, depending on energy and chemical use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
- Findingown data
A slight decline in adsorption capacity was recorded at 60 min (390 mg/g and 78% COD reduction).
“Interestingly, a slight decline in adsorption capacity was recorded at 60 min (390 mg/g and 78% COD reduction), which may be attributed to possible desorption or redistribution of adsorbed molecules.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MTAC possessed a total pore volume of 0.472 cm3/g.
“a total pore volume of 0.472 cm3/g”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The maximum adsorption capacity (qo) for COD adsorption onto MTAC was 484 mg/g.
“The maximum adsorption capacity (qo) was found to be 484 mg/g”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MTAC possessed a BET surface area of 510.4 m2/g.
“MTAC possessed a BET surface area of 510.4 m2/g”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The XRD pattern of maize tassel-derived activated carbon has a clear diffraction peak at 2θ ≈ 25°.
“A clear diffraction peak observed at 2θ ≈ 25° is characteristic of the graphitic (002) plane, confirming the formation of an ordered carbon structure in the activated carbon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Elevated temperatures led to a progressive reduction in both adsorption capacity and COD removal efficiency.
“Figure 4 illustrates that elevated temperatures led to a progressive reduction in both adsorption capacity and COD removal efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MTAC possessed an average pore diameter of 3.71 nm calculated using the BJH method.
“an average pore diameter of 3.71 nm (calculated using the BJH method)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The FTIR spectrum of MTAC synthesized at 800°C displays distinct absorption bands corresponding to critical surface functional groups.
“The FTIR spectrum of maize tassel-derived activated carbon (MTAC), synthesized at an activation temperature of 800°C, displays distinct absorption bands corresponding to critical surface functional groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Prominent FTIR peaks of MTAC include carboxyl (-COOH), hydroxyl (-OH), carbonyl (C=O), and aromatic C=C stretching vibrations.
“Prominent peaks include carboxyl (–COOH), hydroxyl (–OH), carbonyl (C=O), and aromatic C=C stretching vibrations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MTAC achieved a higher COD removal efficiency (96.8%) compared to CAC (85.0%).
“MTAC also achieved a higher COD removal efficiency (96.8%) compared to CAC (85.0%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Adsorption capacity declined from 464 mg/g at 0.5 g/L to 80.5 mg/g at 3 g/L.
“For instance, the adsorption capacity declined from 464 mg/g at 0.5 g/L to 80.5 mg/g at 3 g/L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Post-activation at 800°C, the activated carbon surface morphology underwent significant structural modification, with a highly porous and irregularly rough texture.
“However, post-activation at 800°C, the surface morphology of the activated carbon underwent significant structural modification, characterized by the emergence of a highly porous and irregularly rough texture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MTAC had an estimated production cost of 1.25 USD/kg compared to 3.50 USD/kg for CAC.
“From an economic perspective, MTAC demonstrated a substantial cost advantage, with an estimated production cost of 1.25 USD/kg, compared to 3.50 USD/kg for CAC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
- Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
- Findingown data
The presence and intensity of the FTIR peaks confirm the successful development of surface functionalities during carbonization and activation.
“The presence and intensity of these peaks confirm the successful development of surface functionalities during the carbonization and activation processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The initial COD concentration of the industrial wastewater was approximately 250 mg/L.
“As shown in Table 2, the initial COD concentration was approximately 250 mg/L, and the wastewater exhibited a light-yellow color (320 Pt–Co units) with a mildly acidic pH of 5.8, reflecting the organic-rich nature of juice processing effluent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MTAC maintains high performance even after multiple cycles.
“The results confirm that MTAC maintains high performance even after multiple cycles”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Raw maize tassels exhibited a smooth and compact surface with minimal porosity.
“Raw maize tassels exhibited a smooth and compact surface with minimal porosity, characteristic of the native biomass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The negative ΔG° values confirm that the adsorption process is spontaneous.
“Thermodynamic analysis revealed negative ΔG° values, confirming spontaneity, along with a negative ΔH° (− 0.523 kJ·mol⁻1), validating the exothermic nature of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The negative ΔH° validates the exothermic nature of the process.
“Thermodynamic analysis revealed negative ΔG° values, confirming spontaneity, along with a negative ΔH° (− 0.523 kJ·mol⁻1), validating the exothermic nature of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Freundlich parameters confirmed favorable multilayer adsorption.
“Adsorption equilibrium data fitted well to the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.999), indicating monolayer adsorption with a maximum capacity of 484 mg/g, while Freundlich parameters confirmed favorable multilayer adsorption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
MTAC outperformed CAC in cost-effectiveness.
“Comparative analysis further showed that MTAC outperformed commercial activated carbon (CAC) in adsorption capacity, COD removal, and cost-effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The high cost of commercial activated carbon remains a limiting factor for many industries, particularly in developing countries.
- Interpretationown data
MTAC has superior COD removal efficiency over CAC.
“This performance comparison is visually presented in Fig. 8, clearly illustrating the superior removal efficiency of MTAC over CAC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The presence of well-defined pores and irregular cavities indicates successful activation and formation of a high surface area.
“The presence of well-defined pores and irregular cavities indicates the successful activation and the formation of a high surface area, which is crucial for enhancing adsorption capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The Langmuir model effectively describes the equilibrium adsorption of COD onto MTAC.
“The correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.996) suggests that the Langmuir model effectively describes the equilibrium adsorption of COD onto MTAC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The Langmuir isotherm assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface with finite identical sites.
- Interpretationown data
The adsorption process is exothermic.
“These results suggest that the adsorption process is exothermic, as higher temperatures negatively impacted the adsorption performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These functional groups facilitate enhanced electrostatic and chemical interactions between the adsorbent and pollutant molecules, reinforcing the material's superior adsorption performance.
“These functional groups facilitate enhanced electrostatic and chemical interactions between the adsorbent and pollutant molecules, thus reinforcing the material’s superior adsorption performance in contaminant removal applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The decline in efficiency at elevated temperatures may be attributed to increased molecular motion weakening physical interactions between adsorbate molecules and active sites or causing partial desorption.
“The decline in efficiency at elevated temperatures may be attributed to increased molecular motion, which can weaken the physical interactions between adsorbate molecules and active sites on the adsorbent surface, or even cause partial desorption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The enhanced performance of MTAC compared to conventional activated carbon stems from its superior structural and chemical properties, including a larger surface area, optimized porosity, and abundant functional groups.
“The enhanced performance of MTAC compared to conventional activated carbon stems from its superior structural and chemical properties, including a larger surface area, optimized porosity, and abundant functional groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
pH plays a crucial role in the adsorption performance of MTAC.
“The results, shown in Fig. 3, indicate that pH plays a crucial role in the adsorption performance of MTAC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The decline in regeneration performance is attributed to gradual blockage or degradation of active sites during repeated use.
“This decline is attributed to the gradual blockage or degradation of active sites during repeated use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
MTAC exhibits a mesoporous structure.
“These values confirm that MTAC exhibits a mesoporous structure, which is highly advantageous for the adsorption of organic pollutants, such as those contributing to chemical oxygen demand (COD) in industrial wastewater.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
200 rpm is the optimal agitation intensity under the tested conditions.
“These findings indicate that 200 rpm is the optimal Agitation intensity under the tested conditions, as it ensures efficient mass transfer without introducing disruptive turbulence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
MTAC has potential as a sustainable, low-cost adsorbent for treating industrial effluents, particularly in resource-limited settings.
“This affirms its potential as a sustainable, low-cost adsorbent for treating industrial effluents, particularly in resource-limited settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
- Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
- Interpretationreasoning
The choice of juice processing effluent allows assessment of MTAC in treating real-world, moderately contaminated industrial wastewater with significant organic content.
“The choice of this effluent allows the assessment of MTAC in treating real-world, moderately contaminated industrial wastewater with significant organic content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Batch adsorption results obtained under controlled conditions are indicative of performance in real-world industrial wastewater treatment.
- Interpretationreasoning
Enhanced adsorption under slightly acidic conditions may be attributed to favorable surface charge interactions and increased availability of active functional groups on the MTAC surface.
“The enhanced adsorption under slightly acidic conditions may be attributed to favorable surface charge interactions and increased availability of active functional groups on the MTAC surface for binding organic pollutants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The diffraction peak at 2θ ≈ 25° is characteristic of the graphitic (002) plane.
“A clear diffraction peak observed at 2θ ≈ 25° is characteristic of the graphitic (002) plane, confirming the formation of an ordered carbon structure in the activated carbon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The broad and diffuse diffraction peaks in the low-angle regions reflect diminished crystallinity and a predominantly amorphous structure of the activated carbon.
“The broad and diffuse diffraction peaks observed in the low-angle regions reflect diminished crystallinity, a hallmark trait of activated carbon due to its predominantly amorphous structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The pseudo-first-order model is unsuitable for describing the adsorption behavior of COD onto MTAC.
“Therefore, this model is unsuitable for describing the adsorption behavior in this system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The pseudo-first-order kinetic model assumes that the rate of adsorption is directly proportional to the number of available adsorption sites.
- Interpretationown data
45 min is the optimal contact time for achieving maximum adsorption efficiency under the experimental conditions.
“This behavior suggests that 45 min is the optimal contact time for achieving maximum adsorption efficiency under the experimental conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
COD molecules were primarily adsorbed onto uniformly distributed active functional groups on the MTAC surface in a monolayer fashion.
“These findings suggest that COD molecules were primarily adsorbed onto uniformly distributed active functional groups on the MTAC surface in a monolayer fashion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The Langmuir isotherm assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface with finite identical sites.
- Interpretationown data
30°C is the optimal temperature for maximum adsorption efficiency.
“Thus, 30°C appears to be the optimal temperature for maximum adsorption efficiency, reinforcing the suitability of MTAC for use under ambient or slightly warm conditions in environmental applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The reduction in adsorption performance at high agitation speeds can be linked to excessive turbulence causing desorption or reducing effective contact time between adsorbate and adsorbent particles.
“This reduction can be linked to excessive turbulence at high speeds, which may cause desorption or reduce the effective contact time between adsorbate and adsorbent particles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The adsorption profile is typical, characterized by a fast initial uptake followed by a plateau, indicating equilibrium.
“These findings confirm the typical adsorption profile, characterized by a fast initial uptake followed by a plateau, indicating equilibrium.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The adsorption process was favorable.
“RL was determined to be 0.015, which lies between 0 and 1 signifying that the adsorption process was favorable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The inverse relationship between dose and adsorption capacity occurs because the fixed amount of contaminant becomes distributed across a larger mass of adsorbent, resulting in lower calculated uptake per gram.
“This inverse relationship occurs because, while more active sites are available at higher doses, the fixed amount of contaminant becomes distributed across a larger mass of adsorbent, resulting in a lower calculated uptake per gram of adsorbent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The observed XRD peak positions and intensities corroborate the effectiveness of the activation method in developing a highly porous and structurally modified carbon material.
“The observed peak positions and intensities further corroborate the effectiveness of the activation method used in developing a highly porous and structurally modified carbon material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 19
- It may state two separate claims as one. 61
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPatel et al. (2019) found that MTAC exhibited excellent removal efficiency for methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions, especially under acidic conditions.
“Similarly, Patel et al. (2019) investigated the potential of MTAC for the removal of methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions and found that it exhibited excellent removal efficiency, especially under acidic conditions46.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Dharmapriya, T. N., Shih, H. Y. & Huang, P. J. Facile synthesis of hydrogel-based ion-exchange resins for nitrite/nitrate removal and studies of adsorption behavior. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071442 (2022). source
The Conclusions (page unavailable) identify this as a study of PEGDA-MTAC hydrogels for nitrate and nitrite removal, not a Patel et al. (2019) study of methylene blue dye. The Results and Discussions (page unavailable) also report that nitrate adsorption increased as pH rose from 2 to 10, rather than finding the claimed advantage under acidic conditions. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationChaudhary et al. (2020) demonstrated that MTAC has high adsorption capacity for lead and cadmium, with maximum adsorption capacities reaching 150 mg/g for lead and 120 mg/g for cadmium under optimal conditions.
“For instance, Chaudhary et al. (2020) demonstrated that MTAC has high adsorption capacity for lead and cadmium, with maximum adsorption capacities reaching 150 mg/g for lead and 120 mg/g for cadmium under optimal conditions45.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Ashraf, M. A., Balkhair, K. S., Khan Chowdhury, A. J. & Hanafiah, M. M. Treatment of taman beringin landfill leachate using the columntechnique. Desalin Water Treat. 2019(149), 370–387. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.23839 (2019). source
The abstract (p. 1) describes column experiments using aquifer sand, peat, and BIRM to treat leachate containing Fe, Cr, Ni, and Cu. Searches for MTAC, lead, cadmium, and the claimed 150 and 120 mg/g capacities found no passage addressing those results in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe adsorption efficiency of MTAC increases under acidic conditions due to enhanced electrostatic interactions between the adsorbent and the pollutants.
“The effect of these parameters has been widely studied in the literature, with several investigations indicating that the adsorption efficiency of MTAC increases under acidic conditions due to enhanced electrostatic interactions between the adsorbent and the pollutants48,49.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [48] Abd Elhafez, S. E., El-Maghraby, A. & Taha, N. A. Adsorption studies of cationic dye on raw and modified sugarcane bagasse from aqueous solutions: Kinetic and isotherm aspects. Egypt. J. Chem. 64(3), 1593–1600. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJCHEM.2020.41762.2846 (2021). source
The paper studies methylene blue adsorption on sugarcane bagasse, not MTAC. Section 3.2 (page unavailable) says methylene blue adsorption is favored above pH 6.3, but that finding does not establish whether MTAC adsorption increases under acidic conditions. Searches for MTAC and acidic-condition electrostatic interactions found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [49] Bounaas, M. et al. Effect of washing temperature on adsorption of cationic dyes by raw lignocellulosic biomass. Appl. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210365 (2024). source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCAC is produced from carbonaceous materials such as coal, wood, and coconut shells and has a high surface area ranging from 400 to over 1000 m2/g.
“CAC is produced from carbonaceous materials such as coal, wood, and coconut shells and is characterized by its high surface area (ranging from 400 to over 1000 m2/g) and strong adsorption affinity for a variety of contaminants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [32] Muttil, N., Jagadeesan, S., Chanda, A., Duke, M. & Singh, S. K. Production, types, and applications of activated carbon derived from waste tyres: An overview. Appl. Sci. 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010257 (2023). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says commercial activated carbon can be produced from coal, wood, and coconut shell and describes its high surface area. Section 2.2 reports a surface area of 1000 m²/g for steam-activated waste-tyre carbon, but the paper does not give the claimed range of 400 to over 1000 m²/g for CAC. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [33] Sujiono, E. H. et al. Fabrication and characterization of coconut shell activated carbon using variation chemical activation for wastewater treatment application. Results Chem. 4(February), 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100291 (2022). source
- cites [34] Alam, M. M. et al. The potentiality of rice husk-derived activated carbon: From synthesis to application. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8020203 (2020). source
The Introduction lists coal, wood, and coconut shells as activated-carbon precursors and describes activated carbon as having a high surface area and uses in contaminant removal. The paper defines CAC as commercial activated carbon in Table 6, but does not establish the stated 400-to-over-1000 m²/g range for CAC or specifically link those precursors to commercial products. Its numerical surface-area examples in Table 5 concern rice-husk-derived activated carbon. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationOther studies have highlighted the effectiveness of MTAC in removing pharmaceutical residues, including ibuprofen and paracetamol.
“Other studies have highlighted the effectiveness of MTAC in removing pharmaceutical residues, including ibuprofen and paracetamol, further supporting its versatility as an adsorbent material for a wide range of industrial pollutant47.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Jedynak, K. et al. Ordered mesoporous carbons for adsorption of paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Ibuprofen and naproxen from aqueous solutions. Water (Switzerland). 11(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051099 (2019). source
The Introduction and Conclusions describe adsorption of paracetamol and ibuprofen from water, but the materials studied were ordered mesoporous carbons (ST-A-P and ST-A-P-CO₂) and commercial activated carbon (WG-15), not MTAC. The Conclusions also say ibuprofen removal was significantly lower than removal of the other pharmaceuticals. The paper therefore does not establish MTAC’s effectiveness or its versatility across industrial pollutants. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCAC can effectively adsorb organic pollutants such as dyes, phenols, and pharmaceuticals, as well as inorganic pollutants such as heavy metals including lead, cadmium, and chromium, often with adsorption capacities exceeding 200 mg/g under optimal conditions.
“Studies have shown that CAC can effectively adsorb organic pollutants such as dyes, phenols, and pharmaceuticals, as well as inorganic pollutants such as heavy metals including lead, cadmium, and chromium, often with adsorption capacities exceeding 200 mg/g under optimal conditions32–34.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [32] Muttil, N., Jagadeesan, S., Chanda, A., Duke, M. & Singh, S. K. Production, types, and applications of activated carbon derived from waste tyres: An overview. Appl. Sci. 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010257 (2023). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [33] Sujiono, E. H. et al. Fabrication and characterization of coconut shell activated carbon using variation chemical activation for wastewater treatment application. Results Chem. 4(February), 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100291 (2022). source
- cites [34] Alam, M. M. et al. The potentiality of rice husk-derived activated carbon: From synthesis to application. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8020203 (2020). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMaize tassels are an abundant agricultural waste product and a promising feedstock for producing activated carbon.
“Among these, maize tassels, an abundant agricultural waste product, have gained attention as a promising feedstock for producing activated carbon39–41.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [39] Enaime, G., Dababat, S., Wichern, M. & Lübken, M. Olive mill wastes: From wastes to resources. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 31(14), 20853–20880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32468-x (2024). source
The wastewater-treatment section discusses producing activated carbon from olive mill wastes, not maize tassels. Searches for “maize tassels activated carbon” and “maize corn tassel agricultural waste feedstock” found no passage addressing maize tassels or their suitability as a feedstock. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [40] Jagadeesh, N. & Sundaram, B. Adsorption of pollutants from wastewater by biochar: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100226 (2023). source
- cites [41] Bharathi, K. S. & Ramesh, S. T. Removal of dyes using agricultural waste as low-cost adsorbents: A review. Appl. Water Sci. 3(4), 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0117-y (2013). source
The Introduction describes agricultural wastes as readily available adsorbents, and Modifications of adsorbents discusses activated carbon made from other materials. Searches for maize tassels, tassels, and maize-based activated carbon found no passage addressing whether maize tassels are abundant or a promising activated-carbon feedstock. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationJuice processing effluents typically exhibit elevated COD and BOD levels, low pH values due to natural acids, and high turbidity from suspended solids and pulp.
“These effluents typically exhibit elevated COD and BOD levels, low pH values due to natural acids (e.g., citric acid), and high turbidity from suspended solids and pulp.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Sonawane, J. M., Mahadevan, R., Pandey, A. & Greener, J. Heliyon Recent progress in microbial fuel cells using substrates from diverse sources. Heliyon. 8(12), e12353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12353 (2022). source
The Fruit waste section discusses residues from juice extraction and clarified cashew apple juice as an MFC substrate, but does not describe juice-processing effluents. The Industrial wastewater and Agricultural waste sections report COD, BOD, acidity, and suspended solids for other effluents; they do not establish elevated COD and BOD, acid-driven low pH, or pulp-driven turbidity for juice-processing effluents. Searches for juice wastewater, citric acid, and fruit-processing effluent found no passage addressing those properties together. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] Sar, T., Marchlewicz, A., Harirchi, S., Th, F. & Taherzadeh, M. J. Resource recovery and treatment of wastewaters using filamentous fungi. Sci. Total Environ. 951(June), 175752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175752 (2024). source
Section 3.9 (page unavailable) includes fruit juices among processed fruit products and describes fruit wastewaters as high in COD and organic acids. It does not establish that juice-processing effluents typically have high BOD, low pH caused by natural acids such as citric acid, or high turbidity from suspended solids and pulp. The high BOD reported in section 3.7 concerns paper-pulp effluent, not juice processing. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIf untreated, discharges from juice processing wastewater can severely affect aquatic ecosystems by depleting dissolved oxygen and promoting eutrophication.
“If untreated, such discharges can severely affect aquatic ecosystems by depleting dissolved oxygen and promoting eutrophication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Periyasamy AP. Recent advances in the remediation of textile-dye-containing wastewater: Prioritizing human health and sustainable wastewater treatment. Published online 2024. source
Section 3 says dyes in textile effluent hinder the formation of dissolved oxygen, and Section 3.1 says untreated textile wastewater harms aquatic ecosystems. The paper does not establish this claim for juice-processing wastewater or say that these discharges promote eutrophication; its oxygen statement concerns reduced formation, not explicitly depletion. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [2] Hashem, M. S. & Qi, X. Treated wastewater irrigation—A review. Published online 2025:1–37.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [3] Maia, A. S., Teodorovi, A., Langergraber, G., Ribeiro, A. R. L. & Maja, Đ. Bio-waste valorisation: Agricultural wastes as biosorbents for removal of (in) organic pollutants in wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100239 (2022). source
The Introduction reports that dye-polluted water can have harmful environmental effects and reduced dissolved oxygen. It does not establish those effects for juice-processing wastewater, and the searched passages do not mention eutrophication. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe juice processing industry generates large volumes of wastewater characterized by high organic loads, primarily from fruit residues, sugars, and organic acids.
“Among these, the juice processing industry generates large volumes of wastewater characterized by high organic loads, primarily from fruit residues, sugars, and organic acids4,9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Sonawane, J. M., Mahadevan, R., Pandey, A. & Greener, J. Heliyon Recent progress in microbial fuel cells using substrates from diverse sources. Heliyon. 8(12), e12353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12353 (2022). source
The Fruit waste section (page unavailable) says orange-juice production generates a large volume of residues, including seeds and peels. It does not say that juice processing generates large volumes of wastewater or characterize that wastewater as having high organic loads primarily from fruit residues, sugars, and organic acids. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] Sar, T., Marchlewicz, A., Harirchi, S., Th, F. & Taherzadeh, M. J. Resource recovery and treatment of wastewaters using filamentous fungi. Sci. Total Environ. 951(June), 175752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175752 (2024). source
Section 3.9 (page unavailable) includes fruit juices among processed fruit products and says fruit wastewaters have high organic-acid content and high COD, supporting the claim of a substantial organic load. It does not establish that juice processing generates large wastewater volumes or that fruit residues and sugars are the primary contributors. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe adsorption performance of MTAC was strongly influenced by pH, with the highest adsorption capacity (464 mg/g) and COD removal of 92.8% at pH 6 and 30 °C.
“The adsorption performance was strongly influenced by pH, with the highest adsorption capacity (464 mg/g) and COD removal of 92.8% at pH 6 and 30 °C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataCharacterization by FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed that MTAC has a porous structure and abundant surface functional groups.
“characterization through FTIR, SEM, and XRD confirmed its porous structure and abundant surface functional groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt 40°C, adsorption capacity fell to 440 mg/g and COD removal decreased to 88%.
“When the temperature was elevated to 40 °C, both metrics declined adsorption capacity fell to 440 mg/g, and COD removal decreased to 88% demonstrating reduced efficacy at higher temperatures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataUnder optimized settings, MTAC exhibited a maximum adsorption capacity of 484 mg/g and attained a COD reduction efficiency of 96.8%.
“Under these optimized settings, MTAC exhibited a maximum adsorption capacity of 484 mg/g and attained a COD reduction efficiency of 96.8%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataUnder optimized conditions, MTAC achieved a maximum adsorption capacity of 464 mg/g and COD removal efficiency of 92.8%.
“Under optimized conditions, MTAC achieved a maximum adsorption capacity of 464 mg/g and COD removal efficiency of 92.8%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataCOD removal efficiency decreased gradually over successive adsorption-desorption cycles but remained above 85% even after the fifth cycle.
“As listed Table 8, and FigureS1 (Supplementary File) the COD removal efficiency decreased gradually over successive cycles but remained above 85% even after the fifth cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataBeyond the initial period, the adsorption rate diminished progressively, stabilizing near equilibrium conditions by 45 min.
“Beyond this period, the adsorption rate diminished progressively, stabilizing near equilibrium conditions by 45 min.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningMTAC demonstrated enhanced adsorption performance (484 mg/g, 96.8% COD removal) compared to CAC (370 mg/g, 85%).
“MTAC demonstrated enhanced adsorption performance (484 mg/g, 96.8% COD removal) compared to CAC (370 mg/g, 85%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataTable 7 shows MTAC adsorption capacity of 484 mg/g and CAC adsorption capacity of 370 mg/g under identical experimental conditions.
“Table 7 presents the adsorption capacity of MTAC (484 mg/g) and CAC (370 mg/g) under identical experimental conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataXRD indicates partial graphitization and formation of layered carbon structures.
“Indicates partial graphitization and formation of layered carbon structures”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPeak adsorption capacity of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD reduction occurred at 45 min.
“Prolonged interaction time significantly improved adsorption efficacy, with Fig. 6 showing a peak capacity of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD reduction at 45 min.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt 300 rpm, adsorption capacity decreased to 426 mg/g with 85.2% COD reduction.
“At 300 rpm, the capacity decreased to 426 mg/g with 85.2% COD reduction, and further declined at 500 rpm (390 mg/g, 78%) and 700 rpm (384 mg/g, 76.8%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt 60°C, adsorption capacity was 410 mg/g and COD reduction was 82%.
“Further increases in temperature to 50 °C and 60 °C led to additional reductions in capacity (422 mg/g and 410 mg/g, respectively), accompanied by COD reduction efficiencies of 84.4% and 82%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataUnder optimized conditions, MTAC attained a peak capacity of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD removal, while CAC achieved a maximum capacity of 370 mg/g and 85% COD reduction under identical experimental settings.
“Under optimized conditions, MTAC demonstrated significantly enhanced adsorption performance, attaining a peak capacity of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD removal efficiency. In comparison, commercial activated carbon (CAC) achieved lower efficacy, with a maximum capacity of 370 mg/g and 85% COD reduction under identical experimental settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataXRD indicates reduced crystallinity and dominance of amorphous carbon.
“Suggests reduced crystallinity and dominance of amorphous carbon”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMTAC had a mean adsorption capacity of 484.0 ± 8.6 mg/g, compared with 370.0 ± 10.2 mg/g for CAC (p = 0.0004).
“| Adsorption capacity (mg/g) | 484.0 ± 8.6 | 370.0 ± 10.2 | 0.0004 | Significant |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt pH 8, the adsorption capacity dropped to 408 mg/g and COD reduction was 81.6%.
“At pH 8, the capacity dropped slightly to 408 mg/g, with a COD reduction of 81.6%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt 50°C, adsorption capacity was 422 mg/g and COD reduction was 84.4%.
“Further increases in temperature to 50 °C and 60 °C led to additional reductions in capacity (422 mg/g and 410 mg/g, respectively), accompanied by COD reduction efficiencies of 84.4% and 82%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe initial COD concentration of the industrial wastewater was 250 mg/L, and after treatment the residual COD concentration was reduced to approximately 17.8 mg/L.
“The initial COD concentration of the industrial wastewater was 250 mg/L, and after treatment, the residual COD concentration was reduced to approximately 17.8 mg/L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt pH 4, the adsorption capacity was 400 mg/g and COD reduction was 80%.
“Similarly, at pH 4, although the adsorption capacity was still relatively high (400 mg/g), the COD reduction was only 80%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt 700 rpm, adsorption capacity was 384 mg/g and COD reduction was 76.8%.
“At 300 rpm, the capacity decreased to 426 mg/g with 85.2% COD reduction, and further declined at 500 rpm (390 mg/g, 78%) and 700 rpm (384 mg/g, 76.8%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningThe estimated treatment cost per cubic meter is $1.50-2.10 for MTAC and $7.50-9.00 for CAC.
“MTAC:3kg*$0.5–0.7/Kg = $1.50–2.10/m3CAC: 3kg*$2.5–3.00/Kg = $7.50–9.00/m3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
- Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMTAC demonstrated a cost advantage of approximately 64% over CAC, with an estimated production cost of 1.25 USD/kg.
“Furthermore, MTAC demonstrated a cost advantage of approximately 64% over CAC, with an estimated production cost of 1.25 USD/kg, offering a promising solution for large-scale industrial applications where cost constraints and sustainability are critical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
- Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIncreasing the adsorbent dose resulted in significant enhancement in COD reduction, reaching 95.2% at 1 g/L and up to 96.6% at 3 g/L.
“As shown in Fig. 5, increasing the adsorbent dose resulted in a significant enhancement in COD reduction, reaching 95.2% at 1 g/L, and up to 96.6% at 3 g/L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe adsorption process exhibited an initial rapid phase, with capacity escalating from 430 mg/g at 20 min (86% COD removal) to 464 mg/g at 30 min (92.8% COD removal).
“The adsorption process exhibited an initial rapid phase, with capacity escalating from 430 mg/g at 20 min (86% COD removal) to 464 mg/g at 30 min (92.8% COD removal), driven by the high density of accessible active sites on maize tassel-derived activated carbon (MTAC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMTAC had a mean COD removal efficiency of 96.8 ± 1.1%, compared with 85.0 ± 1.5% for CAC (p = 0.0002).
“| COD removal efficiency (%) | 96.8 ± 1.1 | 85.0 ± 1.5 | 0.0002 | Significant |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe optimal operational conditions for MTAC were pH 6, temperature 30°C, adsorbent dosage 3 g/L, contact duration 45 min, and agitation speed 200 rpm.
“The optimal operational conditions for MTAC were determined to be a pH of 6, temperature of 30°C, adsorbent dosage of 3 g/L, contact duration of 45 min, and agitation speed of 200 rpm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAdsorption capacity and COD reduction initially increased with agitation intensity, reaching a maximum of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD reduction at 200 rpm.
“As shown in Fig. 7, the adsorption capacity and COD reduction initially increased with Agitation intensity, reaching a maximum value of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD reduction at 200 rpm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMaximum adsorption efficiency (464 mg/g) and COD removal (92.8%) occurred at pH 6.
“Maximum adsorption efficiency (464 mg/g) and COD removal (92.8%) occurred at pH 6, suggesting strong electrostatic affinity between MTAC’s functional groups and organic contaminants under slightly acidic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt 30°C, MTAC attained its highest adsorption performance, with a capacity of 464 mg/g and a COD removal efficiency of 92.8%.
“At a temperature of 30°C, MTAC attained its highest adsorption performance, with a capacity of 464 mg/g and a COD removal efficiency of 92.8%, underscoring the effectiveness of mild thermal conditions for adsorption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt pH 10, the adsorption capacity was 390 mg/g and COD reduction was 78%.
“At pH 10, both adsorption capacity (390 mg/g) and COD reduction (78%) declined, suggesting reduced efficiency in alkaline environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt 500 rpm, adsorption capacity was 390 mg/g and COD reduction was 78%.
“At 300 rpm, the capacity decreased to 426 mg/g with 85.2% COD reduction, and further declined at 500 rpm (390 mg/g, 78%) and 700 rpm (384 mg/g, 76.8%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMaize tassels are rich in cellulose and lignin, which are ideal for producing activated carbon with high porosity and surface area.
“Maize tassels are rich in cellulose and lignin, which are ideal for the production of activated carbon with high porosity and surface area11,42–44.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [11] Alvez-Tovar, B. et al. Agro-industrial waste upcycling into activated carbons: A sustainable approach for dye removal and wastewater treatment. Sustainability. 17(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052036 (2025). source
- cites [42] Sarkar, D., Panicker, T. F., Kumar Mishra, R. & Srinivas, K. M. A comprehensive review of production and characterization of biochar for removal of organic pollutants from water and wastewater. Water-Energy Nexus. 7, 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2024.11.001 (2024). source
- cites [43] Trivedi, Y. et al. Biochar potential for pollutant removal during wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review of separation mechanisms, technological integration, and process analysis. Desalination 2025(600), 118509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.118509 (2024). source
- cites [44] Zhao, R. A review on the catalytic ozonation of pollutants in wastewater by heteroelements-doped biochar: Internal and external doping strategies. Alexandria Eng J. 119(January), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.088 (2025). source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningMTAC is a sustainable adsorbent that supports circular economy strategies and advances progress toward SDGs 6, 12, and 13.
“The utilization of maize tassel, an abundant agricultural byproduct, highlights its potential as a sustainable adsorbent that supports circular economy strategies and advances progress toward SDGs 6, 12, and 13.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The high cost of commercial activated carbon remains a limiting factor for many industries, particularly in developing countries.
- Rests on an assumption: Batch adsorption results obtained under controlled conditions are indicative of performance in real-world industrial wastewater treatment.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe Langmuir model indicates monolayer adsorption with a maximum capacity of 484 mg/g.
“Adsorption equilibrium data fitted well to the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.999), indicating monolayer adsorption with a maximum capacity of 484 mg/g, while Freundlich parameters confirmed favorable multilayer adsorption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMTAC offers advantages including low cost, availability, sustainability, and potential for waste valorisation.
“Maize tassel-based activated carbon (MTAC) offers several advantages, including its low cost, availability, and sustainability, as well as its potential for waste valorisation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [11] Alvez-Tovar, B. et al. Agro-industrial waste upcycling into activated carbons: A sustainable approach for dye removal and wastewater treatment. Sustainability. 17(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052036 (2025). source
- cites [42] Sarkar, D., Panicker, T. F., Kumar Mishra, R. & Srinivas, K. M. A comprehensive review of production and characterization of biochar for removal of organic pollutants from water and wastewater. Water-Energy Nexus. 7, 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2024.11.001 (2024). source
- cites [43] Trivedi, Y. et al. Biochar potential for pollutant removal during wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review of separation mechanisms, technological integration, and process analysis. Desalination 2025(600), 118509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.118509 (2024). source
- cites [44] Zhao, R. A review on the catalytic ozonation of pollutants in wastewater by heteroelements-doped biochar: Internal and external doping strategies. Alexandria Eng J. 119(January), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.088 (2025). source
- Rests on an assumption: The high cost of commercial activated carbon remains a limiting factor for many industries, particularly in developing countries.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe BET findings are consistent with the observed high adsorption capacity up to 484 mg/g and support MTAC's effectiveness as a low-cost, sustainable adsorbent for wastewater treatment.
“These findings are consistent with the observed high adsorption capacity (up to 484 mg/g) and support the material’s effectiveness as a low-cost, sustainable adsorbent for wastewater treatment applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataMTAC competes favorably with commercial activated carbon and may offer enhanced performance for COD removal in industrial wastewater treatment, particularly for low to moderate organic pollutant loads such as juice processing effluents.
“In summary, the comparison clearly indicates that MTAC not only competes favorably with commercial activated carbon but may also offer enhanced performance for COD removal in industrial wastewater treatment, particularly in applications targeting low to moderate organic pollutant loads such as juice processing effluents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataHigher doses improve removal efficiency but decrease adsorption capacity per unit mass, so an optimal balance between removal efficiency and material cost must be considered for practical and economic applications.
“These findings highlight that although higher doses improve removal efficiency, the adsorption capacity per unit mass decreases, and therefore, an optimal balance between removal efficiency and material cost must be considered for practical and economic applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenAll trials were replicated to validate reproducibility, with mean values applied for data interpretation.
“All trials were replicated to validate reproducibility, with mean values applied for data interpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe SEM-observed structural modifications align with increased adsorption performance and confirm that the activation protocol improved the adsorbent's adsorptive efficiency.
“These structural modifications, as observed under SEM, align with the increase in adsorption performance reported in the FTIR and other characterization studies, confirming that the activation protocol successfully improved the adsorbent’s adsorptive efficiency, underscoring its suitability for contaminant mitigation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe adsorption kinetics of COD onto MTAC are best described by the pseudo-second-order model, implying chemisorption as the dominant mechanism.
“These results confirm that the adsorption kinetics of COD onto MTAC are best described by the pseudo-second-order model, implying that the dominant mechanism is chemisorption involving strong chemical interactions between the organic pollutants and the functional groups on the MTAC surface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The pseudo-second-order model assumes that chemisorption is the rate-limiting step, involving the sharing or exchange of electrons between the adsorbate and the adsorbent surface.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataMTAC is a low-cost, renewable, sustainable, and regenerable adsorbent suitable for industrial wastewater treatment.
“MTAC is a low-cost, renewable material derived from agricultural waste, promoting environmental sustainability and resource valorization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataMonolayer adsorption remains the dominant mechanism, though surface heterogeneity may still play a contributory role.
“Thus, monolayer adsorption remains the dominant mechanism, though surface heterogeneity may still play a contributory role.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The Langmuir isotherm assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface with finite identical sites.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The Freundlich model assumes adsorption on a heterogeneous surface with sites of varied affinities and multilayer adsorption.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataMTAC offers a substantial economic advantage over CAC, reducing both material costs and the cost per unit volume of treated water.
“These results confirm that MTAC offers a substantial economic advantage over CAC, reducing both material costs and the cost per unit volume of treated water.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
- Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataMTAC is cost-effective and derived from agricultural waste, aligning with sustainable waste management and environmental protection practices.
“Additionally, the MTAC offered the advantage of being cost-effective and derived from agricultural waste, aligning with sustainable waste management and environmental protection practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataThe Freundlich model showed a good fit (R2 = 0.995, n = 2.23), indicating strong adsorption affinity and surface heterogeneity of MTAC.
“These results indicate strong adsorption affinity and surface heterogeneity of MTAC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The Freundlich model assumes adsorption on a heterogeneous surface with sites of varied affinities and multilayer adsorption.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningAll adsorption experiments were conducted in triplicate, and results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
“All adsorption experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the results are presented as mean ± standard deviation to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe adsorption process is highly sensitive to solution pH, with optimal performance at pH 6.
“These results clearly demonstrate that the adsorption process is highly sensitive to the solution pH, with optimal performance observed at pH 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataCOD adsorption onto MTAC is spontaneous, mildly exothermic, and governed primarily by physical adsorption interactions.
“These findings validate the experimental data and demonstrate that COD removal by MTAC is a spontaneous and mildly exothermic process, governed primarily by physical adsorption interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataThe use of Minitab ensured precise validation of observed differences and supported the reliability of the comparative findings.
“The use of Minitab ensured precise validation of observed differences and supported the reliability of the comparative findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataCombined with its high adsorption capacity and reusability, MTAC is a cost-effective and sustainable alternative for industrial wastewater treatment.
“Combined with its high adsorption capacity and reusability, MTAC is a cost-effective and sustainable alternative for industrial wastewater treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
- Rests on an assumption: Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe high surface area and favorable pore characteristics of MTAC facilitate enhanced mass transfer, greater accessibility of adsorbate molecules to active sites, and improved adsorption efficiency.
“The high surface area and favorable pore characteristics facilitate enhanced mass transfer, greater accessibility of adsorbate molecules to active sites, and improved adsorption efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe analytical method ensured precise and reliable detection of contaminants.
“This method ensured precise and reliable detection of contaminants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe pH of wastewater samples was adjusted to target values (2-8) using diluted NaOH or HCl solutions, with adjustments validated via a calibrated pH meter before each experiment.
“The pH of wastewater samples was calibrated to target values (2–8) using diluted NaOH or HCl solutions, with adjustments validated via a calibrated pH meter before commencing each experiment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe optimal batch adsorption conditions for MTAC are pH 6, temperature 30°C, adsorbent dose 3 g/L, contact time 45 min, and agitation intensity 200 rpm.
“In conclusion, the optimal batch adsorption conditions for MTAC are:pH: 6Temperature: 30 °CAdsorbent dose: 3 g/LContact time: 45 minAgitation intensity: 200 rpm”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationown dataThe decline at 60 min may be attributed to possible desorption or redistribution of adsorbed molecules.
“Interestingly, a slight decline in adsorption capacity was recorded at 60 min (390 mg/g and 78% COD reduction), which may be attributed to possible desorption or redistribution of adsorbed molecules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationCOD reduction was measured according to APHA (2017) Standard Methods.
“After the optimum contact time, the treated samples were filtered, and the COD reduction was measured according to APHA (2017) Standard Methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites APHA (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenError bars corresponding to standard deviation values have been added to all applicable figures.
“Error bars corresponding to standard deviation values have been added to all applicable figures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe reduction in COD illustrates the effectiveness of MTAC in eliminating organic pollutants and highlights its potential as a cost-effective alternative to commercial activated carbon.
“This significant reduction illustrates the effectiveness of MTAC in eliminating organic pollutants and highlights its potential as a cost-effective alternative to commercial activated carbon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenBy utilizing an underexplored agricultural waste, the study introduces a novel material to adsorption science and contributes to resource-efficient wastewater treatment aligned with SDGs 6, 12, and 13.
“By utilizing an underexplored agricultural waste, the study not only introduces a novel material to the field of adsorption science but also contributes to resource-efficient wastewater treatment aligned with SDGs 6 (Clean Water), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 13 (Climate Action).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Maize tassel-derived activated carbon is a novel material in adsorption science.
The paper relies on this without support.
The high cost of commercial activated carbon remains a limiting factor for many industries, particularly in developing countries.
“Despite its widespread use, the high cost of commercial activated carbon remains a limiting factor for many industries, particularly in developing countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Compared with other well-studied precursors, maize tassel has not been systematically evaluated for its structural advantages, adsorption efficiency, or economic potential.
“Compared to other well-studied precursors like coconut shell, rice husk, and bamboo, maize tassel has not been systematically evaluated for its structural advantages, adsorption efficiency, or economic potential.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Batch adsorption results obtained under controlled conditions are indicative of performance in real-world industrial wastewater treatment.
“The choice of this effluent allows the assessment of MTAC in treating real-world, moderately contaminated industrial wastewater with significant organic content.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Maize tassels are an abundant agricultural byproduct.
“MTAC was synthesized from maize tassels, an abundant agricultural byproduct, which significantly lowers raw material costs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Commercial activated carbon has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg.
“In contrast, commercially available activated carbon (CAC) has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg, reflecting the cost of raw material procurement, processing, quality control, and distribution.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Maize tassel-derived activated carbon is a novel material in adsorption science.
“By utilizing an underexplored agricultural waste, the study not only introduces a novel material to the field of adsorption science but also contributes to resource-efficient wastewater treatment aligned with SDGs 6 (Clean Water), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 13 (Climate Action).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The adsorption capacity of MTAC (484 mg/g) significantly exceeds many previously reported biosorbents for COD removal.
“The adsorption capacity of MTAC (484 mg/g) significantly exceeds many previously reported biosorbents for COD removal, reflecting its enhanced surface area (510.4 m2/g), mesoporous structure, and abundant functional groups.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Langmuir isotherm assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface with finite identical sites.
“The Langmuir isotherm assumes monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous surface with finite identical sites.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Freundlich model assumes adsorption on a heterogeneous surface with sites of varied affinities and multilayer adsorption.
“The Freundlich model explains adsorption on a heterogeneous surface with sites of varied affinities and multilayer adsorption.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The pseudo-first-order kinetic model assumes that the rate of adsorption is directly proportional to the number of available adsorption sites.
“The pseudo-first-order kinetic model assumes that the rate of adsorption is directly proportional to the number of available adsorption sites.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The pseudo-second-order model assumes that chemisorption is the rate-limiting step, involving the sharing or exchange of electrons between the adsorbate and the adsorbent surface.
“The pseudo-second-order model assumes that chemisorption is the rate-limiting step, involving the sharing or exchange of electrons between the adsorbate and the adsorbent surface.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Wastewater source changes between methods sections
MajorThe batch-experiment description identifies a fertilizer factory in Sharqia as the wastewater source, whereas the wastewater-collection description identifies a juice processing factory in Cairo.
“industrial wastewater obtained from the Rockat fertilizer factory in New Salhia, Sharqia, Egypt (as detailed in Table 1)”
“industrial wastewater obtained from a juice processing factory located in Cairo, Egypt.”
MTAC production-cost estimates disagree
MajorThe comparative analysis gives an estimated MTAC production cost of 1.25 USD/kg, whereas the cost-evaluation section estimates $0.50-$0.70 per kg.
“an estimated production cost of 1.25 USD/kg”
“the estimated cost of MTAC production ranges from $0.50 to $0.70 per kg”
Adsorption mechanism is described as both chemical and physical
MajorThe kinetic-model discussion identifies chemisorption as the dominant mechanism, while the thermodynamic discussion says the process is governed primarily by physical adsorption.
“the dominant mechanism is chemisorption involving strong chemical interactions between the organic pollutants and the functional groups on the MTAC surface.”
“COD removal by MTAC is a spontaneous and mildly exothermic process, governed primarily by physical adsorption interactions.”
Two different results are reported for optimized conditions
MajorOne passage reports 464 mg/g and 92.8% COD removal under optimized conditions; the comparison section reports 484 mg/g and 96.8% under optimized conditions.
“Under optimized conditions, MTAC achieved a maximum adsorption capacity of 464 mg/g and COD removal efficiency of 92.8%.”
“Under optimized conditions, MTAC demonstrated significantly enhanced adsorption performance, attaining a peak capacity of 484 mg/g and 96.8% COD removal efficiency.”
CAC cost estimates disagree
MajorTable 7 lists CAC at 3.50 USD/kg, while the cost-evaluation section gives a CAC price range of $2.50-$3.00 per kg.
“| Estimated cost (USD/kg) | 1.25 | 3.50 |”
“commercially available activated carbon (CAC) has a market price ranging from $2.50 to $3.00 per kg”
Ambient-temperature claim conflicts with temperature experiments
MinorThe batch methods say all experiments were conducted at ambient room temperature, but the temperature results describe experiments at four controlled temperatures up to 60 °C.
“All experiments in this study were conducted in batch mode at ambient room temperature”
“experiments were conducted at 30°C, 40°C, 50°C, and 60°C.”
Reported adsorbent-dose ranges differ
MinorThe batch methods specify a dosage range of 0.01-0.1 g/L, whereas the dose results describe testing 0.5-3 g/L.
“adsorbent dosage (0.01–0.1 g/L)”
“the influence of maize tassel-derived activated carbon (MTAC) dosage (0.5–3 g/L) on organic contaminant adsorption was systematically evaluated”
Reported pH ranges differ
MinorThe stated experimental pH range is 2-8, but the results say pH 4-10 was analyzed and report a measurement at pH 10.
“The experimental parameters investigated include pH (2–8)”
“The impact of pH (4–10) on the adsorption efficacy and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency of maize tassel-derived activated carbon (MTAC) was systematically analyzed.”
pH figure caption disagrees with the reported maximum
MinorThe Fig. 3 caption gives 96.8% removal at pH 6, but the accompanying results give 92.8% at pH 6.
“Figure: Fig. 3 Effect of pH on COD removal efficiency using MTAC: maximum removal observed at pH 6 (96.8%).”
“Maximum adsorption efficiency (464 mg/g) and COD removal (92.8%) occurred at pH 6”
Reported agitation ranges exclude the stated optimum
MinorThe batch methods specify 300-600 rpm, but the results report experiments at 200-700 rpm and identify 200 rpm as optimal.
“an orbital shaker operating at controlled rotational speeds (300–600 rpm)”
“batch adsorption trials were conducted at agitation rates of 200–700 rpm”
Temperature figure caption disagrees with the reported maximum
MinorThe Fig. 4 caption gives 96.8% removal at 30 °C, while the temperature results give 92.8% at 30 °C.
“Figure: Fig. 4 Influence of temperature on COD removal efficiency using MTAC: maximum removal (96.8%) observed at 30 °C, with performance declining at higher temperatures.”
“At a temperature of 30°C, MTAC attained its highest adsorption performance, with a capacity of 464 mg/g and a COD removal efficiency of 92.8%”
Langmuir fit statistic is attributed to the wrong parameter set
MinorThe prose assigns R2 = 0.996 to the Langmuir result with capacity 484 mg/g and KL = 0.25 L/mg. Table 10 assigns that parameter set R2 = 0.999; its 0.996 value belongs to a different parameter set.
“The correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.996) suggests that the Langmuir model effectively describes the equilibrium adsorption of COD onto MTAC. The maximum adsorption capacity (qo) was found to be 484 mg/g, and the Langmuir constant (KL) was 0.25 L/mg”
“| COD | Nonlinear:{q}_{e }={q}_{o}\frac{{K}_{L}{C}_{e}}{1+{K}_{L}{C}_{e}} (4) | {q}_{e }vs {C}_{e} | 484 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 0.999 |”
Citations
Cites
Obaideen, K., Shehata, N., Sayed, E. T., Abdelkareem, M. A., Mahmoud, M. S., & Olabi, A. G. (2022) · Energy Nexus · doi:10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100112 · Cited by 847
Rathi, B. S., & Kumar, P. S. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116995 · Cited by 754
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Review on the impact of heavy metals from industrial wastewater effluent and removal technologies
Oladimeji, T. E., Oyedemi, M. O., Emetere, M. E., Agboola, O., Adeoye, J. B., & Odunlami, O. A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40370 · Cited by 550
Removal of dyes using agricultural waste as low-cost adsorbents: a review
Bharathi, K. S., & Ramesh, S. T. (2013) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-013-0117-y · Cited by 493
Innovative Adsorbents for Pollutant Removal: Exploring the Latest Research and Applications
Akhtar, M. S., Ali, S., & Zaman, W. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29184317 · Cited by 468
Karić, N., Maia, A. S., Teodorović, A., Atanasova, N., Langergraber, G., Crini, G., Ribeiro, A. R. L., & Đolić, M. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100239 · Cited by 466
Adsorption of Pollutants from Wastewater by Biochar: A Review
Jagadeesh, N., & Sundaram, B. (2023) · Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100226 · Cited by 266
Ayach, J., Malti, W. E., Duma, L., Lalevée, J., Ajami, M. A., Hamad, H., & Hijazi, A. (2024) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym16141959 · Cited by 249
Reduction of COD in refinery wastewater through adsorption on date-pit activated carbon
El‐Naas, M. H., Al‐Zuhair, S., & Alhaija, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.002 · Cited by 220
Sujiono, E. H., Zabrian, D., Zurnansyah, Mulyati, Zharvan, V., Samnur, & Humairah, N. A. (2022) · Results in Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100291 · Cited by 175
The Potentiality of Rice Husk-Derived Activated Carbon: From Synthesis to Application
Alam, M. M., Hossain, M. A., Hossain, M. D., Johir, M. A. H., Hossen, J., Rahman, M. S., Zhou, J. L., Hasan, A. T. M. K., Karmakar, A. K., & Ahmed, M. B. (2020) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr8020203 · Cited by 165
Trivedi, Y., Sharma, M., Mishra, R. K., Sharma, A., Joshi, J., Gupta, A. B., Achintya, B., Shah, K., & Vuppaladadiyamd, A. K. (2025) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2024.118509 · Cited by 152
Recent progress in microbial fuel cells using substrates from diverse sources
Sonawane, J. M., Mahadevan, R., Pandey, A., & Greener, J. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12353 · Cited by 145
Strategically engineering advanced nanomaterials for heavy-metal remediation from wastewater
Sable, H., Kumar, V., Singh, V., Rustagi, S., Chahal, S., & Chaudhary, V. (2024) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216079 · Cited by 134
Olive mill wastes: from wastes to resources
Enaime, G., Dababat, S., Wichern, M., & Lübken, M. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-32468-x · Cited by 129
Ouachtak, H., Guerdaoui, A. E., Haouti, R. E., Haounati, R., Ighnih, H., Toubi, Y., Alakhras, F., Rehman, R., Hafid, N., Addi, A. A., et al. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra08059a · Cited by 109
Trends in effective removal of emerging contaminants from wastewater: A comprehensive review
Kathi, S., & Mahmoud, A. E. D. (2024) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100258 · Cited by 103
Salama, R. S., Gouda, M. S., Aboud, M. F. A., Alshorifi, F. T., El‐Hallag, A. A., & Badawi, A. K. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54942-9 · Cited by 99
Ahmed, T., Noman, M., Ijaz, M., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., Ijaz, U., Hameed, A., Ahmad, U., Wang, Y., Sun, G., et al. (2021) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112888 · Cited by 98
Production, Types, and Applications of Activated Carbon Derived from Waste Tyres: An Overview
Muttil, N., Jagadeesan, S., Chanda, A., Duke, M., & Singh, S. K. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13010257 · Cited by 87
Daraei, H., & Mittal, A. (2017) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2017.21344 · Cited by 83
Chandran, P., Suresh, S., Balasubramain, B., Gangwar, J., Raj, A. S., Aarathy, U. L., Meyyazhagan, A., Pappuswamy, M., & Joseph, K. S. (2023) · Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43994-023-00071-4 · Cited by 80
Efficient techniques and practices for wastewater treatment: an update
Mutegoa, E. (2024) · Discover Water · doi:10.1007/s43832-024-00131-8 · Cited by 70
Badawi, A. K., Hassan, R., Alghamdi, A. M., Ismail, B., Osman, R. M., & Salama, R. S. (2024) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100331 · Cited by 69
A comprehensive review of nanomaterials for efficient heavy metal ions removal in water treatment
Feisal, N. A. S., Kamaludin, N. H., Ahmad, M. A., & Tengku Ibrahim, T. N. B. (2024) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105566 · Cited by 68
Jedynak, K., Szczepanik, B., Rędzia, N., Słomkiewicz, P., Kolbus, A., & Rogala, P. (2019) · Water · doi:10.3390/w11051099 · Cited by 65
Saeed-Ul-Hassan, M., Ehtisham, M., Badawi, A. K., Khan, A. M., Khan, R. A., & Ismail, B. (2024) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/d4na00150h · Cited by 62
Badawi, A. K., Hassan, R., Farouk, M., Bakhoum, E. S., & Salama, R. S. (2024) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-024-05591-y · Cited by 58
Alwan, B. A. M. A., Ismail, B., Jery, A. E., & Badawi, A. K. (2024) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105336 · Cited by 55
Ehtisham, M., Badawi, A. K., Khan, A. M., Khan, R. A., & Ismail, B. (2024) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d3ra08152d · Cited by 53
Modified Rice Husk Waste‐Based Filter for Wastewater Treatment: Pilot Study and Reuse Potential
Badawi, A. K., Kriaa, K., Osman, R. M., & Hassan, R. (2024) · Chemical Engineering & Technology · doi:10.1002/ceat.202300461 · Cited by 50
Sarkar, D., Panicker, T. F., Kumar Mishra, R., & Srinivas Kini, M. (2024) · Water-Energy Nexus · doi:10.1016/j.wen.2024.11.001 · Cited by 50
Adsorption technique for pollutants removal; current new trends and future challenges – A Review
El-Baz, A. A., Hendy, I., Dohdoh, A. M., & Srour, M. (2020) · The Egyptian International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Technology · doi:10.21608/eijest.2020.45536.1015 · Cited by 49
Fajardo, C. A. G., Giraldo, L., & Moreno‐Piraján, J. C. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104558 · Cited by 44
An eco-friendly solution for greywater treatment via date palm fiber filter
Hassan, R., Alluqmani, A. E., & Badawi, A. K. (2024) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100163 · Cited by 43
Dharmapriya, T. N., Shih, H.-Y., & Huang, P.-J. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14071442 · Cited by 40
Chen, M., Xu, R., Wu, Y., Xiong, J., Keleş, S. Z., & Hankins, N. P. (2024) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105528 · Cited by 38
Resource recovery and treatment of wastewaters using filamentous fungi
Sar, T., Marchlewicz, A., Harirchi, S., Mantzouridou, F. T., Hosoglu, M. I., Akbas, M. Y., Hellwig, C., & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175752 · Cited by 38
Kuśmierek, K., Świątkowski, A., Kotkowski, T., Cherbański, R., & Molga, E. J. (2021) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105206 · Cited by 37
Maponya, T. C., Makgopa, K., Somo, T. R., & Modibane, K. D. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14173613 · Cited by 31
Tigrine, Z., Benhabiles, O., Merabti, L., Chekir, N., Mellal, M., Aoudj, S., Abdeslam, N. A., Tassalit, D., Lebouachera, S. E. I., & Drouiche, N. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16219308 · Cited by 29
Chaudhary, A. U. R., Fazal, T., Jazaa, Y., Bahadur, A., Iqbal, S., Shah, M., Mahmood, S., Badawi, A. K., Khan, A. M., Shahzad, W., et al. (2024) · Materials Science and Engineering B · doi:10.1016/j.mseb.2024.117273 · Cited by 28
Alvez-Tovar, B., Scalize, P. S., Angiolillo-Rodríguez, G., Albuquerque, A., Ebang, M. N., & de Oliveira, T. F. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17052036 · Cited by 24
Ammar, M. M., Yousef, E., Ashraf, S., & Baltrušaitis, J. (2024) · Separations · doi:10.3390/separations11110320 · Cited by 22
Effect of Washing Temperature on Adsorption of Cationic Dyes by Raw Lignocellulosic Biomass
Bounaas, M., Bouguettoucha, A., Chebli, D., Derbal, K., Benalia, A., & Pizzi, A. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app142210365 · Cited by 20
Treatment of Taman Beringin landfill leachate using the column technique
Ashraf, M. A., Balkhair, K. S., Chowdhury, A. J. K., & Hanafiah, M. M. (2019) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2019.23839 · Cited by 19
Khan, H., Usama, M., Khan, M. I., Wahab, F., Ahmad, I., Ali, H., Hussain, S., & Maqbool, A. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124202 · Cited by 19
Zhao, R. (2025) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.088 · Cited by 13
Aziam, R., Nouaa, S., Aboussabek, A., Boukarma, L., Eddaoudi, E., Zerbet, M., Sinan, F., & Chiban, M. (2023) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2023.30153 · Cited by 11
Produced water secondary treatment using waste casting sand adsorbent
Choksi, H., Amarsheebhai, T. H., & Pandian, S. (2022) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.494 · Cited by 7
Dana, N. H., Borghei, M., Takdastan, A., Javid, A. H., & Zazouli, M. A. (2022) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2022.28141 · Cited by 5
Abd Elhafez, S., Taha, N., & El-Maghraby, A. (2020) · Egyptian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.21608/ejchem.2020.41762.2846 · Cited by 1
Characterization and Adsorptive Capacity of Gutta Percha Leaf
GOJEH, M., PATRICK, O., MAHMUD, M., Alhassan, I. S., Obed, B., AJI, R., & ABDULRAZAK, K. (2024) · African Science Frontiers Initiatives Research Journal ASFIRJ · doi:10.70040/asfirj-5sjs-40rn · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hashem, M. S. & Qi, X. Treated wastewater irrigation—A review. Published online 2025:1–37.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acopa, N. D. J. L., Santolalla-Vargas, C. E., Magaña, M. P. T., García-Zaleta, D. S., Arévalo‐Pérez, J. C., Torres, G., Carrera-Lanestosa, A., García, P. Á., Martínez‐García, H., & Guerra‐Que, Z. (2026) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma19132743 · Cited by 4
Akhter, P., Al‐Haj, L., Hussain, M., Saleem, A., & Zia, A. (2026) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-026-07131-9 · Cited by 3
Jia, C., Bai, G., Yang, L. Y., Xiong, L., Wang, C., Xu, K., & Zheng, M. (2026) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2026.126410 · Cited by 3
Bread-derived TiO2/carbonaceous foams for UV-activated self-cleaning and enhanced benzene adsorption
Viskadourakis, Z., Vrithias, N. R., Papoutsakis, L., Papadakis, V. M., Manousaki, A., Steiakaki, M., Remediakis, I. N., Koudoumas, E., & Kenanakis, G. (2026) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2026.124696 · Cited by 1
Evaluación adsorptiva del bagazo dopado con aluminio para la remoción de PB(II) en aguas mineras
Parada, M., Haro, C., Ortega, M., & Anilema, L. (2026) · FIGEMPA Investigación y Desarrollo · doi:10.29166/revfig.v21i1.10086
Peel-based adsorbents for the removal of emerging contaminants from water/wastewater
Adegoke, K. A., Babarinde, C. O., Bamisaye, A., Olorunnisola, C. G., Oladeji, O. S., Akinseye, M. O., Adegoke, O. R., & Bello, O. S. (2026) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-026-07325-8
Cobalt cyclen-based supramolecular framework for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction
Peng, H., Qiu, J., Yan, Q., He, Y., Wu, J., Lu, X., Zhu, Y., Wu, Y., Zhou, W., Zhang, S., et al. (2026) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2026.141368
Susanti, S., Putri, R. W., Rahmatullah, R., Rahmadhini, A. C., Maulidia, H., Rendana, M., & Jais, F. M. (2026) · Journal of Engineering and Applied Science · doi:10.1186/s44147-026-01218-w
Ahmad, N., Ahmad, S., Khan, S., Matinise, N., & Alansari, A. (2026) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d6ra08566k
Chu, X., Jiang, Y., & Cai, K. (2026) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/d6cc05315g
Mehtougui, E., Bengharez, Z., Bellebia, S., Bendaoudi, A. A., Slamani, I., Boudouaia, N., Merine, H., & Jellali, S. (2026) · Comptes Rendus Chimie · doi:10.5802/crchim.479
Metadata
- Authors
- El Gamal, G. A., & Gomaa, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Egyptian Chinese University (EG)
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2025-11-18
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40378-40378
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12627661
- OpenAlex
- W4416308775
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Egyptian Chinese University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
- Keywords
- maize tassel, activated carbon, agricultural waste valorization, COD removal, industrial wastewater treatment, adsorption, Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, adsorption thermodynamics, adsorbent reusability, low-cost adsorbent, circular economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review