Cited by 136Nanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Strain-resilient electrical functionality in thin-film metal electrodes using two-dimensional interlayers

Open access
Cho, Chullhee, Kang, Pilgyu, Taqieddin, Amir, Jing, Yuhang, Yong, Keong, Kim, Jin Myung, Haque, Md Farhadul, Aluru, Narayana R. +1 more·2021·Nature Electronics

Abstract

Flexible electrodes that allow electrical conductance to be maintained during mechanical deformation are required for the development of wearable electronics. However, flexible electrodes based on metal thin films on elastomeric substrates can suffer from complete and unexpected electrical disconnection after the onset of mechanical fracture across the metal. Here we show that the strain-resilient electrical performance of thin-film metal electrodes under multimodal deformation can be enhanced by using a two-dimensional interlayer. Insertion of atomically thin interlayers—graphene, molybdenum disulfide or hexagonal boron nitride—induces continuous in-plane crack deflection in thin-film metal electrodes. This leads to unique electrical characteristics (termed electrical ductility) in which electrical resistance gradually increases with strain, creating extended regions of stable resistance. Our two-dimensional interlayer electrodes can maintain a low electrical resistance beyond a strain at which conventional metal electrodes would completely disconnect. We use the approach to create a flexible electroluminescent light-emitting device with an augmented strain-resilient electrical functionality and an early damage diagnosis capability. Insertion of an atomically thin interlayer, such as graphene, between a metal thin film and a substrate can be used to create flexible electrodes with electrical performance that changes only gradually with strain and is resistant to abrupt mechanical failure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41928-021-00538-4

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some microscopic strain-sensing mechanisms-misplace, disconnection, and crack propagation-are not found in pressure sensing.

    “It is worth noting that some microscopic mechanisms in strain sensing, like misplace,[173,174] disconnection,[175] and crack propagation[168,176] are not available in pressure sensing.”

    From Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human–Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics (2022) · cites this paper as [173]

    The “In plane mechanical fracture modulation enabled by 2D interlayers” section reports crack propagation during bending and its effects on electrical conductance. It does not establish that crack propagation is a strain-sensing mechanism unavailable in pressure sensing. The citations for misplace and disconnection attach to other sources, so those examples are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, C., Kang, P., Taqieddin, A., Jing, Y., Yong, K., Kim, J. M., Haque, M. F., Aluru, N. R., & Nam, S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Nam, SungWoo
Venue
Nature Electronics
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
126-133
ISSN
2520-1131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128159127
Cited by
136
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Electronics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (OCI1053575, OCI-0725070, ACI-1238993, and OAC-1818253, MRSEC DMR-1720633, ECCS-1935775, DMR-1708852, and CMMI-1554019)
  • United States Department of Defense | United States Air Force | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA2386-17-1-4071)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX16AR56G and 80NSSC17K0149)
  • United States Department of Defense | United States Navy | Office of Naval Research (N00014-17-1-2830)
  • DOE | LDRD | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (B622092)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
graphene, MoS2, hexagonal boron nitride, crack deflection, elastomeric substrates, damage diagnosis, wearable electronics, mechanical fracture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review