Cited by 125Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismRedox biology and oxidative stressViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

Oxygen and Mammalian Cell Culture: Are We Repeating the experiment of Dr. Ox?

Ast, Tslil, Mootha, Vamsi K.·2019·Nature Metabolism

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42255-019-0105-0

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In extreme cases, variations in culture conditions may resemble levels consistent with hypercapnia and hypoxia rather than conditions typical of in vivo extracellular fluids, although in vivo environments vary considerably among selected tissues.

    “In such extreme cases, variations in culture conditions may resemble levels consistent with hypercapnia and hypoxia rather than conditions typical of in vivo extracellular fluids, although in vivo environments vary considerably among selected tissues (Ast and Mootha, 2019).”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Ast and Mootha, 2019

  • O2 levels vary across human tissues and range from 13% O2 in the lung-pulmonary vein to 1-3% O2 in the uterus.

    “For instance, O2 levels vary across human tissues and range from 13% O2 in the lung-pulmonary vein to 1–3% O2 in the uterus (Ast and Mootha, 2019).”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Ast and Mootha, 2019

  • Considering how niche in vivo environments affect experimental outcomes could increase the robustness of experiments and the likelihood that findings have relevance to focal in vivo compartments.

    “By considering how niche in vivo environments affect experimental outcomes, researchers could further increase the robustness of their experiments and increase the likelihood that findings have relevance to focal in vivo compartments (Ast and Mootha, 2019).”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Ast and Mootha, 2019

  • Reliable reports of environmental parameters within selected human tissues are presently limited.

    “although reliable reports of environmental parameters within selected human tissues are presently limited (Al-Ani et al., 2018; Ast and Mootha, 2019)”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Ast and Mootha, 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ast, T., & Mootha, V. K.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Mootha, Vamsi K.
Venue
Nature Metabolism
Published
2019-08-05
Volume
1
Issue
9
Pages
858-860
ISSN
2522-5812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2966730488
Cited by
125
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R35GM122455)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Marriot Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Keywords
oxygen, mammalian cell culture, reproducibility, hypoxia, experimental interpretation
MeSH terms
Animals, Culture Media, Mammals, Oxygen, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review